Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Twin Readiness and Green Entrepreneurship: Evidence from the Baltic States Cover

Digital Twin Readiness and Green Entrepreneurship: Evidence from the Baltic States

By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Acelera Pyme. (2023). The Opportunities of Sustainable Digitalization and Green Technology for Your SME (Green IT and Green Tech). Retrieved from https://www.acelerapyme.gob.es/en/means/monographic/opportunities-sustainable-digitalization-and-green-techonology-your-sme-green-it
  2. Ahmed, R. R., Anwar, R. S., Streimikiene, D., & Streimikis, J. (2026). Green-Hushing in New Technology-Based Firms: How Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Cognition Shape Sustainable Entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 22(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-026-01197-7
  3. Allam, Z., & Jones, D. S. (2021). Future (post-COVID) Digital, Smart and Sustainable Cities in the Wake of 6G: Digital Twins, Immersive Realities and New Urban Economies. Land Use Policy, 101, 105201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105201
  4. Arsecularatne, B. P., Rodrigo, N., & Chang, R. (2024). Review of Reducing Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions Through Digital Twin in Built Environment. Journal of Building Engineering, 98, 111150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111150
  5. Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121–2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121
  6. Ba, L., Tangour, F., El Abbassi, I., & Absi, R. (2025). Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17(8), 3560. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083560
  7. Bănică, A., Ţigănaşu, R., Nijkamp, P., & Kourtit, K. (2024). Institutional Quality in Green and Digital Transition of EU Regions–A Recovery and Resilience Analysis. Global Challenges, 8(9), 2400031. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202400031
  8. Bascle, G. (2008). Controlling for Endogeneity With Instrumental Variables in Strategic Management Research. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 285–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008094339
  9. Bauer, P., Stevens, B., & Hazeleger, W. (2021). A Digital Twin of Earth for the Green Transition. Nature Climate Change, 11, 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00986-y
  10. Bhuller, M., & Sigstad, H. (2024). 2SLS with Multiple Treatments. Journal of Econometrics, 242(1), 105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105785
  11. Bianchini, S., Damioli, G., & Ghisetti, C. (2022). The Environmental Effects of the “Twin” Green and Digital Transition in European Regions. Environmental & Resource Economics, 83(4), 1097–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7
  12. Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2023). How Digitalization Supports a Sustainable Business Model: A Literature Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122146
  13. Bun, M. J., & Windmeijer, F. (2011). A Comparison of Bias Approximations for the Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) Estimator. Economics Letters, 113(1), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.047
  14. Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. (2021). Difference-in-Differences With Multiple Time Periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
  15. Chen, Y. (2022). Research on Collaborative Innovation of Key Common Technologies in New Energy Vehicle Industry Based on Digital Twin Technology. Energy Reports, 8, 15399–15407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.120
  16. Christensen, C. M. (2015). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail: Harvard Business Review Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=lURBCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR4&ots=-GImuo_Kr2m&sig=6C6EW3zvXTuLapJ83KelPpm-3c5o&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  17. Christofi, M., Zahoor, N., Khalid, A., & Usman, M. (2026). Rural Entrepreneurship: Leveraging Social Media for Circular Economies and Green Activism. Small Business Economics, 67, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-026-01190-y
  18. Christopoulos, D., Smyrnakis, D., & Tzavalis, E. (2025). Addressing Regressors' Endogeneity and the Identification of True Parameters. Econometrics and Statistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosta.2025.04.002
  19. Cicerone, G., Losacker, S., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2026). Relatedness and Regional Specialization in Green, Digital, and Twin Economic Activities: Evidence From the UK. The Annals of Regional Science, 75(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01445-8
  20. Clougherty, J. A., & Moliterno, T. P. (2010). Empirically Eliciting Complementarities in Capabilities: Integrating Quasi-Experimental and Panel Data Methodologies. Strategic Organization, 8(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010365019
  21. De Chaisemartin, C., & D' haultfoeuille, X. (2023). Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences Estimators With Several Treatments. Journal of Econometrics, 236(2), 105480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105480
