Jalakasurma levikust ja ohtlikkusest Eestis

Jürisoo, Liina; ja Rein Drenkhan, Allar Padari

doi:10.2478/fsmu-2021-0006

Abstract

This review provides an overview of and describes the current situation of Dutch elm disease (DED), which is one of the most devastating diseases for elms worldwide and in Estonia. It is known that in Estonia DED’s agent Ophiostoma ulmi has been damaging elms since the 1930s. Today a new species Ophiostoma novo-ulmi is considered to be an agent of DED. Since 2013 the current epidemic has been recorded in most of the counties of Estonia. The both known DED agents, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi subsp. americana were molecularly detected on Ulmus spp. Additionally, one hybrid pathogen of the subspecies (americana x novo-ulmi) was identified in northern Estonia. Also, the health status of elms and the potential vector agents of the pathogen are discussed and recommendations for disease management are provided.

References

Aaspõllu, A. 1999. Cultivars of deciduous trees in Estonia. (Lehtpuude kultivarid Eestis). – Sander, H. (ed.). Dendroloogilised uurimused Eestis. Tallinn, EPMÜ Metsanduslik Uurimisinstituut, 110–137. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aaspõllu, A. 2017. The situation of native hardwood species is deteriorating. (Kodumaiste lehtpuuliikide olukord järjest halveneb). – Maaelu, 14 September 2017. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Abner, O., Konsa, S., Lootus, K., Sinijärv, U. 2007. Estonian Parks 1. (Eesti pargid 1). Tallinn, Varrak. 423 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Abner, O., Konsa, S., Lootus, K., Sinijärv, U. 2012. Estonian Parks 2. (Eesti pargid 2). Tallinn, Varrak. 647 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anderbrant, O., Schlyter, F. 1987. Ecology of the Dutch Elm Disease Vectors Scolytus laevis and S. scolytus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Southern Sweden. – Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403891.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aotäht, A. 2018. The city hopes for a researcher of DED. (Linn loodab jalakasurma uurijale). – Sakala, 21 September 2018. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baker, J.E., Norris, D.M. 1968. Further Biological and Chemical Aspects of Host Selection by Scolytus multistriatus. – Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 61, 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/61.5.1248.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beaver, R.A. 1969. Natality, mortality and control of the elm bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Col., Scolytidae). – Bulletin of Entomological Research, 59, 537–540. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300003527.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blumenstein, K. 2015. Endophytic fungi in elms: implications for the integrated management of Dutch elm disease. – Doctoral thesis. Alnarp, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. 84 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boutz, G.E., Brewer, J.W., Bishop, J.N. 2009. Capture patterns of Scolytus multistriatus (Marsh.) (Col., Scolytidae) attracted to a pheromone-baited trap. – Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 99, 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1985.tb01999.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 1979. Dual origin of recent Dutch elm disease outbreaks in Europe. – Nature, 281, 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/281078a0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 1990. China and the origins of Dutch elm disease: an appraisal. – Plant Pathology, 39, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1990.tb02470.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. – Mycopathologia, 115, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462219.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 2000a. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 2000b. Viruses as biological control agents of the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms - Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 2001. Rapid Evolution of Introduced Plant Pathogens via Interspecific Hybridization is leading to rapid evolution of Dutch elm disease and other fungal plant pathogens. – Bioscience, 51(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0123:reoipp]2.0.co;2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M. 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. – Plant Pathology, 57, 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01886.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M., Buck, K.W. 2001. Rapid Evolutionary Changes in a Globally Invading Fungal Pathogen (Dutch Elm Disease). – Biological Invasions, 3, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015248819864.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A. 2000. Survival of clones of NAN Ophiostoma novo-ulmi around its probable centre of appearance in North America. – Mycological Research, 104, 1322–1332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756200002732.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novoulmi as subspecies. – Mycological Research, 105, 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201004087.