References
- Admiraal, W. (2022). A typology of educators using open educational resources for teaching. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60
- Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.
- Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OERs) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
- Baas, M., van der Rijst, R., Huizinga, T., van den Berg, E., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessment of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857
- Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OERs adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
- Belikov, O., & McLure, M. (2020). A qualitative analysis of open textbook reviews. The International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 3(2), 77-114. https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.2.6
- Bliss, T., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OERs COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04
- Bugler, D., Marple, S., Burr, E., Chen-Gaddini, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). How teachers judge the quality of instructional materials. WestEd. https://www.wested.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/resource-selecting-instructional-materials-brief-1-quality.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
- Clarà, M., & Mauri, T. (2010). Toward a dialectic relation between the results in CSCL: Three critical methodological aspects of content analysis schemes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9078-4
- Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2011). User-oriented quality for OERs: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x
- Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER. Open Praxis, 9(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.571
- Creative Commons. (2017). State of the commons. https://stateof.creativecommons.org. (Accessed 11 May 2023).
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
- De los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40.
- Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open education resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–41.
- Haughey, M., & Muirhead, B. (2005). Evaluating learning objects for schools. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 8(1).
- Hood, N., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 1583–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z
- Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/37351085.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
- Jung, I., Sasaki, T., & Latchem, C. A. (2016). A framework for assessing fitness for purpose in open educational resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0002-5
- Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341
- Kurilovas, E., Bireniene, V., & Serikoviene, S. (2011). Methodology for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 9(1), 39–51.
- Kursun, E., Cagiltay, K., & Can, G. (2014). An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 14–32.
- Leighton, R. H., & Griffioen, D. M. E. (2021). Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872530
- Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2017). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438
- Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
- Maine, F., Cook, V., & Lähdesmäki, T. (2019). Reconceptualizing cultural literacy as a dialogic practice. London Review of Education, 17(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.3.12
- Mayweg-Paus, E., Zimmermann, M., & Ruwe, T. (2021). DIALLS Dataset of evaluations of Open Educational Resources – The Cultural Literacy Learning Programme resources [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5553923
- Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107
- Nikoi, S. K., Rowlett, T., Armellini, A., & Witthaus, G. (2011). CORRE: A framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.611681
- Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OERs) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OERs-projects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472
- Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2017). The most reasonable answer: Helping students build better arguments. Harvard Education Press.
- Richter, T., & Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Barriers and motivators for using open educational resources in schools. eLearning Papers, 23, 1–7.
- Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A selfdetermination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584
- Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777
- Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., & Chang, T.-W. (2023). The evolution of sustainability models for open educational resources: Insights from the literature and experts. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507
- Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). Learning to be open: Instructor growth through open pedagogy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1970520
- Wiley, D. (2007). On the sustainability of Open Educational Resource initiatives in higher education: Paper commissioned by the OECD’s centre for educational research and innovation (CERI). OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), 21. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/9/38645447.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
- Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133–147.
- Zawacki-Richter, O., & Mayrberger, K. (2017). Qualität von OER. Internationale Bestandsaufnahme von Instrumenten zur Qualitätssicherung von open educational resources (OER) – Schritte zu einem deutschen Modell am Beispiel der Hamburg Open Online University. Sonderband zum Fachmagazin Synergie. Universität Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.25592/978.3.924330.61.3