Transactional Distance among Open University Students: How Does it Affect the Learning Process?

Kassandrinou, Amanda; Angelaki, Christina; Mavroidis, Ilias

doi:10.2478/eurodl-2014-0002

Abstract

This study examines the presence of transactional distance among students, the factors affecting it, as well as the way it influences the learning process of students in a blended distance learning setting in Greece. The present study involved 12 postgraduate students of the Hellenic Open University (HOU). A qualitative research was conducted, using information collected via individual semi-structured interviews. Content analysis of the gathered information provided evidence regarding the existence of student-student transactional distance for several reasons, such as geographical and relatively limited face to face interaction. The role of the tutor as well as of the course provider were also examined in this respect. Finally the study indicated that the existence of perceived transactional distance among the students has a negative effect on their learning process.

References

1. Anastasiades, P. and Iliadou, C. (2010). Communication between tutors- students in DL. A case study of the Hellenic Open University. In European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 13(2). Retrieved on April 10, 2012 from: http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?p=archives&year=2010&halfyear=2&article=407
Search in Google Scholar
2. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/14910.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
Search in Google Scholar
3. Anderson, T. and Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), (pp. 80-97).10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Search in Google Scholar
4. Angelaki, C. and Mavroidis, I. (2013). Communication and Social Presence: The impact on adult Learners’ emotions in distance learning. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e- Learning, 16(1), (pp. 78-93). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2013/Angelaki_Mavroidis.pdf
Search in Google Scholar
5. Barker, S. (2003). Introducing group work and communication skills for external students: an analysis of the use of asynchronous online tools. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (eds.), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Adelaide, 7-10 December 2003.
Search in Google Scholar
6. Benson, R. and Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design. In Distance Education, 30(1), (pp. 5-21).10.1080/01587910902845972
Search in Google Scholar
7. Bird, M.; Hammersley, M.; Gomm, R. and Woods, P. (1999). Educational Research in Practice.Study Manual. Patras, HOU Press.
Search in Google Scholar
8. Bischoff, W.R. (1993). Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implications for professional education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Bischoff, W.R.; Bisconer, S.W.; Kooker, B.M. and Woods, L.C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. In American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), (pp. 4-19).10.1080/08923649609526937
Search in Google Scholar
10. Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological issues and practices in qualitative research. In The Library Quarterly, 63(1), (pp. 431-449).
Search in Google Scholar
11. Chen, Y.J. (2001a). Transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environments. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), (pp. 327-338).10.1080/14703290110074533
Search in Google Scholar
12. Chen, Y.J. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environment: A factor analysis. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), (pp. 459-470).10.1111/1467-8535.00213
Search in Google Scholar
13. Chen, Y.J. and Willits, F.K. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), (pp. 51-65).
Search in Google Scholar
14. Clair, R.S. and Fite, S. (2005). Far off Voices: Social Capital and Distance Education. In A.Lionarakis (ed), 1st Panhellenic Conference for Open and Distance Education. Pedagogical and Technological Applications. Conference Proceedings. Vol. A, (pp.13-19). Athens : Propompos.
Search in Google Scholar
15. Cohen, L.; Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. 6th edition.Routledge.10.4324/9780203029053
Search in Google Scholar
16. Conrad, D. (2005). Building and Maintaining Community in Cohort -Based Online Learning.In Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), (pp. 1-20).
Search in Google Scholar
17. Dabbagh, N. (2004). Distance learning: emerging pedagogical issues and learning designs. In Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(1), (pp. 37-49).
Search in Google Scholar
18. Deschenes, A.J. (1996). Un programme d’initiation a la formation a distance de type constructiviste: Un réseau de communication pour l’apprentissage. In Distances, 1(2), (pp. 15-34). Retrieved on June 8, 2012 from http://cqfd.teluq.uquebec.ca/distances/D1_2_c.pdf
Search in Google Scholar
19. Dewey, J. and Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the Known. Beacon Press, Boston.
Search in Google Scholar
20. Dron, J.; Seidel, C. and Litten, G. (2004). Transactional distance in a blended learning environment. In ALT-F: Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), (pp. 163-174).
Search in Google Scholar
21. Dron,J. (2006). Social software and the emergence of control. In Proceedings of the sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), (pp. 41-45). Kerkra, The Netherlands IEEE.10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652589
Search in Google Scholar
22. Dron, J. (2007a). Control and Constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.10.4018/978-1-59904-390-6
Search in Google Scholar
23. Dron, J. (2007b). Designing the undesignable. Social software and control. In Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), (pp. 60-71).
Search in Google Scholar
24. Farquhar, L. (2013). The intersection of dialogue and low transactional distance: considerations for Higher Education. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(2), 28-39. http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2013&halfyear=2&article=581
Search in Google Scholar
25. Force, D. (2004). Relationships among transactional distance variables in asynchronous computer conferences: A correlational study. Unpublished Master Thesis Athabasca University.
Search in Google Scholar
26. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for Distance Education in the 21st century: A swift from structural to transactional issues. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), Retrieved on October 10, 2011 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/2/2210.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2
Search in Google Scholar
27. Garrison, D.R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. In Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), (pp. 93-104).
Search in Google Scholar
28. Giossos, I. (2009). Validity and reliability of transactional distance in the framework of Hellenic Open University. Dissertation. Course: Studies in Education, School of Humanities, Patras, Hellenic Open University. (in Greek with English abstract)
Search in Google Scholar
29. Giossos, I.; Mavroidis, I. and Koutsouba, M. (2008). Research in distance education: review and perspectives. In Open Education, 4(1), (pp. 49-60). In Greek with English abstract.
Search in Google Scholar
30. Giossos, I.; Koutsouba, M.; Lionarakis, A. and Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance Theory. In European Journal of Open Distance and ELearning, 2009(2), (pp. 1-6).
