Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Differences in phenolic acids in soil substrates of forest deciduous tree species Cover

Differences in phenolic acids in soil substrates of forest deciduous tree species

Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Overview of the most important chemical groups of root exudates (not scaled)
Overview of the most important chemical groups of root exudates (not scaled)

Figure 2.

Illustration of the transport of organic acids through the last plasma membrane (the apoplastic transport) and its control by the concentration gradient
Illustration of the transport of organic acids through the last plasma membrane (the apoplastic transport) and its control by the concentration gradient

Figure 3.

Chemical structures of phenolic acids detected and analysed in our study
Chemical structures of phenolic acids detected and analysed in our study

Figure 4.

Basic scheme of the experiment from each seed through all seedlings in small and experimental pots (chronologically in the central row) to the soil solution
Basic scheme of the experiment from each seed through all seedlings in small and experimental pots (chronologically in the central row) to the soil solution

Figure 5.

Content of selected phenolic acids in the soil solution of focused trees (n = 3, mean ± st. dev.)
Content of selected phenolic acids in the soil solution of focused trees (n = 3, mean ± st. dev.)

Figure 6.

Relative content of phenolic acids detected in the soil solution of each tree compared to their sum in the control (100%)
Relative content of phenolic acids detected in the soil solution of each tree compared to their sum in the control (100%)

MANOVA analysis of the differences in acid contents among the tree species

Effect of SubjectValueNum DFDen DFF ValuePr>F
Wilks’ lambda0.0025.0031.2245.710.000
Pillai’s trace4.0525.0060.0010.220.000
Hotelling-Lawley trace248.2725.0012.1371.350.000
Roy’s greatest root188.405.0012.00452.170.000

Active and exchangeable pH and electrical conductance (κ) of the substrate (1:10 (w/v); mean ± st_ dev_, n = 3)

pH(H2O)pH(KCl)κ (mS/cm)
5.17±0.004.65±0.000.955±0.005

Total, bioavailable (CAT) and water-soluble fractions of selected elements in the substrate (mg/kg dry wt_; mean ± st_ dev_, n = 3)

FractionKCaMgPZnFeMnCu
Total2321±489655±1031748±42872±1174.1±2.82089±25462.5±8.66.03±0.21
CAT1272±4717±6585±1982.5±3.7508±14407.4±6.72.02±0.42
H2O808±8225±693±3572±50.952±0.0076.14±0.007.15±0.040.188±0.026

Tukey’s HSD test for 4-hydroxybenzoic acid among tree species indicating whether the values are statistically different at the significance level of α ≤ 0_05

Group 1Group 2p-valueRejectGroup 1Group 2p-valueReject
12345678
s4-hydroxybenzoic acidp-coumaric acid
APFS0.0000trueAPFS0.3396false
aPQR0.0000trueAPQR0.6966false
aPRP0.7967falseAPRP0.0002true
aPST0.0001trueAPST0.0331true
aPcontrol0.0000trueAPcontrol0.9609false
fSQR1.0000falseFSQR0.9827false
fSRP0.0000trueFSRP0.0000true
fSST0.1973falseFSST0.6792false
fScontrol0.0000trueFScontrol0.7731false
qRRP0.0000trueQRRP0.0000true
qRST0.2274falseQRST0.3260false
qRcontrol0.0000trueQRcontrol0.9845false
rPST0.0000trueRPST0.0000true
rPcontrol0.0003trueRPcontrol0.0001true
sTcontrol0.0000trueSTcontrol0.1253false
vanillic acidSalicylic acid
APFS0.0749falseAPFS0.1614false
aPQR1.0000falseAPQR0.2248false
aPRP0.0005trueAPRP0.6738false
aPST0.0000trueAPST0.9833false
aPcontrol0.0000trueAPcontrol0.0001true
fSQR0.0951falseFSQR0.0030true
fSRP0.0000trueFSRP0.0136true
fSST0.0024trueFSST0.4073false
fScontrol0.0000trueFScontrol0.0000true
qRRP0.0004trueQRRP0.9335false
qRST0.0000trueQRST0.0800false
qRcontrol0.0000trueQRcontrol0.0021true
rPST0.0000trueRPST0.3240false
rPcontrol0.0000trueRPcontrol0.0005true
sTcontrol0.0000trueSTcontrol0.0000true
Syringic acid
APFS0.0069true
APQR0.0001true
APRP0.9997false
APST0.0000true
APcontrol0.9031false
FSQR0.0509false
FSRP0.0110true
FSST0.0251true
FScontrol0.0384true
QRRP0.0001true
QRST0.9979false
QRcontrol0.0002true
RPST0.0000true
RPcontrol0.9727false
STcontrol0.0001true

Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients among the organic acids

HBAVASyApCASaA
HBA 0.842*0.783*0.4210.702*
VA 0.5390.2380.881**
SyA 0.5950.284
pCA 0.199

Content of mineral nitrogen forms, total organic carbon (TOC) and humic substances (HS), the degree of polymerisation (DP) and the humification index (HI) of the dry substrate (mean ± st_ dev_; n = 3)

N-NH4 (mg/kg)N-NO3 (mg/kg)TOC (% C)HS (% C)DP (HA : FA)HI (HA : TOC)
1421.5±2.636.6±5.213.4±0.36.14±0.031.80±0.060.231
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2024-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 270 - 284
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2023
Accepted on: May 6, 2024
Published on: Sep 12, 2024
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Michal Jakl, Ivan Kuneš, Sanja Ćavar Zeljković, Petr Tarkowski, Jana Jaklová Dytrtová, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.