Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tack Coat Rate and Geotextile Coverage Influence on Interlayer Bonding and Rutting Resistance in Flexible Pavements Cover

Tack Coat Rate and Geotextile Coverage Influence on Interlayer Bonding and Rutting Resistance in Flexible Pavements

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Ali, M. H., Khalil, A. H., & Wang, Y. (2023). Experimental study of the effect of tack coats on interlayer bond strength of pavement. Sustainability, 15(8), 6600. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086600
  2. Alsadik, S. M., Al-Mosawe, H. M., & Thom, N. (2026). Influencing interface morphology and modified asphalt binders on interlayer bonding performance. Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.2026.163700.1677 https://qjes.qu.edu.iq/article_191561_bc2952d7d5626a645947d07896f889fe.pdf
  3. Al-Tameemi, A. F., Al-Fayyadh, Z. T., Al-Mosawe, H., Wang, Y., & Moyet, A. A. (2025). Sustainable Asphalt Mixtures Comprising Steel Slag Filler and SBS-Modified Binder: An Experimental Investigation. Civil Engineering Journal, 11(4), 1318–1330. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-04-04
  4. Ameri, M., Shahi, J., & Khani Sanij, H. (2013). A mathematical model for determination of structural value of geotextile in pavements. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 11, 60–66.
  5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2013). Standard method of test for determining rutting susceptibility of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) (AASHTO T 340-10).
  6. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2017). Standard specification for geosynthetic specification for highway applications (AASHTO M 288-17).
  7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2022). Determining the interlayer shear strength (ISS) of asphalt pavement layers (AASHTO TP 114-18).
  8. ASTM International. (2022). Standard test method for Marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures (ASTM D6927).
  9. Bahia, H., Sufian, A., Swiertz, D., Mohammad, L., & Akentuna, M. (2019). Investigation of tack coat materials tracking performance (WHRP 0092-17-06).
  10. Bianchini, A., Gonzalez, C. R., & Bell, H. P. (2018). Correction for the asphalt overlay thickness of flexible pavements considering pavement conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19(7), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1198480
  11. Biglari, M., Asgharzadeh, S. M., & Sharif Tehrani, S. (2019). Evaluation of factors affecting tack coat bond strength. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 46(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0290
  12. Canestrari, F., Cardone, F., Gaudenzi, E., Chiola, D., Gasbarro, N., & Ferrotti, G. (2022). Interlayer bonding characterization of interfaces reinforced with geocomposites in field applications. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 50(1), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.09.010
  13. Chen, S., Wang, D., Yi, J., & Feng, D. (2022). Analytical Calculations for Asphalt Pavement Considering Interlayer Performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 148(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000357
  14. Correia, N. de S., & Bueno, B. de S. (2011). Effect of bituminous impregnation on nonwoven geotextiles tensile and permeability properties. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.004
  15. Correia, N. S., Souza, T. R., Silva, M. P. S., & Kumar, V. V. (2023). Investigations on interlayer shear strength characteristics of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt overlay sections at Salvador International Airport. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 24(6), 1542–1558. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2022.2092021
  16. Correia, N. S., & Zornberg, J. G. (2016). Mechanical response of flexible pavements enhanced with geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays. Geosynthetics International, 23(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00041
  17. Delbono, H. L., & Giudice, C. A. (2014). Adherence in a pavement rehabilitated with a polymeric grid used as interlayer. Construction and Building Materials, 54, 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.098
  18. European Committee for Standardization. (2019). Bituminous mixtures—Test methods—Part 33: Specimen prepared by roller compactor (EN 12697-33:2019).
  19. European Committee for Standardization. (2020). Bituminous mixtures—Test methods—Part 22: Wheel tracking (EN 12697-22:2020).
  20. Federal Highway Administration. (2008). Geosynthetic design and construction guidelines (FHWA-NHI-07-092).
  21. Giri, J. P., & Panda, M. (2018). Laboratory Evaluation of Inter-layer Bond Strength Between Bituminous Paving Layers. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 5(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-018-0064-z
  22. Guo, W., Bai, Z., Zhang, Q., Tong, D., & Chen, S. (2025). Influence of Interlayer Bonding Conditions Between Base and Surface Layers on Structural Mechanics Response of Asphalt Pavements. Buildings, 15(16), 2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162922
  23. Jia, X., & Huang, B. (2022). Characterization of Shear Resistance of Interlayer between Concrete Bridge Deck and Asphalt Concrete Overlay Utilizing Inclination Shear Test. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004051
  24. Karki, P., Mraiza, Z., Karnei, E., & Hu, S. (2022). Performance-graded asphalt binder selection catalog for asphalt overlays. Construction and Building Materials, 319, 126012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126012
  25. Kumar, A. (2024). The Bond Between the Bituminous Paving Layers: Lab Scale Assessment. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(6).
