Follicular renewal and stemness potency of follicular cells depended of telomerase activity and TERT expression – short review

Zgórecka, Wiktoria; Narenji, Afsaneh Golkar; Krajnik, Kornelia; Antosik, Paweł; Bukowska, Dorota; Grzesiak, Małgorzata; Prochazka, Radek; Mozdziak, Paul; Skowroński, Mariusz T.; Kranc, Wiesława

doi:10.2478/acb-2022-0005

Abstract

Several hypotheses have been proposed, relating to the potential genesis of follicular cells in the ovarian niche. Reports using mice as an experimental model have suggested that the ovaries may contain stem cells that are likely involved in the formation of new follicles in adult reproductive life. Over recent years, various types of ovarian cells have been identified and described to confirm or disprove the existence of ovarian adult stem cells. Most research is focused on granulosa cells (GCs), which are essential for follicular development and maturation of female germ cells (oocytes). GCs exhibit the features of stem cells, such as expression of stem cell markers: OCT-4, Sox-2, Nanog as well as certain markers of mesenchymal stem cells, including CD29, CD44, CD90, CD105, CD117, and CD166. Another discovery in favor of the potential stemness of GCs is their ability to transdifferentiate towards other cell lines and high telomerase (TERT) activity in dividing compartments of the follicle during its maturation.

