Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Validity and Model Goodness of Fit
| Constructs | PXL | JC | JA | EIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXL | 0.782 | 0.751 | 0.776 | 0.755 |
| JC | 0.644 | 0.807 | 0.713 | 0.536 |
| JA | 0.671 | 0.619 | 0.803 | 0.779 |
| EIP | 0.663 | 0.479 | 0.696 | 0.857 |
| Indexes | NNFI>0.9 | RMSFA<0.07 | IFI>0.9 | TLI>0.9 |
| Matric | 0.968 | 0.047 | 0.966 | 0.924 |
| Scaled | 0.924 | 0.056 | 0.945 | 0.918 |
| Robust | 0.914 | 0.051 | 0.925 | 0.901 |
Demographic Summary of Participants
| Participants Demographics | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 158 | 48.47 |
| Male | 168 | 51.53 |
| Education | ||
| Intermediate | 108 | 33.13 |
| Graduate | 122 | 37.42 |
| Masters | 96 | 29.45 |
| Age (in years) | ||
| <24 | 58 | 17.79 |
| 25–35 | 106 | 32.52 |
| 36–46 | 86 | 26.38 |
| >46 | 76 | 23.31 |
| Experience (in years) | ||
| <2 | 97 | 29.75 |
| 3 to 6 | 119 | 36.50 |
| 7 to 10 | 64 | 19.63 |
| >11 | 46 | 14.11 |
Loadings, Reliability, and Descriptive Statistics
| Items | Loading | A | CR | AVE | Mean | Std. Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradoxical Leadership (PXL) | 0.897 | 0.827 | 0.684 | 3.141 | 0.625 | |
| Uniformity vs. Individualization | 0.864 | 0.868 | 0.869 | 0.695 | 2.584 | 0.528 |
| UI1 | 0.754 | |||||
| UI2 | 0.814 | |||||
| UI3 | 0.732 | |||||
| UI4 | 0.795 | |||||
| UI5 | 0.814 | |||||
| Self-centeredness vs. other-centeredness | 0.847 | 0.869 | 0.847 | 0.624 | 0.3841 | 0.574 |
| SO1 | 0.795 | |||||
| SO2 | 0.815 | |||||
| SO3 | 0.807 | |||||
| SO4 | 0.874 | |||||
| SO5 | 0.796 | |||||
| Decision control vs. autonomy | 0.795 | 0.828 | 0.864 | 0.624 | 3.145 | 0.587 |
| CA1 | 0.827 | |||||
| CA2 | 0.787 | |||||
| CA3 | 0.798 | |||||
| CA4 | 0.714 | |||||
| Enforcing requirements vs. flexibility | 0.869 | 0.824 | 0.862 | 0.674 | 3.274 | 0.568 |
| RF1 | 0.822 | |||||
| RF2 | 0.869 | |||||
| RF3 | 0.799 | |||||
| RF4 | 0.854 | |||||
| Maintaining distance vs. closeness | 0.734 | 0.857 | 0.829 | 0.689 | 2.741 | 0.524 |
| DC1 | 0.747 | |||||
| DC2 | 0.758 | |||||
| DC3 | 0.798 | |||||
| DC4 | 0.766 | |||||
| Job Crafting | 0.847 | 0.863 | 0.692 | 2.574 | 0.562 | |
| Task Crafting | 0.857 | 0.857 | 0.867 | 0.624 | 2.361 | 0.587 |
| TC1 | 0.827 | |||||
| TC2 | 0.854 | |||||
| TC3 | 0.862 | |||||
| Relational Crafting | 0.821 | 0.827 | 0.861 | 0.607 | 2.661 | 0.457 |
| RC1 | 0.874 | |||||
| RC2 | 0.865 | |||||
| RC3 | 0.892 | |||||
| Cognitive Crafting | 0.826 | 0.874 | 0.862 | 0.674 | 2.625 | 0.524 |
| CC1 | 0.869 | |||||
| CC2 | 0.847 | |||||
| CC3 | 0.798 | |||||
| Job Autonomy | 0.862 | 0.857 | 0.647 | 2.351 | 0.524 | |
| Method Autonomy | 0.798 | 0.847 | 0.835 | 0.627 | 2.471 | 0.528 |
| MA1 | 0.748 | |||||
| MA2 | 0.875 | |||||
| MA3 | 0.785 | |||||
| Scheduling Autonomy | 0.821 | 0.865 | 0.824 | 0.574 | 2.398 | 0.587 |
| SA1 | 0.82 | |||||
| SA2 | 0.827 | |||||
| SA3 | 0.874 | |||||
| Criteria Autonomy | 0.734 | 0.869 | 0.851 | 0.657 | 2.362 | 0.451 |
| CTA1 | 0.785 | |||||
| CTA2 | 0.748 | |||||
| CTA3 | 0.728 | |||||
| Employee Innovative Performance | 0.857 | 0.827 | 0.684 | 2.351 | 0.627 | |
| EIP1 | 0.847 | |||||
| EIP2 | 0.824 | |||||
| EIP3 | 0.874 | |||||
| EIP4 | 0.844 | |||||
| EIP5 | 0.827 | |||||
| EIP6 | 0.827 | |||||
| EIP7 | 0.796 | |||||
| EIP8 | 0.874 | |||||
| EIP9 | 0.867 |
Path Analysis Estimations
| Variables | Hypothesis | Estimates | VIF | P Value | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXL → EIP | H1 | 0.324 | 1.743 | 0.003 | Accept |
| PXL → JC | H2 | 0.375 | 1.828 | 0.001 | Accept |
| JC → EIP | H3 | 0.284 | 1.771 | 0.004 | Accept |
| PXL → JC → EIP | H4 | 0.241 | 1.681 | 0.002 | Accept |
| PXL*JA → JC | H5 | 0.488 | 1.287 | 0.005 | Accept |
| JC*JA → EIP | H6 | 0.343 | 1.352 | 0.006 | Accept |