References
- Anderson, R.E. and J.R. Hair (1972): Consumerism, consumer expectations, and perceived product performance. In: Venkatesan, M. (Ed.): Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference. Association for Consumer Research, Iowa City, USA.
- Anderson, R.E. (1973): Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research 10, 38–44.
- Araki, M. and T. Ishii (2015): Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends in Plant Science 20, 145–149.
- Assefa, G. and B. Frostell (2007): Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society 29, 63–78.
- Bajpai, P. (2013): Biorefinery in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Academic Press, London, UK, 114 pp.
- Boons, F. and F. Lüdeke-Freund (2013): Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 45, 9–19.
- Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Río, P. and T. Könnölä (2010): Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 1073–1083.
- Clark, D., Aurenhammer, P., Bartlomé, O. and M. Spear (2012): Innovative wood-based products, 2011-2012. In: UNECE/FAO (Ed.): Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2011-2012. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, New York and Geneva, 141–150.
- Costa-Font, M., Gil, J.M. and W.B. Traill (2008): Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy 33, 99–111.
- Deliza, R. and H.J.H. MacFie (1996): The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 11, 103–128.
- de Assis, C.A., Houtman, C., Phillips, R., Bilek, E.M., Rojas, O.J., Pal, L., Peresin, M.S., Jameel, H. and R. Gonzalez (2017): Conversion economics of forest biomaterials: Risk and financial analysis of CNC manufacturing. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 11, 682–700.
- Eichhorn, S.J., Dufresne, A., Aranguren, M., Marcovich, N.E., Capadona, J.R., Rowan, S.J., Weder, C., Thielemans, W., Roman, M. and S. Renneckar (2009): Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science 45, 1.
- Ekman, A., Campos, M., Lindahl, S., Co, M., Börjesson, P., Karlsson, E.N. and C. Turner (2013): Bioresource utilisation by sustainable technologies in new valueadded biorefinery concepts – Two case studies from food and forest industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 57, 46–58.
- European Commission (2012): Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdfAccessed on 7 February 2018.
- Fenn, J. (2006): Understanding Gartner’s hype cycles. Gartner Inc., Stanford, USA.
- Fenn, J. and M. Raskino (2008): Hype Cycle Winners and Losers. In: Fenn, J. and M. Raskino (Eds.): Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, USA, pp. 3–24.
- Greenwald, A.G. (1968): Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change. Academic Press Inc, New York, USA.
- Hansen, E. (2006): Structural panel industry evolution: Implications for innovation and new product development. Forest Policy and Economics 8, 774–783.
- Hansen, E. and H. Juslin (2011): Strategic marketing in the global forest industries. 2nd ed., Authors Academic Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 327 pp.
- Hellsmark, H. and P. Söderholm (2017): Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development: Key considerations and lessons from Sweden. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 11, 28–40.
- Henseling, C., Hahn T. and K. Nolting (2006): Instrument in der Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung. Werkstatt Bericht Nr. 82, Berlin, Deutschland.
- Hemström, K., Mahapatra, K. and L. Gustavsson (2014): Public perceptions and acceptance of intensive forestry in Sweden. Ambio 43, 196–206.
- Hesser, F. (2015): Environmental advantage by choice: Exante LCA for a new Kraft pulp fibre reinforced polypropylene composite in comparison to reference materials. Composites Part B: Engineering 79, 197–203.
- Hetemäki, L., Hoen, H. and P. Schwarzbauer (2014): Conclusions and policy implications. In: Hetemäki, L. (Ed.): Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes Towards Bioeconomy. What Science Can Tell Us 6, European Forestry Institute, pp. 95–108.
- Karana, E., Hekkert, P. and P. Kandachar (2010): A tool for meaning driven materials selection. Materials & Design 31, 2932–2941.
- Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B.H., Thorsen, B.J., Toppinen, A., Roos, A. and S. Baardsen (2014): Shades of green: A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 402–410.
