Have a personal or library account? Click to login

AI-Powered Discourse in Mathematics Education in Support of SDG 4: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Research Literature

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Aguirre, J., Herbel‐Eisenmann, B., Celedón‐Pattichis, S., Civil, M., Wilkerson, T., Stephan, M., Pape, S., & Clements, D. H. (2017). Equity within mathematics education research as a political act: Moving from choice to intentional collective professional responsibility. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.2.0124
  2. Akinci, M., Genç, M., Karataş, İ., Çolakoğlu, Ö. M., & Yılmaz, N. (2025). Matematiksel iletişim becerisi ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Development of the mathematical communication skills scale]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(25), 575–601. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1623215
  3. Al-Buraiki, S. (2024). Characteristics of teachers’ classroom discourse in an EFL setting. Studies in English Language Teaching, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v12n1p1
  4. Alexander, M., Rushton, S., Dawson, S., & Vakil, S. (2024). AI to AIE: Artificial intelligence to access, inclusion and equity. In J. Morska, A. Rogerson (Eds.). Third Symposium Proceedings. New ways of teaching and learning. Aemilia Hotel, Bologna, Italy. August 6-10, 2024 (pp. 18–22). WTM Verlag. https://doi.org/10.37626/GA9783959872881.0.04
  5. Alobaidi, O. G., Crockett, K., O’Shea, J. D., & Jarad, T. M. (2015). The application of learning theories into Abdullah: An Intelligent Arabic conversational agent tutor. In Proceedings of the international conference on agents and artificial intelligence (pp. 361–369). SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005197003610369
  6. Alsharidah, M. A., & Alkramiti, A. M. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions towards using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 13(84), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.84.12.3
  7. Al-Smadi, O. A. (2017). A theoretical review of classroom discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3169
  8. Arugaslan, E. (2025). Examining the relationships between academic intrinsic motivation, online learning self-efficacy, and online student engagement: A study on distance education students. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(25), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1549186
  9. Awang, L. A., Yusop, F. D., & Danaee, M. (2025). Current practices and future direction of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), Article em0823. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16006
  10. Bimba, A. T., Idris, N., Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Mahmud, R. B., & Shuib, N. L. B. M. (2017). Adaptive feedback in computer-based learning environments: A review. Adaptive Behavior, 25(5), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712317727590
  11. Brewley-Kennedy, D. N. (2016). The struggles of incorporating equity into practice in a university mathematics methods course. The Mathematics Educator. https://doi.org/10.63301/tme.v0i0.2008
  12. Bringula, R. P., Basa, R. S., Dela Cruz, C., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2016). Effects of prior knowledge in mathematics on learner-interface interactions in a learning-byteaching intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115622213
  13. Cao, W. (2023). Study of classroom discourse of English-major interns from the perspective of functional linguistics. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 4(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v4n2p37
  14. Charland, P., Létourneau, A., Deslandes-Martineau, M., Boasen, J., & Léger, P. (2024). Navigating the future of learning: A systematic review of ai-driven intelligent tutoring systems (its) in k-12 education. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4276591/v1
  15. Dan, L., Mohamed, H., & Yue, Z. (2023). A review on the effect of integrating AI-based technology into flipped learning. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 7(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.11113/itlj.v7.133
  16. Ferrans, J. (2023). Student comfort levels during political discourse in high school classrooms. Journal of Student Research, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4966
  17. Güler, A., & Polatgil, M. (2025). Bilişim alanında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı düzeylerinin ölçülmesi [Measuring artificial intelligence literacy levels of students studying in the field of informatics]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(25), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1549267.