  26. Lee, S. L., Mannan, M. A., & Wan Ibrahim, W. H. (2020). Shear strength evaluation of composite pavement with geotextile as reinforcement at the interface. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 48(3), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.002
  27. Liu, J., Zhao, S., Li, L., & Li, P. (2018). Evaluation of Cracking Resistance in Alaskan Asphalt Pavement with Paving Interlayers. Journal of Cold Regions Engineering, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000162
  28. Menkash, O. A., Joni, H. H., & Nsaif, M. H. (2024). An experimental study on the tensile properties of reinforced asphalt pavement. Open Engineering, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0591
  29. Meteab, A., Al-khafaji, F., Mohammed, T., Latif, M., Hussein, A., Ali, Y., Ali, A., Jebur, Y., Ali, L., Al-Mulali, M., & Al-khazraji, A. (2022). Prospect of using geotextile reinforcement within flexible pavement layers to reduce the effects of rutting in the middle and southern parts of Iraq. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 31, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0040/html
  30. Moghadas Nejad, F., Noory, A., Toolabi, S., & Fallah, S. (2015). Effect of using geosynthetics on reflective crack prevention. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16(6), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.943128
  31. Musselman, J., Moraes, R., Walbeck, T., & West, R. C. (2020). Methods for addressing tack tracking: Literature review (NCAT Report 20-06).
  32. Panda, M., Sutradhar, B., Giri, J., & Chattaraj, U. (2013). An Experimental Study on Assessment of Pavement Interlayer Bond Strength. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1260/2046-0430.2.2.141
  33. Pasetto, M., Pasquini, E., Giacomello, G., & Baliello, A. (2019). Innovative composite materials as reinforcing interlayer systems for asphalt pavements: an experimental study. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20(sup2), S617–S631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1628438
  34. Raja, K., Saxena, V., & Sharma, J. K. K. (2019). Pavement design using geo-textiles. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 6(4).
  35. Rezende, J. de P., Pitanga, H. N., Da Silva, T. O., Marques, G. L. de O., & Pereira, G. S. (2020). Structural analysis of reinforced asphalt pavement by impregnated surface geotextile. Transportes, 28(5), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v28i3.2203
  36. Salman, N., & Joni, H. (2025). Tire contact pressure effects on stress responses of scaled models of geotextile-reinforced flexible pavements over weak subgrade. Engineering and Technology Journal, 43(11), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2025.164322.2009
  37. Sarsam, S. I. (2025). Viscoelastic behavior of geotextile reinforced asphalt concrete. Civil Engineering Beyond Limits, 3, 11002.
  38. Silva, M. P. S., Saxena, A., Kumar, V. V., Correia, N. S., & Zornberg, J. G. (2024). Influence of interface bond strength on fracture resistance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt. E3S Web of Conferences, 569, 21003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456921003
  39. Silva, M. P. S., Zornberg, J. G., & Correia, N. S. (2024). Predictive model for the interface bond strength of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt layers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 52(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.05.002
  40. Singh, S., & Malhotra, S. (2018). Evaluation of Bond between Bituminous Paving Layers in Laboratory. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 1(11).
  41. Solatiyan, E., Bueche, N., Vaillancourt, M., & Carter, A. (2020). Permeability and mechanical property measurements of reinforced asphalt overlay with paving fabrics using novel approaches. Materials and Structures, 53(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-1440-z
  42. State Corporation for Roads and Bridges. (2003). General specification for roads and bridges: Section R/9, hot-mix asphalt concrete pavement (SCRB/R9).
  43. Sudarsanan, N., Karpurapu, R., & Amrithalingam, V. (2018). An investigation on the interface bond strength of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt concrete using Leutner shear test. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.010
  44. Sudarsanan, N., Mohapatra, S. R., Karpurapu, R., & Amirthalingam, V. (2018). Use of Natural Geotextiles to Retard Reflection Cracking in Highway Pavements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002195
  45. Sun, G., Ling, J., Tao, Z., Qian, J., & Cai, Y. (2020). Effect of geotextile on reduction of reflective cracking induced by traffic load in asphalt concrete. HKIE Transactions, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.33430/V27N2THIE-2017-0023
  46. Wang, X., Zhou, X., & Zhang, X. (2021). Laboratory Characterization of Geosynthetics-Reinforced Asphalt Mixture. Materials, 14(21), 6424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216424
  47. West, R. C., Zhang, J., & Moore, J. (2005). Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers (NCAT Report 05-08).
  48. Yang, K., & Li, R. (2021). Characterization of bonding property in asphalt pavement interlayer: A review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 8(3), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.10.005
  49. Yang, K., Li, R., Yu, Y., Pei, J., & Liu, T. (2020). Evaluation of interlayer stability in asphalt pavements based on shear fatigue property. Construction and Building Materials, 258, 119628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119628
  50. Yin, Z., Ndiema, K. M., Lekalpure, R. L., & Kiptum, C. K. (2022). Numerical Study of Geotextile-Reinforced Flexible Pavement Overlying Low-Strength Subgrade. Applied Sciences, 12(20), 10325. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010325
  51. Zamora-Barraza, D., Calzada-Pérez, M. A., Castro-Fresno, D., & Vega-Zamanillo, A. (2011). Evaluation of anti-reflective cracking systems using geosynthetics in the interlayer zone. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.005
  52. Zaniewski, J. P., Knihtila, S. F., & Rashidi, H. N. (2015). Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Asphalt Overlays. Airfield and Highway Pavements 2015, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479216.017
  53. Zhang, H., Sun, B., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Adhesive Property and Road Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Overlay Pavement with Geotextile Interlayer. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3084668
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2027-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 (formerly 1336-5835) | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 26, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 22, 2026
Published on: Aug 19, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Hassan H. Al-Abodi, Ahmed F. Al-Tameemi, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.