Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring wild edible flowers as a source of bioactive compounds: New perspectives in horticulture Cover

Exploring wild edible flowers as a source of bioactive compounds: New perspectives in horticulture

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

RACI calculated for the 26 studied flower species. Different lower case letters indicate significant differences between species according to Kruskal–Wallis’ stepwise comparison (p < 0.05). RACI, relative antioxidant capacity index. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
RACI calculated for the 26 studied flower species. Different lower case letters indicate significant differences between species according to Kruskal–Wallis’ stepwise comparison (p < 0.05). RACI, relative antioxidant capacity index. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Figure 2

Total polyphenols and polyphenol classes (flavonols, flavanols, benzoic acids and cinnamic acids) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
Total polyphenols and polyphenol classes (flavonols, flavanols, benzoic acids and cinnamic acids) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Figure 3

Hierarchical cluster analysis of the selected species according to their TPC and antioxidant activity (FRAP, DPPH and ABTS). The respective botanical family and vegetation community is provided for every species. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants. ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; TPC, total polyphenol content.
Hierarchical cluster analysis of the selected species according to their TPC and antioxidant activity (FRAP, DPPH and ABTS). The respective botanical family and vegetation community is provided for every species. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants. ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; TPC, total polyphenol content.

Figure 4

Hierarchical cluster analysis of the selected species according to their polyphenolic profile and vitamin C content. The respective botanical family and vegetation community is provided for every species. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
Hierarchical cluster analysis of the selected species according to their polyphenolic profile and vitamin C content. The respective botanical family and vegetation community is provided for every species. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Figure A1

Flavonols (hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercetin, quercitrin and rutin) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
Flavonols (hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercetin, quercitrin and rutin) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Figure A2

Flavanols (catechin and epicatechin) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
Flavanols (catechin and epicatechin) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Figure A3

Benzoic acids (ellagic and gallic acid) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
Benzoic acids (ellagic and gallic acid) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Figure A4

Cinnamic acids (caffeic, chlorogenic, coumaric and ferulic acid) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.
Cinnamic acids (caffeic, chlorogenic, coumaric and ferulic acid) content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species. Different lower case letters in a row indicate significant differences between species according to Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Data are means of three biological replicates. -, compound not detected. §Flowers sampled from cultivated plants.

Vitamin C content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species_

SpeciesVitamin C
Allium ursinum0.0 -
Bellis perennis4.4 fi
Centaurea cyanus3.3 gi
Cichorium intybus4.0 gi
Dianthus carthusianorum5.5 di
Dianthus pavonius16.4 bc
Erythronium dens-canis6.7 ch
Geranium sylvaticum7.9 bg
Lavandula angustifolia2.8 hi
Leucanthemum vulgare5.9 di
Mentha aquatica2.6 i
Paeonia officinalis11.3 be
Primula veris44.9 a
Primula vulgaris3.8 gi
Robinia pseudoacacia4.0 gi
Rosa canina12.3 bd
Rosa pendulina7.2 bg
Salvia pratensis4.0 gi
Sambucus nigra11.0 bf
Taraxacum officinale3.5 gi
Trifolium alpinum15.5 bc
Viola odorata4.6 ei
Borago officinalis§0.0 -
Calendula officinalis§11.8 bd
Tagetes patula§7.2 bg
Tropaeolum majus§17.7 b

List of the 22 wild and 4 cultivated species collected and analysed in the study, with references on their botanical family, vegetation community, food and/or medicinal uses, month, site (WGS84/32N system) and soil (USDA soil taxonomy; the bedrock type is provided in brackets: C, calcareous; S, siliceous)* of sampling in 2017_

