Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Teacher evaluations of open educational resources designed to support dialogic cultural literacy learning in schools Cover

Teacher evaluations of open educational resources designed to support dialogic cultural literacy learning in schools

European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning
Volume 25 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Admiraal, W. (2022). A typology of educators using open educational resources for teaching. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 1–23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OERs) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Baas, M., van der Rijst, R., Huizinga, T., van den Berg, E., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessment of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100857. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OERs adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Belikov, O., & McLure, M. (2020). A qualitative analysis of open textbook reviews. The International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 3(2), 77-114. <a href="https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.2.6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.2.6</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bliss, T., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OERs COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), 1–25. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Bugler, D., Marple, S., Burr, E., Chen-Gaddini, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). How teachers judge the quality of instructional materials. WestEd. https://www.wested.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/resource-selecting-instructional-materials-brief-1-quality.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Clarà, M., & Mauri, T. (2010). Toward a dialectic relation between the results in CSCL: Three critical methodological aspects of content analysis schemes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 117–136. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9078-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9078-4</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2011). User-oriented quality for OERs: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4–14. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER. Open Praxis, 9(2), 151–171. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.571" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.571</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Creative Commons. (2017). State of the commons. https://stateof.creativecommons.org. (Accessed 11 May 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14–23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. De los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open education resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–41.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Haughey, M., & Muirhead, B. (2005). Evaluating learning objects for schools. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 8(1).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Hood, N., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 1583–1604. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/37351085.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Jung, I., Sasaki, T., & Latchem, C. A. (2016). A framework for assessing fitness for purpose in open educational resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(3), 1–11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0002-5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0002-5</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 39–57. <a href="https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kurilovas, E., Bireniene, V., & Serikoviene, S. (2011). Methodology for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 9(1), 39–51.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Kursun, E., Cagiltay, K., & Can, G. (2014). An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 14–32.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Leighton, R. H., & Griffioen, D. M. E. (2021). Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872530" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872530</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2017). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 499–510. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140–158. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Maine, F., Cook, V., & Lähdesmäki, T. (2019). Reconceptualizing cultural literacy as a dialogic practice. London Review of Education, 17(3), 383–392. <a href="https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.3.12" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.3.12</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Mayweg-Paus, E., Zimmermann, M., & Ruwe, T. (2021). DIALLS Dataset of evaluations of Open Educational Resources – The Cultural Literacy Learning Programme resources [Data set]. Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5553923" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5553923</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Nikoi, S. K., Rowlett, T., Armellini, A., & Witthaus, G. (2011). CORRE: A framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(3), 191–207. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.611681" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.611681</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OERs) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OERs-projects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 122–140. <a href="https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2017). The most reasonable answer: Helping students build better arguments. Harvard Education Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Richter, T., & Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Barriers and motivators for using open educational resources in schools. eLearning Papers, 23, 1–7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A selfdetermination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 1–13. <a href="https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., & Chang, T.-W. (2023). The evolution of sustainability models for open educational resources: Insights from the literature and experts. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1421–1436. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). Learning to be open: Instructor growth through open pedagogy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 1–14. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1970520" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1970520</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Wiley, D. (2007). On the sustainability of Open Educational Resource initiatives in higher education: Paper commissioned by the OECD’s centre for educational research and innovation (CERI). OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), 21. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/9/38645447.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133–147.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Mayrberger, K. (2017). Qualität von OER. Internationale Bestandsaufnahme von Instrumenten zur Qualitätssicherung von open educational resources (OER) – Schritte zu einem deutschen Modell am Beispiel der Hamburg Open Online University. Sonderband zum Fachmagazin Synergie. Universität Hamburg. <a href="https://doi.org/10.25592/978.3.924330.61.3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.25592/978.3.924330.61.3</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2023-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 136 - 147
Published on: Aug 5, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Open educational resources,
Teachers’ evaluation of learning materials,
Dialogic practice,
Cultural literacy learning,
Self-regulated use of OER
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Curriculum and pedagogy,
Education, other

© 2023 Maria Zimmermann, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus, Theresa Ruwe, Fiona Maine, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)Next article