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A. 2010. Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. – Plant Pathology, 59, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02157.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M., Mehrotra, M.D. 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. – Mycological Research, 99, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80887-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brasier, C.M., Webber, J.F. 2019. Is there evidence for post-epidemic attenuation in the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi? – Plant Pathology, 68, 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clinton, G.P., McCormick, F.A. 1936. Dutch elm disease. Graphium ulmi. – Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 389, 701–752.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Corfixen, P., Parmasto, E. 2005. Hymenochaete ulmicola sp. nov. (Hymenochaetales). – Mycotaxon, 91, 465–469.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drenkhan, R., Adamson, K., Drenkhan, T., Agan, A., Laas, M. 2017a. New problems in dendropathology – new and invasive pathogens. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 67, 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drenkhan, R., Solheim, H., Bogacheva, A., Riit, T., Adamson, K., Drenkhan, T., Maaten, T., Hietala, A.M. 2017b. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus is a leaf pathogen of local Fraxinus species in the Russian Far East. – Plant Pathology, 66, 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12588.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dvořák, M., Tomšovský, M., Jankovský, L., Novotný, D. 2007. Contribution to identify the causal agents of Dutch elm disease in the Czech Republic. – Plant Protection Science, 43, 142–145. https://doi.org/10.17221/2243-PPS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
eElurikkus, 2019. Ophiostoma ulmi. [WWW Document]. – URL https://elurikkus.ee/biehub/species/161882#classification. [Accessed 14 December 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
El-Sayed, A.M., Suckling, D.M., Wearing, C.H., Byers, J.A. 2006. Potential of Mass Trapping for Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species. – Journal of Economic Entomology, 99, 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.5.1550.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
El-sayed, A.M., Suckling, D.M., Byers, J.A., Jang, E.B., Wearing, C.H. 2009. Potential of ‘Lure and Kill’ in Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species. – Journal of Economic Entomology, 102, 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0301.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elgersma, D.M., Roosien, T., Scheffer, R.J. 1993. Biological control of Dutch elm disease by exploiting resistance in the host. – Sticklen, M.B., Sherald, J.L. (eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research. New York, NY, Springer, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ellstrand, N.C., Schierenbeck, K.A. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 7043–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EPPO Global Database, 2019. EPPO. [WWW Document]. – URL https://gd.eppo.int/. [Accessed 7 June 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EVS 939-2:2020, 2020. Woody plants in landscaping. Part 2: Quality Requirements for the Nursery Plants. (Puittaimed haljastuses. Osa 2: Ilupuude ja -põõsaste istikute kvaliteedinõuded). Tallinn, Eesti Standardimis- ja Akrediteerimiskeskus. 23 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ganley, R.J., Bulman, L.S. 2016. Dutch elm disease in New Zealand: impacts from eradication and management programmes. – Plant Pathology, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12527.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ghelardini, L., Luchi, N., Pecori, F., Pepori, A.L., Danti, R., Della Rocca, G., Capretti, P., Tsopelas, P., Santini, A. 2017. Ecology of invasive forest pathogens. – Biological Invasions, 19, 3183–3200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1487-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibbs, J., Brasier, C.M. 1973. Correlation between cultural characters and pathogenicity in Ceratocystis ulmi from Britain, Europe and America. – Nature, 241, 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/241381a0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibbs, J.N. 1978. Intercontinental Epidemiology of Dutch Elm Disease. – Annual Review of Phytopathology, 16, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.16.090178.001443.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hallin, A.-K. 2010. Ash and elm join the Swedish Red List. [WWW Document]. – URL https://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/biowissenschaften-chemie/ash-elm-join-swedish-red-list-153585.html. [Accessed 16 June 2020].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hannunen, S., Marinova-Todorova, M. 2016. Pest Risk Assessment for Dutch elm disease. – Evira Research Reports 1/2016. Viikki, Helsinki, Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira. 106 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hanso, M., Drenkhan, R. 2007. Trees in forests and towns are suffering from the extreme weather conditions. (Metsa- ja linnapuud ilmastiku äärmuste vaevas). – Eesti Loodus, 58, 6–13. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hantula, J. 2021. The story of Dutch elm disease. (Hollanninjalavataudin tarina). – Sorbifolia, 52, 31–35. (In Finnish).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haugen, L. 1998. How to identify and manage Dutch elm disease. St. Paul, MN, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. 26 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heliövaara, K., Peltonen, M. 1999. Bark Beetles in a Changing Environment. – Ecological Bulletins, 47, 48–59.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Herald, 2019. Hundreds of Dutch elm disease trees to be felled. The Herald Scotland Online. [WWW Document]. – URL https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17535477.hundreds-dutch-elm-disease-trees-felled/. [Accessed 16 June 2020].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hintikka, V. 1974. Ceratocystis ulmi in Finland. – Karstenia, 14, 32–32. https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.1974.87.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hubbes, M., Jeng, R.S. 1981. Aggressiveness of Ceratocystis ulmi strains and induction of resistance in Ulmus americana. – European Journal of Forest Pathology, 11, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1981.tb00094.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jüriado, I., Liira, J., Paal, J. 2009. Diversity of epiphytic lichens in boreo-nemoral forests on the North-Estonian limestone escarpment: The effect of tree level factors and local environmental conditions. – Lichenologist, 41, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282909007889.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jürisoo, L. 2015a. Voltveti manor park maintenance plan for 2015-2024. (Voltveti mõisa pargi hoolduskava 2015–2024). (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jürisoo, L. 2015b. Dendrological assessment of Heimtali park. (Heimtali pargi dendroloogiline hinnang). (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jürisoo, L., Adamson, K., Padari, A., Drenkhan, R. 2019. Health of elms and Dutch elm disease in Estonia. – European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154, 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01707-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jürisoo, L., Selikhovkin, A. V., Padari, A., Shevchenko, S. V., Shcherbakova, L.N., Popovichev, B.G., Drenkhan, R. 2021a. The extensive damages of elms by Dutch elm disease agents and their hybrids in north-western Russia. – Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, 127214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127214.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jürisoo, L., Süda, I., Agan, A., Drenkhan, R. 2021b. Vectors of Dutch elm disease in northern Europe. – Insects, 12, 393.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaar, E. 2011. Elms in Estonia. (Jalakas ja künnapuu Eestis). – Eesti Loodus, 62(3). (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalamees, K. 2011. Wrinkled Peach: rare fungus on elms. (Roosa võrkheinik: seenharuldus jalakal). – Eesti Loodus, 2011/03. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalamees, K., Sõmermaa, A.-L. 2000. Order ophiostomatales. (Selts Siugsuudmelaadsed, Ophiostomatales). – Kalamees, K. (ed.). Tartu, Eesti seenestik EPMÜ ZBI, 52. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalda, A. 1995. Broadleaved forests in Estonia. – Aaviksoo, K., Kull, K., Paal, J., Trass, H. (eds.). Consortium Masingii: a Festschrift for Viktor Masing. Tartu, Tartu University, 89–95.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konrad, H., Kirisits, T., Riegler, M., Halmschlager, E., Stauffer, C. 2002. Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi ssp. americana. – Plant Pathology, 51, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0032-0862.2001.00653.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kukk, T., Kull, T. 2005. Atlas of the Estonian Flora. (Eesti taimede levikuatlas). Tartu, Eesti Maaülikooli Põllumajandus- ja Keskkonnainstituut. 528 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
La Porta, N., Capretti, P., Thomsen, I.M., Kasanen, R., Hietala, A.M., Von Weissenberg, K. 2008. Forest pathogens with higher damage potential due to climate change in Europe. – Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 30, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2008.10540534.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laas, E., Treumuth, S. 2006. Dendrological inventory of Voltvet manor park and Tihemetsa arboretum. (Voltveti mõisapargi ja Tihemetsa arboreetumi dendroloogiline inventuur). Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 78 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Łakomy, P., Kwaśna, H., Kuźmiński, R., Napierała-Filipiak, A., Filipiak, M., Behnke, K., Behnke-Borowczyk, J. 2016. Investigation of Ophiostoma population infected elms in Poland. – Dendrobiology 76, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.12657/denbio.076.013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lepik, E. 1940a. Estonia. The Elm disease in the country. – International Bulletin of Plant Protection, International Review of Agriculture, 31, 2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lepik, E. 1940b. Why are our elms drying out? (Miks kuivavad meie jalakad?). – Postimees, 16 June 1940, 5. