References
- Andersen, K. N. (2018). Evaluation of school tasks in the light of sustainability education: Textbook research in science education in Luxembourgish primary schools. Environmental Education Research, 24(9), 1301–1319.
- Andersen, K. N. (2020). Assessing task-orientation potential in primary science textbooks: Toward a new approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57, 481–509.
- Andersen, K. N. (2022). Inclusive cultures in science education: the case of science learning in Luxembourg. In K. N. Andersen, V. Silva de Moraes Novais, & B. T. Ferreira da Silva (Eds.), Educação, cultura e inclusão: contextos internacionais e locais [Education, culture and inclusion: International and local contexts] (pp. 61–78). Curitiba: Appris Editora.
- Bagger, A. (2022). Discourses on inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities in policy. In K. N. Andersen, V. Silva de Moraes Novais, & B. T. Ferreira da Silva (Eds.), Educação, cultura e inclusão: contextos internacionais e locais [Education, culture and inclusion: International and local contexts] (pp. 27–46). Curitiba: Appris Editora.
- Bagger, A. & Lillvist, A. (2021). Mediala diskurser om inkludering: En berättelse om (gem)ensamhet. Utbildning och Demokrati [Discourses on inclusion in media. An account of belonging and exclusion], 30(1), 45–74.
- Ballard, K. (2013). Thinking in another way: Ideas for sustainable inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 762–775.
- Barwell, R. (2018). From language as a resource to sources of meaning in multilingual mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50(6), 155–168.
- Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). The Nordic education model. “A School for All” encounters neo-liberal policy. Springer.
- Blossing, U. & Söderström, M. (2014). A school for every child in Sweden. In Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (Eds.), The Nordic education model. “A school for all” encounters neoliberal policy (pp. 17–34). Springer.
- Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92(4), 708–732.
- Creagh, S. (2016). Multiple ways of speaking back to the monolingual mindset. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 146–156.
- Florin, C. (2010). Från folkskola till grundskola 1842–1962 [From Folskola to compulsory school 1842–1962]. Website: Lärarnas historia.se.
- Governmental Offices. (2011). FN:s konventioner om Mänskliga Rättigheter [UN Conventions on human rights]. Stockholm: Elanders.
- Government Offices of Sweden. (2007). National minorities and minority languages, A summary of the Government’s minority policy. Fact sheet. Articleno.IJ07.07e.
- Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
- et de l’Innovation pédagogiques et technologiques SFS. (2008). Diskrimineringslag [Discrimination act]. Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet.
- Kirsch, C., Aleksi„, G., Mortini, S., & Andersen, K. N. (2020). Developing multilingual practices in early childhood education through professional development in Luxembourg. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(4), 319–337.
- Landqvist, M., & Spetz, J. (2020). Ten years with the Swedish Language Act. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(5), 532–547.
- Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. (2017). Une Stratégie pour Promouvoir la Langue Luxembourgeoise [A strategy to promote the Luxembourgish language]. gouvernement.lu
- Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. (2012). Aktionsplan der Luxemburger Regierung zur Umsetzung der UNO-Behindertenrechtskonvention [Action plan for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. gouvernement.lu
- Lundberg, A. (2018). Multilingual educational language policies in Switzerland and Sweden: A meta-analysis. Language Problems and Language Planning, 42(1), 45–69.
- Luxembourg Centre for Educational Testing (LUCET) & Service de Coordination de la Recherche et de l’Innovation pédagogiques et technologiques (SCRIPT). (Eds.) (2021). Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2021 [National Education Report Luxembourg 2021]. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Centrale.
- Magnusson, G. (2019). An amalgam of ideals – images of inclusion in the Salamanca Statement. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 677–690.
- Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse (MENJE). (2020). The Luxembourg Education System, Luxembourg.
- Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse (MENJE). (2019). Dossier de presse: PISA 2018. Constats et conclusions [Press release: PISA 2018. Findings and Conclusions]. Luxembourg.
- Moschkovich, J. (2007). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 89–104). New York: Teachers College Press.
- National Agency for Education. (2019). PISA 2018. 15-ringars kunskaper i läsförståelse, matematik och naturvetenskap [15-year olds knowledge in reading, mathematics and science]. Stockholm: Skolverkets publikationsservice.
- OECD. (2016). Education Policy Outlook – Luxembourg. Luxembourg: OECD.
- Paulsrud, B. A., Zilliacus, H., & Ekberg, L. (2020). Spaces for multilingual education: Language orientations in the national curricula of Sweden and Finland. International Multilingual Re-search Journal, 11(1), 25–33.
- Popkewitz, T. (2014). Social epistemology, the reason of ‘reason’ and the curriculum studies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 1–18.
- Popkewitz, T. (2013). The sociology of education as the history of the present: Fabrication, difference and abjection. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 439–456.
- Service de Coordination de la Recherche (SCRIPT). (2020). PISA 2018: Luxemburg: SCRIPT.
- SFS. (2010). Skollag [Education Act]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
- Skolöverstyrelsen. (1980). Läroplan för grundskolan (LGR 80) [Curriculum for the compulsory school]. Stockholm: Liber Läromedel.
- Stobart, G. (2005). Fairness in multicultural assessment systems. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 12(3), 275–287.
- Swedish Government. (1975). Prop 1975/76: 39. Skolans inre arbete mm (SIA) [The inner work of schools etc.]. Governmental Proposition, Stockholm.
- Swedish Government. (2000). Från patient till medborgare [From patient to citizen – a national action plan for the disability policy]. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
- Slee, R. (2008). Beyond special and regular schooling? An inclusive education reform agenda. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(2), 99–116.
- Slee, R. (2013a). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895–907.
- Slee, R. (2013b). Meeting some challenges of inclusive education in an age of exclusion. AJIE Asian Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(2), 3–17.
- Slee, R. (2018). Testing inclusive education? Testing and inclusive schooling: International challenges and opportunities. In B. Hamre, A. Morin, & C. Ydesen (Eds.), Routledge Research in International and Comparative Education (pp. 79–86). New York: Routledge.
- Slee, R. & Allan, J. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(2), 173–192.
- Ugen, S., & Fischbach, A. (2017). 15 Jahre PISA: Eine Bilanz für Luxemburg [15 years of PISA: A review for Luxembourg]. Forum, 370, 11–13.
- UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. UNESCO: Paris.
- Valero, P. (2017). Mathematics for all, economic growth, and the making of the citizen-worker. In T. A. Popkewitz, J. Diaz, & C. Kirchgasler (Eds.), A political sociology of educational knowledge: Studies of exclusions and difference (pp. 117–132). Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
- Yang Hansen, K. & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Causes of educational segregation in Sweden – school choice or residential segregation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(1–2), 23–44. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2016.1178589