Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effectiveness of Neural Mobilizations Techniques on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review Cover

Effectiveness of Neural Mobilizations Techniques on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Population characteristics of included trials

StudyCountryStudy Type (RCTs)ParticipantsAge (Years)Diagnosis
Alshimy, Ahmed Mag dy, et al., (Nct, 2022)EgyptRCTN = 42
NMG = 21
STPG = 21
NMG = 52.72 ± 4
STPG = 51.14 ± 4.92
Diabetic Neuropathy
(Sharma & Kalia, 2023)IndiaRCTN = 40
Group 1 = 20
Group 2 = 20
Male = 18
Female = 22
Group 1 = 56.65 ± 4.57
Group 2 = 56.8 ± 3.87
Diabetic Neuropathy
(Kumar et al., 2011)IndiaRCTN = 32
CG = 16
EG = 16
CG = 57.43 ± 12.04
EG = 62.81 ± 10.43
Diabetic Neuropathy
(Chacón et al., 2024)MexicoRCTN = 34
Older adults = 17
Adults = 17
Older adults = 76.5
Adults = 23.5
Diabetic Neuropathy
Table 2:

Details of interventions of included trials

StudyControl Group InterventionExperimental Group InterventionDosage
SessionDurationTotal Weeks
(Nct, 2022)STGP graduated active range of motion exercises for both UL and LL joints and gait trainingNMG on median nerve and tibial nerve3 session per week30 minutes4 weeks
(Sharma & Kalia, 2023)Balance gait trainingNeural mobilization with balance gait trainingOnce a day for 5 days a week35 minutes4 weeks
(Kumar et al., 2011)Drugs for glycemic control, analgesics, lifestyle modifications and walkIn addition, tibial nerve neurodynamic mobilizationOne session per week45 minutes5 weeks
(Chacón et al., 2024)Radial neurodynamics, ulnar neurodynamics and median neurodynamicsSciatic neurodynamics and Peroneus neurodynamicsOnce a day per week25 minutes8 weeks
Table 3:

Outcome measures, findings, and results of included studies

StudyOutcome measuresFollow UPResultsConclusion
Experimental Group Differences (Mean±SD)Findings
Experimental GroupControl Group
(Nct, 2022)(Sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity)
(Visual analogue scale)
(Katz index)
4 weeksVAS = 7 ± 1.14
MSN-NcV = 39.12 ± 5.61
TMN-NcV = 37.42 ± 2.49
Katz index = 3 ± 1.14
VAS = 7 ± 1.14
MSN-NcV = 39.95 ± 5.89
TMN-NcV = 38.48 ± 2.54
Katz index = 3 ± 1.14
VAS
P = 0.001
MSN-NcV
P = 0.002
TMN-NcV p = 0.001
Katz index P = 0.001
No significant difference
(Sharma & Kalia, 2023)BBS
DGI
TUG
VPT
4 weeksBBS = 40.5 ± 5.73
DGI = 13.60 ± 3.25
TUG = 19.50 ± 4.11
VPT = 17.77 ± 2.48
BBS = 47.5 ± 5.73
DGI = 18.5 ± 3.69
TUG = 15.85 ± 3.65
VPT = 16.74 ± 2.60
EG
BBS P = 0.0001
DGI P = 0.0001
TUG P = 0.0001
VPT P = 0.0001
CG
BBS P = 0.63
DGI P = 0.52
TUG P = 0.69
VPT P = 0.001
NM with BGT showed significant impact on BBS, DGI and TUG. BGT alone showed non-significant difference.
(Kumar et al., 2011)NPQ (pre- post) NeuroQoL (pre-post)
Vibration Thresholds (pre- post) volts
SLR2 ROM (pre-post) degrees
5 weeksNPQ (pre- post) = 28.5 ± 7.15
NeuroQoL (pre- post) = 28.63 ± 6.84
Vibration Thresholds (pre- post) = 16.5 ± 3.14 volts
SLR2 ROM (pre- post) degrees = −8.62 ± 5.79
NPQ (pre- post) = 9.61 ± 4.69
NeuroQoL (pre- post) = 12.7 ± 3.99
Vibration
Thresholds (pre-post) = 10.56 ± 2.22 volts
SLR2 ROM (pre-post) degrees = −4.62 ± 2.94
NPQ (pre- post) P = .000
NeuroQoL (pre- post) P = .000
Vibration Thresholds (pre- post) P = .000 volts
SLR2 ROM (pre-post) degrees P = .020
Both the groups showed statistically significant improvements in all the four variables studied
(Chacón et al., 2024)Michigan Questionnaire
Sensitivity test
8 weeksMNSI = 76.5%
TSSM = (2,0,0)
ThSSM = (1.88235,0.0,0.11765)
TSLM = (1.76471,0.00,0.23529)
ThSLM = (1.52941,0.00,0.47059)
VSM = (0.588,0.294,0.118)
VLM = (0.706,0.176,0.118)
MNSI = 100%
TSSM = (2,0,0)
ThSSM = (2,0,0)
TSLM = (2,0,0)
ThSLM = (2,0,0)
VSM = (1,0,0)
VLM = (0.882,0.118,0)
MNSI P = (4.6610×10−29,4.4833×10−25,1.8120× 10−45)
TSSM P = (□□, □□,□□)
ThSSM P = (5.8069×10−12, □□, 1.5987×10−14)
TSLM P = (2.6017×10−22,□□, 0.00)
ThSLM P = (7.3437×10−31, □□,0.00)
VSM P = (1.9620×10−30,0.00,6.7526×10−12)
VLM P = (2.2287×10−30,2.5083×10−7,2.1578× 10−12)
This study showed significant results of neurodynamic mobilization techniques.

[i] Pubmed : ((((diabetic neuropathy[MeSH Terms]) OR (diabetic neuropathy)) OR (diabetic neuropathy[Text Word])) AND (((mobilization) OR (neurodynamic)) OR (neurodynamics[Text Word]))) AND (((rehabilitation[MeSH Terms]) OR (rehabilitation[Text Word])) OR (rehabilitation))

[ii] Pedro : ((((diabetic neuropathy[MeSH Terms]) OR (diabetic neuropathy)) OR (diabetic neuropathy[Text Word])) AND (((mobilization) OR (neurodynamic)) OR (neurodynamics[Text Word]))) AND (((rehabilitation[MeSH Terms]) OR (rehabilitation[Text Word])) OR (rehabilitation))

[iii] Science Direct : ((((diabetic neuropathy[MeSH Terms]) OR (diabetic neuropathy)) OR (diabetic neuropathy[Text Word])) AND (((mobilization) OR (neurodynamic)) OR (neurodynamics[Text Word]))) AND (((rehabilitation[MeSH Terms]) OR (rehabilitation[Text Word])) OR (rehabilitation))

[iv] Google Scholar : ((((diabetic neuropathy[MeSH Terms]) OR (diabetic neuropathy)) OR (diabetic neuropathy[Text Word])) AND (((mobilization) OR (neurodynamic)) OR (neurodynamics[Text Word]))) AND (((rehabilitation[MeSH Terms]) OR (rehabilitation[Text Word])) OR (rehabilitation))

graphic/j_ajon-2026-0004_fig_001.jpg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ajon-2026-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2208-6781 | Journal ISSN: 1032-335X
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 34
Published on: May 18, 2026
Published by: Australasian Neuroscience Nurses Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Asad Anwar, Marium Zafar, Aqsa Saman, published by Australasian Neuroscience Nurses Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.