References
- Aaspõllu, A. 1999. Cultivars of deciduous trees in Estonia. (Lehtpuude kultivarid Eestis). – Sander, H. (ed.). Dendroloogilised uurimused Eestis. Tallinn, EPMÜ Metsanduslik Uurimisinstituut, 110–137. (In Estonian).
- Aaspõllu, A. 2017. The situation of native hardwood species is deteriorating. (Kodumaiste lehtpuuliikide olukord järjest halveneb). – Maaelu, 14 September 2017. (In Estonian).
- Abner, O., Konsa, S., Lootus, K., Sinijärv, U. 2007. Estonian Parks 1. (Eesti pargid 1). Tallinn, Varrak. 423 pp. (In Estonian).
- Abner, O., Konsa, S., Lootus, K., Sinijärv, U. 2012. Estonian Parks 2. (Eesti pargid 2). Tallinn, Varrak. 647 pp. (In Estonian).
- Anderbrant, O., Schlyter, F. 1987. Ecology of the Dutch Elm Disease Vectors Scolytus laevis and S. scolytus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Southern Sweden. – Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403891.
- Aotäht, A. 2018. The city hopes for a researcher of DED. (Linn loodab jalakasurma uurijale). – Sakala, 21 September 2018. (In Estonian).
- Baker, J.E., Norris, D.M. 1968. Further Biological and Chemical Aspects of Host Selection by Scolytus multistriatus. – Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 61, 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/61.5.1248.
- Beaver, R.A. 1969. Natality, mortality and control of the elm bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Col., Scolytidae). – Bulletin of Entomological Research, 59, 537–540. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300003527.
- Blumenstein, K. 2015. Endophytic fungi in elms: implications for the integrated management of Dutch elm disease. – Doctoral thesis. Alnarp, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. 84 pp.
- Boutz, G.E., Brewer, J.W., Bishop, J.N. 2009. Capture patterns of Scolytus multistriatus (Marsh.) (Col., Scolytidae) attracted to a pheromone-baited trap. – Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 99, 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1985.tb01999.x.
- Brasier, C.M. 1979. Dual origin of recent Dutch elm disease outbreaks in Europe. – Nature, 281, 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/281078a0.
- Brasier, C.M. 1990. China and the origins of Dutch elm disease: an appraisal. – Plant Pathology, 39, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1990.tb02470.x.
- Brasier, C.M. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. – Mycopathologia, 115, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462219.
- Brasier, C.M. 2000a. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_4.
- Brasier, C.M. 2000b. Viruses as biological control agents of the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms - Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_12.
- Brasier, C.M. 2001. Rapid Evolution of Introduced Plant Pathogens via Interspecific Hybridization is leading to rapid evolution of Dutch elm disease and other fungal plant pathogens. – Bioscience, 51(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0123:reoipp]2.0.co;2.
- Brasier, C.M. 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. – Plant Pathology, 57, 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01886.x.
- Brasier, C.M., Buck, K.W. 2001. Rapid Evolutionary Changes in a Globally Invading Fungal Pathogen (Dutch Elm Disease). – Biological Invasions, 3, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015248819864.
- Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A. 2000. Survival of clones of NAN Ophiostoma novo-ulmi around its probable centre of appearance in North America. – Mycological Research, 104, 1322–1332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756200002732.
- Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novoulmi as subspecies. – Mycological Research, 105, 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201004087.
- Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A. 2010. Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. – Plant Pathology, 59, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02157.x.
- Brasier, C.M., Mehrotra, M.D. 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. – Mycological Research, 99, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80887-3.
- Brasier, C.M., Webber, J.F. 2019. Is there evidence for post-epidemic attenuation in the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi? – Plant Pathology, 68, 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13022.
- Clinton, G.P., McCormick, F.A. 1936. Dutch elm disease. Graphium ulmi. – Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 389, 701–752.
- Corfixen, P., Parmasto, E. 2005. Hymenochaete ulmicola sp. nov. (Hymenochaetales). – Mycotaxon, 91, 465–469.
- Drenkhan, R., Adamson, K., Drenkhan, T., Agan, A., Laas, M. 2017a. New problems in dendropathology – new and invasive pathogens. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 67, 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0012.
