Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The design of hybrid work for improved employee engagement and well-being: perspectives for HRD practice Cover

The design of hybrid work for improved employee engagement and well-being: perspectives for HRD practice

Open Access
|Feb 2025

References

  1. Ab Wahab, M., & Tatoglu, E. (2020). Chasing productivity demands, worker well-being, and firm performance: The moderating effects of HR support and flexible work arrangements. Personnel Review, 49(9). https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2019-0026
  2. Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2022). Working from home around the world. CESifo Forum, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4219442
  3. Aldoghan, M., Elrayah, M., & Debla, F. (2021). The job quality dimensions and employees’ performance during covid-19: A case study of the Saudi’s female employees. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.01
  4. Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E., Rees, C., & Genenby, M. (2010). Creating An Engaged Workforce: Findings from the Kingston Employee Engagement Consortium Project. In CIPD Research Report.https://engageforsuccess.org/insights-data-surveys/creating-an-engaged-workforce-cipd-report-2010/
  5. Arora, P., & Suri, D. (2020). Redefining, relooking, redesigning, and reincorporating HRD in the post Covid 19 context and thereafter. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1780077
  6. Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews. 19: 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12077
  7. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.22(3):273-285.https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
  8. Braithwaite, E. C., Cooper, C., & Jones, M. V. (2023). Home-working and e-communications with colleagues during COVID-19: impact on psychological health and productivity. Minerva Psychiatry, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6612.22.02299-0
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (4th Edition). Abhigyan VO - 32, 4.
  11. Carver, H., Price, T., Falzon, D., McCulloch, P., & Parkes, T. (2022). Stress and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods exploration of frontline homelessness services staff experiences in Scotland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063659
  12. Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A., & Grandy, G. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: Methods and challenges. SAGE Publishers Ltd. p.33 35. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526430236
  13. Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
  14. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2022). CIPD viewpoint: Employee health and wellbeing. CIPD Website. Cecchinato, M. E., Rooksby, J., Hiniker, A., Munson, S., Lukoff, K.,
  15. Ciolfi, L., Thieme, A., & Harrison, D. (2019). Designing for Digital Wellbeing: A Research & Practice Agenda. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper W17, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3298998
  16. Choudhury, P., Khanna, T., Makridis, C., & Schirmann, K. (2022). Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 22-063. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4068741
  17. CIPD. (2021). CIPD mega trends flexible working. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development), https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/reports/megatrends-flexible-working/.
  18. Conway, E., Fu, N., Monks, K., Alfes, K., & Bailey, C. (2016). Demands or resources? The relationship between HR practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations. Human Resource Management. 55: 901-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21691
  19. Cooper, C., & Lapierre Laurent M. (2023). Organizational stress and well-being (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009268332
  20. Costanza, R., Daly, L., Fioramonti, L., Giovannini, E., Kubiszewski, I., Mortensen, L. F., Pickett, K. E., Ragnarsdottir, K. V., De Vogli, R., & Wilkinson, R. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ecological Economics, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009
  21. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157
  22. Curzi, Y., Fabbri, T., & Pistoresi, B. (2020). The stressful implications of remote e-working: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(7), 108. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n7p108
  23. De Witte, N. A. J., Joris, S., Van Assche, E., & Van Daele, T. (2021). Technological and digital interventions for mental health and well-being: An overview of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Digital Health (Vol. 3-2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.754337
  24. De-La-calle-durán, M. C., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. L. (2021). Employee engagement and wellbeing in times of covid-19: A proposal of the 5cs model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105470
  25. Delany, K. (2022). What challenges will organisations face transitioning for the first time to the new normal of remote working? Human Resource Development International, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2021.2017391
  26. Deschênes, A. A. (2024). Digital literacy, the use of collaborative technologies, and perceived social proximity in a hybrid work environment: Technology as a social binder. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100351
  27. Di Fabio, A. (2022). Cross-cultural perspectives on well-being and sustainability in organizations. Springer. p. 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86709-6
  28. Di Fabio, A., & Cooper, C. L. (2023). Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations. Routledge. p. 94-107. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212157-2
  29. Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4
  30. Donnelly, R., & Johns, J. (2020). Recontextualising remote working and its HRM in the digital economy: An integrated framework for theory and practice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1737834
  31. Fauville, G., Luo, M., Queiroz, A. C. M., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Nonverbal mechanisms predict Zoom fatigue and explain why women experience higher levels than men. SSRN ElectronicJournal. April 05, 2021. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3820035. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820035
  32. Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32: 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
  33. Fletcher, L. (2019). How can personal development lead to increased engagement? The roles of meaningfulness and perceived line manager relations. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 30(7):1203-1226.https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1184177
  34. Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Shantz, A. (2020). Meaningfulness of work and supervisory-rated job performance: A moderated- mediation model. Human Resource Management. 60: 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22041
  35. Galanxhi, H., Nah, F.FH. (2021). Addressing the “unseens”: Digital wellbeing in the remote workplace. In: Nah, F.FH., Siau, K. (Eds.) HCI in Business, government and organizations. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_22
  36. Garg, A. (2022). The future of work: A hybrid model. ANWESH: International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 7(2), 65–75. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=160525765&site=eds-live&authtype=sso&custid=s9494728
  37. Gifford, J. (2022). Remote working: unprecedented increase and a developing research agenda. Human Resource Development International,25(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2049108
  38. Gifford, J. & Young, J. (2021).Employee engagement: definitions, measures and outcomes. Discussion report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
  39. Grzegorczyk, M., Mariniello, M., Nurski, L., & Schraepen, T. (2021). Blending the physical and virtual: A hybrid model for the future of work. Policy Contribution, 14(21).
