Language Policies in STEM Subjects: Triggering Inclusion, Exclusion, or Abjection?

Andersen, Katja N.; Bagger, Anette

doi:10.2478/dcse-2023-0008

Abstract

The combination of language policies, the global testing industry, and the role of STEM subjects in school systems have been shown to undermine the inclusion of all pupils, especially with regard to language backgrounds. This lack of inclusion shows signs of developing into a point of systematic exclusion for those students. In this article we will consider the language policies in two national contexts, the Swedish and the Luxembourgish ones, and specifically examine issues of in(ex)clusion in relation to multi-lingualism in STEM teaching. This study analyzes policy documents on (1) inclusion, (2) language use, and (3) STEM teaching at school in the two national contexts, using a methodology that builds on Popkewitz’s (2013; 2014) approach to politics of schooling. Our results show, first, that different policies on language and multilingualism become visible in policy documents for primary school teaching in Sweden and Luxembourg. Secondly, this article discusses what impacts these policies may have on matters of inclusion, exclusion, or abjection in STEM teaching contexts at primary schools.

References

Andersen, K. N. (2018). Evaluation of school tasks in the light of sustainability education: Textbook research in science education in Luxembourgish primary schools. Environmental Education Research, 24(9), 1301–1319.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andersen, K. N. (2020). Assessing task-orientation potential in primary science textbooks: Toward a new approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57, 481–509.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andersen, K. N. (2022). Inclusive cultures in science education: the case of science learning in Luxembourg. In K. N. Andersen, V. Silva de Moraes Novais, & B. T. Ferreira da Silva (Eds.), Educação, cultura e inclusão: contextos internacionais e locais [Education, culture and inclusion: International and local contexts] (pp. 61–78). Curitiba: Appris Editora.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bagger, A. (2022). Discourses on inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities in policy. In K. N. Andersen, V. Silva de Moraes Novais, & B. T. Ferreira da Silva (Eds.), Educação, cultura e inclusão: contextos internacionais e locais [Education, culture and inclusion: International and local contexts] (pp. 27–46). Curitiba: Appris Editora.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bagger, A. & Lillvist, A. (2021). Mediala diskurser om inkludering: En berättelse om (gem)ensamhet. Utbildning och Demokrati [Discourses on inclusion in media. An account of belonging and exclusion], 30(1), 45–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ballard, K. (2013). Thinking in another way: Ideas for sustainable inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 762–775.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barwell, R. (2018). From language as a resource to sources of meaning in multilingual mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50(6), 155–168.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). The Nordic education model. “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy. Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blossing, U. & Söderström, M. (2014). A school for every child in Sweden. In Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (Eds.), The Nordic education model. “A school for all” encounters neoliberal policy (pp. 17–34). Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92(4), 708–732.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Creagh, S. (2016). Multiple ways of speaking back to the monolingual mindset. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 146–156.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Florin, C. (2010). Från folkskola till grundskola 1842–1962 [From Folskola to compulsory school 1842–1962]. Website: Lärarnas historia.se.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Governmental Offices. (2011). FN:s konventioner om Mänskliga Rättigheter [UN Conventions on human rights]. Stockholm: Elanders.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Government Offices of Sweden. (2007). National minorities and minority languages, A summary of the Government’s minority policy. Fact sheet. Articleno.IJ07.07e.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
et de l’Innovation pédagogiques et technologiques SFS. (2008). Diskrimineringslag [Discrimination act]. Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kirsch, C., Aleksi„, G., Mortini, S., & Andersen, K. N. (2020). Developing multilingual practices in early childhood education through professional development in Luxembourg. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(4), 319–337.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Landqvist, M., & Spetz, J. (2020). Ten years with the Swedish Language Act. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(5), 532–547.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. (2017). Une Stratégie pour Promouvoir la Langue Luxembourgeoise [A strategy to promote the Luxembourgish language]. gouvernement.lu
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. (2012). Aktionsplan der Luxemburger Regierung zur Umsetzung der UNO-Behindertenrechtskonvention [Action plan for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. gouvernement.lu
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lundberg, A. (2018). Multilingual educational language policies in Switzerland and Sweden: A meta-analysis. Language Problems and Language Planning, 42(1), 45–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luxembourg Centre for Educational Testing (LUCET) & Service de Coordination de la Recherche et de l’Innovation pédagogiques et technologiques (SCRIPT). (Eds.) (2021). Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2021 [National Education Report Luxembourg 2021]. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Centrale.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Magnusson, G. (2019). An amalgam of ideals – images of inclusion in the Salamanca Statement. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 677–690.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse (MENJE). (2020). The Luxembourg Education System, Luxembourg.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse (MENJE). (2019). Dossier de presse: PISA 2018. Constats et conclusions [Press release: PISA 2018. Findings and Conclusions]. Luxembourg.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moschkovich, J. (2007). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 89–104). New York: Teachers College Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
National Agency for Education. (2019). PISA 2018. 15-ringars kunskaper i läsförståelse, matematik och naturvetenskap [15-year olds knowledge in reading, mathematics and science]. Stockholm: Skolverkets publikationsservice.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. (2016). Education Policy Outlook – Luxembourg. Luxembourg: OECD.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paulsrud, B. A., Zilliacus, H., & Ekberg, L. (2020). Spaces for multilingual education: Language orientations in the national curricula of Sweden and Finland. International Multilingual Re-search Journal, 11(1), 25–33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Popkewitz, T. (2014). Social epistemology, the reason of ‘reason’ and the curriculum studies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 1–18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Popkewitz, T. (2013). The sociology of education as the history of the present: Fabrication, difference and abjection. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 439–456.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Service de Coordination de la Recherche (SCRIPT). (2020). PISA 2018: Luxemburg: SCRIPT.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SFS. (2010). Skollag [Education Act]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Skolöverstyrelsen. (1980). Läroplan för grundskolan (LGR 80) [Curriculum for the compulsory school]. Stockholm: Liber Läromedel.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stobart, G. (2005). Fairness in multicultural assessment systems. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 12(3), 275–287.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swedish Government. (1975). Prop 1975/76: 39. Skolans inre arbete mm (SIA) [The inner work of schools etc.]. Governmental Proposition, Stockholm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swedish Government. (2000). Från patient till medborgare [From patient to citizen – a national action plan for the disability policy]. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slee, R. (2008). Beyond special and regular schooling? An inclusive education reform agenda. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(2), 99–116.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slee, R. (2013a). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895–907.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slee, R. (2013b). Meeting some challenges of inclusive education in an age of exclusion. AJIE Asian Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(2), 3–17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slee, R. (2018). Testing inclusive education? Testing and inclusive schooling: International challenges and opportunities. In B. Hamre, A. Morin, & C. Ydesen (Eds.), Routledge Research in International and Comparative Education (pp. 79–86). New York: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slee, R. & Allan, J. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(2), 173–192.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ugen, S., & Fischbach, A. (2017). 15 Jahre PISA: Eine Bilanz für Luxemburg [15 years of PISA: A review for Luxembourg]. Forum, 370, 11–13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. UNESCO: Paris.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Valero, P. (2017). Mathematics for all, economic growth, and the making of the citizen-worker. In T. A. Popkewitz, J. Diaz, & C. Kirchgasler (Eds.), A political sociology of educational knowledge: Studies of exclusions and difference (pp. 117–132). Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang Hansen, K. & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Causes of educational segregation in Sweden – school choice or residential segregation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(1–2), 23–44. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2016.1178589
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Language Policies in STEM Subjects: Triggering Inclusion, Exclusion, or Abjection?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account