Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Structural Behaviour of Hollow One-way Slabs of Recycled Concrete Aggregate with Rectangular Longitudinal Cavities for Sustainability: An Experimental and Numerical Study Cover

Structural Behaviour of Hollow One-way Slabs of Recycled Concrete Aggregate with Rectangular Longitudinal Cavities for Sustainability: An Experimental and Numerical Study

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Abdulkareem, O. M., Alshahwany, R. B., Shlla, R. D., & Anas, S. (2024). Performance of zero-slump concrete made with recycled concrete aggregate. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 20 (1), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2024-0036.
  2. Abdulhussein, S. S., Alkhafaji, S. F., & J. F., Al-kaabi, H. (2023). The flexural behavior of hollow core concrete slabs with different shape. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 21(3), 778–784. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-41643.
  3. Adesina, A., & Zhang, J. (2024). Impact of concrete structures durability on its sustainability and climate resiliency. Next Sustainability, 3(January), 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100025.
  4. Ahmed, S., Hano, M. M. A., & Hano, S. M. A. (2025). Fracture energy and mechanical properties of concrete incorporated with recycled coarse concrete aggregate exposed to temperatures. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 21(2), 812–824. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2025-0058.
  5. Al-azzawi, A. A., & Abed, S. A. (2016). NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE HOLLOW-CORE SLABS. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(15), 9284–9296.
  6. Al-Bayati, J. K., Mohsin Abuzaid, E. K., & Mohammed, M. H. (2024). Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete One-way Slabs with Longitudinal Hollows. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 28(5), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.28.5.2.
  7. Al-fakher, U., Manalo, A., Alajarmeh, O., Aravinthan, T., & Zhuge, Y. (2021). Axial behaviour of precast concrete panels with hollow composite reinforcing systems. Structures, 32(May 2020), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.015.
  8. Al-gasham, T. S., Hilo, A. N., & Alawsi, M. A. (2019). Structural behavior of reinforced concrete one-way slabs voided by polystyrene balls. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 11, e00292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00292.
  9. ASTM C33. (2018). Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates: Vol. i (pp. 1–3). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0033.
  10. ASTM C494. (2017). Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete (p. 10).
  11. ASTM International. (2015). ASTM C 150/C150M-15 Standard specification for portland cement. ASTM International, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0150.
  12. Benhelal, E., Shamsaei, E., & Rashid, M. I. (2021). Challenges against CO 2 abatement strategies in cement industry: A review. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 104, 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.11.020.
  13. CASQC. (2019). Iraqi specification for Portland cement No. 5 (p. 11). www.cosqc.gov.iq.
  14. Cement, T. E. (2011). The role of CEMENT in the 2050 LOW CARBON ECONOMY (T. EUROPEAN & CEMENT ASSOCIATION (eds.)). THE EUROPEAN CEMENT ASSOCIATION.
  15. David C. Wilson, L. R. (2024). Global Waste Management Outlook (United Nations (ed.)). ISWA.
  16. EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2 (2004). Design of Concrete Structures-Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (p. 227).
  17. Grau, C., Hasselsteen, L., Stapel, E. B., Birgisd, H., & Kanafani, K. (2025). Evaluating the environmental impact of construction waste: A comprehensive analysis of End-of-Life scenarios in Environmental Product Declarations. 280(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113159.
  18. Hakeem, N., Ma, T. U., Hammood, M. N., & Mohsin, R. D. (2021). Flexural strength estimation for hollow cross-section simply supported uhpc beams. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 17(2), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0050.
  19. Hsino, M., & Jankowiak, T. (2022). Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Concrete Maturation Process with Additive of Phase Change Materials. Materials Mdpi, 15(4687), 1–21. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/ma15134687.
  20. Ighalo, J. O., & George, A. (2020). A perspective on environmental sustainability in the cement industry. Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy, 2(July), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-020-00043-y.