- Drenkhan, R., Solheim, H., Bogacheva, A., Riit, T., Adamson, K., Drenkhan, T., Maaten, T., Hietala, A.M. 2017b. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus is a leaf pathogen of local Fraxinus species in the Russian Far East. – Plant Pathology, 66, 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12588.
- Dvořák, M., Tomšovský, M., Jankovský, L., Novotný, D. 2007. Contribution to identify the causal agents of Dutch elm disease in the Czech Republic. – Plant Protection Science, 43, 142–145. https://doi.org/10.17221/2243-PPS.
- eElurikkus, 2019. Ophiostoma ulmi. [WWW Document]. – URL https://elurikkus.ee/biehub/species/161882#classification. [Accessed 14 December 2019].
- El-Sayed, A.M., Suckling, D.M., Wearing, C.H., Byers, J.A. 2006. Potential of Mass Trapping for Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species. – Journal of Economic Entomology, 99, 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.5.1550.
- El-sayed, A.M., Suckling, D.M., Byers, J.A., Jang, E.B., Wearing, C.H. 2009. Potential of ‘Lure and Kill’ in Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species. – Journal of Economic Entomology, 102, 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0301.
- Elgersma, D.M., Roosien, T., Scheffer, R.J. 1993. Biological control of Dutch elm disease by exploiting resistance in the host. – Sticklen, M.B., Sherald, J.L. (eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research. New York, NY, Springer, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8.
- Ellstrand, N.C., Schierenbeck, K.A. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 7043–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043.
- EPPO Global Database, 2019. EPPO. [WWW Document]. – URL https://gd.eppo.int/. [Accessed 7 June 2019].
- EVS 939-2:2020, 2020. Woody plants in landscaping. Part 2: Quality Requirements for the Nursery Plants. (Puittaimed haljastuses. Osa 2: Ilupuude ja -põõsaste istikute kvaliteedinõuded). Tallinn, Eesti Standardimis- ja Akrediteerimiskeskus. 23 pp.
- Ganley, R.J., Bulman, L.S. 2016. Dutch elm disease in New Zealand: impacts from eradication and management programmes. – Plant Pathology, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12527.
- Ghelardini, L., Luchi, N., Pecori, F., Pepori, A.L., Danti, R., Della Rocca, G., Capretti, P., Tsopelas, P., Santini, A. 2017. Ecology of invasive forest pathogens. – Biological Invasions, 19, 3183–3200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1487-0.
- Gibbs, J., Brasier, C.M. 1973. Correlation between cultural characters and pathogenicity in Ceratocystis ulmi from Britain, Europe and America. – Nature, 241, 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/241381a0.
- Gibbs, J.N. 1978. Intercontinental Epidemiology of Dutch Elm Disease. – Annual Review of Phytopathology, 16, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.16.090178.001443.
- Hallin, A.-K. 2010. Ash and elm join the Swedish Red List. [WWW Document]. – URL https://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/biowissenschaften-chemie/ash-elm-join-swedish-red-list-153585.html. [Accessed 16 June 2020].
- Hannunen, S., Marinova-Todorova, M. 2016. Pest Risk Assessment for Dutch elm disease. – Evira Research Reports 1/2016. Viikki, Helsinki, Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira. 106 pp.
- Hanso, M., Drenkhan, R. 2007. Trees in forests and towns are suffering from the extreme weather conditions. (Metsa- ja linnapuud ilmastiku äärmuste vaevas). – Eesti Loodus, 58, 6–13. (In Estonian).
- Hantula, J. 2021. The story of Dutch elm disease. (Hollanninjalavataudin tarina). – Sorbifolia, 52, 31–35. (In Finnish).
- Haugen, L. 1998. How to identify and manage Dutch elm disease. St. Paul, MN, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. 26 pp.
- Heliövaara, K., Peltonen, M. 1999. Bark Beetles in a Changing Environment. – Ecological Bulletins, 47, 48–59.
- Herald, 2019. Hundreds of Dutch elm disease trees to be felled. The Herald Scotland Online. [WWW Document]. – URL https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17535477.hundreds-dutch-elm-disease-trees-felled/. [Accessed 16 June 2020].
