Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Dual Role of a Reflective Future Teacher during School Practise Cover

The Dual Role of a Reflective Future Teacher during School Practise

Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
  2. Adler, A. (1998). Understanding children with emotional problems. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 38(1), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167898038101
  3. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
  4. Aglazor, G. (2017). The role of teaching practise in teacher education programmes. Designing framework for best practise. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.4
  5. Almasri, F. (2022). Simulations to teach science subjects: Connections between student participation, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7161-7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10940-w
  6. Arrington, N. M. (2023). Enhancing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching diverse learners: Capturing young students’ attention through a read-a-loud and music. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v23i2.33527
  7. Augustinovič, A. (2019). Educational opportunities of natural science motivation for students with special educational needs: The viewpoint of natural science teachers. Pedagogika, 136(4), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2019.136.9
  8. Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014
  9. Beňo, P., Havan, P., & Šprinková, S. (2020). Structured, analytical and critical thinking in the educational process of future teachers. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10(3), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0024
  10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 92(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
  11. Borko, H., Putnam, R., Berliner, D., & Calfee, R. (1996). Handbook of educational psychology. In Learning to Teach (pp. 673-708). New York: MacMillan.
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitatitve Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  13. Brown, W. S. (2021). Successful strategies to engage students in a COVID-19 environment. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 641865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.641865
  14. Bucat, R. (2005). Implications of chemistry education research for teaching practice: Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward. Chemistry Education International, 6(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90025A
  15. Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students’ perceptions. International Education Journal, 4(3), 177-191.
  16. Caires, S., Almeida, J., & Vieira, D. (2012). Becoming a teacher: Student teachers’ experiences and perceptions about teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643395
  17. Castañeda-Trujillo, J. E., López, A. F., & Molina Santana, M. (2022). Empirical in-service teachers’ identities in an ELT education program. Actualidades Pedagógicas, 1(78), 4. https://doi.org/10.19052/ap.vol1.iss78.4
  18. Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2004). Problem‐based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education, 88(5), 707-727. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10144
  19. Chionidou-Moskofoglou, M., Skoumios, M., & Karampelas, K. (2019). Primary teachers’ teaching practices in Mathematics and Science classes. A descriptive research approach. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 7-18. https://www.cymsjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/MJRME-Volume-16-Final-June-2019.pdf
  20. Christensson, C., & Sjöström, J. (2014). Chemistry in context: Analysis of thematic chemistry videos available online. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00102D
  21. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher Educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00091-4
  22. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research. 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
  23. Chong, S., & Low, E. L. (2009). Why I want to teach and how I feel about teaching-formation of teacher identity from pre-service to the beginning teacher phase. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-008-9056-z
  24. Craig, C. J., Evans, P., Verma, R., Stokes, D., & Li, J. (2019). A tribute to ‘unsung teachers’: teachers’ influences on students enrolling in STEM programs with the intent of entering STEM careers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 335-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1523390
  25. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
  26. Delclaux, M., & Saltiel, E. (2011). An evaluation of local teacher support strategies for the implementation of inquiry-based science education in French primary schools. Education, 41(2), 138-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2011.564198
  27. Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2015). The effects of a short-term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behaviour and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 234-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.947024
  28. Díaz Montes, L. A., & Barrera Zapata, R. (2022). Uso de recursos educativos digitales y ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje para la enseñanza de matemáticas en ingeniería. Sistematización de la experiencia docente. Actualidades Pedagógicas, 1(77), 5. https://doi.org/10.19052/ap.vol1.iss77.5
  29. Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
  30. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
  31. Gabalán-Coello, J., & Vásquez-Rizo, F. E. (2021). Una propuesta metodológica didáctico-constructivista para fomentar el aprendizaje de la modelación estadística a nivel universitario. Actualidades Pedagógicas, 1(76), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.19052/ap.vol1.iss76.3
  32. Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through Chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548-554. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p548
  33. Garrett, R. M. (1986). Problem-solving in Science education. Studies in Science Education, 13, 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559931
  34. Griffiths, V. (2000). The reflective dimension in teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(5), 539-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00033-1
  35. Guskey, T. R. (1989) Attitude and perceptual change in teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90039-6
  36. Gül, G. (2023). Use of technology-supported educational tools in general music education and its contribution to the process of music education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(2), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0014
  37. Iqbal, M. H., Siddiqie, S. A., & Mazid, M. A. (2021). Rethinking theories of lesson plan for effective teaching and learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100172. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3800865
  38. Johnson, P. A. (2011). Problem-based, cooperative learning in the engineering classroom. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1999)125:1(8)
  39. Junior, J. B. B. (2020). Assessment for learning with mobile apps: Exploring the potential of quizzes in the educational context. International Journal of Development Research, 10(1), 33366-33371.
