Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of Climate Models Using Bergen Metrics as a Multi-Metrics Comparison over Indonesia Cover

Evaluation of Climate Models Using Bergen Metrics as a Multi-Metrics Comparison over Indonesia

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Ahmed, A., Al-Said, T., Madhusoodhanan, R., Naqvi, S. W. A., Sarkar, A., Fernandes, L., Thuslim, F., Al-Zakri, W., & Al-Yamani, F. (2022). Environmental impact of a series of flash flood events on a hypersaline subtropical system in the Northwestern Arabian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 175, 113394. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2022.113394.
  2. Ahmed, K., Shahid, S., Wang, X., Nawaz, N., & Khan, N. (2019). Evaluation of Gridded Precipitation Datasets over Arid Regions of Pakistan. Water, 11(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020210.
  3. Akinsanola, A. A., Ongoma, V., & Kooperman, G. J. (2021). Evaluation of CMIP6 models in simulating the statistics of extreme precipitation over Eastern Africa. Atmospheric Research, 254, 105509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105509.
  4. Aldrian, E., & Dwi Susanto, R. (2003). Identification of three dominant rainfall regions within Indonesia and their relationship to sea surface temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 23(12), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.950
  5. Andrews, T., Forster, P. M., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., & Jones, A. (2010). Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(14). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043991.
  6. Aslam, A. A. (2025). Rainfall over the Maritime Continent: key processes, scale interactions and model representation. Weather, 80(6), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.7731.
  7. Baba, Y. (2020). Diurnal cycle of precipitation over the Maritime Continent simulated by a spectral cumulus parameterization. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 91, 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2020.101160.
  8. Beaugrand, G., Reid, P. C., & Conversi, A. (2025). Acceleration of changes in global surface temperature after the Earth system has crossed a tipping point. Climate Research, 95, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01756.
  9. Bock, L., Lauer, A., Schlund, M., Barreiro, M., Bellouin, N., Jones, C., Meehl, G. A., Predoi, V., Roberts, M. J., & Eyring, V. (2020). Quantifying Progress Across Different CMIP Phases With the ESMValTool. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(21). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032321.
  10. Chen, W., Jiang, Z., & Li, L. (2011). Probabilistic projections of climate change over China under the SRES A1B scenario using 28 AOGCMs. Journal of Climate, 24(17), 4741–4756. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4102.1.
  11. Desmet, Q., & Ngo-Duc, T. (2022). A novel method for ranking CMIP6 global climate models over the southeast Asian region. International Journal of Climatology, 42(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7234.
  12. Diaconescu, E. P., Gachon, P., & Laprise, R. (2015). On the Remapping Procedure of Daily Precipitation Statistics and Indices Used in Regional Climate Model Evaluation. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 16(6), 2301–2310. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0025.1.
  13. Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5), 1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.
  14. Eyring, V., Cox, P. M., Flato, G. M., Gleckler, P. J., Abramowitz, G., Caldwell, P., Collins, W. D., Gier, B. K., Hall, A. D., Hoffman, F. M., Hurtt, G. C., Jahn, A., Jones, C. D., Klein, S. A., Krasting, J. P., Kwiatkowski, L., Lorenz, R., Maloney, E., Meehl, G. A., … Williamson, M. S. (2019). Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0355-y.
  15. Fan, X., Duan, Q., Shen, C., Wu, Y., & Xing, C. (2022). Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations and future projections of temperature over the Pan-Third Pole region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(18), 26214–26229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17474-7.
  16. Fofana, M., Adounkpe, J., Larbi, I., Hounkpe, J., Djan’na Koubodana, H., Toure, A., Bokar, H., Dotse, S. Q., & Limantol, A. M. (2022). Urban flash flood and extreme rainfall events trend analysis in Bamako, Mali. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVC.2022.100449.
  17. Forster, P. M., Smith, C., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Cassou, C., Hauser, M., Hausfather, Z., Lee, J.-Y., Palmer, M. D., von Schuckmann, K., Slangen, A. B. A., Szopa, S., Trewin, B., Yun, J., Gillett, N. P., Jenkins, S., Matthews, H. D., Raghavan, K., … Zhai, P. (2025). Indicators of Global Climate Change 2024: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth System Science Data, 17(6), 2641–2680. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2641-2025.
