Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Additive Manufacturing and Advanced Technology with Materials of Polymer, Concrete and Clay in Construction Industry and Architecture Cover

Additive Manufacturing and Advanced Technology with Materials of Polymer, Concrete and Clay in Construction Industry and Architecture

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Design and test print element – clay

Figure 2:

3D scanning technology – clay

Figure 3:

3D scanning and reverse engineering

Figure 4:

3D printer: (a) 3D printer Delta construction (left – FDM, right – clay); (b) 3D printer Delta construction – concrete; (c) 3D printer Delta construction – printhead for concrete

Figure 5:

3D print detail and artistic aspect – clay MA

Figure 6:

3D print detail and artistic aspect – clay CERADBUD (1)

Figure 7:

3D print detail and artistic aspect – clay CERADBUD (2)

Figure 8:

Mold for concrete samples I

Figure 9:

Mold for concrete samples II

Figure 10:

Granulometry – materials for 3D printing

Figure 11:

Detail of fibre of geopolymer: (a) material; (b) fibre; (c) detail of fibre

Table 1:

Composition: MA clay material

CompositionWeight [%]
- Na2O0.550
- MgO0.374
- Al2O328.613
- SiO255.658
- P2O50.066
- SO30.121
- Cl0.031
- K2O2.132
- CaO0.370
- TiO21.092
- MnO0.010
- Fe2O31.611
- Loss by annealing8.800
Table 2:

Composition: CERADBUD clay material (Ceradbud, 2025)

CompositionWeight [%]
- SiO255.00 – 62.14
- Al2O315.70 – 17.70
- TIO20.70 – 0.90
- Fe2O36.09 – 7.90
- MnO0.04 – 0.17
- MgO2.20 – 3.20
- CaO0.33 – 1.81
- Na2O0.06 – 0.26
- K2O2.90 – 3.50
- P2O50.05 – 0.18
- Loss by annealing7.04 – 13.40
Figure 12:

Cladding concept for building application

Figure 13:

Cladding concept for building application v visualization

Figure 14:

3D comprehensive visualization

Figure 15:

3D symmetrical composition

Figure 16:

3D asymmetrical and random composition

Figure 17:

3D mold for concrete (1)

Figure 18:

3D mold for concrete (2)

Figure 19:

3D print model

Figure 20:

Clay test sample

Figure 21:

Clay test sample – print

Figure 22:

Clay test samples – 3×3

Figure 23:

Clay test samples - 2×4

Figure 24:

Geopolymer (concrete) sample

Figure 25:

3D scan – Geopolymer (concrete) sample

Table 3:

Print materials for LDM (geopolymer and clay)

CharacteristicGeopolymerClay
Volumetric weight [kg/m3]Flexural strength [MPa]Compressive strength [MPa]Volumetric weight [kg/m3]Flexural strength [MPa]Compressive strength [MPa]
Mean18891.85.815754.813.4
Standard deviation4.70.30.214.70.32.4
Coefficient of variation [%]0.218.33.30.95.618.1
Figure 26:

Printing layers: (a) Geopolymer; (b) Clay

Figure 27:

3D printed clay models

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0104 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 (formerly 1336-5835) | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 12, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2026
Published on: May 21, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Oldrich Sucharda, Zuzana Marcalikova, Radoslav Gandel, Jakub Kralovanec, Petr Cmiel, Libor Topolář, Ivona Dlabikova, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.