Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrated Static–dynamic Assessment and Field-validated External Prestressing Strengthening of an Aging Steel Railway Bridge Cover

Integrated Static–dynamic Assessment and Field-validated External Prestressing Strengthening of an Aging Steel Railway Bridge

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Armijo, A., et al. (2024). Integration of railway bridge structural health monitoring and digital twin using low-cost wireless accelerometers and machine learning. Sensors, 24(7), 2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072115.
  2. Atta, A. M., et al. (2024). Effectiveness of external prestressing in enhancing the non-ductile hanger failure mitigation of inverted T-beams. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1026-x.
  3. Bacinskas, D., Kamaitis, Z., Jatulis, D., & Kilikevicius, A. (2013). Load testing and model updating of a single-span composite steel–concrete railway bridge. Procedia Engineering, 57, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.019.
  4. Bayraktar, A., et al. (2017). Static and dynamic field load testing of the long span Nissibi cable-stayed bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 94, pp. 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.019.
  5. Bertolesi, E., Buitrago, M., Adam, J. M., & Calderón, P. A. (2021). Fatigue assessment of steel riveted railway bridges: Full-scale tests and analytical approach. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 182, 106664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106664.
  6. Bień, J., Kużawa, M., & Kamiński, T. (2020). Strategies and tools for the monitoring of concrete bridges. Structural Concrete, 21(4), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900410.
  7. Borzovič, V., Halvonik, J., & Paulík, P. (2026). Experience in monitoring the state of the load-bearing structure of prestressed concrete bridge to extend its operation. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Advance online publication. Sciendo (De Gruyter). https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0036.
  8. Cao, J., & An, L. (2023). Static load test detection of continuous rigid frame railway bridge. Journal of Architectural Research and Development, 7(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26689/jard.v7i5.5207.
  9. Chacón, R., et al. (2024). Digital twinning during load tests of railway bridges: Case study of the high-speed railway network, Extremadura, Spain. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(7–8), 1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2264840.
  10. Duvnjak, I., Bartolac, M., Damjanović, D., & Košćak, J. (2020). Performance assessment of a concrete railway bridge by diagnostic load testing. Structural Concrete, 21(6), 2363–2376. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900491.
  11. Duvnjak, I., Damjanović, D., Bartolac, M., Frančić Smrkić, M., & Skender, A. (2019). Monitoring and diagnostic load testing of a damaged railway bridge. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5, 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00108.
  12. Fang, D., et al. (2024). Flexural performance and stress calculation of external prestressing using FRP bars. Materials, 17(5), 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051130.
  13. Fawad, M., et al. (2023). Automation of structural health monitoring (SHM) system of a bridge using BIMification approach. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40355-7.
  14. Gedam, V. G., Meshram, V., & Mase, D. (2020). Condition assessment and structural analysis of P.C.C railway bridge. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(11), 1199–1205.
  15. Guo, H., et al. (2024). Monitoring and analysis of prestress loss in prestressed box girder bridges strengthened with external prestressing. Sensors, 24(14), 4549. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144549.
  16. He, H., et al. (2023). Bridge model updating based on wavelet neural network and wind-driven optimization algorithm. Sensors, 23(22), 9185. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229185.
  17. Hekič, D., et al. (2024). Improved finite element model updating of a highway viaduct using strain- and acceleration-based analyses. Sensors, 24(9), 2788. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24092788.
  18. Hekič, D., et al. (2025). Model updating of bridges using measured influence lines. Applied Sciences, 15(8), 4514. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084514.
  19. Hlinka, R., Farbák, M., & Odrobiňák, J. (2024). The use of up-to-date analyses for the temporary bridges application in the present. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 20(1), 491–507. Sciendo (De Gruyter). https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2024-0038.
  20. Innocenzi, R. D., et al. (2022). A Good Practice for the Proof Testing of Cable-Stayed Bridges. Applied Science. 2022, 12, 3547. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073547.