  18. Heasly, B., Iliško, D. & Lindner, J. (2025). Editorial: Sustainable initiatives making significant impacts. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 16(1), 2025. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2025-0001
  19. Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584
  20. Jiang, D., Chen, Y., & Garg, A. (2018). A hybrid method for overlapping speech detection in classroom environment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(1), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21855
  21. Jiménez, S., Juárez‐Ramírez, R., Castillo, V. H., Ramírez‐Noriega, A., & Quezada, Á. (2021). The use of a weighted affective lexicon in a tutoring system to improve student motivation to learn. Expert Systems, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12483
  22. Karabacak, S., & Bilgin, E. A. (2025). Investigation of secondary school students’ and teachers’ opinions on the use of ChatGPT artificial intelligence application in mathematics education. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 9(19), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1562535
  23. Karacı, A., Piri, Z., İbrahim, H., & Bilgici, G. (2018). Student perceptions of an intelligent tutoring system: A technology acceptance model perspective. International Journal of Computer Applications, 182(22), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018918025
  24. Kaynak, S., Kaynak, B., & Evirgen, H. (2018). Student consultancy service: Prediction of course grades in course selection phases using artificial intelligence techniques. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 6(12), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.421123
  25. Kim, B., Koopmanschap, I., Mehrizi, M. H. R., Huysman, M., & Ranschaert, E. (2021). How does the radiology community discuss the benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence for their work? A systematic discourse analysis. European Journal of Radiology, 136, Article 109566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109566
  26. LaRusso, M. D., Al‐Adeimi, S., Kim, H. Y., Harbaugh, A. G., & O’Connor, C. (2024). Capturing classroom talk with the low- inference discourse observation tool: A validation study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 44(4), 486–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316231182291
  27. Li, X., Han, G., Fang, B., & He, J. (2025). Advancing the in-class dialogic quality: Developing an artificial intelligence-supported framework for classroom dialogue Analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(1), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00872-z
  28. López Chávez, O., Rodríguez, L.-F., Salazar Lugo, G., & Castro, L. A. (2017). Authoring tools and virtual environments in intelligent tutoring systems: Challenges and opportunities. Research in Computing Science, 146(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.13053/rcs-146-1-1
  29. Maity, S., & D eroy, A . ( 2024). Generative AI and its impact on personalized intelligent tutoring systems. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/kawr5
  30. Maldonado Rodríguez, L. A., Jessup, N., Myers, M., Louie, N., & Chao, T. (2022). A critical lens on cognitively guided instruction: Perspectives from mathematics teacher educators of color. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 10(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTE.2020.0015
  31. Mavrikis, M., Schlepps, D. S., & Mubeen, J. (2018) C. Penstein Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, R. Luckin, M. Mavrikis, K. Porayska-Pomsta, B. McLaren, B. du Boulay (Eds.). Artificial Intelligence in Education: 19th International Conference, AIED 2018, London, UK, June 27–30, 2018, Proceedings, Part II (pp. 452–457). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_85
  32. Meylani, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the education of teachers: A qualitative synthesis of the cutting-edge research literature. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 600–637. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1477709
  33. Meylani, R. (2025a). Gamification and game-based learning in mathematics education for advancing SDG 4: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of contemporary research literature. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGS Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe04567
  34. Meylani, R. (2025b). A critical glance at technology’s role in mathematics education for a sustainable future: Advancing SDG 4 – Quality education through a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGS Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe04566
  35. Meylani, R. (2025c). Discourse in online learning environments: A systematic review of contemporary research literature. Open Access Journal of Education and Language Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.19080/OAJELS.2025.03.555602
  36. Meylani, R. (2025d). Integration of TI 84 and TI 89 model graphing calculators in mathematics education: Precalculus instruction using the TPACK framework. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(25), 254–282. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1589181
  37. Meylani, R., & Kaplan, R. (2025). Novel approaches for teaching mathematical modeling to preservice teachers: A systematic review. EMTEKA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v6i1.8362
  38. Meylani, R., Bitter, G., & Legacy, J. (2025). Impacts of professional development and implementation fidelity on online middle school mathematics: A quasiexperimental quantitative study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(2), 90–119. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.1484344.