  22. Eteris, E. (2020). Sustainability and Digitalization: Double Strategy Guidelines in National Development. Acta Prosperitatis, (11), 42–56. https://www.turiba.lv/storage/files/ap-11.pdf
  23. European Commission. (n.d.). Glossary: EU survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises. Eurostat Statistics Explained. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:EU_survey_on_ICT_usage_and_e-commerce_in_enterprises
  24. European Environment Agency. (2024, December 11). Eco-innovation index in Europe. Retrieved from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/eco-innovation-index-8th-eap
  25. Favot, M., Vesnic, L., Priore, R., Bincoletto, A., & Morea, F. (2023). Green Patents and Green Codes: How Different Methodologies Lead to Different Results. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 18, 200132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200132
  26. Fraga-Lamas, P., Lopes, S. I., & Fernández-Caramés, T. M. (2021). Green IoT and Edge AI as Key Technological Enablers for a Sustainable Digital Transition Towards a Smart Circular Economy: An Industry 5.0 Use Case. Sensors, 21(17), 5745. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175745
  27. Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012, April). The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA (p. 1818). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818
  28. Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Sorkin, I., & Swift, H. (2020). Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How. American Economic Review, 110(8), 2586–2624. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181047
  29. Hill, A. D., Johnson, S. G., Greco, L. M., O'Boyle, E. H., & Walter, S. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A Review and Agenda for the Methodology-Practice Divide Affecting Micro and Macro Research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320960533
  30. Huang, S., Tian, H., Tufail, B., & Aslam, S. (2026). Catalyzing Ambidextrous Green Innovation of SMEs Through Green Knowledge Capabilities, Green Entrepreneurial Intention, and Digital Financial Literacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 22(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-025-01144-y
  31. Huy, P. Q., & Phuc, V. K. (2026). Digital Twin Fosters Social Entrepreneurship for Smart Sustainable Infrastructure: Mediating Role of Environmental Management Accounting Practices. SN Business & Economics, 6(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-025-01041-0
  32. Khorishko, L., & Vasylchuk, T. (2022). Mechanisms For Ensuring Estonia's Permanent Development: The Environmental Aspect. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(3), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-3-205-209
  33. Kraus, S., Burtscher, J., Niemand, T., Roig-Tierno, N., & Syrjä, P. (2017). Configurational Paths to Social Performance in SMEs: The Interplay of Innovation, Sustainability, Resources and Achievement Motivation. Sustainability, 9(10), 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101828
  34. Liobikienė, G., & Brizga, J. (2025). Factors Influencing Carbon Footprint in Latvian Consumption: Environmental Awareness and a Socio-Economic Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 489, 144664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144664
  35. Liu, X., Liu, F., & Ren, X. (2023). Firms' Digitalization in Manufacturing and the Structure and Direction of Green Innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 335, 117525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117525
  36. Liu, Y., Liu, N., & Huo, Y. (2025). Impact of Digital Technology Innovation on Carbon Emission Reduction and Energy Rebound: Evidence From the Chinese Firm-Level. Energy, 320, 135187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135187
  37. Liu, S., Ma, X., & Yang, S. (2026). Substantive or Strategic? A Study on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Green Innovation. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 28(4), 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-026-03451-6
  38. Lowenstein, C. (2024). “Deaths of Despair” Over the Business Cycle: New Estimates From a Shift-Share Instrumental Variables Approach. Economics & Human Biology, 53, 101374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101374
  39. Magretta, J. (2002). Why Business Models Matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92. https://hbr.org/2002/05/why-business-models-matter
  40. Marra, G., & Radice, R. (2011). A Flexible Instrumental Variable Approach. Statistical Modelling, 11(6), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X1001100607
  41. Matricano, D., & Liguori, E. W. (2026). Can Digital Innovation Hubs Improve the Performance of SMEs? Empirical Evidence From Italy. Small Business Economics, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-026-01228-1
