Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Energetic and Fractographic Investigation of Crack Growth Under Variable Amplitude Loading Cover

Energetic and Fractographic Investigation of Crack Growth Under Variable Amplitude Loading

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Schematic of a compact tension specimen.
Schematic of a compact tension specimen.

Figure 2.

Schematic of crack opening displacement δ.
Schematic of crack opening displacement δ.

Figure 3.

Reduced spectrum studied.
Reduced spectrum studied.

Figure 4.

(a) Testing machine; (b) crack opening displacement gauge (CODG).
(a) Testing machine; (b) crack opening displacement gauge (CODG).

Figure 5.

(a) Schematic diagram of P – δ and P – δ′; (b) curve fitting method (Stoychev & Kajawski, 2003).
(a) Schematic diagram of P – δ and P – δ′; (b) curve fitting method (Stoychev & Kajawski, 2003).

Figure 6.

Crack closure measurement system.
Crack closure measurement system.

Figure 7.

Diagram P–δ hysteresis energy measurements under CAL (Benguediab, 1989).
Diagram P–δ hysteresis energy measurements under CAL (Benguediab, 1989).

Figure 8.

Diagram P – δ hysteresis energy measurements under VAL; (a) Sp. A. (b) Sp. C (Benguediab, 1989).
Diagram P – δ hysteresis energy measurements under VAL; (a) Sp. A. (b) Sp. C (Benguediab, 1989).

Figure 9.

(a) 1 – Ductile striations S1, 2 – brittle striations S2, 5 – Dimples D2; (b) 3 – Quasi-cleavage, 4 – Dimples D1.
(a) 1 – Ductile striations S1, 2 – brittle striations S2, 5 – Dimples D2; (b) 3 – Quasi-cleavage, 4 – Dimples D1.

Figure 10.

Example of typical dimple D2, with magnified inset.
Example of typical dimple D2, with magnified inset.

Figure 11.

The relation between da/dN vs. ∆ K and between da/dN vs. Kmax.
The relation between da/dN vs. ∆ K and between da/dN vs. Kmax.

Figure 12.

Area distribution of striations and dimples.
Area distribution of striations and dimples.

Figure 13.

Repartition of features at da/dN = 5 × 10−7m/cycle; (a) R=0.10; (b) R=0.70.
Repartition of features at da/dN = 5 × 10−7m/cycle; (a) R=0.10; (b) R=0.70.

Figure 14.

Evolution of the crack growth rate da/dN vs. the energy dissipated Q.
Evolution of the crack growth rate da/dN vs. the energy dissipated Q.

Figure 15.

Evolution of the energy dissipated per cycle vs. Kmax.
Evolution of the energy dissipated per cycle vs. Kmax.

Figure 16.

Δa/block vs. Kmax.
Δa/block vs. Kmax.

Figure 17.

Evolution of the crack growth rate da/block vs. the energy dissipated Q.
Evolution of the crack growth rate da/block vs. the energy dissipated Q.

Figure 18.

Evolution of US with respect to Kmax.
Evolution of US with respect to Kmax.

Figure 19.

Area distribution of fractographic characteristics: (a) striations; (b) dimples.
Area distribution of fractographic characteristics: (a) striations; (b) dimples.

Figure 20.

Slip markings observed at low Kmax values (Kmax=13.50 MPa.m1/2 Spectrum D).
Slip markings observed at low Kmax values (Kmax=13.50 MPa.m1/2 Spectrum D).

Figure 20.

Ratio of Δs (spacing between markings) to Δa (macroscopic crack advance) as function of Kmax for VAL tests.
Ratio of Δs (spacing between markings) to Δa (macroscopic crack advance) as function of Kmax for VAL tests.

Mechanical properties of the aluminum alloy 2024 T351_

yield stress (MPa)ultimate tensile strength (MPa)elongation (%)cyclic strength coefficient, K′ (MPa)Hardening coefficient, n
31852412.86520.104

Transition-related parameters_

R0.010.100.330.540.70
T1ΔK87.5665
Kmax8.58.591215
da/dN10−810−88 × 10−97.5 × 10−98 × 10−9
T2ΔK1211977
Kmax1212121523.3
da/dN1.30 × 10−71.30 × 10−71.70 × 10−77.2 × 10−82 × 10−7
T3ΔK19.818211312
Kmax2020312837
da/dN3 × 10−63 × 10−61.6 × 10−67 × 10−74 × 10−7

Lifespan in number of blocks and relative error_

BlockNumber of blocksError (%)
AMeasured Maachou et al. (2016) Present model Elber (1976)75120683236945492981-9.047.5423.77
BMeasured Maachou et al. (2016) Present model Elber (1976)23900111962616131060-53.159.4629.95
CMeasured Maachou et al. (2016) Present model Elber (1976)9600111531020810713-16.176.3311.60
DMeasured Maachou et al. (2016) Present model Elber (1976)5500367051515883-33.276.356.96

Nomenclature

symbolsDesignationssymbolsDesignations
da/dNCrack growth rate (m/cycle)QiEnergy dissipated per cycle i
Aa dimensionless constantQenvEnclosed energy (total area enclosed by all the cycles)
AElongation (%)RLoad Ratio
BThickness (mm)S1, S2Ductile and brittle Striations
D1, D2DimplesUSSpecific energy (J/m2)
Kmin, KmaxMinimal and maximal stress intensity factor (MPa.m1/2)WWidth (mm)
KCyclic strength coefficient (MPa)αThe maximum specimen compliance during a cycle and Po
ΔKAmplitude stress intensity factor (MPa.m1/2)δ, δCrack opening displacement (mm) and differential crack opening (mm)
LLength (mm)γEnergy necessary for creating surface (J/m2)
nHardening coefficientμShear modulus, MPa
Pmin, PmaxMinimum and maximum load (N)σcCritical stress at fracture MPa
PoCrack opening load (N)σuUltimate tensile strength (MPa)
Qhysteretic energy dissipated (J/cycle)σyyield stress (MPa)

Nominal composition of the aluminum alloy 2024 T351_

ElementSiFeCuMnMgCrZnTiAl
Mean %0.900.224.460.661.50.010.040.02rest

Loading conditions under constant amplitude loading_

R0.010.100.330.540.70
Pmin (daN)464050158178324588
Pmax (daN)400600400500480540600840
ΔP (daN)396594360450322362276252

Different load levels with specific steps_

Type of spectrumLevel 1Pmin = 80 daNPmax = 150 daNR=0.53Level 2Pmin = 160 daNPmax = 392 daNR = 0.41Level 3Pmin = 323 daNPmax = 600 daNR = 0.54Level 4Pmin = 138 daNPmax = 323 daNR = 0.43
N1N2N3N4
A1111
B1010102
C1010502
D10101002

Repartition of features at da/dN = 5 × 10−7 m/cycle_

R0.100.70
% Striations6030
% Dimples1530
Kmax [MPa.m1/2]1331.27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2025-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2300-7591 | Journal ISSN: 2081-7738
Language: English
Published on: Nov 14, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Mohamed Benguediab, Tayeb Kebir, Abdelkader Lahcene, Hichem Mebarki, Soumia Benguediab, Mustapha Benachour, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT