Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evolutionary, Natural Protections of the Human Species Against Inbreeding and Inbreeding Depression Cover

Evolutionary, Natural Protections of the Human Species Against Inbreeding and Inbreeding Depression

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Alergenne A., Faurie C., Raymond M. Are parents’ perceptions of offspring facial resemblance consistent with actual resemblance? Effects on parental investment. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2010; 31, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.002
  2. Alvergne A., Faurie C., Raymond M. Father–offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans. Anim. Behav. 2009; 78, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.019
  3. Antfolk J, Karlsson M, Bäckström A i wsp. Disgust elicited by third-party incest: the roles of biological relatedness, co-residence, and family relationship. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2012; 33(3): 217–223. doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.005
  4. Antfolk J, Lieberman D, Santtila P. Fitness costs predict inbreeding aversion irrespective of self-involvement: support for hypotheses derived from evolutionary theory. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050613
  5. Aoki K. Avoidance and prohibition of brother–sister sex in humans. Population Ecology 2004; 47(1): 13–19
  6. Aoki K., Ihara Y., Feldman M.W. Conditions for the spread of culturally transmitted costly punishment of sib mating. W: M. J. Brown (Ed.), Explaining culture scientifically, str. 100-116. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2008
  7. Apicella C.L., Marlowe, F.W. Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men’s investment in children. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2004; 25, 371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.003
  8. Becker April M. The flight of the locus of selection: Some intricate relationships between evolutionary elements, Behavioural Processes 2019; 161: 31–44. doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.002
  9. Beecher M.D. Kin recognition in birds. Behavior Genetics 1988; 18, 465–482. doi:10.1007/BF01065515
  10. Billingsley J., Antfolk J., Santtila P. i wsp. Cues to paternity: do partner fidelity and offspring resemblance predict daughter-directed sexual aversions? Evol. Hum. Behav. 2018; 39, 290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.02.001
  11. Bittles AH, Neel JV. The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nature Genetics 1994; 8: 117–121
  12. Bressan P., Bertamini M., Nalli A. i wsp. Men do not have a stronger preference than women for self-resemblant child faces. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2009; 38, 657–664. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9350-0
  13. Bushnell O.A. The Gifts of Civilization: Germs and Genocide in Hawai’i. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 1993
  14. Buss D. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, wyd. 4. London: Psychology Press. 2014
  15. Buss D.M., Larsen R.J., Westen D. i wsp. Sex differences in jealousy: evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychol. Sci. 1992; 3, 251–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x.
  16. Carando J. Hawaiian Royal Incest. Transatlantica: Revue d’Études Américaines. 2021. doi. org/10.4000/transatlantica.525
  17. Cassedy J.H., Bushnell O.A.. The Gifts of Civilization: Germs and Genocide in Hawai’i Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. The American Historical Review 1995, 100: 5: 1676–1677, doi. org/10.1086/ahr/100.5.1676.
  18. Charlesworth D., Willis J.H. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009; 10, 783–796. doi:10.1038/nrg2664
  19. Cooper, John M. Incest Prohibitions in Primitive Culture. Primitive Man, 1932; 5, 1:1–20
  20. Darwin C., Bynum W.F. The origin of species by means of natural selection: or, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life (p. 458). New York: AL Burt. 2009
  21. DarwinC.R.On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. 1859
  22. DeBruine L.M. Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 2005; 272, 919–922. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3003
  23. DeMause, L. The universality of incest. The Journal of Psychohistory 1991; 19(2), 1-20
  24. Durand V.M., Barlow, D.H. Essentials of Abnormal Psychology, 6th Edn. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. 2012
  25. Eggins B.R. Chemical Sensors and Biosensors. John Wiley & Sons. 2002
  26. El Guindi F., Read D. Westermarck hypothesis reconsidered: A comment onKushnick and Fessler. Current Anthropology, 2012; 53 (1): 134-135
  27. Ene C., Burtăverde V., Jonason P. i wsp. Fathers high in psychopathy invest more in offspring who resemble them. Personality and Individual Differences 159 (2020): 109879
  28. Fergusson D.M., McLeod G.F., Horwood L.J. Childhood sexual abuse and adult developmental outcomes: Findings from a 30-year longitudinal study in New Zealand. Child Abuse & Neglect 2013; 37: 664–674. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu. 2013.03.013
  29. Fessler DMT, Navarrete CD. Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest Evidence for Westermarck’ s hypotheses. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004; 25: 277–294
  30. Fox R. Sibling incest. British Journal of Sociology 1962; 13 (2):28-150
  31. Gaulin S.J.C., Schlegel A. Paternal confidence and paternal investment – a cross-cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1980; 1: 301–309. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(80)90015-1
  32. Grammer K.F., Bernhard N.N. Human pheromones and sexual attraction. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2005; 118 (2): 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.010
  33. Haig D. Asymetric Relations: Internal Conflicts and the Horror of Incest. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999; 20: 83–98
  34. Hamilton WD. The genitical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964; 7(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
  35. Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. Women’s preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol Lett. 2005;1(3):256-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332
  36. Heijkoop M., Semon Dubas J., van Aken M.A. Parent–child resemblance and kin investment: physical resemblance or personality similarity? Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 2009; 6, 64–69. doi: 10.1080/17405620802642306
  37. Herz R.S., Inzlicht M. Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. Evol. Hum. Behav.2002; 23 (5): 359–364. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00095-8
  38. Heth G., Todrank J., Johnston R.E. Similarity in the qualities of individual odors among kin and species in Turkish (Mesocricetus brandti) and golden (Mesocricetus auratus) hamsters. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1999; 113, 321–326
  39. Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S.L. i wsp. Renovating the pyramid of needs contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010; 5, 292–314. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369469
  40. Koh K.B., Lee, B.K. Reduced lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin-2 production in anxiety disorders. Psychosom. Med. 1998; 60, 479–483. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199807000-00015
  41. Kresanov P, Kotler J, Seto M. i wsp. Intergenerational incest aversion: self-reported sexual arousal and disgust to hypothetical sexual contact with family members. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2018;39(6):664-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.008
  42. Kring A.M., Johnson S., Davison, G.C. i wsp. Abnormal Psychology, wyd. 12. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2013
  43. Kumar s. Pai RA. Swaminathan MS. Consanguincous marriages and the genetic load due to Iethal genes in Kerala. Ann Humn Genet 1967; 31:141-5.
  44. Lieberman D., Tooby J., Cosmides L. The architecture of human kin detection. Nature 2007; 445, 727–731. doi:10.1038/nature05510
  45. Lumsden C.J., Wilson E.O. Gene-culture translation in the avoidance of sibling incest. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1980; 77(10), 6248-6250
  46. Mace D. i V. Marriage: East and West. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1959
  47. Mahmut MK, Croy I. The role of body odors and olfactory ability in the initiation, maintenance and breakdown of romantic relationships – A review, Physiology & Behavior, 2019; 207:179-184
  48. Marshall J. AR. What is inclusive fitness theory, and what is it for?, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2016; 12: 103–108. doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.015
  49. Masters R.E.L., Patterns of Incest A Psycho-social Study of Incest, Based on Clinical and Historic Data. New York: Ace Books. 1970
  50. May R. When to be incestuous. Nature 1979; 279: 192–194
  51. McCabe J. FBD marriage: Further support for the Westermarck hypothesis. American Anthropologist 1983; 85, 50-69
  52. McGee W.J., ‘The Beginning of Marriage. American Anthropologist, 1899, 1, 4: 646-674. doi. org/10.1525/aa.1899.1.4.02a00040
  53. Morgan L., Tooker E. The Structure of the Iroquois League: Lewis H. Morgan’s Research and Observations. Ethnohistory, 1983; 30(3), 141-154. doi:10.2307/481022
  54. Nak-Eon Choi; Jung H. Han. How Flavor Works: The Science of Taste and Aroma. John Wiley & Sons. 2015
  55. Noble M., Mason J.K. Incest. Journal of medical ethics, 1978; 4(2): 64-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.4.2.64
  56. Obeyesekere G., The Cult of the Goddess Pattini. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984
  57. Palau-Marti M.. Cazeneuve J.. Sociologie du rite (tabou, magie, sacré). In: Revue de l’histoire des religions, 1971; 184, 1,. s. 110
  58. Prokop P., Fančovičová J. Mothers are less disgust sensitive than childless females, Personality and Individual Differences, Personality and Individual Differences 2016; 96(3):65-69. doi:10.1016/j. paid.2016.02.064
  59. Prokosch M.L., Airington Z., Murray D.R.. Investigating the relationship between olfactory acuity, disgust, and mating strategies, Evolution and Human Behavior, 2021; 42, 2:113-120
  60. Radha Rama Devi A, Rao NA, Bittles AH. Inbreeding in the state of Karnataka, South India. Hum Hered. 1982; 32(1):8-10. doi: 10.1159/000153252
  61. Rampal S.N., Indian Women and Sex. New Delhi: Printoy, 1978, str. 69-71
  62. Rantala M.J., Marcinkowska U.M. The role of sexual imprinting and the Westermarck Effect in mate choice in humans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011; 65,859-873
  63. Rao P.S.S. Inharaj S.G. Inbreeding in Tamil Nadu. South India. Soc Biol 1977:24:281-8
  64. Read D.W. Incest taboos and kinship: a biological or a cultural story? Reviews in Anthropology, 2014; 43(2), 150-175. doi: 10.1080/00938157.2014.903151
  65. Roberts, R., O’Connor, T., Dunn, J. i wsp. The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life: Mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2004; 28, 525–545. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.07.006
  66. Robertson A.F. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Roberts, R., O’Connor, T., Dunn, J. i wsp. The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life: Mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2004; 28, 525–545. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.07.006Behavioral Sciences, 2001
  67. Sanghvi LD. Inbreeding in rural areas of Andhra Priadesh. Inidiaui J GeCeet 1966; 26A: 351-65
  68. Seemanovà E. A study of children of incestuous matings. Prague Human Heredity, 1971; 21, 1085–1128. doi:10.1159/000152391
  69. Shackelford T.K., Buss D.M., Bennett K. Forgiveness or breakup: sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cogn. Emotion 2002; 16, 299–307. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000202.
  70. Shepher J. Mate selection among second-generation kibbutz adolescents and adults:Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1971; 1, 293-307
  71. Spehr M., Kelliher K.R., Li X.H. i wsp. Essential role of the main olfactory system in social recognition of major histocompatibility complex peptide ligands. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(7): 1961-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4939-05.2006
  72. Stevenson R. The Psychology of Flavour, Oxford, 2009; online ed, Oxford Academic, 2010
  73. Stoltenborgh M., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., van IJzendoorn M.H. i wsp. Cultural–geographical differences in the occurrence of child physical abuse? A meta-analysis of global prevalence. International Journal of Psychology, 2013; 48:81–94. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.697165
  74. Stoltenborgh, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Euser, E. M. i wsp. A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment, 2011; 16, 79–101. doi:10.1177/1077559511403920
  75. Stroebel S.S., O’Keefe S.L., Beard K i wsp.–daughter incest: Data from an anonymous computerized survey. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2012; 21, 176–199. doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.654007
  76. Stubbs B., Koyanagi A., Hallgren M. i wsp. Physical activity and anxiety: a perspective from the World Health Survey. J. Affect. Disord. 2017; 208, 545–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.028
  77. Thomas W.I. The Relation of Sex to Primitive Social Control, American Journal of Sociology 1898; 3: 754-76
  78. Tidefors I., Arvidsson H., Ingevaldson s. i wsp. Sibling incest: a literature review and a clinical study. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice, 2010; 16(3), 347-360. doi: 10.1080/13552600903511667
  79. Tooby J. Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1982; 97: 557–576
  80. Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. Natural Selection and Social Theory: Selected Papers of Robert Trivers. New York: International University Press. 1972
  81. Tybur J.M., Inbar Y., Güler E., Molho C. Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies?,Evolution and Human Behavior, 2015; 36,6: 489-497. doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.006
  82. Vincent G.E. “The Development of Sociology.” W:Howard J. Rogers (ed) Congress of Arts and Sciences, Universal Exposition, St. Louis, 5: 800, 1904
  83. Volk A., Quinsey V.L. Parental investment and resemblance: Replications, refinements, and revisions. Evolutionary Psychology, 2007; 5, 1–14. doi:10.1177/v147470490700500101
  84. Walter A. From Westermarck’s Effect to Fox’s Law: paradox and principle in the relationship between incest taboos and exogamy. Social Science Information. 2000;39(3):467-488. doi:10.1177/053901800039003007
  85. Westermarck E. The history of human marriage, wyd 5. .London: Macmillan. 1922
  86. Westermarck E. The History of Human Marriage. wyd. 1. New York, Macmillan. 1891; 18, 444: 80. doi: 10.1126/science.ns-18.444.80-b
  87. Wolf A., Durham W.L. Inbreeding, incest, and the Incest taboo: the state of knowledge at the turn of the century. California, CA: Stanford University Press. 2004
  88. Wolf, A.P. Incest avoidance and the incest taboos: Two aspects of human nature. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 2014
  89. Wolf, A.P. Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1995
  90. Wolf, A.P. Westermarck redivius. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1993; 22,157-175
  91. Yu Q., Guo Y., Zhang L. i wsp. More Similar,the Healthier: The Effect of Perceived Parent-Child Facial Resemblance on Parental Physical Health.Front. Psychol. 2019; 9:2739.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02739
  92. Yu Q., Zhang Q., Chen J. i wsp. The effect of perceived parent–child facial resemblance on parents’ trait anxiety: the moderating effect of parents’ gender. Front. Psychol. 2016; 7:658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00658
  93. Yu Q., Zhang Q., Jin s. i wsp. The effect of perceived facial resemblance on parent-child relationship. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2017; 116, 359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bgbl-2023-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2956-6851 | Journal ISSN: 0373-174X
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 162
Published on: Dec 17, 2023
Published by: The Medical Library named after S. Konopka in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Andrzej Wojtyła, Paulina Wojtyła-Buciora, Lucyna Kapka-Skrzypczak, Anna Królak, Janusz Szymborski, published by The Medical Library named after S. Konopka in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.