Have a personal or library account? Click to login

An Experimental Application of the Interactive Reading Approach with ICT Tools to Improve Struggling Readers’ Comprehension Skills during English for Law Classes

By:
Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Abreo, K., & Baco, R. (2022). Reading Models at a Glance. Retrieved from https://fr.scribd.com/presentation/462082777/Reading-models-AT-A-GLANCE-pptx
  2. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  4. Apuke, D. O. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(10), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336
  5. Armagan, S, K., & Genc, S. Z. (2017). Impact of timed reading on comprehension and speed: A study on Turkish EFL learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p204
  6. Bell, T. (2001). Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/bell/article.pdf
  7. Bloom, B. S (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.
  8. Brown, H. D., & Abewickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
  9. Budi, A. S., & Zuhro, C. (2023). Literal reading comprehension ability of English study program students of Politeknik Negeri Jember. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 9(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v9i1.3760
  10. Butler, D.B. (2013). Strategies for clarity in L2 legal writing. Journal of the International Association Promoting Language. Clarity, 70. Retrieved from http//www.content/uploads/2020/07/Clarity-no-70-web-bookmarked.pdf
  11. Cambridge Law Studio. (2020). Legal English for Lawyers and Law students. Retrieved from https://cambridgelawstudio.co.uk/
  12. Carver, R. (1990). Reading Rate: A Review of Research and Theory. San Diego: Academic Press.
  13. Chang, A. C. S., & College, H. W. (2010). The effect of a time reading activity on EFL learners: Speed comprehension, and perception. Reading in a Foreign Language Journal, 22(2), 284-303. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICwebportal/RecordDetai?accno=EJ901548
  14. Chung, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2006). The effect of a speed-reading course. English Teaching, 61(4), 181-204.
  15. Dubin, F., & Bycina, D. (1991). Academic reading and the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.) (pp. 195-215). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
  16. Flynt, E. S. & Cooter, R. B. (1996). Teaching Reading in Content Areas. New Jersey, USA: Simon & Schuster Company.
  17. Fry, B. E. (1963). Teaching Faster Reading: A Manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Gamez, E. (2001). Interpersonal motives in comprehension of narratives. Discourse Processes, 31, 215-240.
  19. Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading as a psychologistic guessing game. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, N. J.: International Reading Association.
  20. Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kawanagh, & I. G. Mattingley (Eds.), Language by Ear and by Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  21. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Greenlee-Moore, M. E., & Smith, L. L. (1996). Interactive computer software: The effects on young children’s reading achievement. Reading Psychology, 17(1), 43-64.
  23. Haigh, R. (2009). Legal English (2nd edition). New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
  24. Hans, A. (2013). Role of computers in reading skills. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 15(4), 15-19.
  25. He, M. (2014). Does extensive reading promote reading speed? The Reading Matrix, 14(1), 16-25.
  26. Higgins, J., & Wallace, R. (1989). Hopalong: A computer reader pacer. System, 17(3), 389-399.
  27. Hudson, T. (2011). Teaching Second Language Reading (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Illinois Professional Teaching Standards. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.iwu.edu/educational-studies/teachers/2012-illinois-professional-teaching-standards.pdf
  29. Iwahori, Y. (2008). Developing reading fluency: A study of extensive reading in EFL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 70-91.Retrieved from http//:nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2008/iwahori/iwahori.html
  30. James, L. (2014). The integration of a computer based early reading program to increase English language learners’ literary skills. Teaching English with Technology, 14(1), 9-22. Retrieved from https://www.tewtjournal.org
  31. Kledecka-Nadera,A. (2001). Application of Computer Assisted Language Learning in the Development of Reading Comprehension Skills. Poznan. Retrieved https://ifa.amu.edu.pl/fa/files/ifa/papers/kledecka/kledecka-mgr.pdf
  32. Köksal, D., Ulum, Ö. G., & Yürük, N. (2023). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy in reading texts in EFL/ESL settings. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0007
  33. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181.
  34. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
  35. Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  36. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
  37. Lewin, C. (2019). Exploring the effects of talking book software in UK primary classrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 149.