SpeciesBotanical familyVegetation communityReference of flower use
Flower sampling
Soil type
FoodMedicinalMonthLongitudeLatitude
Allium ursinum L.AmaryllidaceaeWoodlandsLim (2014a)Sobolewska et al. (2015)April7.87845.490Eutrudept (S)
Bellis perennis L.AsteraceaeNutrient rich grasslandsLim (2014a)Lim (2014a)March7.59245.065Hapludalf (S)
Centaurea cyanus L.**AsteraceaeRuderal communitiesLim (2014a)Lim (2014a)May7.89645.475Eutrudept (S)
Cichorium intybus L.AsteraceaeRuderal communitiesLim (2014a)Street et al. (2013)June7.84345.192Dystrudept (S)
Dianthus carthusianorum L.CaryophyllaceaeDry grasslands-Palma (1964)June7.21945.301Udifluvent (S)
Dianthus pavonius TauschCaryophyllaceaeNutrient poor grasslands--July7.12244.391Eutrocryept (C)
Erythronium dens-canis L.LiliaceaeWoodlands--March7.37145.157Dystrudept (C)
Geranium sylvaticum L.GeraniaceaeEdges--June7.18645.300Dystrudept (S)
Lavandula angustifolia Mill.**LamiaceaeDry grasslandsLim (2014b)Lim (2014b)June---
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.AsteraceaeNutrient rich grasslandsLim (2014a)Prinsloo et al. (2018)April7.59245.065Hapludalf (S)
Mentha aquatica L.LamiaceaeWetlandsLim (2014b)Alvarado (2018)September7.48545.120Hapludalf (S)
Paeonia officinalis L.**PaeoniaceaeEdgesLim (2014b)-April7.34445.097Udorthent (S)
Primula veris L.PrimulaceaeWoodlandsLim (2014b)Apel et al. (2017)May6.80244.968Eutrudept (C)
Primula vulgaris Huds.PrimulaceaeWoodlandsLim (2014b)Tuttolomondo et al. (2014)March7.37945.145Dystrudept (C)
Robinia pseudoacacia L.FabaceaeWoodlandsLim (2014a)Jarić et al. (2015)May7.59345.065Hapludalf (S)
Rosa canina L. **RosaceaeShrublandsLim (2014b)Nemati et al. (2015)May7.67745.715Udorthent (S)
Rosa pendulina L.RosaceaeWoodlands--June7.19245.301Dystrudept (S)
Salvia pratensis L.LamiaceaeDry grasslandsKucekova et al. (2013)Kucekova et al. (2013)May7.60345.036Udifluvent (S)
Sambucus nigra L.AdoxaceaeShrublandsLim (2014a)Młynarczyk et al. (2018)May7.59345.064Hapludalf (S)
Taraxacum officinale Weber**AsteraceaeNutrient rich grasslandsLim (2014a)Lim (2014a)March7.59345.064Hapludalf (S)
Trifolium alpinum L.FabaceaeNutrient poor grasslandsAbbet et al. (2014)Agelet and Vallès (2001)July7.12244.390Eutrocryept (C)
Viola odorata L.ViolaceaeRuderal communitiesLim (2014b)Lim (2014b)March7.59145.065Hapludalf (S)

Borago officinalis L.BoraginaceaeCultivatedLim (2014a)Gupta and Singh (2010)May-§-§-§
Calendula officinalis L.AsteraceaeCultivatedLim (2014a)Lim (2014a)May-§§-§
Tagetes patula L.AsteraceaeCultivatedLim (2014a)Lim (2014a)July-§§-§
Tropaeolum majus L.TropaeolaceaeCultivatedLim (2014b)Lim (2014b)May-§§-§

Flavonols and flavanols content (mg · 100 g−1) in the flowers of the 26 studied species_

SpeciesFlavonolsFlavanols


HyperosideIsoquercitrinQuercetinQuercitrinRutinCatechinEpicatechin
Allium ursinum38.7 b0.0 -0.0 -0.9 c19.7 b0.0 -20.8 g
Bellis perennis0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.4 d421.0 a
Centaurea cyanus0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.9 c0.0 -0.0 -65.2 c
Cichorium intybus23.5 bc16.1 c0.0 -0.0 -13.7 b19.1 bc533.3 a
Dianthus carthusianorum262.4 a163.6 b0.0 -8.0 c17.8 b0.0 -0.1 h
Dianthus pavonius0.0 -2,072.0 a0.0 -163.6 c34.1 b11.7 c26.3 dg
Erythronium dens-canis9.0 cd0.0 -0.0 -108.5 c0.5 c0.4 d29.9 cg
Geranium sylvaticum0.6 e12.5 c189.0 a34.5 c17.1 b20.7 bc37.7 cg
Lavandula angustifolia17.3 bd0.0 -207.3 a0.0 -0.0 -375.6 a306.6 ab
Leucanthemum vulgare0.0 -0.0 -328.1 a0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.1 h
Mentha aquatica0.0 -12.0 c227.2 a0.0 -16.8 b24.0 bc59.2 cd
Paeonia officinalis0.0 -0.0 -216.3 a16.4 c0.0 -28.6 b30.7 cg
Primula veris14.7 bd10.8 c0.0 -82.3 c18.1 b0.4 d52.0 ce
Primula vulgaris9.4 cd100.1 b0.0 -109.6 c107.7 a0.0 -23.9 eg
Robinia pseudoacacia0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -547.3 b0.0 -0.0 -22.0 fg
Rosa canina38.5 b130.2 b205.7 a35.9 c0.0 -26.0 b158.1 b
Rosa pendulina15.3 bd184.5 b0.0 -1,353.4 a12.9 b0.4 d388.4 b
Salvia pratensis0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -25.0 eg
Sambucus nigra0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -23.4 c0.0 -0.0 -48.3 cf
Taraxacum officinale0.6 e0.0 -0.7 b0.0 -0.5 c0.0 -0.1 h
Trifolium alpinum7.4 d7.9 c0.0 -13.5 c0.5 c0.0 -0.1 h
Viola odorata16.3 bd15.7 c0.0 -10.8 c14.4 b0.0 -21.9 fg
Borago officinalis§0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Calendula officinalis§0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -1.7 c0.0 -0.4 d0.1 h
Tagetes patula§0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.5 c0.0 -29.3 cg
Tropaeolum majus§0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -619.6 b0.0 -0.0 -49.1 cf

