Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effectiveness of Neural Mobilizations Techniques on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review Cover

Effectiveness of Neural Mobilizations Techniques on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Details of interventions of included trials

StudyControl Group InterventionExperimental Group InterventionDosage
SessionDurationTotal Weeks
(Nct, 2022)STGP graduated active range of motion exercises for both UL and LL joints and gait trainingNMG on median nerve and tibial nerve3 session per week30 minutes4 weeks
(Sharma & Kalia, 2023)Balance gait trainingNeural mobilization with balance gait trainingOnce a day for 5 days a week35 minutes4 weeks
(Kumar et al., 2011)Drugs for glycemic control, analgesics, lifestyle modifications and walkIn addition, tibial nerve neurodynamic mobilizationOne session per week45 minutes5 weeks
(Chacón et al., 2024)Radial neurodynamics, ulnar neurodynamics and median neurodynamicsSciatic neurodynamics and Peroneus neurodynamicsOnce a day per week25 minutes8 weeks

Population characteristics of included trials

StudyCountryStudy Type (RCTs)ParticipantsAge (Years)Diagnosis
Alshimy, Ahmed Mag dy, et al., (Nct, 2022)EgyptRCTN = 42 NMG = 21 STPG = 21NMG = 52.72 ± 4 STPG = 51.14 ± 4.92Diabetic Neuropathy
(Sharma & Kalia, 2023)IndiaRCTN = 40 Group 1 = 20 Group 2 = 20 Male = 18 Female = 22Group 1 = 56.65 ± 4.57 Group 2 = 56.8 ± 3.87Diabetic Neuropathy
(Kumar et al., 2011)IndiaRCTN = 32 CG = 16 EG = 16CG = 57.43 ± 12.04 EG = 62.81 ± 10.43Diabetic Neuropathy
(Chacón et al., 2024)MexicoRCTN = 34 Older adults = 17 Adults = 17Older adults = 76.5 Adults = 23.5Diabetic Neuropathy

Outcome measures, findings, and results of included studies

StudyOutcome measuresFollow UPResultsConclusion
Experimental Group Differences (Mean±SD)Findings
Experimental GroupControl Group
(Nct, 2022)(Sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity) (Visual analogue scale) (Katz index)4 weeksVAS = 7 ± 1.14 MSN-NcV = 39.12 ± 5.61 TMN-NcV = 37.42 ± 2.49 Katz index = 3 ± 1.14VAS = 7 ± 1.14 MSN-NcV = 39.95 ± 5.89 TMN-NcV = 38.48 ± 2.54 Katz index = 3 ± 1.14 VAS P = 0.001 MSN-NcV P = 0.002 TMN-NcV p = 0.001 Katz index P = 0.001No significant difference
(Sharma & Kalia, 2023)BBS DGI TUG VPT4 weeksBBS = 40.5 ± 5.73 DGI = 13.60 ± 3.25 TUG = 19.50 ± 4.11 VPT = 17.77 ± 2.48BBS = 47.5 ± 5.73 DGI = 18.5 ± 3.69 TUG = 15.85 ± 3.65 VPT = 16.74 ± 2.60EG BBS P = 0.0001 DGI P = 0.0001 TUG P = 0.0001 VPT P = 0.0001 CG BBS P = 0.63 DGI P = 0.52 TUG P = 0.69 VPT P = 0.001NM with BGT showed significant impact on BBS, DGI and TUG. BGT alone showed non-significant difference.
(Kumar et al., 2011)NPQ (pre- post) NeuroQoL (pre-post) Vibration Thresholds (pre- post) volts SLR2 ROM (pre-post) degrees5 weeksNPQ (pre- post) = 28.5 ± 7.15 NeuroQoL (pre- post) = 28.63 ± 6.84 Vibration Thresholds (pre- post) = 16.5 ± 3.14 volts SLR2 ROM (pre- post) degrees = −8.62 ± 5.79NPQ (pre- post) = 9.61 ± 4.69 NeuroQoL (pre- post) = 12.7 ± 3.99 Vibration Thresholds (pre-post) = 10.56 ± 2.22 volts SLR2 ROM (pre-post) degrees = −4.62 ± 2.94NPQ (pre- post) P = .000 NeuroQoL (pre- post) P = .000 Vibration Thresholds (pre- post) P = .000 volts SLR2 ROM (pre-post) degrees P = .020Both the groups showed statistically significant improvements in all the four variables studied
(Chacón et al., 2024)Michigan Questionnaire Sensitivity test8 weeksMNSI = 76.5% TSSM = (2,0,0) ThSSM = (1.88235,0.0,0.11765) TSLM = (1.76471,0.00,0.23529) ThSLM = (1.52941,0.00,0.47059) VSM = (0.588,0.294,0.118) VLM = (0.706,0.176,0.118)MNSI = 100% TSSM = (2,0,0) ThSSM = (2,0,0) TSLM = (2,0,0) ThSLM = (2,0,0) VSM = (1,0,0) VLM = (0.882,0.118,0) MNSI P = (4.6610×10−29,4.4833×10−25,1.8120× 10−45) TSSM P = (□□, □□,□□) ThSSM P = (5.8069×10−12, □□, 1.5987×10−14) TSLM P = (2.6017×10−22,□□, 0.00) ThSLM P = (7.3437×10−31, □□,0.00) VSM P = (1.9620×10−30,0.00,6.7526×10−12) VLM P = (2.2287×10−30,2.5083×10−7,2.1578× 10−12) This study showed significant results of neurodynamic mobilization techniques.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ajon-2026-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2208-6781 | Journal ISSN: 1032-335X
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 34
Published on: May 18, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Asad Anwar, Marium Zafar, Aqsa Saman, published by Australasian Neuroscience Nurses Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.