Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Development of a Teacher Rating Scale for Giftedness (TRSG)

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Alma, S. (2015). Üstün yetenekliliği derecelendirme ölçekleri-okulöncesi/ anaokul formu (GRS-P)’nun Türkçeye uyarlanması (Unpublished master’s thesis). Turkey: Selçuk University.
  2. Biber, M., Biber, S. K., Ozyaprak, M., Kartal, E., Can, T., & Simsek, I. (2021). Teacher nomination in identifying gifted and talented students: Evidence from Turkey. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39(14), 100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100751
  3. Bracken, B. A., Keith, L. K., & Walker, K. C. (1998). Assessment of preschool behavior and social-emotional functioning: A review of thirteen third-party instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299801600204
  4. Ferrando, M., Ferrándiz, C., Llor, L., & Sainz, M. (2016). Successful intelligence and giftedness: An empirical study. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259431
  5. Frasier, M. M. (1995). Core Attributes of Giftedness: A Foundation for Recognizing the Gifted Potential of Minority and Economically Disadvantaged Students. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED402703.pdf
  6. Gentry, M., Pereira, N., Peters, S. J., McIntosh, J. S., & Fugate, C. M. (2021). Hope teacher rating scale: Administration Manual. New York, NY: Routledge.
  7. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Gilliam, J. E., & Jerman, O. (2015). GATES-2: Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales - Second Edition [Measurement instrument]. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Retrieved from https://www.proedinc.com/Products/14445/gates2-gifted-and-talented-evaluation-scalessecond-edition.aspx
  9. Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales: A norm-referenced procedure for identifying gifted and talented students. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  11. Havigerová, J. M., & Burešová, I. (2015). Gender differences in characteristics of giftedness scale scores in preschool children. International Journal of Early Childhood Learning, 22(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7939/CGP/v22i01/48435
  12. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  13. Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational assessment, 20(4), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290202000401
  14. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford publications.
  15. Lee, H., Gentry, M., & Maeda, Y. (2022). Validity evidence of the HOPE scale in korea: Identifying gifted students from low-income and multicultural families. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211024590
  16. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
  17. Machů, E., & Lukeš, P. (2019). Teachers’ work with taxonomy of educational objectives as one of the forms of the gifted preschoolers’ development. Acta Educationis Generalis, 9(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2019-0011
  18. McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1998). The Gifted Evaluation Scale - Technical Manual (2nd ed.). Columbia: Hawthorne Educational Services.
  19. Nguyen, P. L. T., Nguyen, C. H., Dang, C. X., & Duong, H. T. T. (2022). Proposing a framework to assess the intellectual development and competence of Vietnamese students based on Sternberg’s Triarchic theory of intelligence. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2), 685-700.
  20. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Petscher, Y., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2020). Reconsidering the psychometrics of the GRS-S: Evidence for parsimony in measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418824743
  22. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. The Psychological Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=015-8130-502&Mode=summary
  23. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Petscher, Y. (2008). Identifying young gifted children using the gifted rating scales - Preschool/kindergarten form. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311055
  24. Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., & Kumtepe, A. (2008). The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: A validation study based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review, 30(2), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190801955418
  25. Pilavcı, N. B. (2021). 4-5 yaş grubu özel yetenekli öğrencilerin tanılanması üzerine bir model geliştirilmesi: Türkiye örneği (Unpublished master’s thesis). Turkey: Hacettepe University.
  26. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students: Revised edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. Retrieved from http://www.creativelearningpress.com/scalesforratingthebehavioralcharacteristicsofsuperiorstudents--50scales.aspx
  27. Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2008). History of giftedness: Perspectives from the past presage modern scholarship. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 13-31). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
  28. Ryser, G. R., & McConnell, K. (2004). Scales for Identifying Gifted Students: Ages 5 through 18. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press. Retrieved from http://www.prufrock.com/productdetails.cfm?PC=212
  29. Sabbah, S. S., & Aldin, A. M. A. (2022). Distinctive behavioral characteristics of outstanding students in the light of Triarchic theory of intelligence from the point of view of students and their teachers. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 8624-8639. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.7236
  30. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  31. Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2022). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (pp. 73-163). New York: The Guilford Press.
  32. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
  33. Silverman, D. (2003). Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  34. Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Social Indicators Research, 45(1), 83-117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006985528729
  35. Sireci, S. G., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256
  36. Sofologi, M., Papantoniou, G., Avgita, T., Lyraki, A., Thomaidou, C., Zaragas, H., Ntritsos, G., Varsamis, P., Staikopoulos, K., Kougioumtzis, G., Papantoniou, A., & Moraitou, D. (2022). The Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form (GRSP): A preliminary examination of their psychometric properties in two greek samples. Diagnostics, 12, 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112809
  37. Spratt, J. J. (1994). Increasing the Number of Elementary Students Found Eligible for Placement in a Gifted Program by Improving the Prescreening Process through Increased Training for School Staff and Parent Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378780.pdf
  38. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Successful intelligence: Finding a balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 436-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01391-1
  39. Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 383-393.
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (2018). The triarchic theory of successful intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan, & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (pp. 174-194). New York: The Guilford Press.
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Teaching and assessing gifted students in STEM disciplines through the augmented theory of successful intelligence. High Ability Studies, 30(1-2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1528847
  42. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(4), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600403
  43. Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. (1998). Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. The Phi Delta Kappan, 79(9), 667-669.
  44. Sternberg, R. J. (2020). The augmented theory of successful intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 679-708). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Westberg, K. L. (2012). Using teacher rating scales in the identification of students for gifted services. In S. Hunsaker (Ed.), Identification: The Theory and Practice of Identifying Students for Gifted and Talented Education Services (pp. 363-379). New York: Routledge.
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 117
Submitted on: Jul 12, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 26, 2023
Published on: Jun 20, 2024
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Şeyda Aydın-Karaca, Şule Kılınç, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.