Mobile phases, elution conditions and wavelength used to detect the five classes of compounds with HPLC analysis_

Class of compoundsMobile phaseElution conditionsWavelength (nm)
Cinnamic acids and flavonolsA: 10 mM KH2PO4/H3PO4, pH = 2.8B: CH3CN5%B to 21%B in 17 min + 21%B in 3 min (2 min conditioning time); flow: 1.5 mL min−1330

Benzoic acids and flavanolsA: H2O/CH3OH/HCOOH(5:95:0.1 v/v/v), pH = 2.5B: CH3OH/HCOOH (100:0.1 v/v)3%B to 85%B in 22 min + 85%B in 1 min (2 min conditioning time); flow: 0.6 mL min−1280

Vitamin CA: 5 mM C16H33N(CH3)3Br/50 mMKH2PO4, pH = 2.5B: CH3OHIsocratic, ratio of phase A and B: 95:5 in 10 min (5 min conditioning time); flow: 0.9 mL min−1261, 348

Dry matter, TPC and antioxidant activity (FRAP, DPPH and ABTS assays) in the 26 edible flowers_

SpeciesDry matter (%)TPC (mg GAE · 100 g−1)Antioxidant activity

FRAP (mmol Fe2+ · kg−1)DPPH (mmol TE · g−1)ABTS (mmol TE · g−1)
Allium ursinum10.2 jk184.4 k4.2 j7.6 kl0.7 m
Bellis perennis16.9 ef396.3 gi81.6 cf24.3 i13.4 hj
Centaurea cyanus26.4 b378.5 hi68.3 df23.6 i17.8 fh
Cichorium intybus17.3 ef618.4 df138.4 ad69.2 f26.9 d
Dianthus carthusianorum27.8 ab936.3 bd222.2 ab81.1 ef33.6 c
Dianthus pavonius21.2 cd752.8 ce176.1 ac106.5 c24.3 de
Erythronium dens-canis15.1 fh364.3 hi53.5 eg20.4 ik14.4 hj
Geranium sylvaticum12.8 i1,267.8 ab267.0 ab152.9 b55.2 a
Lavandula angustifolia31.2 a396.0 gi89.5 ce14.8 il14.0 hj
Leucanthemum vulgare17.0 ef448.8 fi44.3 eh20.9 ik10.8 ij
Mentha aquatica22.3 c1,061.7 bc256.0 ab86.7 de42.5 b
Paeonia officinalis13.9 gi1,930.5 a303.8 a226.2 a55.3 a
Primula veris18.8 de1,044.9 bc230.1 ab97.1 cd38.5 bc
Primula vulgaris9.8 jk602.9 dg127.4 bd41.7 gh21.5 df
Robinia pseudoacacia12.9 i203.8 jk15.7 i4.5 l2.4 m
Rosa canina16.7 ef1,396.6 ab257.5 ab146.2 b55.6 a
Rosa pendulina21.6 cd1,773.7 a253.8 ab154.3 b55.7 a
Salvia pratensis17.7 ef314.7 ij38.9 fh8.9 jl9.0 jl
Sambucus nigra16.8 ef508.7 eh78.8 cf28.5 hi18.3 fh
Taraxacum officinale16.5 ef159.4 k13.0 i7.7 kl3.3 lm
Trifolium alpinum10.0 jk464.6 fi91.5 ce50.3 gh20.3 eg
Viola odorata13.0 hi428.4 fi66.1 dg22.6 ij15.6 gi
Borago officinalis§15.3 fg163.4 k29.7 gi22.8 i3.7 km
Calendula officinalis§13.7 gi189.6 k22.6 hi3.6 l9.2 jk
Tagetes patula§10.7 j470.8 fi143.9 ad44.1 gh23.0 df
Tropaeolum majus§8.9 k355.8 hi45.3 eh14.8 il12.8 hj
p***************