  39. Mier, M. R., & Blanco, G. A. B. (2022). Communicative orientation of English language classes. FOSTER, 3(4), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v3i4.52
  40. Na, X. (2023). Algorithms of intelligent language recognition and English discourse analysis based on fisher’s three-dimensional model. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2445963/v1
  41. Nugroho, M., Widiastuti, H., Ginanjar, B., & Wirajaya, A. (2020). Realization of various acts on initiation rank: Case Study of Mad’u speech in dialogic Da’wah discourse. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Recent Language, Literature, and Local Culture Studies, BASA, 20-21 September 2019, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-9-2019.2296897
  42. Ok, G., Kaya, D., & Kutluca, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence for a sustainable future in the 21st century: Impacts and reflections on education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 16(1), 109-136. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2025-0009
  43. Opesemowo, O. A. G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education. In M. Khosrow-Pour, D.B.A. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of information science and technology, Sixth Edition (pp. 1–18). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch084
  44. Purwandari, J. D. (2021). The roles of the F move and its effect on classroom interaction. Epistema, 2(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.21831/ep.v2i1.40512
  45. Qothrunnada, I., & Maghfiroh, S. U. (2025). Research trend of artificial intelligence application in mathematics education. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 13(2), 581–589. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v13i02.m01
  46. Ramasamy, S. A., & Zainal, A. Z. (2023). Facilitating the construction of knowledge collectively through dialogic discourse: Teachers’ perspectives and practices in English language teaching. TEFLIN Journal-A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 34(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/79-96
  47. Rees, C. (2019). The shift to more dialogic discourse in a classroom transitioning to student-centered science inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/1441840
  48. Rees, C. A. B., & Roth, W.-M. (2019). Discourse forms in a classroom transitioning to student-centred scientific inquiry through co-teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1571649
  49. Roos, H. (2023). Exploring ways to design mathematics education promoting inclusion and equity for every student. In K. Koreeda, M. Tsuge, S. Ikuta, E. M. Dalton, L. P. Ewe (Eds.). Building inclusive education in K-12 classrooms and higher education: Theories and principles (pp. 166–181). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7370-2.ch010
  50. Roshanaei, M., Olivares, H., & Lopez, R. R. (2023). Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities, challenges, and emerging strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(4), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2023.154009
  51. Saimon, M., Mtenzi, F., Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., Arnold, M., & Diego-Mantecón, J. M. (2024). Applying the 6ème learning by design model to support student teachers to integrate artificial intelligence applications in their classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 23937–23954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12795-9
  52. Shahrill, M., Nurhasanah, F., Ibrahim, S. A., Prahmana, R. C. I., Asamoah, D., Mohammad, H., & Gan, A. L. (2023). Exploring students’ perceptions of private mathematics tutoring in three countries. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p339-358
  53. Sharifuddin, N. S., & Hashim, H. (2024). Benefits and challenges in implementing artificial intelligence in education (AIED) in ESL classroom: A systematic review (2019–2022). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20422
  54. Son, T. (2024). Intelligent tutoring systems in mathematics education: A systematic literature review using the substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition model. Computers, 13(10), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13100270
  55. Song, G., & Cheng, H. (2022). The power of teaching discourse: A case study of the students at West Virginia State University. Modern Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56968/mlll.v1i01.62
  56. Spitzer, M. W. H., & Moeller, K. (2023). Performance increases in mathematics during COVID-19 pandemic distance learning in Austria: Evidence from an intelligent tutoring system for mathematics. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 31, Article 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2023.100203
  57. Toscano, R., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J . M ., & S ánchez, V . ( 2019). A s tudy o f p re-service primary teachers’ discourse when solving didactic-mathematical tasks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108631
  58. Tural Sönmez, M. (2024). The development of non-formal learning organization skills in preservice math teachers. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 8(18), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1505901
  59. Viberg, O., Kizilcec, R. F., Wise, A. F., Jivet, I., & Nixon, N. (2024). Advancing equity and inclusion in educational practices with AI-powered educational decision support systems (AI – EDSS). British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 1974–1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13507
  60. Wang, X., Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2025). Fostering engagement in AI‐mediate Chinese EFL classrooms: The role of classroom climate, ai literacy, and resilience. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12874
  61. Wille, A. M. (2017). Imaginary dialogues in mathematics education. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 38(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-016-0111-7
  62. Xatamova, N., & Ashurov, J. (2024). The future of legal English learning: Integrating ai into ESP education. SPAST Reports, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.69848/sreports.v1i7.5081
  63. Yıldız, T., & Özkök, G. A. (2025). Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the Multidimensional Cognitive Load Scale for virtual environments. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(25), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1601749
  64. Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12988
  65. Zreik, M. (2024). Redefining mathematics education in the age of artificial intelligence (pp. 19–40). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2873-6.ch002
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 43
Published on: Oct 10, 2025
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Rusen Meylani, Tamer Kutluca, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.