  38. Macalister, J. (2008). The effect of a speed reading course in an English as a second language environment. The TESONLANZ Journal, 16, 23-33.
  39. Macalister, J. (2010). Speed reading course and their effect on reading authentic texts: A preliminary investigation. Reading in a Foreign Language Journal, 22(1), 104-116. Retrieved from http//nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2010/articles/macalister.pdf
  40. Manset-Williamson, G., Dunn, M., Hinshaw, R., & Nelson, J. M. (2018). The impact of self-questioning strategy use on the text-reader assisted comprehension of students with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 123-135.
  41. McKenna, M. C., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2009). Assessment for Reading Instruction (2nd ed.) (Chapters 3 and 70. New York: Guilford Press.
  42. Mellinkoff, D. (2004). The Language of the Law. Resource Publications.
  43. Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A. P., & Florencio, D. (1999). Reading rate and prose retrieval. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(4), 303-329. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_1
  44. Mioduser, D., Tur-Kaspa, H., & Leitner, I. (2017). The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 54-63.
  45. Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 271-279.
  46. Muhaimin, A. (2018). Reading Speed and Comprehension Enhancement in Hybrid Learning Delivery Mode. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1185882.pdf2018
  47. Naseri, S., Maghsoudi, M., & Rajabi, P. (2014). The effect of speed reading on IELTS EFL learners’ reading comprehension ability. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(1), 506-514.
  48. Nation, P. (2009). Reading faster. International Journal of English Studies, IJES, 9(2), 131-144.
  49. Nordquist, R. (2019). Legal English. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-legalenglish1691106#:~:text=Richard%20Nordquist%20is%20professor%20emeritus,level%20grammar%20and%20composition%20textbooks.&text=The%20specialized%20variety%20(or%20occupational,documents%20is%2
  50. Nurhana, R. D. (2014). Improving Students’ Reading Skills through Interactive Multimedia of the 8th Grade at SMP Raden Fatah Cimanggu Cilacap in the Academic, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/18491/
  51. Quinn, E, & Nation, I. S. P. (1974). Speed Reading: A Course for Learners of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  52. RAND Reading Study Group. (2020). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/
  53. Rasinski, T. (2014). Fluency matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 3-12.
  54. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  55. Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 33-49). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  56. ScaleLive. (2016). Sampling Methods: Probability and Non-Probability Methods. Retrieved from https://www.scalestatistics.com/samplingmethods.html#:~:text=Probability%20sampling%20is%20necessary%20in,characteristics%20at%20baseline%20between%20groups
  57. Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Multimedia support of early literacy learning. Computers and Education, 39, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00034-9
  58. Smith, F. (2012). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. Routledge.
  59. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
  60. Stearns, S. C. (2012). Integration of Technology into the Classroom: Effects on Reading Comprehension. Research Papers. Paper 248. Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/248
  61. Study Legal English. (2018). Legal English. Retrieved from https://studylegalenglish.com/
  62. Thompson, G. (2015). Text-to-Speech Reading Intervention with First-Grade Students. Retrieved from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no1/pdf/ThompsonVAM_0505.pdf/
  63. Tungka, F. N. (2019). Approaches and strategies in reading unfamiliar English text. sintuwumarosoJET, 5(1), 1-6.
  64. Ul-Amin, N. S. (2017). An effective use of ICT for education and learning. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(4), 38-45. Retrieved from http://www.scholarly-journals.com/SJE
  65. Ur, P. (2012). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Urquhart, S. & Weir, C. (Eds.). (1998). Reading in a Foreign Language: Process, Product, and Practice. Harlow: Longman.
  67. Van den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087512
  68. Yumul, C. M. (2017). Three Models of Reading Strategies. Retrieved from https://docit.tips/download/three-models-of-reading-strategies-reading-process-reading.pdf
  69. Zainal, A. (2012). ESL teachers’ use of ICT in teaching English literature: An analysis of teachers’ TPCK. A Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 34(1), 234-237.
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 125
Submitted on: Apr 4, 2025
Accepted on: May 15, 2025
Published on: Oct 29, 2025
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Lina Sabbah, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.