Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Perceived Limitations of the Athena SWAN Gender Equality Charter in Improving the Lives of Early- and Mid-Career Women Academics: A Case Study of an Athena SWAN Gold-Awarded Department Cover

The Perceived Limitations of the Athena SWAN Gender Equality Charter in Improving the Lives of Early- and Mid-Career Women Academics: A Case Study of an Athena SWAN Gold-Awarded Department

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Advance HE. (2019). Equality and higher education: Staff statistical report 2019. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/equality-higher-education-statistical-report-2019
  2. Advance HE. (2024). Equality in higher education: statistical reports 2024. Advance HE. [online] Advance-he.ac.uk. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/equality-higher-education-statistical-reports-2024 [Accessed 26 Dec. 2024].
  3. Advance HE. (2025). Women. Advance HE, www.advance-he.ac.uk. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/guidance/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/employment-and-careers/women
  4. Advance HE. (2025a). The transformed UK Athena Swan Charter. Advance HE. [online] www.advance-he.ac.uk. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/equality-charters/transformed-uk-athena-swan-charter
  5. Aiston, S. J., & Fo, C. K. (2021). The silence/ing of academic women. Gender and Education, 33(2), 138-155.
  6. Albia, J., & Cheng, M. (2023). Re-examining and developing the notion of academic citizenship: A critical literature review. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(4), 709-721.
  7. Armstrong, J., & Sullivan, A. (2023). A time-series analysis of the impact of Athena Swan on the representation of women in senior roles. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4447937
  8. Ayyildiz, P., & Banoglu, K. (2024). The leaky pipeline: Where exactly are these leakages for women leaders in higher education? School Leadership & Management, 44(2), 120–139.
  9. Barnard, S. (2017). The Athena SWAN Charter: Promoting commitment to gender equality in higher education institutions in the UK. In Gendered success in higher education, pp. 155-174. Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Barnard, S., Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2010). Researching UK women professionals in SET: A critical review of current approaches researching UK women professionals in SET. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2(3), 362–381.
  11. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2022). Grounded theory: A practical guide (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  12. Blackburn, H. (2017). The status of women in STEM in higher education: A review of the literature 2007–2017. Science & Technology Libraries.
  13. Blalock, A. E., & Stefanese-Yates, A. (2024). Hierarchies and paradoxes: How women in non-tenure-track faculty positions experience a gendered organization. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education,17(6), 856.
  14. Brewis, J., Hampton, M. P., & Linstead, S. (1997). Unpacking Priscilla: Subjectivity and identity in the organization of gendered appearance. Human Relations, 50(10), 1275-1304.
  15. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.
  16. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
  17. Butler, J., (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discourse Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
  18. Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
  19. Caffrey, L., Wyatt, D., Fudge, N., Mattingley, H., Williamson, C., & McKevitt, C. (2016). Gender equity programmes in academic medicine: A realist evaluation approach to Athena SWAN processes. BMJ open, 6(9), e012090.
  20. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage publications.
  21. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
  22. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
  23. Davids, N. (2022). Professing the vulnerabilities of academic citizenship. Ethics and Education, 17(1), 1-13.
  24. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
  25. Fagan, C., & Teasdale, N. (2021). Women professors across STEMM and non-STEMM disciplines: Navigating gendered spaces and playing the academic game. Work, Employment and Society, 35(4), 774-792.
  26. Fotaki, M. (2013). No woman is like a man (in academia): The masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1251–1275.
  27. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Weidenfield & Nicolson, pp.1–19.
  28. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1966). Awareness of dying. Transaction Publishers.
  29. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
  30. Gond, J. P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440-463.
  31. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. SAGE Publications.
  32. Heijstra, T. M., Steinthorsdóttir, F. S., & Einarsdóttir, T. (2017). Academic career making and the double-edged role of academic housework. Gender and Education, 29(6), 764-780.
  33. Henderson, H., & Bhopal, K. (2022). Narratives of academic staff involvement in Athena SWAN and race equality charter marks in UK higher education institutions. Journal of Education Policy, 37(5), 781-797.
  34. Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2022). Higher Education Staff Statistics: UK, 2020/21. HESA. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/01-02-2022/sb261-higher-education-staff-statistics
  35. Jenkins, J., & Finneman, T. (2018). Gender trouble in the workplace: Applying Judith Butler’s theory of performativity to news organizations. Feminist Media Studies, 18(2), 157-172.
  36. Johnston, Alan (2025) Academic Citizenship through the lens of the Psychological Contract: A qualitative study of UK Business Schools. Applied Psychology Research, 4 (1). p. 1773.
  37. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
  38. Kelan, E. K. (2010). Gender logic and (un) doing gender at work. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(2), 174-194.
  39. Laver, K. E., Prichard, I. J., Cations, M., Osenk, I., Govin, K., & Coveney, J. D. (2018). A systematic review of interventions to support the careers of women in academic medicine and other disciplines. BMJ Open, 8(3).
  40. Macfarlane, B. (2005). The disengaged academic: The retreat from citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), 296-312.
  41. Macfarlane, B. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261-273.
  42. Macfarlane, B., & Burg, D. (2019). Women professors and the academic housework trap. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 262-274.
  43. Mathew, R. C. (2025). Workload negotiations for early and mid-career researchers in an Athena Swan gold-awarded department. International Journal of HRD: Practice, Policy and Research, 8(2), 128-140.
  44. McKie, A. (2020). Athena SWAN revamp urged as academics lose faith in awards, Times Higher Education (THE). Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/athena-swan-revamp-urged-academics-lose-faith-awards.
  45. Misra, J., Smith-Doerr, L., Dasgupta, N., Weaver, G., & Normanly, J. (2017). Collaboration and gender equity among academic scientists.Social Sciences, 6(1), 25.
  46. Nunes, J. M. B., Martins, J. T., Zhou, L., Alajamy, M., & Al-Mamari, S. (2010). Contextual sensitivity in grounded theory: The role of pilot studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 73-84.
  47. O’Connor, P. (2019). Gender imbalance in senior positions in higher education: What is the problem? What can be done? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 28-50.
  48. O’Connor, P. (2020). Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(2), 207-228.
  49. O’Connor, P., O’Hagan, C., & Gray, B. (2018). Femininities in STEM: Outsiders within. Work, Employment and Society, 32(2), 312-329.
  50. O’Meara, K., Templeton, L., & Nyunt, G. (2018). Earning professional legitimacy: Challenges faced by women, under-represented minority and non-tenure track faculty. Teachers College Record, 120(12), 1–38.
  51. Ovseiko, P. V., Edmunds, L. D., Pololi, L. H., Greenhalgh, T., Kiparoglou, V., Henderson, L. R., Williamson, C., Grant, J., Lord, G. M., Channon, K. M., & Lechler, R. I. (2017). Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol. BMJ Open, 6(1), e009022.
  52. Ovseiko, P.V., Pololi, L.H., Edmunds, L.D., Civian, J.T., Daly, M. and Buchan, A.M. (2019). Creating a more supportive and inclusive university culture: A mixed-methods interdisciplinary comparative analysis of medical and social sciences at the University of Oxford. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 44(2), pp.166–191.
  53. Riach, K., Rumens, N., & Tyler, M. (2014). Un/doing chrononormativity: Negotiating ageing, gender and sexuality in organizational life. Organization Studies, 35(11), 1677-1698.
  54. Russo, L., & Ionescu, D. P. (2024). The helpers, the doers, and the ones left behind: Reflections on the gendered dimension of academic citizenship in Dutch academia. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 6(2), 101-121.
  55. Schoch, K. (2020). Case study research. In G. J. Burkholder, K. A. Cox, & L. M. Crawford (Eds.), Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner (pp. 245–258). SAGE Publications.
  56. Strauβ, A., & Boncori, I. (2020). Foreign women in academia: Double-strangers between productivity, marginalization and resistance. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(6), 1004-1019.
  57. Sümer, S., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2023). Academic women’s voices on gendered divisions of work and care: ‘Working till I drop ... then dropping’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30(1), 49-65.
  58. Tayar, M. (2017). Ranking LGBT inclusion: Diversity ranking systems as institutional archetypes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 34(2), 198-210.
  59. Thébaud, S., & Charles, M. (2018). Segregation, stereotypes, and STEM. Social Sciences, 7(7), 111.
  60. Thornberg, R., Perhamus, L., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory. Handbook of research methods in early childhood education. Research Methodologies, 1, 405–439.
  61. Tsouroufli, M. (2019). An examination of the Athena Swan initiatives in the UK: Critical reflections. In G. Crimmins (Ed.), Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy (pp. 35–54). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  62. Tzanakou, C., Clayton-Hathway, K., & Humbert, A. L. (2021). Certifying gender equality in research: Lessons learnt from Athena Swan and total e-quality award schemes. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 784446.
  63. Tzanakou, C., & Pearce, R. (2019). Moderate feminism within or against the neoliberal university? The example of Athena SWAN. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(8), 1191-1211.
  64. Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175-198.
  65. Visser, L. M., & Davies, O. E. (2021). The becoming of online healthcare through entangled power and performativity: A posthumanist agential realist perspective. Organization Studies, 42(12), 1817-1837.
  66. Westoby, C., Dyson, J., Cowdell, F., & Buescher, T. (2021). What are the barriers and facilitators to success for female academics in UK HEIs? A narrative review. Gender and Education, 33(8), 1033-1056.
  67. Yarrow, E., & Johnston, K. (2022). Athena SWAN: “Institutional peacocking” in the neoliberal university. Gender, Work & Organization,30(3), 757-772.
  68. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage.
Language: English
Published on: Sep 23, 2026
Published by: University Forum for Human Resource Development & World Federation of People Management Associations
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Ruby Christine Mathew, published by University Forum for Human Resource Development & World Federation of People Management Associations
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.