- Hintikka, V. 1974. Ceratocystis ulmi in Finland. – Karstenia, 14, 32–32. https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.1974.87.
- Hubbes, M., Jeng, R.S. 1981. Aggressiveness of Ceratocystis ulmi strains and induction of resistance in Ulmus americana. – European Journal of Forest Pathology, 11, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1981.tb00094.x.
- Jüriado, I., Liira, J., Paal, J. 2009. Diversity of epiphytic lichens in boreo-nemoral forests on the North-Estonian limestone escarpment: The effect of tree level factors and local environmental conditions. – Lichenologist, 41, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282909007889.
- Jürisoo, L. 2015a. Voltveti manor park maintenance plan for 2015-2024. (Voltveti mõisa pargi hoolduskava 2015–2024). (In Estonian).
- Jürisoo, L. 2015b. Dendrological assessment of Heimtali park. (Heimtali pargi dendroloogiline hinnang). (In Estonian).
- Jürisoo, L., Adamson, K., Padari, A., Drenkhan, R. 2019. Health of elms and Dutch elm disease in Estonia. – European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154, 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01707-0.
- Jürisoo, L., Selikhovkin, A. V., Padari, A., Shevchenko, S. V., Shcherbakova, L.N., Popovichev, B.G., Drenkhan, R. 2021a. The extensive damages of elms by Dutch elm disease agents and their hybrids in north-western Russia. – Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, 127214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127214.
- Jürisoo, L., Süda, I., Agan, A., Drenkhan, R. 2021b. Vectors of Dutch elm disease in northern Europe. – Insects, 12, 393.
- Kaar, E. 2011. Elms in Estonia. (Jalakas ja künnapuu Eestis). – Eesti Loodus, 62(3). (In Estonian).
- Kalamees, K. 2011. Wrinkled Peach: rare fungus on elms. (Roosa võrkheinik: seenharuldus jalakal). – Eesti Loodus, 2011/03. (In Estonian).
- Kalamees, K., Sõmermaa, A.-L. 2000. Order ophiostomatales. (Selts Siugsuudmelaadsed, Ophiostomatales). – Kalamees, K. (ed.). Tartu, Eesti seenestik EPMÜ ZBI, 52. (In Estonian).
- Kalda, A. 1995. Broadleaved forests in Estonia. – Aaviksoo, K., Kull, K., Paal, J., Trass, H. (eds.). Consortium Masingii: a Festschrift for Viktor Masing. Tartu, Tartu University, 89–95.
- Konrad, H., Kirisits, T., Riegler, M., Halmschlager, E., Stauffer, C. 2002. Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi ssp. americana. – Plant Pathology, 51, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0032-0862.2001.00653.x.
- Kukk, T., Kull, T. 2005. Atlas of the Estonian Flora. (Eesti taimede levikuatlas). Tartu, Eesti Maaülikooli Põllumajandus- ja Keskkonnainstituut. 528 pp. (In Estonian).
- La Porta, N., Capretti, P., Thomsen, I.M., Kasanen, R., Hietala, A.M., Von Weissenberg, K. 2008. Forest pathogens with higher damage potential due to climate change in Europe. – Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 30, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2008.10540534.
- Laas, E., Treumuth, S. 2006. Dendrological inventory of Voltvet manor park and Tihemetsa arboretum. (Voltveti mõisapargi ja Tihemetsa arboreetumi dendroloogiline inventuur). Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 78 pp. (In Estonian).
- Łakomy, P., Kwaśna, H., Kuźmiński, R., Napierała-Filipiak, A., Filipiak, M., Behnke, K., Behnke-Borowczyk, J. 2016. Investigation of Ophiostoma population infected elms in Poland. – Dendrobiology 76, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.12657/denbio.076.013.
- Lepik, E. 1940a. Estonia. The Elm disease in the country. – International Bulletin of Plant Protection, International Review of Agriculture, 31, 2.
- Lepik, E. 1940b. Why are our elms drying out? (Miks kuivavad meie jalakad?). – Postimees, 16 June 1940, 5. (In Estonian).
- Liberato, J.R., Scott, C.R., Dick, M.A., Inglis, C., Dunnell, K.L., Bergdahl, A.D. 2016. Dutch Elm Disease. – Bergdahl, A. D., Hill, A. (eds.). Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO, USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 126–128.
- Lilleleht, V. 2008. Red Data Book of Estonia. (Eesti Punane Raamat). Tartu, Commission for Nature Conservation of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. 38 pp. (In Estonian).
- Martín, J.A., Solla, A., Esteban, L.G., de Palacios, P., Gil, L. 2009. Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39, 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-183.
- Martín, Juan A, Sobrino-Plata, J., Coira, B., Medel, D., Collada, C., Gil, L. 2019a. Growth resilience and oxidative burst control as tolerance factors to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in Ulmus minor. – Tree Physiology, 39, 1512–1524. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz067.
- Martín, Juan A., Sobrino-Plata, J., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Collada, C., Gil, L. 2019b. Breeding and scientific advances in the fight against Dutch elm disease: Will they allow the use of elms in forest restoration? – New Forests, 50, 183–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9640-x.
- Matisone, I., Kenigsvalde, K., Zaļuma, A., Burņeviča, N., Šņepste, I., Matisons, R., Gaitnieks, T. 2020. First report on the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi from Latvia. – Forest Pathology, 50, e12601. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12601.
- Menkis, A., Östbrant, I.L., Davydenko, K., Bakys, R., Balalaikins, M., Vasaitis, R. 2016. Scolytus multistriatus associated with Dutch elm disease on the island of Gotland: phenology and communities of vectored fungi. – Mycological Progress, 15, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1199-3.
- Mihkelson, L. 2017. Fungal disease kills elms. (Seenhaigus tapab jalakaid). – Maaleht, 1 August 2017. (In Estonian).
- Mittempergher, L., La Porta, N. 1991. Hybridization studies in the Eurasian species of elm (Ulmus spp.). – Silvae Genetica, 40, 237–243.
- Morgenroth, J., Östberg, J. 2017. Measuring and monitoring urban trees and urban forests. – Ferrini, F., Bosch, C.C.K. van den, Fini, A. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry. London, New York, Routledge, 33–48.
- Motiejūnaitė, J., Kutorga, E., Kasparavičius, J., Lygis, V., Norkutė, G. 2016. New records from Lithuania of fungi alien to Europe. – Mycotaxon, 131, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5248/131.49.
- Myers, D.F., Strobel, G.A. 1983. Pseudomonas syringae as a microbial antagonist of Ceratocystis ulmi in the apoplast of American elm. – Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 80, 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(83)80034-5.
- Ogris, N. 2018. Ash dieback and Dutch elm disease: Current situation and prospects in Slovenia. – Baltic Forestry, 24, 181–184.
- Paal, J. 1998. Rare and threatened plant communities of Estonia. – Biodiversity & Conservation, 7, 1027–1049. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008857014648.
- Pajares, J. 2004. Elm breeding for resistance against bark beetle. – Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 13, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.5424/825.
- Pajares, J., García, S., Martín, D., Diez, J.J., García-Vallejo, M.C. 2004. Feeding responses by Scolytus scolytus to twig bark extracts from elms. – Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 13, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5424/826.
- Pecori, F., Ghelardini, L., Luchi, N., Pepori, A.L., Santini, A. 2017. Lights and Shadows of a Possible Strategy to Cope with Alien and Destructive Forest Pathogens: the Example of Breeding for Resistance to Dutch Elm Disease in Italy. – Baltic Forestry, 23, 255–263.
- Pepori, A.L., Bettini, P.P., Comparini, C., Sarrocco, S., Bonini, A., Frascella, A., Ghelardini, L., Scala, A., Vannacci, G., Santini, A. 2018. Geosmithia-Ophiostoma: a New Fungus-Fungus Association. – Microbial Ecology, 75, 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1062-3.
- Phillips, D.H., Burdekin, D.A. 1982. Diseases of Forest and Ornamental Trees. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK. 435 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06177-8.
- Pintson, M.-L. 2015. The infectious and rapidly killing Dutch elm disease reached Tartu. (Ülinakkav ja kiirelt tappev jalakasurm jõudis Tartusse). – Postimees, 15 May 2017. (In Estonian).
