Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Change agents’ structural roles and reflection on improving student success: Insights from a departmental action team case Cover

Change agents’ structural roles and reflection on improving student success: Insights from a departmental action team case

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Agresti, A., & Agresti, B. F. (1978). Statistical analysis of qualitative variation. Sociological Methodology, 9, 204–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/270810
  2. Blumenschein, D., & Hannisdal, B. (2024). Social network analysis and educational change: unravelling the role of innovative teaching staff in a higher education environment. Studies in Higher Education, 49(12), 2827–2843. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2324346
  3. Borgatti, S. P. (2002). Netdraw Network Visualization. Analytic Technologies: Harvard.
  4. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies: Harvard.
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Johnson, J. C., & Agneessens, F. (2024). Analyzing Social Networks (3rd ed.). Sage.
  6. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
  7. Burt, R. S., & Soda, G. (2021). Network capabilities: Brokerage as a bridge between network theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320988764
  8. Conger, J. A., & Pearce, C. L. (2012). Using empowerment to motivate people to engage in effective self- and shared leadership. In Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (pp. 201–216). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206422.ch11
  9. Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166121
  10. Fernandez, R. M., & Gould, R. V. (1994). A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1455–1491. https://doi.org/10.1086/230451
  11. Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/270949
  12. Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
  13. Heyden, M. L., Fourné, S. P., Koene, B. A., Werkman, R., & Ansari, S. (2017). Rethinking ‘top‐down’and ‘bottom‐up’roles of top and middle managers in organizational change: Implications for employee support. Journal of Management Studies, 54(7), 961–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12258
  14. Ives, J., Falk, J., & Drayton, B. (2024). Broadening participation in STEM through equity- minded high-impact practices: a multimodal systematic review. Higher Education, 88(3), 1183–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01165-y
  15. Kezar, A., Bertram Gallant, T., & Lester, J. (2011). Everyday people making a difference on college campuses: The tempered grassroots leadership tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903532304
  16. Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(5), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9288-5
  17. Kezar, A. (2014). Higher education change and social networks: A review of research. The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 91–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777320
  18. Miller, R. A., & Struve, L. E. (2020). “Heavy lifters of the university”: Non-tenure track faculty teaching required diversity courses. Innovative Higher Education, 45(6), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09517-7
  19. Ngai, C., Corbo, J. C., Falkenberg, K. L., Geanious, C., Pawlak, A., Pilgrim, M. E., Quan, G. M., Reinholz, D. L., Smith, C., and Wise, S. B. (2020a). Facilitating Change in Higher Education: The Departmental Action Team Model. Glitter Cannon Press.
  20. Ngai, C., Pilgrim, M. E., Reinholz, D. L., Corbo, J. C., & Quan, G. M. (2020b). Developing the DELTA: Capturing cultural changes in undergraduate departments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), ar15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-09-0180
  21. Quardokus, K., & Henderson, C. (2015). Promoting instructional change: Using social network analysis to understand the informal structure of academic departments. Higher Education, 70(3), 315–335. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9831-0
  22. Quardokus Fisher, K., Sitomer, A., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., & Koretsky, M. (2019). Using social network analysis to develop relational expertise for an instructional change initiative. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0172-5
  23. Reinholz, D. L., & Apkarian, N. (2018). Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x
  24. Reinholz, D. L., Corbo, J. C., Dancy, M. H., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). Departmental action teams: Supporting faculty learning through departmental change. Learning Communities Journal, 9(1), 5–32.
  25. Reinholz, D. L., Matz, R. L., Cole, R., & Apkarian, N. (2019a). STEM is not a monolith: A preliminary analysis of variations in STEM disciplinary cultures and implications for change. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), mr4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-02-0038
  26. Reinholz, D. L., Ngai, C., Quan, G., Pilgrim, M. E., Corbo, J. C., & Finkelstein, N. (2019b). Fostering sustainable improvements in science education: An analysis through four frames. Science Education, 103(5), 1125–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21526
  27. Roy, D., Borin, P., & Kustra, E. (2007). Assisting curriculum change through departmental initiatives. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, 21–32. http://doi.org/10.1002/tl.295
  28. Swindell, N., Thomas, J., Tree, J., Hill, D., Hudson, J., & Stratton, G. (2024). Understanding (in) formal health and wellbeing networks within higher education: a mixed-method social network perspective. Higher Education, 88(3), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01158-x
  29. Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Menges, J. I. (2015). The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1361–1387. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573996
  30. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/connections-2026-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 (formerly 0226-1766) | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 17
Submitted on: Dec 4, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2026
Published on: Aug 7, 2026
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Jaeyun Han, Fructoso Basaldua, Mikayla Strasser, Susan P. Farruggia, Carmen M. Lilley, Mike Stieff, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.