Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Disinformation, Misinformation and the Agri-Food Sector Cover

Disinformation, Misinformation and the Agri-Food Sector

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Ali, R. N. – Rubin, H. – Sarkar, S. Countering the potential re-emergence of a deadly infectious disease – Information warfare, identifying strategic threats, launching countermeasures. In PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 8. [online]. [cit. 15. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0256014
  2. Baptista, J. P. – Gradim, A. 2022. A Working Definition of Fake News. In Encyclopedia, vol. 2, 2022, no. 1, pp. 632–645. [online]. [cit. 17. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/2/1/43
  3. Bennett, W. – Livingston, S. 2018. The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. In European Journal of Communication, vol. 33, 2018, no. 2, pp. 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
  4. Brown, V. et al. 2020. Risks of introduction and economic consequences associated with african swine fever, classical swine fever and foot-and-mouth disease: a review of the literature. In Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, vol. 68, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1910–1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13919
  5. Cook, N. A. 2017. Posttruth, Truthiness, and Alternative Facts: Information Behavior and Critical Information Consumption for a New Age. In The Library Quarterly, vol. 87, 2017, no. 3, pp. 211–221.
  6. Čechmánek, K. 2023. Dezinformácie asvet korporácií. In Mura, L. (ed.) Mladí vedci 2023. Bratislava : Paneurópska vysoká škola, Fakulta ekonómie a podnikania, Ekonomická univerzita v Bratislave, Obchodná fakulta v spolupráci s Univerzitou J. Selyeho, Fakultou ekonómie ainformatiky as Odborom ekonomiky amanažmentu Slovenskej akadémie pôdohospodárskych vied v roku 2023, pp. 46–62.
  7. Davidson, M. 2017. Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies. In Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 19, 2017, no. 4, pp. 403–407.
  8. Delsman, J. et al. 2016. Global sampling to assess the value of diverse observations in conditioning a real-world groundwater flow and transport model. In Water Resources Research, vol. 52, 2016, no. 3, pp. 1652–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016476
  9. Dretske, F. I. 1982. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge : The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-04063-8
  10. Dubóczi, P. – Škríbová, S. 2023. Imported grain from Ukraine dubbed “toxic” by dubious actors spreading anti-Ukrainian sentiment. Friedrich Naumann Foundation. [online]. [cit. 11.04.2024]. Available at: https://www.freiheit.org/central-europe-and-baltic-states/imported-grain-ukraine-dubbed-toxic-dubious-actors-spreading-anti
  11. Erlich, A. – Garner, C. 2021. Is pro-kremlin disinformation effective? Evidence from Ukraine. In The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 28, 2021, no. 1, pp. 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221
  12. EUROBAROMETER. 2018. [online]. [cit. 24. 2. 2024]. Available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2183
  13. Fallis, D. 2015. A conceptual analysis of disinformation? In Library Trends, vol. 63, 2015, no. 3, pp. 401–426.
  14. Gelfert, A. 2018. Fake News: A Definition. In Informal Logic, vol. 38, 2018, no. 1, pp. 84–117. [online]. [cit. 30.10.2023]. Available at: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/informallogic/2018-v38-n1-informallogic04379/1057034ar.pdf
  15. General Assembly of the United Nations. 2022. Resolution 76/227 on Countering disinformation for the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. [online]. [cit. 13. 4. 2024]. Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n21/416/87/pdf/n2141687.pdf?token=MmodZasFNlDDloSqR1&fe=true
  16. Getson, J. M. et al. 2022. Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture. In Plos One, vol. 17, 2022, no. 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269927
  17. Ghosh, M. 2019. Climate-smart agriculture, productivity and food security in india. In Journal of Development Policy and Practice, vol. 4, 2019, no. 2, pp. 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133319862404
  18. Hassanian-Moghaddam, H. et al. 2020. Double trouble: methanol outbreak in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran-a cross-sectional assessment. In Critical Care, vol. 24, 2020, no. 402. [online]. [cit. 15.10.2023]. Available at: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-03140-w
  19. Herring, R. 2023. Genetically modified democracy: transgenic crops in contemporary india by aniketaga. In Journal of Agrarian Change, vol. 23, 2023, no. 4, pp. 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12529
  20. Hiltbrand, K. et al. 2023. 228 food for thought: how influenceable is the next generation consumer. In Journal of Animal Science, vol. 101, 2023, no. 3, pp. 148–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad281.182
  21. Hussain, A. et al. 2018. The Anti-vaccination Movement: A Regression in Modern Medicine. In Cureus, vol. 10, 2018, no. 7. [online]. [cit. 16.10.2023]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122668/
  22. Chowdhury, A. et al. 2023. Systematic Review of Misinformation in Social and Online Media for the Development of an Analytical Framework for Agri-Food Sector. In Sustainability, vol. 15, 2023, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064753
  23. Islam, M, S. et al. 2020. COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis. In The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 103, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1621–1629. ISSN 1476-1645
  24. Kapferer, J. N. 1989. A Mass Poisoning Rumor in Europe. In Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 53, 1989, pp. 467–481.