Benzoic acids and cinnamic acids content (mg · 100 g−1) in 26 flower species_

SpeciesBenzoic acidsCinnamic acids


Ellagic acidGallic acidCaffeic acidChlorogenic acidCoumaric acidFerulic acid
Allium ursinum15.2 h0.1 c0.0 -0.0 -0.5 c357.3 a
Bellis perennis212.9 ad0.0 -15.6 ab0.0 -158.5 a0.0 -
Centaurea cyanus180.1 ad0.0 -0.1 d0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Cichorium intybus23.7 fh27.5 b0.0 -230.0 b148.5 a0.0 -
Dianthus carthusianorum278.5 ac27.6 b14.6 ab0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Dianthus pavonius214.4 ad0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Erythronium dens-canis20.4 gh0.0 -16.2 a275.5 a110.7 a20.9 bc
Geranium sylvaticum121.4 be0.0 -0.0 -244.1 b16.4 b0.0 -
Lavandula angustifolia122.8 be0.0 -11.7 c0.2 c0.0 -0.0 -
Leucanthemum vulgare63.2 dg0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Mentha aquatica153.8 bd0.0 -15.9 ab270.6 a113.8 a0.0 -
Paeonia officinalis589.2 a244.2 a13.9 b0.0 -0.0 -32.6 bc
Primula veris27.9 fh0.1 c15.2 ab0.0 -0.0 -43.9 b
Primula vulgaris16.3 h0.0 -16.3 a0.0 -0.0 -29.3 bc
Robinia pseudoacacia79.5 cf0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Rosa canina72.5 dg0.1 c0.0 -232.0 b0.0 -0.0 -
Rosa pendulina410.7 ab0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Salvia pratensis20.4 gh0.1 c0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Sambucus nigra27.1 fh0.1 c15.3 ab0.0 -112.0 a0.0 -
Taraxacum officinale28.2 fh0.0 -15.7 ab273.3 a0.0 -0.0 -
Trifolium alpinum34.6 eh0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.5 c0.2 c
Viola odorata26.2 fh0.0 -1.9 d0.0 -113.4 a0.2 c
Borago officinalis§0.1 i27.9 b0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Calendula officinalis§15.2 h0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Tagetes patula§150.1 bd0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -
Tropaeolum majus§214.3 ad0.0 -14.1 b241.2 b109.6 a0.0 -

Spearman’s correlation indexes between TPC, antioxidant activity (FRAP, DPPH and ABTS assays) and phenolic compounds recorded in the 26 edible flowers_

FRAPDPPHABTSCaffeic acidChlorogenic acidCoumaric acidFerulic acidHyperosideIsoquercitrinQuercetinQuercitrinRutinEllagic AcidGallic AcidCatechinEpicatechinVitamin C
TPC0.94**0.93**0.95**0.070.060.050.090.26*0.68**0.43**0.36**0.43**0.47**0.180.50**0.43**0.44**
FRAP10.93**0.96**0.090.090.060.040.23*0.65**0.40**0.26*0.40**0.49**0.210.56**0.49**0.37**
DPPH 10.93**0.010.070.010.090.220.68**0.33**0.30**0.42**0.40**0.31**0.49**0.37**0.41**
ABTS 10.070.150.070.050.25*0.67**0.36**0.29**0.38**0.47**0.190.52**0.47**0.44**
Caffeic acid 10.30**0.44**0.35**0.04−0.01−0.030.080.120.02−0.03−0.070.11−0.05
Chlorogenic acid 10.49**−0.07−0.030.040.22*0.060.01−0.04−0.060.35**0.21−0.01
Coumaric acid 1−0.12−0.08−0.07−0.040.020.05−0.05−0.060.090.40**−0.02
Ferulic acid 10.30**−0.03−0.030.170.32**−0.22*0.08−0.08−0.050.00
Hyperoside 10.48**−0.060.030.44**−0.170.140.110.13−0.05
Isoquercitrin 10.030.38**0.69**0.170.010.27*0.140.30**
Quercetin 1−0.09−0.080.29*0.060.70**0.200.02
Quercitrin 10.230.20−0.23*0.010.26*0.50**
Rutin 1−0.040.040.140.07−0.05
Ellagic acid 10.060.27*0.34**0.28*
Gallic acid 10.23*−0.09−0.12
Catechin 10.49**0.05
Epicatechin 10.04
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2021-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 48
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 3, 2021
Published on: Mar 2, 2021
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Sonia Demasi, Matteo Caser, Dario Donno, Simone Ravetto Enri, Michele Lonati, Valentina Scariot, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.