Rouhani’s and Obama’s Persian New Year messages: A systemic functional grammar perspective
By:
References
- Bayram, Fatih (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. Arecls 7: 23-40.
- Brown, Gillian, George Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Coffin, Caroline (2006). English Grammar in Context: Book 3 - Getting Practical (Evaluating Everyday Texts). The Open University.
- Fairclough, Isabela, Norman Fairclough (2013). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
- Halliday, Michael (1994). Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, Michael (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3): 322-361.
- Halliday, Michael, Christian Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.
- Karami, Arash (2014). ‘We’re Worried’ conference against nuclear deal stirs backlash. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/05/iran-anti-nucleardeal-conference-backlash.html. (last access 01/05/2016).
- Karimnia, Amin, Leila Barbareh (2017). Moves, poetic types, poetic schemes, and cultural themes in Iranian obituaries. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 12: 290-305.
- Mahdavi, Seyedamir Hossein (2014). Worried or valiant? The dialectic between Iran’s nuclear negotiations and its domestic politics. Middle East Brief, Brandeis University, Crown Center for Middle East Studies 8: 1-8.
- O’Halloran, Kieran (2006). English Grammar in Context, Book 2: Getting Inside English. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
- Renkema, Jan (2009). Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Saragih, Amrin (2010). Introducing Systemic Functional Grammar of English. Medan: FBS UNIMED
- Stojičić, Violeta, Nikoleta Momčilović (2016). Verbal derivatives and process types in transitivity configurations of English and German clauses. Linguistics and Literature 14(1): 15-24.
- Tavakoli, Mahboobeh, Amin Karimnia (2017). Dominant and gender-specific tendencies in the use of discourse markers: Insights from EFL learners. World Journal of English Language 7(2): 1-9.
- Titscher, Stefan, Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak, Eva Vetter (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. UK: Sage Publications.
- Wodak, Ruth. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Wodak, Ruth, Michael Mayer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63-94.
- Yarmohammadi, Lotfollah (2007). ?ertebatat ?æz mænzær-e gofteman shenasi-ye ?enteqadi (Communications from Critical Discourse Perspective). Tehran: Hermes.
- Zhuanglin, Hu (1988). A Course of Linguistics. Beijing: Peking University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2018-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2303-4858
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 39
Submitted on: Nov 30, 2017
Accepted on: Jan 16, 2018
Published on: Jan 25, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Amin Karimnia, Shidak Rahbarian, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.