- Pipe, N.D., Buck, K.W., Brasier, C.M. 1997. Comparison of the cerato-ulmin (cu) gene sequences of the Himalayan Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma himal-ulmi with those of O. ulmi and O. novo-ulmi suggests that the cu gene of O. novo-ulmi is unlikely to have been acquired recently from O. himal-ulmi. – Mycological Research, 101, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756296002754.
- Pipe, N.D., Brasier, C.M., Buck, K.W. 2000. Evolutionary Relationships of the Dutch Elm Disease Fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi to Other Ophiostoma Species Investigated by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of the rDNA Region. – Journal of Phytopathology, 148, 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2000.00556.x.
- Postma, J., Goossen-van de Geijn, H., Schraven, R. 2014. Biological control of Dutch elm disease. – Proceedings of the IOBC Working Group “Biocontrol of Plant Diseases”, Sweden, 15-18 June 2014. Uppsala, 221–222.
- Rabaglia, R.J., Lanier, G.N. 1983. Effects of multilure components on twig-crotch feeding by European elm bark beetles. – Journal of Chemical Ecology, 9, 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988417.
- Raudsaar, M., Sims, A., Timmusk, T., Pärt, E., Nikopensius, M. 2018. Forest resources. – Yearbook Forest 2017 (Aastaraamat Mets 2017). Tallinn, Keskkonnaagentuur, 17–86. (In Estonian).
- Relve, H. 2011. The thickest elms in Estonia. (Eesti jämedaimad jalakad ja künnapuud). – Eesti Loodus, 2011/12. (In Estonian).
- Rist, E. 2015. Inventory of Tihemetsa park. (Tihemetsa pargi inventuur). Tihemetsa: Lôputöö. (In Estonian).
- Roy, B.A., Alexander, H.M., Davidson, J., Campbell, F.T., Burdon, J.J., Sniezko, R., Brasier, C.M. 2014. Increasing forest loss worldwide from invasive pests requires new trade regulations. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1890/130240.
- Rytkönen, A., Lilja, A., Petäistö, R.L., Hantula, J. 2008. Irrigation water and Phytophthora cactorum in a forest nursery. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802419034.
- Rytkönen, A., Lilja, A., Drenkhan, R., Gaitnieks, T., Hantula, J. 2011. First record of Chalara fraxinea in Finland and genetic variation among isolates sampled from Åland, mainland Finland, Estonia and Latvia. – Forest Pathology, 41, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00647.x.
- Santini, A., Faccoli, M. 2013. Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association. [WWW Document]. – URL. https://doi.org/10.3832/IFOR1231-008. [Accessed 24 May 2019].
- Scheffer, R.J. 1983. Biological control of Dutch elm disease by Pseudomonas species. – Annals of Applied Biology, 103, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1983.tb02736.x.
- Scheffer, R.J. 1990. Mechanisms Involved in Biological Control of Dutch Elm Disease. – Journal of Phytopathology, 130, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1990.tb01177.x.
- Scheffer, R.J., Brakenhoff, A.C., Kerkenaar, A., Elgersma, D.M. 1988. Control of Dutch elm disease by the sterol biosynthesis inhibitors fenpropimorph and fenpropidin. – Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 94, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01978005.
- Schmidt, O. 2006. Wood and Tree Fungi. Biology, Damage, Protection and Use. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer. 336 pp.
- Sell, I. 2019. Action plan for conservation of Rhodotus palmatus. (Roosa võrkheiniku (Rhodotus palmatus) kaitse tegevuskava). [WWW Document]. – URL https://keskkonnaamet.ee/media/691/download. [Accessed 14 December 2019]. (In Estonian).
- Sjöman, H., Östberg, J., Bühler, O. 2012. Diversity and distribution of the urban tree population in ten major Nordic cities. – Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.09.004.
- Stančin, P., 2018. Characterisation of fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi isolated from field elm samples in Croatia. (Karakterizacija gljive Ophiostoma novo-ulmi izolirane iz uzoraka nizinskog brijesta s područja Hrvatske). – Undergraduate Thesis. Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Department of Biology. 23 pp. (In Croatian).