  25. Karinshak, E. 2023. Ai-driven disinformation: a framework for organizational preparation and response. In Journal of Communication Management, vol. 27, 2023, no. 4, pp. 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-09-2022-0113
  26. Kolchinsky, E. I. – Kutschera, U. – Hossfeld, U. –Levit, G. S. 2017. Russia’s New Lysenkoism. In Current Biology, vol. 27, 2017, no. 19, pp. R1042–R1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.045
  27. Lotto, M. et al. 2023. Ethical principles for infodemiology and infoveillance studies concerning infodemic management on social media. In Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130079
  28. Loucks, D. 2021. Science informed policies for managing water. In Hydrology, vol. 8, 2021, no. 2, p. 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020066
  29. Lynas, M. – Adams, J. – Conrow, J. 2022. Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019–2021. InGM Crops & Food – Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain, 2022, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2022.2140568
  30. Meel, P. – Vishwakarma, D. K. 2020. Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. In Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 153. [online]. [cit. 20. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957417419307043
  31. Merriam-Webster Dicitionary. 2023. [online]. [cit. 18.10.2023]. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misinformation
  32. Muhvić, D. – Čulo, I. 2022. “Fake news” in times of crisis in the context of article 10 of the european convention on human rights. In Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveučilišta U Rijeci, vol. 43, 2022, no. 1, pp. 189–207. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.43.1.10
  33. Pathak, A. – Srihari, R. K. – Natu, N. 2021. Disinformation: analysis and identification. In Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 27, 2021, no. 3, pp. 357–375.
  34. Persily, N. 2017. The 2016 U.S. Election: Can democracy survive the internet? In Journal of Democracy, vol. 28, 2017, no. 2, pp. 63–76.
  35. Pertwee, E. – Simas, C. – Larson, H. J. 2022. An epidemic of uncertainty: rumors, conspiracy theories and vaccine hesitancy. In Nature Medicine, vol. 28, 2022, pp. 456–459.
  36. Rahmanian, E. 2023. Fake news: a classification proposal and a future research agenda. In Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, vol. 27, 2023, no. 1, pp. 60–78.
  37. Rippke, U. et al. 2016. Timescales of transformational climate change adaptation in sub-saharan african agriculture. In Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, 2016, no. 6, pp. 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2947
  38. Rust, N. et al. 2021. Have farmers had enough of experts? In Environmental Management, vol. 69, 2021, no. 1, pp. 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01546-y
  39. Staender, A. – Humprecht, E. 2022. Content Analysis in the Research Field of Disinformation. In Oehmer-Pedrazzi, F., Kessler, S. H., Humprecht, E. Sommer, K., Castro, L. (Eds.). Standardisierte Inhaltsanalyse in der Kommunikations-wissenschaft – Standardized Content Analysis in Communication Research. Springer VS, 2022, pp. 339–348.
  40. UNESCO. 2018. Journalism, ‘Fake News’ & Disinformation: Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. Paris : United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2018. ISBN 978-92-3-100281-6
  41. UNICEF Montenegro. 2021. 43% citizens believe in a conspiracy theory regarding the concealment of information about vaccines. [online]. [cit. 17. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/montenegro/en/stories/43-citizens-believe-conspiracy-theory-regarding-concealment-information-about-vaccines
  42. Wang, CH. 2020. Fake News and Related Concepts: Definitions and Recent Research Development. In Contemporary Management Research, vol. 16, 2020, no. 3, pp. 145–174.
  43. Wardle, C. 2017. Fake news. It’s complicated. [online]. [cit. 17. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79
  44. World Economic Forum. 2013. Global Risks 2013. [online]. [cit. 18.10.2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2013.pdf
  45. World Economic Forum. 2024. The Global Risks Report 2024. [online]. [cit. 13.04.2024]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf?_gl=1*182sqyd*_up*MQ..&gclid=CjwKCAjw_e2wBhAEEiwAyFFFo9_81poNFVaU-DVG-lkqqJjylB_6qAsKOXOPEnAMYALJudbrod4XnBoCr7sQAvD_BwE
  46. Wu, L. et al. 2019. Misinformation in Social Media: Definition, Manipulation, and Detection. In ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 21, 2019, no. 2, pp. 80–90. [online]. [cit. 17.10.2023]. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3373464.3373475
  47. Yang, Z. – Luo, X. – Jia, H. 2021. Is It All a Conspiracy? Conspiracy Theories and People’s Attitude to COVID-19 Vaccination. In Vaccines, vol. 9, 2021, no. 10. [online]. [cit. 15. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/10/1051
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eual-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1339-9276 | Journal ISSN: 1338-6891
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 27
Published on: Jun 27, 2024
Published by: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Kristián Čechmánek, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.