  21. Karavasilis, T. L., Lou, T., & Chen, B. (2021). Assessment of second-order effect in externally prestressed steel–concrete composite beams. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001718.
  22. Kim, S. W., Yun, D. W., Chang, S. J., Park, D. U., & Park, J. B. (2022). Dynamic stability assessment of high-speed railway bridges using numerical model updating. Applied Sciences, 12(8), 3948. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083948.
  23. Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Regulation of the Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia. No 69 of 2018. Railway safety management systems.
  24. Li, L., & Ohkubo, T. (2024). Wireless vibration testing and bridge deck damage identification using underneath maintenance walkway. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77179-y.
  25. Liu, Z., et al. (2024). Load testing and analysis of a large span through simply-supported steel box arch bridge. Applied Sciences, 14(23), 11418. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311418.
  26. Lantsoght, E. O. L., Schmidt, J. W., & Sas, G. (2024). Bridge load testing: Recent advances in research, collaboration, and codes. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003483755-31.
  27. Moravvej, M., et al. (2024). Reference-free vibration-based damage identification of bridges using time–frequency features. Sensors, 24(3), 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030876.
  28. Nawy, E. G. (2009). Prestressed concrete: A fundamental approach. Pearson.
  29. Nhung, N. T. C., et al. (2023). Development and application of LVDT sensors for structural health monitoring of an urban railway bridge in Vietnam. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 13(5), 11622–11627. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6192.
  30. Odrobiňák, J., Vičan, J., Hlinka, R., Prokop, J., & Vavák, B. (2025). On the load-carrying capacity determination of railway box-girder bridges using the reduced stress method. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Advance online publication. Sciendo (De Gruyter). https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0021.
  31. Qiao, L., et al. (2025). Analysis of bridge dynamic load test based on millimeter-wave radar. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96196-z.
  32. Qi, Z., Fang, S., Lin, G., & Wang, H. (2011). Static and dynamic experiment of the behavior of the constructed Hanjiang super-major railway bridge in Laohekou. Advanced Materials Research, 255–260, 1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.1230.
  33. Rahman, A. K., et al. (2024). A simplified method for estimating bridge frequency effects as a function of train-to-bridge mass ratio. Frontiers in Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1382210.
  34. Recupero, A., Spinella, N., Colajanni, P., & Scilipoti, C. D. (2014). Increasing the capacity of existing bridges by using unbonded prestressing technology: A case study. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2014, 840902. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/840902.
  35. Rehacek, S., Citek, D., Holy, M., Krystov, M., Citek, A., & Mezera, A. (2026). Diagnostic survey of prestressed concrete bridges in Prague. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Advance online publication. Sciendo (De Gruyter). https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0049.
  36. Ren, Z., et al. (2025). Bending test and numerical simulation of externally prestressed reinforcement applied to concrete beams. Materials, 18(13), 3024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18133024.
  37. Su, H. C., et al. (2024). Fiber monitoring system applied to railway bridge corrosion and deformation assessment. Applied Sciences, 14(17), 7883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177883.
  38. Topurova, I. (2023). Testing of a temporary railway bridge and analysis of the results. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1297(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1297/1/012003.
  39. Zapata, J., et al. (2025). Models for the analysis of the structural capacity of main steel railway bridges. Modeling, 5(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/modeling5020038.
  40. Zhao, H., et al. (2025). Experimental investigation on flexural behavior of precast segmental bridges with external prestressing tendons. Buildings, 15(4), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040642.
  41. Zhou, W., et al. (2025). Finite element model updating for a continuous beam–arch composite bridge based on the RSM and a nutcracker optimization algorithm. Sensors, 25(15), 4831. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25154831.
  42. Zou, Y., et al. (2024). Dynamic response analysis of a train–track–bridge coupled system for railway bridge vibration under train loads. Frontiers in Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1498790.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0111 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 31, 2026
Published on: May 22, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Sumargo Sumargo, Mardiana Oesman, Fachmi Fadli, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT