Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Educational Use of Social Media in Higher Education: Gender and Social Networking Sites as the Predictors of Consuming, Creating, and Sharing Content Cover

Educational Use of Social Media in Higher Education: Gender and Social Networking Sites as the Predictors of Consuming, Creating, and Sharing Content

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Baym, N. K. (2015). Social Media and the Struggle for society. Social Media + Society 1(1), 1-2.
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Casual modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
  3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  4. Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E., & Matassi, M. (2018). “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3523-3539.
  5. Bogozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1998). On the Evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assesing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp.136-162). Bevelry Hills, CA: Sage.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  8. Dikbaş Torun, E. (2019). Adapting Social Media Behavior Scale to Turkish: Reliability and Validity. Sosyal Medya Davranışları Ölçeklerinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 217-234. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.620551
  9. Dikbaş Torun, E. (2019). Students’ social media use as a new communication environment: The case of Pamukkale University. In E. Doğan (Ed.), Current Debates in Film and Media Studies (pp. 43-51), London: IJOPEC Publication.
  10. Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168-176.
  11. Gismondi, A., & Osteen, L. (2017). Student activism in the technology age. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2017(153), 63-74.
  12. Huang, C. (2018). Social network site use and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 119, 76-83.
  13. Hung H.-T., & Yuen, S. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507307
  14. Ifinedo, P. (2017). Examining students’ intention to continue using blogs for learning: Perspectives from technology acceptance, motivational, and social-cognitive frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 189-199.
  15. Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187-198.
  16. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245.
  17. Lu, J., Hao, Q., & Jing, M. (2016). Consuming, sharing, and creating content: How young students use new social media in and outside school. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 55-64.
  18. Lu, J., Luo, J., Liang, L., & Jing, M. (2018). Measuring adolescents’ social media behavior outside and inside of school: Development and validation of two scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research 57(5) 1108-1130.
  19. Özen, Ü., Çam, H., Can, D., & Dönmez, Ö. (2018). Uzaktan Yükseköğretim Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Medyanın Eğitim Boyutu Konusundaki Algıları ve Eğitim Amaçlı Sosyal Medya Kullanımlarının Belirlenmesi. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 3(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.403692
  20. Poellhuber, B., Anderson, T., & Roy, N. (2011). Distance students’ readiness for social media and collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 102-125.
  21. Reagle, J. M. (2015). Reading the Comments: Likers, Haters, and Manipulators at the Bottom of the Web. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  22. Rideout, V. (2015). The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens. Common Sense Media. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/census_researchreport.pdf
  23. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M 2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
  24. Roberts, D. F. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
  25. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216-230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
  26. Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in higher education. The Europa World of Learning, 1, 1-10.
  27. Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C., & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 637-662.
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 132
Submitted on: Feb 18, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 10, 2020
Published on: Jul 31, 2020
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2020 Emel Dikbaş Torun, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.