References

1. Johnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, Pru JK, Tilly JL. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature. 2004;428(6979):145–50; DOI:10.1038/NATURE02316.10.1038/nature02316
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Woods DC, Tilly JL. Isolation, characterization and propagation of mitotically active germ cells from adult mouse and human ovaries. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(5):966–88; DOI:10.1038/NPROT.2013.047.10.1038/nprot.2013.047
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. OB O, AM M, D O. Ovarian stem cells: from basic to clinical applications. World J Stem Cells. 2015;7(4):757; DOI:10.4252/WJSC.V7.I4.757.10.4252/wjsc.v7.i4.757
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Nikolic A, Volarevic V, Armstrong L, Lako M, Stojkovic M. Primordial germ cells: current knowledge and perspectives. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016: 1741072; DOI:10.1155/2016/1741072.10.1155/2016/1741072
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Baker TG, Wai Sum O. Development of the ovary and oogenesis. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1976;3(1):3–26; DOI:10.1016/s0306-3356(21)00330-7.10.1016/S0306-3356(21)00330-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Dansereau DA, Lasko P. The development of germline stem cells in Drosophila. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;450:3; DOI:10.1007/978-1-60327-214-8_1.10.1007/978-1-60327-214-8_1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Wylie C. Germ Cells. Cell. 1999;96(2):165–74; DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80557-7.10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80557-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Xie T, Spradling AC. A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science. 2000;290(5490):328–30; DOI:10.1126/SCIENCE.290.5490.328.10.1126/science.290.5490.32811030649
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Nakamura S, Kobayashi K, Nishimura T, Higashijima SI, Tanaka M. Identification of germline stem cells in the ovary of the teleost medaka. Science. 2010;328(5985):1561–3; DOI:10.1126/SCIENCE.1185473.10.1126/science.118547320488987
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Draper BW, McCallum CM, Moens CB. nanos1 is required to maintain oocyte production in adult zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2007;305(2):589; DOI:10.1016/J.YDBIO.2007.03.007.10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.007198672617418113
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Kim J, Hyun M, Hibi M, You YJ. Maintenance of quiescent oocytes by noradrenergic signals. Nat Commun 2021 121. 2021;12(1):1–14; DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-26945-x.10.1038/s41467-021-26945-x862643834836956
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Crane AM, Bhattacharya SK. The use of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assays to assess corneal stem cell proliferation. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1014:65–70; DOI:10.1007/978-1-62703-432-6_4.10.1007/978-1-62703-432-6_423690005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Birbrair A. Stem cells heterogeneity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1123:1–3; DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-11096-3_1.10.1007/978-3-030-11096-3_131016591
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Shamsudeen S, Mahdy H. Granulosa theca cell cancer. Treasure Island:StatPearls; 2022. 8 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Auersperg N, Wong AST, Choi K-C, Kang SK, Leung PCK. Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(2):255–88; DOI:10.1210/EDRV.22.2.0422.10.1210/edrv.22.2.042211294827
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Bast RC, Hennessy B, Mills GB. The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(6):415; DOI:10.1038/NRC2644.10.1038/nrc2644281429919461667
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Tudrej P, Kujawa KA, Cortez AJ, Lisowska KM. Characteristics of in vitro model systems for ovarian cancer studies. Oncol Clin Pract. 2019;15(5):246–59; DOI:10.5603/OCP.2019.0024.10.5603/OCP.2019.0024
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Kossaï M, Leary A, Scoazec JY, Genestie C. Ovarian cancer: a heterogeneous disease. pathobiology. 2018;85(1–2):41–9; DOI:10.1159/000479006.10.1159/00047900629020678
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Riva F, Omes C, Bassani R, Nappi RE, Mazzini G, Icaro Cornaglia A, Casasco A. In-vitro culture system for mesenchymal progenitor cells derived from waste human ovarian follicular fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):457–69; DOI:10.1016/J.RBMO.2014.06.006.10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.00625131558
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Dzafic E, Stimpfel M, Novakovic S, Cerkovnik P, Virant-Klun I. Expression of mesenchymal stem cells-related genes and plasticity of aspirated follicular cells obtained from infertile women. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014; DOI:10.1155/2014/508216.10.1155/2014/508216395878424724084
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Kossowska-Tomaszczuk K, De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Martin I, Holzgreve W, Scherberich A, Zhang H. The multipotency of luteinizing granulosa cells collected from mature ovarian follicles. Stem Cells. 2009;27(1):210–9; DOI:10.1634/STEMCELLS.2008-0233.10.1634/stemcells.2008-023319224509
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Riva F, Omes C, Bassani R, Nappi RE, Mazzini G, Icaro Cornaglia A, Casasco A. In-vitro culture system for mesenchymal progenitor cells derived from waste human ovarian follicular fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):457–69; DOI:10.1016/J.RBMO.2014.06.006.10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.00625131558
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Simon LE, Rajendra Kumar T, Duncan FE. In vitro ovarian follicle growth: a comprehensive analysis of key protocol variables. Biol Reprod. 2020;103(3):455; DOI:10.1093/BIOLRE/IOAA073.10.1093/biolre/ioaa073744277732406908
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Kossowska-Tomaszczuk K, De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Martin I, Holzgreve W, Scherberich A, Zhang H. The multipotency of luteinizing granulosa cells collected from mature ovarian follicles. Stem Cells. 2009;27(1):210–9; DOI:10.1634/STEMCELLS.2008-0233.10.1634/stemcells.2008-023319224509
