References
- Barone, D. (2013). Tweaking literature circles: A: Las Vegas schoolteacher aces the common Core. Reading Today. December 2013, online /January 2014.
- Boellstorff, T. (2015). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
- Cebrián, G., & Junyent, M. (2015). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student-teachers’ views. Sustainability, 7(3), 2768–2786.
- Collins, S. (2008). The hunger games. London: Scholastic.
- Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centred classroom. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
- Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups. (2nd Ed.). Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
- Daniels, H. (2006). What’s the next big thing with literature circles? Voices from the Middle, 13(4), 10–15.
- Devick-Fry, J., & LeSage, T. (2010). Science literacy circles: Big ideas about science. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 47(2), 35–40.
- Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism. New York: Routledge.
- Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The ecocriticism reader. Landmarks in literary ecology. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
- Goga, N., Guanio-Uluru, L., Hallås, B. O., & Nyrnes, A. (Eds.). (2018). Ecocritical perspectives on children’s texts and cultures: Nordic dialogues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge, 149–81.
- Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
- Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making king in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Heise, U. (2016). Imagining extinction: The cultural meanings of endangered species. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Hintz, C., & Ostry, E. (2003). Utopian and dystopian writing for children and young adults. London: Routledge.
- Iliško, D., Olehnoviča, E., Ostrovska, I., Akmene, V., & Salīte, I. (2017). Meeting the challenges of ESD competency ñ based curriculum in a vocational school setting. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 103–113.
- Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (Eds). (2018). Issues and trends in Education for Sustainable Development. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261445
- Massey, G., & Bradford, C. (2011). Children as ecocitizens: Ecocriticism and environmental texts. In K. Mallan & C. Bradford (Eds.). Contemporary children’s literature and film: Engaging with theory (pp. 208–217). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- McCall, A. L. (2010). Teaching powerful social studies Ideas through literature circles. Social Studies, 101(4), 152–159.
- Mehrparvar, F., & Karimnia, A. (2018). Second language teaching effectiveness from the perspective of university students: A case study of departments of applied linguistics. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(1), 64–78.
- Miller, L., Kucan, L., & Dass, M. (2007). Literature circles roles for science vocabulary. The Science Teacher, 74, 52–54.
- Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Noll, E. (1994). Social issues and literature circles with adolescents. Journal of Reading, 38(2), 88–93.
- Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2016, June). Framework plan for primary and lower secondary teacher education. Retrieved from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/fbaf26939bbd40abacba73e34a95d2fc/forskrift-omrammeplan-for-grunnskolelarerutdanning-for-trinn-1-7.pdf
- Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2016, November). Proposal for Renewal and Improvement of School Subjects. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/proposal-for-renewal-and-improvement-of-school-subjects/id2483423/
- Peralta-Nash, C., & Dutch, J. A. (2000). Literature circles: Creating an environment for choice. Primary Voices, K-6 8.4, 29–37.
- Straits, W., & Nicolls, S. (2006). Literature circles for science. National Science Teacher Association Web News, October 30th. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=52824
- Rizzo, S. (2011). Developing dynamic classroom interaction through reading circles. AUC TESOL Journal. Retrieved from https://www3.aucegypt.edu/auctesol/Default.aspx?issueid=dc82a931-ec50-4ac8-98a3-4878b73f0399&aid=d03ca6d6-4242-4325-a79f-f39ceff31918
- Rousseau, J. J. (2010 [1762]). Emile (Collected writing of Rousseau). Edited by C. Kelly. Translated by Kelly, C. and A. Bloom. New Hampshire: Dartmouth College Press.
- UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf
- UN. (1987). Our Common Future. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm#I
- UN. (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2018.pdf
- Westerfield, S. (2012 [2005]). Uglies. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Wilfong, L. G. (2009). Textmasters: Bringing literature circles to textbook reading across the curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(2), 164–171.
- Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.