Examining validity in computerized dynamic assessment
By:
References
- Aljaafreh, Ali, James P. Lantolf (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78: 465–483.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
- Chapelle, Carol A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on Applied Linguistics in the Age of Information and Communication Technology. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.7
- Chapelle, Carol A., Dan Douglas (2006). Assessing Language Through Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733116
- Birjandi, Parviz, Saman Ebadi (2012). Microgenesis in dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ sociocognitive development via web 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32: 34–39.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.006
- Feuerstein, Reuven, Ya’acov Rand, John E. Rynders (1988). Don’t Accept Me As I Am: Helping “Retarded” People to Excel. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-6128-0
- Frederiksen, John R., Alan Collins (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher 18(9): 27-32.10.3102/0013189X018009027
- Jacobs, Ellen L. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly 22: 217–226.10.1177/152574010102200407
- Lantolf, James P., Matthew E. Poehner (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 49–74.10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
- Lantolf, James P., Steve L. Thorne (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lin, Zheng (2010). Interactive dynamic assessment with children learning EFL in kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal 37: 279–287.10.1007/s10643-009-0356-6
- Loevinger, Jane (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports 3: 635-694 (Monograph supplement 9).10.2466/PR0.3.7.635-694
- McNamara, Tim (1997). “Interaction” in second language performance assessment. Whose performance? Applied Linguistics 18, 446-466.10.1093/applin/18.4.446
- McNamara, Tim (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing 18(4): 333-349.10.1177/026553220101800402
- Messick, Samuel (1980). Test validity and ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35.11: 1012-1027.10.1037/0003-066X.35.11.1012
- Messick, Samuel (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher 18(2): 5-11.10.3102/0013189X018002005
- Messick, Samuel (1990). Validity of test interpretation and use. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service. ETS-RR-90-1110.1002/j.2333-8504.1990.tb01343.x
- Messick, Samuel (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing 13: 241-256.10.1177/026553229601300302
- Moss, Pamela A. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice 22.4: 13-25.10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00140.x
- Poehner, Matthew E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal 91: 323–340.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
- Poehner, Matthew E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting Second Language Development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9
- Poehner, Matthew E. (2011). Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 dynamic assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21(2): 244-263.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277.x
- Poehner, Matthew E., James P. Lantolf (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (CDA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3): 323–342.10.1177/1362168813482935
- Porte, Graeme Keith (2010). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning: A Practical Approach to Critical Analysis of Quantitative Research (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.28
- Ratner, Carl (1997). Cultural Psychology: Theory and Methods. New York: Plenum.
- Shabani, Karim (2012). Dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ reading comprehension processes: A Vygotskian perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32: 321-328.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.047
- Shrestha, Prithvi, Caroline Coffin (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing 17: 55–70.10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003
- Sternberg, Robert J., Elena L. Grigorenko (2002). Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Teo, Adeline, Fu Jen (2012). Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning and Technology, 16.3: 10-20.
- Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2018-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2303-4858
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 70
Submitted on: Jan 22, 2018
Accepted on: Feb 27, 2018
Published on: Jan 25, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Zaha Alonazi, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.