  40. Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139
  41. Hesketh, I., Cooper, C.L. (2023). Working Environment: Post- Pandemic. In: I. Hesketh & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Law enforcement, leadership and wellbeing. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22416-4_4
  42. Holland, P. (2019). Contemporary HRM issues in the 21st century. In Contemporary HRM issues in the 21st century. p 3-14. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781789734577
  43. Hopkins, J., & Bardoel, A. (2023). The future is hybrid: How organisations are designing and supporting sustainable hybrid work models in post-pandemic Australia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043086
  44. Innstrand, S. T., Christensen, M., Grødal, K., & Banks, C. (2022). Within- and between-person changes in work practice and experiences due to COVID-19: Lessons learned from employees working from home, hybrid working, and working at the office. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948516
  45. Jetha, A., Bonaccio, S., Shamaee, A., Banks, C. G., Bültmann, U., Smith, P. M., Tompa, E., Tucker, L. B., Norman, C., & Gignac, M. A. M. (2023). Divided in a digital economy: Understanding disability employment inequities stemming from the application of advanced workplace technologies. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100293
  46. Jiang, Z., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Le, H. (2023). Perceived red tape and precursors of turnover: The roles of work engagement and career adaptability. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09834-y
  47. Johnson, A., Dey, S., Nguyen, H., Groth, M., Joyce, S., Tan, L., Glozier, N., & Harvey, S. B. (2020). A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being. Australian Journal of Management, 45(3), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220922292
  48. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), pp. 692-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  49. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  50. Krajčík, M., Schmidt, D. A., & Baráth, M. (2023). Hybrid work model: An approach to work–life flexibility in a changing environment. Administrative Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13060150
  51. MacLeod, D., & Clarke, N. (2009). Engaging for success: A report to Government. Department for Business Innovation & Skills. https://engageforsuccess.org/engaging-for-success/
  52. Macleod, D., & Clarke, N. (2014). The evidence wellbeing and employee engagement. Engage for Success Report.https://engageforsuccess.org/wellbeing/the-evidence-wellbeing-and-engagement/
  53. Martínez, S. F. (2021). Occupational safety and health and workplace health promotion: An essential area for a recovery from covid-19 based on decent work. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 10(2). ISSN 2280-4056
  54. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology. 52, 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.10.20944/preprints202004.0195.v1.
  55. Mhlanga, D., & Moloi, T. (2020). COVID-19 and the digital transformation of education: What are we learning on 4ir in South Africa? Education Sciences. 10.20944/preprints202004.0195.v1. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070180
  56. Moglia, M., Hopkins, J., & Bardoel, A. (2021). Telework, hybrid work and the united nation’s sustainable development goals: Towards policy coherence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169222
  57. Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Finkel, M., Cornesse, C., & Blom, A. G. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well- being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies, 23(sup1), S601–S617.1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833066
  58. Molala, T. S., & Makhubele, J. C. (2021). The connection between the digital divide and social exclusion: Implications from Social Work. .Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.9427
  59. Monge Roffarello, A., & De Russis, L. (2019). The race towards digital wellbeing: Issues and opportunities. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Paper No.: 386, Pages 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300616
  60. Monge Roffarello, A., & De Russis, L. (2021). Coping with digital well-being in a multi-device world. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Article No.: 538, Pages 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445076
  61. Nachmias, S., McGuire, D., & Ghosh, R. (2022). Is the dream of flexible work fading? In Human Resource Development International, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2130298
  62. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  63. Pass, S., & Ridgway, M. (2022). An informed discussion on the impact of COVID-19 and ‘enforced’ remote working on employee engagement. Human Resource Development International, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2048605
  64. Passey, D. (2021). Digital technologies—and teacher wellbeing? Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030117
  65. Plester, B. A., & Lloyd, R. (2023). Happiness is ‘being yourself’: Psychological safety and fun in hybrid work. Administrative Sciences,13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13100218
  66. Prasad, K. D. V., Mangipudi, M. R., Vaidya, R. W., & Muralidhar, B. (2020). Organizational climate, opportunities, challenges and psychological wellbeing of the remote working employees during covid-19 pandemic: A general linear model approach with reference to information technology industry in Hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.11.4.2020.037
  67. Prismastatement.Org 2009. Prisma-statement 2009. http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/CitingAndUsingPRISMA.