Search in Google Scholar
31. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the Theoretical Impasse: Extending the applications of Transactional Distance Theory. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, (9)3.10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.541
Search in Google Scholar
32. Gunawardena, C.N. and McIsaac, M.S. (2004). Distance Education. In D.H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications & technology, (pp. 355-395), (2nd Edition).London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Search in Google Scholar
33. Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the Course: A study in online student satisfaction and retention.In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4).
Search in Google Scholar
34. Hillman, D.C.; Willis, D.J. and Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner interface Interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and Strategies for practitioners. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), (pp. 30-42).10.1080/08923649409526853
Search in Google Scholar
35. Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of Web-based instruction in the context of distance education. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), (pp. 525-534).10.1111/1467-8535.00222
Search in Google Scholar
36. Kanuka, H.; Collet, D. and Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), (pp. 151-167).10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_3
Search in Google Scholar
37. Lemone, K. (2005). Analysing Cultural Influences on E-Learning Transactional Issues. In G.Richards (ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005, (pp. 2637-2644). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Search in Google Scholar
38. Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Liang, G.; Song, J.; Liao, J.; Li, G. and Lin, M. (2004). Comparison of ELearning in Distance Education in Different Cultural Settings. In G. Richards (ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, (pp. 370-374). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Search in Google Scholar
39. Loizidou-Hatzitheodoulou, P.; Vasala, P.; Kakouris, Α.; Mavroidis, I.; Tassios, T. (2001).Types of communication in distance learning and their contribution to the educational process. The case of the students of the postgraduate module “Open and Distance Education” of HOU. In the Proceedings - 1st Panhellenic Conference for Open and Distance Education (in Greek with English abstract).
Search in Google Scholar
40. Mavroidis, I.; Karatrantou, A.; Koutsouba, M.; Giossos, Y.; Papadakis, S. (2013). Technology Acceptance and Social Presence in Distance Education. A case Study on the Use of Teleconference at a Postgraduate Course of the Hellenic Open University. In European Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 16(2). Retrieved on November 27, 2013 from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2013&halfyear=2&article=590
Search in Google Scholar
41. Moore, M.G. (1997). Theory of Transactional distance. In D. Keegan (ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, (pp. 22-38). New York: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar
42. Moore, M. and Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A systems review. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Search in Google Scholar
43. Moss, D. (2004). Creating space for learning: Conceptualising women & higher education through space & time. In Gender & Education, 16(3), (pp. 283-362).10.1080/09540250042000251452
Search in Google Scholar
44. Μüller, T. (2008). Persistence of Women in on line Degree Completion Programs. In International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9(2), (pp. 1-18).
Search in Google Scholar
45. Parrott, S. (1995). Future Learning: Distance Education in Community Colleges. ERIC Digest No.ED385311.
Search in Google Scholar
46. Pavlakis, A. and Kaitelidou, D. (2012) Burnout Syndrome in Students of a Distance Learning Program: The Open University of Cyprus Experience. In European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 15(1). Retrieved on March 8, 2013 from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=1&article=485
Search in Google Scholar
47. Richardson, C.J. and Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning & satisfaction. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), (pp. 68-88).
Search in Google Scholar
48. Rovai, A.P. and Baker, J.D. (2005). Gender Differences in Online Learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. In Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), (pp. 31-44).
Search in Google Scholar
49. Saba, F. and Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), (pp. 36-59).10.1080/08923649409526844
Search in Google Scholar
50. Saenz, B.L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of Social Presence and its value in Asynchronous Web-based Master’s Instructional Program. PhD Thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Search in Google Scholar
51. Sarakatsanou, E. (2007). Tutor-Student Communication at the Hellenic Open University. Students perceptions of two postgraduate course: Studies in Education and Adult Education. M.Ed Dissertation.Patras, Hellenic Open University (in Greek with English abstract).
Search in Google Scholar
52. Simpson, O. (2003). Student retention in online, open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page.10.4324/9780203416563
Search in Google Scholar
53. Stein, S.D.; Wanstreet, E.C.; Calvin, J.; Overtoom, C. and Wheaton, E.J. (2005). Bridging the Transactional Distance Gap in Online Learning Environments. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), (pp. 105-118).10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4
Search in Google Scholar
54. Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. In Computers & Education, 46(4), (pp. 349-370).10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010
Search in Google Scholar
55. Terre Blanche, M.; Durrheim, K. and Painter, D. (eds.) (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
Search in Google Scholar
56. Tait, A. (2003). Reflection on Student Support in Open & Distance Learning. In The International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 4(1). Retrieved on February 2, 2011 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/134/214
Search in Google Scholar
57. Tzoutza, S. (2010). Face-to-face tutorials: The views of postgraduate students and their tutors at the Hellenic Open University. The case of postgraduate course on “Open and Distance Education” at Hellenic Open University. In Open Education, 6(1-2), (pp. 46-65). In Greek with English abstract.
Search in Google Scholar
58. Terhemba, N. (2006). Interactivity in distance education: The National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) experience. In Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education - TOJDE, (7)4, Article 9. Retrieved on May 25, 2012 from: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde24/articles/article_9.htm
Search in Google Scholar
59. Wilson, Τ. and Whitelock, D. (1998). What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? In Computers & Education, 36(3/4), (pp. 259-269).
Search in Google Scholar
60. Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction. PhD Thesis. Virginia Commonwealth University.
Search in Google Scholar

Transactional Distance among Open University Students: How Does it Affect the Learning Process?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account