- Stennes, M.A. 2000. Dutch elm disease chemotherapy with Arbotect 20-S® and Alamo®. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_10.
- Stipes, R.J. 2000. The Management of Dutch Elm Disease. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_9.
- Stipes, R.J., Campana, R.J. 1981. Compendium of elm diseases. St. Paul, Minnesota, American Phytopathological Society. 66 pp.
- Süda, I. 2006. Scolytus triarmatus (Eggers, 1912) - New bark beetle in the Baltics. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 44, 112–117.
- Sutherland, M.L., Mittempergher, L., Brasier, C.M. 1995. Control of Dutch elm disease by induced host resistance. – European Journal of Forest Pathology, 25, 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1995.tb01346.x.
- Swinton, J., Gilligan, C.A. 1999. Selecting hyperparasites for biocontrol of Dutch elm disease. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0657.
- Synergy Semiochemicals Corporation, 2019. Bark Beetles. [WWW Document]. – URL https://semiochemical.com/bark-beetles/. [Accessed 23 November 2019].
- Tamm, H. 2007. Vegetation and plantcover. (Taimestik ja taimkate). – Tammet, T. (ed.). Eesti Parkide Almanahh. Tallinn, Muinsuskaitseamet, Keskkonnaministeerium, 92–97. (In Estonian).
- Thor, G., Johansson, P., Jönsson, M.T. 2010. Lichen diversity and red-listed lichen species relationships with tree species and diameter in wooded meadows. – Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2307–2328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9843-8.
- Townsend, A.M., Douglass, L.W. 2004. Evalutation of elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. – Journal of Arboriculture, 30, 179–184.
- Vanatoa, A. 2004. Arthropods. (Lülijalgsed). [WWW document]. – URL http://www.zbi.ee/satikad/putukad/klass/phys/phys_f.htm. [Accessed 23 November 2019]. (In Estonian).
- Venturas, M., Fuentes-Utrilla, P., López, R., Perea, R., Fernández, V., Gascó, A., Guzmán, P., Li, M., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Miranda, E., Domínguez, J., González-Gordaliza, G., Zafra, E., Fajardo-Alcántara, M., Martín, J.A., Ennos, R., Nanos, N., Lucena, J.J., Iglesias, S., Collada, C., Gil, L. 2014. Ulmus laevis in the Iberian peninsula: A review of its ecology and conservation. – iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1201-008.
- Voeten, J., Postma, J., Cornelissen, B., Houterman, P., Geijn, H.G. de, Goossen-van de Geijn, H. 2009. Biological control of Dutch elm disease. – Gewasbescherming, 40, 3, 130–130.
- Voolma, K., Õunap, H., Süda, I. 2000. Distribution maps of Estonian insects, 2: Scolytidae. (Eesti putukate levikuatlas, 2: Ürasklased – Scolytidae). Tartu, Eesti Loodusfoto. 84 pp. (In Estonian).
- Voolma, K., Mandelshtam, M.Y., Shcherbakov, A.N., Yakovlev, E.B., Õunap, H., Süda, I., Popovichev, B.G., Sharapa, T. V., Galasjeva, T. V., Khairetdinov, R.R., Lipatkin, V.A., Mozolevskaya, E.G. 2004. Distribution and spread of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) around the Gulf of Finland: a comparative study with notes on rare species of Estonia, Finland and North-Western Russia. – Entomologica Fennica, 15, 198–210.
- Webber, J.F. 1987. Influence of the d2 factor on survival and infection by the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma ulmi. – Plant Pathology, 36, 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1987.tb02270.x.
- Webber, J.F. 2004. Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease. – Investigación agraria. Sistemas y recursos forestales, 13, 197–205.
- Webber, J.F., Brasier, C.M. 1984. The transmission of Dutch elm disease: a study of the process involved. – Anderson, J.M., Rayner, A.D.M., Walton, D.W.H. (eds.). Invertebrate-Microbial Interactions. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 271–306.
- Zalapa, J.E., Brunet, J., Guries, R.P. 2008. Genetic diversity and relationships among Dutch elm disease tolerant Ulmus pumila L. accessions from China. – Genome, 51, 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1139/G08-034.