  42. Mondejar, M. E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H. L. B., Dubey, R. K., Esteban, J., Gómez-Morales, A., … & Garcia-Segura, S. (2021). Digitalization to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Steps Towards a Smart Green Planet. Science of The Total Environment, 794, 148539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539
  43. Morgan, K. (2013). The Regional State in the Era of Smart Specialisation. EKONOMIAZ: Revista vasca de Economía, (83), 103–126. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekz/ekonoz/2013205.html
  44. Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., Asikainen, T., Salvi, M., & Scapolo, F. (2022). Towards a Green & Digital Future. https://doi.org/10.2760/977331
  45. Odeyemi, O., Usman, F. O., Mhlongo, N. Z., Elufioye, O. A., & Ike, C. U. (2024). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Review of Green Business Practices and Environmental Impact. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0461
  46. Ozturkoglu, Y., Ozturkoglu, O., & Danisman, E. (2025). New Business Model Proposal in the Digital Age: Sustainability-Focused Servitization. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 38(6), 1776–1802. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2025-0124
  47. Petersen, N. H., & Rasmussen, E. (2024). Digital Entrepreneur's Platformication and Rapid Internationalization Through Brokering, Making and Giving Sense. Small Enterprise Research, 31(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2023.2288579
  48. Polimeni, J. M., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M., & Alcott, B. (2015). The Myth of Resource Efficiency: The Jevons Paradox. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315781358
  49. Samiepour, M., Barricelli, B. R., & Fogli, D. (2026). Fostering Sustainability With Digital Twins and Gamification: A Systematic Review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 85(6), 563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-026-21730-8
  50. Škare, M., Gavurova, B., & Porada-Rochon, M. (2024). Digitalization and Carbon Footprint: Building a Path to a Sustainable Economic Growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123045
  51. Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Digital Twin for Smart Manufacturing, A Review. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 2, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smse.2023.100017
  52. Štreimikienė, D. (2021). Low carbon energy transition of baltic states. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Podgorica: Economic Laboratory Transition Research (ELIT), 17(1), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2021.17-1.17
  53. Sun, L., & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies With Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
  54. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. (2018). Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
  55. Veugelers, R., Faivre, C., Rückert, D., & Weiss, C. (2023). The Green and Digital Twin Transition: EU vs US Firms. Intereconomics, 58(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2023-0010
  56. Vettik-Leemet, P., Raudsaar, M., & Kaseorg, M. (2020). The variety of aspects of business models in the high-growth and high-tech enterprises: An estonian case. In Business Models (pp. 49–80). Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003018124-4
  57. Wang, X., Tao, X., Bai, M. et al. The Role of Green Finance Policy in Fostering Twin Transition: An Empirical Investigation using Machine Learning Techniques. Inf Syst Front (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-026-10753-z
  58. Yan, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, M. (2024). Study on the Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Low-Carbon Agricultural Development in Guizhou Province—Empirical Analysis Based on Two-Way Fixed Effects Model and Mediated Effects Model. Procedia Computer Science, 242, 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.164
  59. Young, A. (2024). Nearly Collinear Robust Procedures for 2SLS Estimation. The Stata Journal, 24(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X241233668
  60. Zhou, W., Kriviņš, A., & Kaze, V. (2025a). Digital Twins and Innovation in Sustainability Management: A Bibliometric Analysis, Challenges and Future Directions. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 12(4), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.9770/e4829634749
  61. Zhou, W., Kriviņš, A., & Kaze, V. (2025b). Management in Real Estate: Powered by Digital Twins. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 13(2), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.9770/h9697726695
  62. Zou, Z., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Economic Digitalization and Energy Transition for Green Industrial Development Pathways. Ecological Informatics, 78, 102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2026-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2543-6821 | Journal ISSN: 2544-9001
Language: English
Page range: 304 - 326
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2026
Published on: Aug 7, 2026
Published by: Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
JEL:

© 2026 Weibo Zhou, Anatolijs Krivins, published by Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.