  18. Gebrechorkos, S., Leyland, J., Slater, L., Wortmann, M., Ashworth, P. J., Bennett, G. L., Boothroyd, R., Cloke, H., Delorme, P., Griffith, H., Hardy, R., Hawker, L., McLelland, S., Neal, J., Nicholas, A., Tatem, A. J., Vahidi, E., Parsons, D. R., & Darby, S. E. (2023). A high-resolution daily global dataset of statistically downscaled CMIP6 models for climate impact analyses. Scientific Data, 10(1), 611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02528-x.
  19. Graff, L. S., Landgren, O. A., Parding, K. M., Levine, X., Williams, R. S., & Mooney, P. A. (2025). Selecting CMIP6 Models for Future Arctic Storylines Using a Novel Performance Score. Tellus, 78(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusa.4111
  20. Gu, G., & Adler, R. F. (2018). Precipitation Intensity Changes in the Tropics from Observations and Models. Journal of Climate, 31(12), 4775–4790. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0550.1.
  21. Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., & Martinez, G. F. (2009). Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377(1–2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
  22. Gutowski Jr., W. J., Giorgi, F., Timbal, B., Frigon, A., Jacob, D., Kang, H.-S., Raghavan, K., Lee, B., Lennard, C., Nikulin, G., O’Rourke, E., Rixen, M., Solman, S., Stephenson, T., & Tangang, F. (2016). WCRP COordinated Regional Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX): a diagnostic MIP for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(11), 4087–4095. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4087-2016.
  23. Ha, T. V., Huth, J., Bachofer, F., & Kuenzer, C. (2022). A Review of Earth Observation-Based Drought Studies in Southeast Asia. Remote Sensing, 14(15), 3763. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153763.
  24. Hansen, J. E., Kharecha, P., Sato, M., Tselioudis, G., Kelly, J., Bauer, S. E., Ruedy, R., Jeong, E., Jin, Q., Rignot, E., Velicogna, I., Schoeberl, M. R., von Schuckmann, K., Amponsem, J., Cao, J., Keskinen, A., Li, J., & Pokela, A. (2025). Global Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 67(1), 6–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2025.2434494.
  25. HARA, M., YOSHIKANE, T., TAKAHASHI, H. G., KIMURA, F., NODA, A., & TOKIOKA, T. (2009). Assessment of the Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation over the Maritime Continent Simulated by a 20 km Mesh GCM Using TRMM PR Data. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 87A, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.87A.413.
  26. Hariadi, M. H., van der Schrier, G., Steeneveld, G., Ratri, D. N., Sopaheluwakan, A., Tank, A. K., Aldrian, E., Gunawan, D., Moine, M., Bellucci, A., Senan, R., Tourigny, E., Putrasahan, D. A., & Linarka, U. A. (2023). Evaluation of extreme precipitation over Southeast Asia in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 regional climate model results and HighResMIP global climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 43(3), 1639–1659. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7938.
  27. Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., & Lister, D. (2020). Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Scientific Data, 7(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3.
  28. Khadka, D., Babel, M. S., Abatan, A. A., & Collins, M. (2022). An evaluation of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models in simulating summer rainfall in the Southeast Asian monsoon domain. International Journal of Climatology, 42(2), 1181–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7296.
  29. Kling, H., Fuchs, M., & Paulin, M. (2012). Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios. Journal of Hydrology, 424–425, 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011.
  30. Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., & Woods, R. A. (2019). Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash-Sutcliffe and Kling-Gupta efficiency scores. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(10), 4323–4331. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019.
  31. Krinner, G., & Flanner, M. G. (2018). Striking stationarity of large-scale climate model bias patterns under strong climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(38), 9462–9466. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807912115.
  32. Lalande, M., Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Naegeli, K., & Wunderle, S. (2021). Climate change in the High Mountain Asia in CMIP6. Earth System Dynamics, 12(4), 1061–1098. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1061-2021.
  33. Lauer, A., Bock, L., Hassler, B., Schröder, M., & Stengel, M. (2023). Cloud Climatologies from Global Climate Models—A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models with Satellite Data. Journal of Climate, 36(2), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0181.1.
  34. Legates, D. R., & McCabe, G. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35(1), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018.
  35. Love, B. S., Matthews, A. J., & Lister, G. M. S. (2011). The diurnal cycle of precipitation over the Maritime Continent in a high-resolution atmospheric model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(657), 934–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.809.
  36. Mohammadlou, M., Bahremand, A., Princz, D., Kinar, N., Haghnegahdar, A., & Razavi, S. (2022). Objective evaluation of the Global Environmental Multiscale Model (GEM) with precipitation and temperature for Iran. Natural Resource Modeling, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12343.
  37. Nazeri Tahroudi, M. (2025). Comprehensive global assessment of precipitation trend and pattern variability considering their distribution dynamics. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 22458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06050-5.
  38. Ngo-Duc, T., Nguyen-Duy, T., Desmet, Q., Trinh-Tuan, L., Ramu, L., Cruz, F., Dado, J. M., Chung, J. X., Phan-Van, T., Pham-Thanh, H., Truong-Ba, K., Tangang, F. T., Juneng, L., Santisirisomboon, J., Srisawadwong, R., Permana, D., Linarka, U. A., & Gunawan, D. (2024). Performance ranking of multiple CORDEX-SEA sensitivity experiments: towards an optimum choice of physical schemes for RegCM over Southeast Asia. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07353-5.
  39. Nguyen, P. L., Alexander, L. V., Thatcher, M. J., Truong, S. C. H., Isphording, R. N., & Mcgregor, J. L. (2024). Selecting CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) for Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) dynamical downscaling over Southeast Asia using a standardised benchmarking framework. Geoscientific Model Development, 17(19), 7285–7315. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7285-2024.
  40. Nguyen-Duy, T., Ngo-Duc, T., & Desmet, Q. (2023). Performance evaluation and ranking of CMIP6 global climate models over Vietnam. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(6), 1831–1846. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.454.
  41. Nofrizal, Fauzan, Hakam, A., Istijono, B., & Aprisal. (2025). Analysis of the Effect of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Steepness on Landslide Disaster. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 21(2), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2025-0073.
  42. Ouyang, H., Baklanov, A., Tang, X., Wang, P., & Zhang, R. (2025). Urgency and importance of local-scale modeling tools to support climate adaptation and sustainable development. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 19(12), 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-2091-7.
  43. Pellicone, G., & Caloiero, T. (2025). Assessment and ranking of CMIP6-global climate models over the Calabria region (southern Italy). Journal of Hydrology, 661, 133655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133655.
  44. Pour, S. H., Shahid, S., & Mainuddin, M. (2022). Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 149(1–2), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04076-7.
  45. Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Cuaresma, J. C., KC, S., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., … Tavoni, M. (2017). The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009.
  46. Sa’adi, Z., Awhari, D. P., Kemarau, R. A., Zainon Noor, Z., Taining, Z., Ahmad, M. F., Salem, A., Muniandy, G., Mohammed Dafalla, M. F., Nursiwan, W. A., Maha, M. R. A., Astuti, A. D., & Al-Husban, S. A. (2026). Optimizing category-based statistical metrics for selecting global climate models in rainfall projections for Peninsular Malaysia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 157(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05952-8.
  47. Samantaray, A. K., Mooney, P. A., & Vivacqua, C. A. (2024). Bergen metrics: Composite error metrics for assessing performance of climate models using EURO-CORDEX simulations. Geoscientific Model Development, 17(8), 3321–3339. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3321-2024.
  48. Schaller, N., Mahlstein, I., Cermak, J., & Knutti, R. (2011). Analyzing precipitation projections: A comparison of different approaches to climate model evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116(D10), D10118. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014963.
  49. Scherrer, S. C. (2011). Present-day interannual variability of surface climate in CMIP3 models and its relation to future warming. International Journal of Climatology, 31(10), 1518–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2170.
  50. Taylor, K. E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 106(D7), 7183–7192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719.
  51. Tebaldi, C., Debeire, K., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Fyfe, J., Friedlingstein, P., Knutti, R., Lowe, J., O’Neill, B., Sanderson, B., van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., Meinshausen, M., Nicholls, Z., Tokarska, K. B., Hurtt, G., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Meehl, G.,… & Ziehn, T. (2021). Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6. Earth System Dynamics, 12(1), 253–293. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-253-2021.
  52. Tost, H., Jöckel, P., & Lelieveld, J. (2006). Influence of different convection parameterisations in a GCM. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6(12), 5475–5493. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5475-2006.
  53. Tripathy, K. P., Mukherjee, S., Mishra, A. K., Mann, M. E., & Williams, A. P. (2023). Climate change will accelerate the high-end risk of compound drought and heatwave events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(28). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219825120.
  54. van den Besselaar, E. J. M., van der Schrier, G., Cornes, R. C., Iqbal, A. S., & Klein Tank, A. M. G. (2017). SA-OBS: A Daily Gridded Surface Temperature and Precipitation Dataset for Southeast Asia. Journal of Climate, 30(14), 5151–5165. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0575.1.