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liberato, J.R., Scott, C.R., Dick, M.A., Inglis, C., Dunnell, K.L., Bergdahl, A.D. 2016. Dutch Elm Disease. – Bergdahl, A. D., Hill, A. (eds.). Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO, USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 126–128.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lilleleht, V. 2008. Red Data Book of Estonia. (Eesti Punane Raamat). Tartu, Commission for Nature Conservation of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. 38 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martín, J.A., Solla, A., Esteban, L.G., de Palacios, P., Gil, L. 2009. Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39, 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-183.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martín, Juan A, Sobrino-Plata, J., Coira, B., Medel, D., Collada, C., Gil, L. 2019a. Growth resilience and oxidative burst control as tolerance factors to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in Ulmus minor. – Tree Physiology, 39, 1512–1524. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz067.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martín, Juan A., Sobrino-Plata, J., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Collada, C., Gil, L. 2019b. Breeding and scientific advances in the fight against Dutch elm disease: Will they allow the use of elms in forest restoration? – New Forests, 50, 183–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9640-x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matisone, I., Kenigsvalde, K., Zaļuma, A., Burņeviča, N., Šņepste, I., Matisons, R., Gaitnieks, T. 2020. First report on the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi from Latvia. – Forest Pathology, 50, e12601. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12601.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menkis, A., Östbrant, I.L., Davydenko, K., Bakys, R., Balalaikins, M., Vasaitis, R. 2016. Scolytus multistriatus associated with Dutch elm disease on the island of Gotland: phenology and communities of vectored fungi. – Mycological Progress, 15, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1199-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mihkelson, L. 2017. Fungal disease kills elms. (Seenhaigus tapab jalakaid). – Maaleht, 1 August 2017. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mittempergher, L., La Porta, N. 1991. Hybridization studies in the Eurasian species of elm (Ulmus spp.). – Silvae Genetica, 40, 237–243.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morgenroth, J., Östberg, J. 2017. Measuring and monitoring urban trees and urban forests. – Ferrini, F., Bosch, C.C.K. van den, Fini, A. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry. London, New York, Routledge, 33–48.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Motiejūnaitė, J., Kutorga, E., Kasparavičius, J., Lygis, V., Norkutė, G. 2016. New records from Lithuania of fungi alien to Europe. – Mycotaxon, 131, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5248/131.49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Myers, D.F., Strobel, G.A. 1983. Pseudomonas syringae as a microbial antagonist of Ceratocystis ulmi in the apoplast of American elm. – Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 80, 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(83)80034-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ogris, N. 2018. Ash dieback and Dutch elm disease: Current situation and prospects in Slovenia. – Baltic Forestry, 24, 181–184.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paal, J. 1998. Rare and threatened plant communities of Estonia. – Biodiversity & Conservation, 7, 1027–1049. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008857014648.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pajares, J. 2004. Elm breeding for resistance against bark beetle. – Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 13, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.5424/825.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pajares, J., García, S., Martín, D., Diez, J.J., García-Vallejo, M.C. 2004. Feeding responses by Scolytus scolytus to twig bark extracts from elms. – Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 13, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5424/826.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pecori, F., Ghelardini, L., Luchi, N., Pepori, A.L., Santini, A. 2017. Lights and Shadows of a Possible Strategy to Cope with Alien and Destructive Forest Pathogens: the Example of Breeding for Resistance to Dutch Elm Disease in Italy. – Baltic Forestry, 23, 255–263.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pepori, A.L., Bettini, P.P., Comparini, C., Sarrocco, S., Bonini, A., Frascella, A., Ghelardini, L., Scala, A., Vannacci, G., Santini, A. 2018. Geosmithia-Ophiostoma: a New Fungus-Fungus Association. – Microbial Ecology, 75, 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1062-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Phillips, D.H., Burdekin, D.A. 1982. Diseases of Forest and Ornamental Trees. