Skip to main content

The Grounds for Higher Education Teachers to Engage in MOOC Development Projects Cover

The Grounds for Higher Education Teachers to Engage in MOOC Development Projects

European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning

Volume 22 (2019): Issue 2

By: Ulf Olsson

Open Access

|Jan 2020

Abstract

The conditions for higher education teachers operating in a technology-enhanced education setting and an open educational context – such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) – are different when compared to traditional teaching methods (e.g. in a lecture hall). This study investigates the grounds for 20 teachers at Swedish Higher education institutions to be involved in MOOC development projects. Six categories are found and described; including curiosity, merits, teaching development, flexibility, as well as the possibility to disseminate their research and expand their professional networks. Interviewees believed that the work was a viable way to strengthen their research portfolio, while also making a limited effort for teaching, enhancing the dissemination possibilities and strengthening their research networks.

Abstrakt

Det är stor skillnad för lärare inom högre utbildning att undervisa i öppna nätbaserade kurser jämfört med traditionella föreläsningar och klassrumsundervisning. Denna studie undersöker motiven för 20 lärare vid svenska universitet att engagera sig i projekt för att utveckla och undervisa i Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Sex kategorier identifierades: Nyfikenhet; meriterande; utvecklande för deras undervisning; Flexibilitet; möjlighet att sprida egna forskningsresultat; och utöka deras professionella nätverk. Lärarna motiverade sitt arbete med att det var ett sätt att stärka sina forskningsmeriter genom en begränsad undervisningsinsats och att kunna sprida sina forskningsresultat och stärka sina respektive nätverk.

References

1. Acker, F. van, Buuren, H. van, & Kreijns, K. (2013). Resources : A Social Exchange Perspective Sharing OER as a Social Exchange Process. In R. McGreal, W. Kinuthia, & S. Marshall (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice (pp. 177-192). Commonwealth of Learning, Athabasca University. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/pub_PS_OERIRP_web.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Arcos, B. de los, Faems, B., Comas-Quinn, A., & Pulker, H. (2017). Teachers’ Use and Acceptance of Gamification and Social Networking Features of an Open Repository. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Bachy, S., & Louvain, U. de. (2014). TPDK, a new definition of the TPACK model for a University. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(2), 15–39.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Çakıroğlu, Ü., Gökoğlu, S., & Öztürk, M. (2017). Pre-service Computer Teachers’ Tendencies towards the Use of Mobile Technologies: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Cox, G. (2016). Explaining the relations between culture, structure and agency in lecturers’ contribution and non-contribution to Open Educational Resources in a Higher Education Institution. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the School of Edu. University of Cape Town.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Cronin, C. I. (2018). Openness and Praxis: A Situated Study of Academic Staff Meaning-making and Decision-making with Respect to Openness and Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/handle/10379/7276
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Evans, S., & Gall, J. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (2007). Challenging e-learning in the university : a literacies perspective. McGraw Hill Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Hammersley, M. (2011). Methodology : who needs it? Los Angeles: SAGE.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Karunanayaka, S. P., Naidu, S., Rajendra, J. C. N., & Ariadurai, S. A. (2018). Designing Continuing Professional Development MOOCs to promote the adoption of OER and OEP. Open Praxis, 10(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.826
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Kilis, S., Gülbahar, Y., & Rapp, C. (2016). Exploration of Teaching Preferences of Instructors’ use of Social Media. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 19(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Kolowich, S. (2013, March 18). The Professors behind the MOOC. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Kreber, C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902953048
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K., Mitchell, R., Warburton, S., & Williams, S. A. (2019). A MOOC Taxonomy Based on Classification Schemes of MOOCs. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 22(1), 85-103.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. McNaughton, S. M., & Billot, J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1163669
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2016). In search for the open educator: Proposal of a definition and a framework to increase openness adoption among university educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V17I6.2736
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Olsson, U. (2017). Higher Education Lecturers Lived Experience of Going Public in MOOCs. Open Praxis, 9(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.589
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Price, D. (2015, April 16). What Will Education Look Like in a More Open Future? | MindShift | KQED News [Blog post]. Retrieved February 21, 2019, from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/40074/what-will-education-look-like-in-a-more-open-future
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Pundak, D., & Dvir, Y. (2014). Engineering College Lecturers Reluctance to Adopt Online Courses. Retrieved September. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14395
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Roth, M. (2013). My Modern Experience Teaching a MOOC. Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(34), B18–B21. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/My-Modern-MOOC-Experience/138781
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Salmon, G. (2014). Learning Innovation: A Framework for Transformation. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 17(2), 219–235.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research, 51(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880903354741
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing roles for Educators and Designers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Stöhr, C., Stathakarou, N., Mueller, F., Nifakos, S., & McGrath, C. (2019). Videos as learning objects in MOOCs: A study of specialist and non-specialist participants’ video activity in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12623
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Wannemacher, K., & Jungermann, I. (2015). MOOCs from the Instructors’ Perspective Klaus. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2015, 81–85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Weller, M., & Anderson, T. (2013). Digital resilience in higher education. European Journal of Distance and E-learning, 2013(I). Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/36988/1/Weller_Anderson.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Zheng, S., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Ask the Instructors: Motivations and Challenges of Teaching Massive Open Online Courses. Proceedings of the 19^th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing – CSCW’ 16, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820082
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 145 - 156

Published on: Jan 24, 2020

Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

Higher education,

Open educational practises,

Open education,

© 2020 Ulf Olsson, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 22 (2019): Issue 2

Previous article