  40. Juuti, K., Christophersen, K. A., Elstad, E., Solhaug, T., & Turmo, A. (2018). Finnish teacher education and its contributions to pre-service teachers’ instructional self-efficacy. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 422-437.
  41. Kholmuratovich, M. K., Mardanaqulovich, A. S., Ravshanovich, J. R., Sharifovna, K. U., & Shodiyevna, B. O. (2020). Methodology of improving independent learning skills of future fine art teachers (On the example of still life in colorful paintings). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 2043-2048. https://doi.org/10.37200/V24I5/17074
  42. Kirbulut, Z. D., & Bektas, O. (2011). Prospective chemistry teachers’ experiences of teaching practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 3651-3655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.351
  43. Kožuchová, M., Barnová, S., Stebila, J., & Krásna, S. (2023). Inquiry-based approach to education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(2), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0013
  44. Krzeczkowska, M. (2020). How students – future teachers identify themselves with the issue of organic reaction mechanisms in the context of Chemistry lesson carried out at schools. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia ad Didacticam Biologiae Pertinentia, 10(I), 134-141.
  45. Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
  46. Markovıć, M., Trivic, D., Markovi, M., Randjelovıć, M., & Randjelovi, M. (2010). Practical homework assignments as part of chemistry teaching and learning. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(2), 69-78.
  47. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  48. Mathew, P., Mathew, P., & Peechattu, P. J. (2017). Reflective practices: A means to teacher development. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology, 3(1), 126-131.
  49. Matúšová, S., & Kollár, V. (2023). Labour and education markets in Industry 4.0. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0001
  50. Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the College Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  51. Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
  52. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction - What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
  53. Munir, M. T., Baroutian, S., Young, B. R., & Carter, S. (2018). Flipped classroom with cooperative learning as a cornerstone. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.001
  54. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  55. Pei, L., Longcamp, M., Leung, F. K. S., & Ouyang, G. (2021). Temporally resolved neural dynamics underlying handwriting. NeuroImage, 244, 118578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118578
  56. Pekdag, B., & Le Maréchal, J. F. (2010). Movies in chemistry education. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-19.
  57. Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
  58. Sancar, R., Atal, D., Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101(2), 03305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
  59. Sarıca, R., & Çetin, B. (2020). The process of inquiry-based teaching practices from the perspective of prospective Mathematics teachers. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10(3), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0018
  60. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Sotáková, I., Ganajová, M., & Babincáková, M. (2020). Inquiry-based science education as a revision strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.499
  61. Syam, F., Resyadi, H., & Sanusi, A. P. (2023). Unveiling the journey: exploring the personal experience of a novice EFL teacher in the classroom. International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.30863/ijretal.v4i1.5008
  62. Trávníčková, P. (2021). The view of student teachers on the teacher’s profession. Acta Educationis Generalis, 11(3), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2021-0019
  63. Vrieling-Teunter, E., de Vries, N., Sins, P., & Vermeulen, M. (2022). Student motivation in teacher learning groups. European Journal of Teacher Education, 6, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2086119
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2023
Published on: Feb 8, 2024
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Małgorzata Krzeczkowska, Agata Augustinovič, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.