  21. Jabbar, A. M. (2023). Impact of Failure-surface Parameters of Concrete Damage Plasticity Model on the Behavior of Reinforced Ultra-high Performance Concrete Beams. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 67(2), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.21345.
  22. Jonny Nilimaa. (2023). Smart materials and technologies for sustainable concrete construction. Developments in the Built Environment Journal, 15(May), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100177.
  23. Kanth, L. L., & Poluraju, P. (2023). STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF VOIDED FLAT SLAB WITH VARIOUS VOID RATIOS UNDER VERTICAL LOADING. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 19(1), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2023-0027.
  24. Kheder, G. F., & Al-Windawi, S. A. (2005). Variation in mechanical properties of natural and recycled aggregate concrete as related to the strength of their binding mortar. Materials and Structures, 38(7), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484315.
  25. Khouzani, M. A., Zeynalian, M., Hashemi, M., Mosto, D., & Farahbod, F. (2020). Study on shear behavior and capacity of biaxial ellipsoidal voided slabs. Structures, 27(June), 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.017.
  26. Mahdi, A. A., & Ismael, M. A. (2021). Structural Behavior of Hollow-core One Way Slabs of High Strength Self-compacting Concrete. International Journal of Engineering, 34(01), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2021.34.01a.05.
  27. Mohamad, N., Muthusamy, K., Embong, R., Kusbiantoro, A., & Hanafi, M. (2021). Environmental impact of cement production and Solutions: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 48 (2022) 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.212.
  28. Omar, A., & Muthusamy, K. (2021). Concrete Industry, Environment Issue, and Green Concrete: A Review. CONSTRUCTION, 2(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15282/cons.v2i1.7188.
  29. Programme, U. N. E. (2024). Global Waste Management Outlook 2024: Beyond an age of waste – Turning rubbish into a resource. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/44939.
  30. Purchase, C. K., Manna, D., Zulayq, A., Brien, B. T. O., Kowalewski, M. J., Berenjian, A., Tarighaleslami, A. H., & Seifan, M. (2022). Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits. Materials Mdpi, 15(76), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076.
  31. Shkirman, K., Stoppato, A., Giussani, F., & Pezzutto, S. (2025). Investigating circularity in the construction and demolition sector through remote sensing: A case study of Bolzano / Bozen, Italy. Circular Economy, 4(3), 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2025.100156.
  32. Sika Corporation. (2022). Sika ViscoCrete ® -180GS (Issue 12, pp. 1–2).
  33. Simulia, D. S. (2012). Getting Started with Abaqus: Interactive Edition. In Dassault Systèmes: Vol. 6.12 (6.12). Dassault Systèmes, 2012 Abaqus, http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/computing/software/abaqus_docs/docs/v6.12/pdf_books/GET_STARTED.pdf.
  34. Solhmirzaei, R., & Kodur, V. K. R. (2017). Modeling the response of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams. Procedia Engineering, 210, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.068.
  35. Technical Committee CEN/TC250. (2011). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-2: General rules (Vol. 1, Issue 2005). European committee for standardization. https://doi.org/ICS 13.220.50; 91.010.30; 91.080.40.
  36. Wolfova, M. (2022). Concrete Structures and Their Impacts on Climate Change, Water, and Raw Material Resource Depletion. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 8, 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00701-8.
  37. Xu, Y., Liu, S., & Heisel, F. (2024). Towards sustainable construction waste management: Study on a disassemblable brick partition wall for the architecture, construction, and engineering industry. Circular Economy, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2024.100078.
  38. Zhang, H., Shi, S., Zhao, F., Hu, M., & Fu, X. (2024). Integrated Benefits of Sustainable Utilization of Construction and Demolition Waste in a Pressure-State-Response Framework. Sustainability, 16(8459), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198459.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2027-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 (formerly 1336-5835) | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 12, 2026
Accepted on: May 1, 2026
Published on: Jun 25, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Zahraa Gheni Jebur, Adil Mahdi Jabbar, Thaar Saud Salman Al-Gasham, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.