- Krueger, R.A. and M.A. Casey (2009): Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
- Ljungberg, L.Y. and K.L. Edwards (2003): Design, materials selection and marketing of successful products. Materials & Design 24, 519–529.
- Mayring, P. (2003): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 8. Aufl., Beltz UTB, Weinheim, Deutschland.
- Morgan, D.L. (1998): The Focus Group Guidebook. Sage Publications, Tousand Oaks, California.
- Näyhä, A., Hetemäki, L. and T. Stern (2014): New products outlook. In: Hetemäki, L. (Ed.): Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes Towards Bioeconomy. What Science Can Tell Us 6, European Forestry Institute, pp. 43–54.
- OECD/Eurostat. (2005): Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Ollikainen, M. (2014): Forestry in bioeconomy – Smart green growth for the humankind. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 360–366.
- Pantano, E. and L. Di Pietro (2012): Understanding consumer’s acceptance of technology-based innovations in retailing. Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation 7, 1–19.
- Patermann, C. and A. Aguilar (2018): The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. New Biotechnology 40, 20–24.
- Provasnek, A.K., Sentic, A. and E. Schmid (2017): Integrating Eco-Innovations and Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainable Development and a Social License to Operate. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24, 173–185.
- Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. and H. Pülzl (2018): Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 4170–4180.
- Ranacher, L., Lähtinen, K., Järvinen, E. and A. Toppinen (2017): Perceptions of the general public on forest sector responsibility: A survey related to ecosystem services and forest sector business impacts in four European countries. Forest Policy and Economics 78, 180–189.
- Ranacher, L. and T. Stern (2016): Are your messages being heard? Evaluation of the forest-based sector’s communication on sustainable forest management in Austria. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, Band 25, 159–168.
- Rametsteiner, E., Hansen, E. and A. Niskanen (2006): Introduction to the special issue on innovation and entrepreneurship in the forest sector, Forest Policy and Economics 8, 669–673.
- Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M. and E.D. Cranston (2017): Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production. Langmuir 33, 1583–1598.
- Rogers, E.M. (2003): Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed., Free Press, New York, USA.
- Roos, A., Lindström, M., Heuts, L., Hylander, N., Lind, E. and C. Nielsen (2014): Innovation diffusion of new wood-based materials – reducing the “time to market”. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 394–401.
- Ruef, A. and J. Markard (2010): What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22, 317–338.
- Sandin, G., Peters, G.M. and M. Svanström (2016): Life Cycle Assessment of Forest Products. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
- Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.F., Monforti-Ferrario, F. and V. Nita (2015): The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmental Development 15, 3–34.
- Schaltegger, S. and M. Wagner (2011): Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions, Business Strategy and the Environment 20, 222–237.
- Schumpeter, J. (1934): The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Harvard, USA.
- Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., Kastenholz, H. and C. Keller (2008): Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 51, 283–290.
- Sijtsema, S.J., Onwezen, M.C., Reinders, M.J., Dagevos, H., Partanen, A. and M. Meeusen (2016): Consumer perception of bio-based products – An exploratory study in 5 European countries. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 77, 61–69.
- Stendahl, M. (2009): Management of product development projects in the wood industry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24, 434–447.
- Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boningner, D. and S. Edwards (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighting immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 742–752.
- Stern, T., Ranacher, L., Mair, C., Berghäll, S., Lähtinen, K., Vihakara, M. and A. Toppinen (2018): Perceptions on the future importance of forest sector innovations: biofuels, biomaterials or niche products? Forests 9, 255.
- UNECE/FAO (2016): Forest Products Annual Market Review 2015-2016 https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ timber/publications/fpamr2016.pdf Accessed on 7 February 2018.
- UN (2015): Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly 21st October 2015. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed on 2 February 2018.
- Voegtling, C. and A.G. Scherer (2017): Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics 143, 227–243.
- WCED (1987): Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 400 pp.