  55. Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Tramblay, Y., Reig, F., González-Hidalgo, J. C., Beguería, S., Brunetti, M., Kalin, K. C., Patalen, L., Kržič, A., Lionello, P., Lima, M. M., Trigo, R. M., El-Kenawy, A. M., Eddenjal, A., Türkes, M., Koutroulis, A., Manara, V., Maugeri, M., Badi, W., … Potopová, V. (2025). High temporal variability not trend dominates Mediterranean precipitation. Nature, 639(8055), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08576-6.
  56. Voon, K. L., Tan, K. W., & Chin, K. S. (2022). Assessment of the Flood and Drought Occurrence Using Statistically Downscaled Local Climate Models: A Case Study in Langat River Basin, Malaysia. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 18(1), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0021.
  57. Wagener, T., Reinecke, R., & Pianosi, F. (2022). On the evaluation of climate change impact models. WIREs Climate Change, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.772.
  58. Wang, L., Liu, Z., & Jiang, D. (2025). Overestimation of Interannual Temperature Variability Over China by CMIP6 Simulations: The Role of Snow Cover and Cloud Representation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043551.
  59. Wang, L., Wang, L., Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). A century-long analysis of global warming and earth temperature using a random walk with drift approach. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DAJOUR.2023.100237.
  60. Wei, Y., Pu, Z., & Zhang, C. (2020). Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation Over the Maritime Continent Under Modulation of MJO: Perspectives From Cloud-Permitting Scale Simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(13). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032529.
  61. Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30, 79–82. www.int-res.com.
  62. Willmott, C. J., Robeson, S. M., & Matsuura, K. (2012). A refined index of model performance. International Journal of Climatology, 32(13), 2088–2094. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2419.
  63. Yang, X., Zhou, B., Xu, Y., & Han, Z. (2021). CMIP6 Evaluation and Projection of Temperature and Precipitation over China. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 38(5), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0351-4.
  64. Zhang, S., Hu, Q., Meng, X., Lü, Y., & Yang, X. (2024). Spatiotemporal Evaluation and Future Projection of Diurnal Temperature Range over the Tibetan Plateau in CMIP6 Models. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 41(11), 2245–2258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-024-3346-0.
  65. Agiel, H. M., Pratama, A., Mareta, L., & Birastri, W. (2024). Uncertainty of Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects 6 (CMIP6) in Indonesia’s maritime continental region for the historical period. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1314(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1314/1/012020.
  66. Dix, M., Bi, D., Dobrohotoff, P., Fiedler, R., Harman, I., Law, R., Mackallah, C., Marsland, S., O’Farrell, S., Rashid, H., Srbinovsky, J., Sullivan, A., Trenham, C., Vohralik, P., Watterson, I., Williams, G., Woodhouse, M., Bodman, R., Dias, F. B.,… & Yang, R. (2019). CSIRO-ARCCSS ACCESS-CM2 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4271.
  67. (EC-Earth), E.-E. C. (2019a). EC-Earth-Consortium EC-Earth3 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4700.
  68. (EC-Earth), E.-E. C. (2019b). EC-Earth-Consortium EC-Earth3-Veg model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4706.
  69. Jungclaus, J., Bittner, M., Wieners, K.-H., Wachsmann, F., Schupfner, M., Legutke, S., Giorgetta, M., Reick, C., Gayler, V., Haak, H., de Vrese, P., Raddatz, T., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., von Storch, J.-S., Behrens, J., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., … Roeckner, E. (2019). MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6594.
  70. Karpasitis, A., Hadjinicolaou, P., & Zittis, G. (2025). A new efficiency metric for the spatial evaluation and inter-comparison of climate and geoscientific model output. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1471.
  71. Ridley, J., Menary, M., Kuhlbrodt, T., Andrews, M., & Andrews, T. (2019). MOHC HadGEM3-GC31-MM model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6112.
  72. Uwe, S. (2023). CDO User Guide (2.3.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10020800.
  73. Voldoire, A. (2019). CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-CM6-1-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4067.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0107 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2026
Accepted on: Feb 24, 2026
Published on: May 22, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Mas Agus Mardyanto, Asyam Mulayyan Dary, R Irwan Bagyo Santoso, Ervin Nurhayati, Hilmi Putra Pradana, Achmad Muzakky, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT