Figure 1.
Size of fruits of tomato plants under fluorinated nematicide treatments for managing Meloidogyne enterolobii. FSF= fluensulfone, FZL= fluazaindolizine, FPM= fluopyram, FSF+FPM= fluensulfone plus fluopyram, FZL+FPM= fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, (−) control= inoculated plants without nematicide treatment, (+) control= non-inoculated plants without nematicide treatment. Data are means ± standard errors of 168 plants per treatment. Bars (within the same fruit size group) with different lower-case letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) according to the Tukey test.
Table 1.
Treatments of fluorinated nematicides for the management of Meloidogyne enterolobii on tomato.
Figure 2.
Plant yield of tomato plants under fluorinated nematicide treatments for managing Meloidogyne enterolobii. FSF= fluensulfone, FZL= fluazaindolizine, FPM= fluopyram, FSF+FPM= fluensulfone plus fluopyram, FZL+FPM= fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, (+) control= non-inoculated plants without nematicide treatment, (−) control= inoculated plants without nematicide treatment. Data are means ± standard errors of 168 plants per treatment. According to the Tukey test, bars with different lower-case letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3.
Root galling of tomato plants under fluorinated nematicide treatments for managing Meloidogyne enterolobii. FSF= fluensulfone, FZL= fluazaindolizine, FPM= fluopyram, FSF+FPM= fluensulfone plus fluopyram, FZL+FPM= fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, (−) control= inoculated plants without nematicide treatment. No galling was found on the non-inoculated control treatment (+). Data are means ± standard errors of 168 plants per treatment. According to the Tukey test, bars with different lower-case letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Table 2.
Growth variables of tomato plants under fluorinated nematicide treatments for managing Meloidogyne enterolobii.
| Treatment* | Plant height (cm)y, z | Stem diameter (mm) | Plant fresh weight (kg) | Dry weight of roots (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSF | 436 ± 18 b | 13.41 ± 1.61 b | 4.75 ± 0.12 b | 67.00 ± 7.2 b |
| FZL | 451 ± 13 ab | 13.72 ± 1.47 b | 5.29 ± 0.17 ab | 61.44 ± 8.6 b |
| FPM | 432 ± 16 b | 14.68 ± 1.71 ab | 4.75 ± 0.16 b | 59.75 ± 10.5 c |
| FSF+FPM | 469 ± 19 a | 14.61 ± 1.63 ab | 6.00 ± 0.27 ab | 60.50 ± 7.9 bc |
| FZL+FPM | 474 ± 13 a | 15.33 ± 1.75 a | 6.25 ± 0.31 ab | 57.63 ± 11.8 c |
| (+) control | 489 ± 24 a | 16.08 ± 1.81 a | 7.50 ± 0.28 a | 60.75 ± 9.6 c |
| (−) control | 340 ± 17 c | 12.62 ± 1.72 b | 2.25 ± 0.21 c | 101.70 ± 12.6 a |
Figure S1.
Alignment of sequences OR428268 and MW014364.1 of M. enterolobii intergenomic spacer 5S–18S rRNA. Alignment was performed with the MAFFT sequence alignment server (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server).