  68. PWC. (2021). It’s time to reimagine where and how work will get done. In PwC’s US Remote Work Survey. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/consulting/business-transformation/library.html
  69. Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Saeed, A., & Iqbal, J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052294
  70. Robertson, I., & Cooper, C. (2011). Well-being: Productivity and happiness at work. In Well-being: Productivity and happiness at work. Palgrave Macmillan. p.45-56 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306738
  71. Roffarello, A. M., & De Russis, L. (2023). Achieving digital wellbeing through digital self-control tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571810
  72. Rožman, M., Peša, A., Rajko, M., & Štrukelj, T. (2021). Building organisational sustainability during the covid-19 pandemic with an inspiring work environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111747
  73. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
  74. Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
  75. Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Q uarterly,25(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21187
  76. Sani, K. F., Adisa, T. A., Adekoya, O. D., & Oruh, E. S. (2023). Digital onboarding and employee outcomes: Empirical evidence from the UK. Management Decision, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2021-1528
  77. Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the Job Demands-Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
  78. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht work engagement scale Preliminary Manual Version 1.1. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01350000;https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/Test%20Manuals/Test_manual_UWES_English.pdf
  79. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). Short UWES. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  80. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burn-out: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  81. Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C., & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047380
  82. Singh, R., Chaudhuri, S., Sihag, P., & Shuck, B. (2023). Unpacking generation Y’s engagement using employee experience as the lens: an integrative literature review. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 548–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.21702102170210
  83. Smith, C., & Ulus, E. (2020). Who cares for academics? We need to talk about emotional well-being including what we avoid and intellectualise through macro-discourses. Organization, 27(6), 840-857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419867201
  84. Sun, L., & Bunchapattanasakda, C. (2019). Employee engagement: A literature review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies,9(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v9i1.14167
  85. Teng-Calleja, M., Mactal, M. T. de G., & Caringal-Go, J. F. (2024). Examining employee experiences of hybrid work: An ecological approach. Personnel Review, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2023-0222
  86. The digital divide: Employment and development implications. (2001). International Labour Review, 140(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913x.2001.tb00216.x
  87. Thomson, H. (2021). Why going back to offices may affect mental health. New Scientist, 250(3330). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(21)00629-1
  88. Truss, C., Delbridge, R., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Soane, E. (2013a). Employee engagement in theory and practice. p.63-79. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076965
  89. Truss, C., Shantz, A., Soane, E., Alfes, K., & Delbridge, R. (2013b). Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: Exploring the evidence, developing the theory. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 24(14).2657–2669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.798921
  90. Waddell, G., & Burton, A. K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being? Occupational Health Review, 57(3). 229, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql174
  91. Warr, P., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Wellbeing and work performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers. DOI:nobascholar.com
  92. Wheatley, D. (2022). Well-being and the quality of working lives. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839108785
  93. Wheatley, D., Broome, M. R., Dobbins, T., Hopkins, B., & Powell, O. (2023). Navigating choppy water: Flexibility ripple effects in the COVID-19 pandemic and the future of remote and hybrid working. Work, Employment and Society. 38(5), 1379-1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231195230
  94. The World Bank. (2017). Tracking universal health coverage: 2017 Global monitoring report. In World Health Organisation. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/universalhealthcoverage/publication/tracking-universal-health-coverage-2017-global-monitoring-report
  95. Widdicks, K. (2020). When the good turns ugly: Speculating next steps for digital wellbeing tools. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (NordiCHI ‘20), October 25–29, 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. ACM, New York, NY, USA 6 Pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420117
  96. World Health Organisation. (2019). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Disease.https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases
  97. Xie, J. L., Elangovan, A. R., Hu, J., & Hrabluik, C. (2019). Charting new terrain in work design: A study of hybrid work characteristics. Applied Psychology, 68(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12169
  98. Yang, X., Feng, Y., Meng, Y., & Qiu, Y. (2019). Career adaptability, work engagement, and employee well-being among Chinese employees: The role of Guanxi. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY). Article 1029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01029
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 99
Published on: Feb 24, 2025
Published by: University Forum for Human Resource Development & World Federation of People Management Associations
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Roopa Nagori, Natalia Rocha Lawton, published by University Forum for Human Resource Development & World Federation of People Management Associations
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.