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK. 435 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06177-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pintson, M.-L. 2015. The infectious and rapidly killing Dutch elm disease reached Tartu. (Ülinakkav ja kiirelt tappev jalakasurm jõudis Tartusse). – Postimees, 15 May 2017. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pipe, N.D., Buck, K.W., Brasier, C.M. 1997. Comparison of the cerato-ulmin (cu) gene sequences of the Himalayan Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma himal-ulmi with those of O. ulmi and O. novo-ulmi suggests that the cu gene of O. novo-ulmi is unlikely to have been acquired recently from O. himal-ulmi. – Mycological Research, 101, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756296002754.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pipe, N.D., Brasier, C.M., Buck, K.W. 2000. Evolutionary Relationships of the Dutch Elm Disease Fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi to Other Ophiostoma Species Investigated by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of the rDNA Region. – Journal of Phytopathology, 148, 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2000.00556.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Postma, J., Goossen-van de Geijn, H., Schraven, R. 2014. Biological control of Dutch elm disease. – Proceedings of the IOBC Working Group “Biocontrol of Plant Diseases”, Sweden, 15-18 June 2014. Uppsala, 221–222.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rabaglia, R.J., Lanier, G.N. 1983. Effects of multilure components on twig-crotch feeding by European elm bark beetles. – Journal of Chemical Ecology, 9, 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988417.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Raudsaar, M., Sims, A., Timmusk, T., Pärt, E., Nikopensius, M. 2018. Forest resources. – Yearbook Forest 2017 (Aastaraamat Mets 2017). Tallinn, Keskkonnaagentuur, 17–86. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Relve, H. 2011. The thickest elms in Estonia. (Eesti jämedaimad jalakad ja künnapuud). – Eesti Loodus, 2011/12. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rist, E. 2015. Inventory of Tihemetsa park. (Tihemetsa pargi inventuur). Tihemetsa: Lôputöö. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roy, B.A., Alexander, H.M., Davidson, J., Campbell, F.T., Burdon, J.J., Sniezko, R., Brasier, C.M. 2014. Increasing forest loss worldwide from invasive pests requires new trade regulations. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1890/130240.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rytkönen, A., Lilja, A., Petäistö, R.L., Hantula, J. 2008. Irrigation water and Phytophthora cactorum in a forest nursery. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802419034.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rytkönen, A., Lilja, A., Drenkhan, R., Gaitnieks, T., Hantula, J. 2011. First record of Chalara fraxinea in Finland and genetic variation among isolates sampled from Åland, mainland Finland, Estonia and Latvia. – Forest Pathology, 41, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00647.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Santini, A., Faccoli, M. 2013. Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association. [WWW Document]. – URL. https://doi.org/10.3832/IFOR1231-008. [Accessed 24 May 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scheffer, R.J. 1983. Biological control of Dutch elm disease by Pseudomonas species. – Annals of Applied Biology, 103, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1983.tb02736.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scheffer, R.J. 1990. Mechanisms Involved in Biological Control of Dutch Elm Disease. – Journal of Phytopathology, 130, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1990.tb01177.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scheffer, R.J., Brakenhoff, A.C., Kerkenaar, A., Elgersma, D.M. 1988. Control of Dutch elm disease by the sterol biosynthesis inhibitors fenpropimorph and fenpropidin. – Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 94, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01978005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmidt, O. 2006. Wood and Tree Fungi. Biology, Damage, Protection and Use. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer. 336 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sell, I. 2019. Action plan for conservation of Rhodotus palmatus. (Roosa võrkheiniku (Rhodotus palmatus) kaitse tegevuskava). [WWW Document]. – URL https://keskkonnaamet.ee/media/691/download. [Accessed 14 December 2019]. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sjöman, H., Östberg, J., Bühler, O. 2012. Diversity and distribution of the urban tree population in ten major Nordic cities. – Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.09.004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stančin, P., 2018. Characterisation of fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi isolated from field elm samples in Croatia. (Karakterizacija gljive Ophiostoma novo-ulmi izolirane iz uzoraka nizinskog brijesta s područja Hrvatske). – Undergraduate Thesis. Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Department of Biology. 23 pp. (In Croatian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stennes, M.A. 2000. Dutch elm disease chemotherapy with Arbotect 20-S® and Alamo®. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stipes, R.J. 2000. The Management of Dutch Elm Disease. – Dunn, C.P. (ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Boston, Springer, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stipes, R.J., Campana, R.J. 1981. Compendium of elm diseases. St. Paul, Minnesota, American Phytopathological Society. 66 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Süda, I. 2006. Scolytus triarmatus (Eggers, 1912) - New bark beetle in the Baltics. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 44, 112–117.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sutherland, M.L., Mittempergher, L., Brasier, C.M. 1995. Control of Dutch elm disease by induced host resistance. – European Journal of Forest Pathology, 25, 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1995.tb01346.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swinton, J., Gilligan, C.A. 1999. Selecting hyperparasites for biocontrol of Dutch elm disease. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0657.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Synergy Semiochemicals Corporation, 2019. Bark Beetles. [WWW Document]. – URL https://semiochemical.com/bark-beetles/. [Accessed 23 November 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tamm, H. 2007. Vegetation and plantcover. (Taimestik ja taimkate). – Tammet, T. (ed.). Eesti Parkide Almanahh. Tallinn, Muinsuskaitseamet, Keskkonnaministeerium, 92–97. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thor, G., Johansson, P., Jönsson, M.T. 2010. Lichen diversity and red-listed lichen species relationships with tree species and diameter in wooded meadows. – Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2307–2328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9843-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Townsend, A.M., Douglass, L.W. 2004. Evalutation of elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. – Journal of Arboriculture, 30, 179–184.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vanatoa, A. 2004. Arthropods. (Lülijalgsed). [WWW document]. – URL http://www.zbi.ee/satikad/putukad/klass/phys/phys_f.htm. [Accessed 23 November 2019]. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Venturas, M., Fuentes-Utrilla, P., López, R., Perea, R., Fernández, V., Gascó, A., Guzmán, P., Li, M., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Miranda, E., Domínguez, J., González-Gordaliza, G., Zafra, E., Fajardo-Alcántara, M., Martín, J.A., Ennos, R., Nanos, N., Lucena, J.J., Iglesias, S., Collada, C., Gil, L. 2014. Ulmus laevis in the Iberian peninsula: A review of its ecology and conservation. – iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1201-008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voeten, J., Postma, J., Cornelissen, B., Houterman, P., Geijn, H.G. de, Goossen-van de Geijn, H. 2009. Biological control of Dutch elm disease. – Gewasbescherming, 40, 3, 130–130.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voolma, K., Õunap, H., Süda, I. 2000. Distribution maps of Estonian insects, 2: Scolytidae. (Eesti putukate levikuatlas, 2: Ürasklased – Scolytidae). Tartu, Eesti Loodusfoto. 84 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voolma, K., Mandelshtam, M.Y., Shcherbakov, A.N., Yakovlev, E.B., Õunap, H., Süda, I., Popovichev, B.G., Sharapa, T. V., Galasjeva, T. V., Khairetdinov, R.R., Lipatkin, V.A., Mozolevskaya, E.G. 2004. Distribution and spread of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) around the Gulf of Finland: a comparative study with notes on rare species of Estonia, Finland and North-Western Russia. – Entomologica Fennica, 15, 198–210.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webber, J.F. 1987. Influence of the d2 factor on survival and infection by the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma ulmi. – Plant Pathology, 36, 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1987.tb02270.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webber, J.F. 2004. Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease. – Investigación agraria. Sistemas y recursos forestales, 13, 197–205.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webber, J.F., Brasier, C.M. 1984. The transmission of Dutch elm disease: a study of the process involved. – Anderson, J.M., Rayner, A.D.M., Walton, D.W.H. (eds.). Invertebrate-Microbial Interactions. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 271–306.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zalapa, J.E., Brunet, J., Guries, R.P. 2008. Genetic diversity and relationships among Dutch elm disease tolerant Ulmus pumila L. accessions from China. – Genome, 51, 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1139/G08-034.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Jalakasurma levikust ja ohtlikkusest Eestis

Abstract

Paradigm

My account