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Kossowska-Tomaszczuk K, De Geyter C. Cells with stem cell characteristics in somatic compartments of the ovary. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013; DOI:10.1155/2013/310859.10.1155/2013/310859359121723484108
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Varras M, Griva T, Kalles V, Akrivis C, Paparisteidis N. Markers of stem cells in human ovarian granulosa cells: is there a clinical significance in ART? J Ovarian Res. 2012;5(1); DOI:10.1186/1757-2215-5-36.10.1186/1757-2215-5-36353659423164047
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Mattioli M, Gloria A, Turriani M, Berardinelli P, Russo V, Nardinocchi D, Curini V, Baratta M, Martignani E, Barboni B. Osteo-regenerative potential of ovarian granulosa cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Theriogenology. 2012;77(7):1425–37; DOI:10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2011.11.008.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.11.00822284224
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Brązert M, Kranc W, Celichowski P, Jankowski M, Piotrowska-Kempisty H, Pawelczyk L, Bruska M, Zabel M, Nowicki M, Kempisty B. Expression of genes involved in neurogenesis, and neuronal precursor cell proliferation and development: Novel pathways of human ovarian granulosa cell differentiation and transdifferentiation capability in vitro. Mol Med Rep. 2020;21(4):1749–60; DOI:10.3892/mmr.2020.10972.10.3892/mmr.2020.10972705778132319615
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Brązert M, Kranc W, Celichowski P, Ożegowska K, Budna-Tukan J, Jeseta M, Pawelczyk L, Bruska M, Zabel M, Nowicki M, Kempisty B. Novel markers of human ovarian granulosa cell differentiation toward osteoblast lineage: a microarray approach. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20(5):4403–14; DOI:10.3892/MMR.2019.10709.10.3892/mmr.2019.10709679795731702034
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Hoang SN, Ho CNQ, Nguyen TTP, Doan CC, Tran DH, Le LT. Evaluation of stemness marker expression in bovine ovarian granulosa cells. Anim Reprod. 2019;16(2):277–81; DOI:10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0083.10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0083767359633224287
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Stefańska K, Sibiak R, Hutchings G, Dompe C, Moncrieff L, Janowicz K, Jeseta M, Kempisty B, Machatkova M, Mozdziak P. Evidence for existence of molecular stemness markers in porcine ovarian follicular granulosa cells. Med J Cell Biol. 2019; DOI:10.2478/acb-2019-0025.10.2478/acb-2019-0025
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Parte S, Bhartiya D, Telang J, Daithankar V, Salvi V, Zaveri K, Hinduja I. Detection, characterization, and spontaneous differentiation in vitro of very small embryonic-like putative stem cells in adult mammalian ovary. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20(8):1451–64; DOI:10.1089/SCD.2010.0461.10.1089/scd.2010.0461314882921291304
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. 33. Parte S, Patel H, Sriraman K, Bhartiya D. Isolation and characterization of stem cells in the adult mammalian ovary. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1235:203–29; DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-1785-3_16.10.1007/978-1-4939-1785-3_1625388396
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Woods DC, White YAR, Niikura Y, Kiatpongsan S, Lee HJ, Tilly JL. Embryonic stem cell-derived granulosa cells participate in ovarian follicle formation in vitro and in vivo. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(5):524–35; DOI:10.1177/1933719113483017.10.1177/1933719113483017363506823536570
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Virant-Klun I, Skutella T, Stimpfel M, Sinkovec J. Ovarian surface epithelium in patients with severe ovarian infertility: a potential source of cells expressing markers of pluripotent/multipotent stem cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011; DOI:10.1155/2011/381928.10.1155/2011/381928323701722187524
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Bukovsky A, Svetlikova M, Caudle MR. Oogenesis in cultures derived from adult human ovaries. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3(1):1–13; DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-3-17/COMMENTS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Virant-Klun I, Skutella T, Hren M, Gruden K, Cvjeticanin B, Vogler A, Sinkovec J. Isolation of small SSEA-4-positive putative stem cells from the ovarian surface epithelium of adult human ovaries by two different methods. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013; DOI:10.1155/2013/690415.10.1155/2013/690415359061423509763
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Virant-Klun I, Zech N, Rzǒman P, Vogler A, Cvjetičanin B, Klemenc P, Maličev E, Meden-Vrtovec H. Putative stem cells with an embryonic character isolated from the ovarian surface epithelium of women with no naturally present follicles and oocytes. Differentiation. 2008;76(8):843–56; DOI:10.1111/J.1432-0436.2008.00268.X.10.1111/j.1432-0436.2008.00268.x18452550
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Rungsiwiwut R, Numchaisrika P, Thuwanut P, Pruksananonda K. Characterization of stem cells from human ovarian follicular fluid; a potential source of autologous stem cell for cell-based therapy. Hum Cell. 2021;34(2):300–9; DOI:10.1007/s13577-020-00439-2.10.1007/s13577-020-00439-233543452
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Dompe C, Kulus M, Stefańska K, Kranc W, Chermuła B, Bryl R, Pieńkowski W, Nawrocki MJ, Petitte JN, Stelmach B, Mozdziak P, Jeseta M, Pawelczyk L, Jaśkowski JM, Piotrowska-Kempisty H, Spaczyński RZ, Nowicki M, Kempisty B. Human granulosa cells—stemness properties, molecular cross-talk and follicular angiogenesis. Cells. 2021;10(6); DOI:10.3390/cells10061396.10.3390/cells10061396822987834198768
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. Fàbregues F, Ferreri J, Méndez M, Calafell JM, Otero J, Farré R. In Vitro Follicular Activation and Stem Cell Therapy as a Novel Treatment Strategies in Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;11:1135; DOI:10.3389/FENDO.2020.617704/BIBTEX.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. Szczepańska MA, Jagodziński PP, Wender-Ożegowska E. The effect of endometrioma on ovarian reserve. J Med Sci. 2017;86(3):237–9; DOI:10.20883/JMS.2017.201.10.20883/jms.2017.201
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Rasool S, Shah D. Fertility with early reduction of ovarian reserve: the last straw that breaks the Camel’s back. Fertil Res Pract 2017 31. 2017;3(1):1–12; DOI:10.1186/S40738-017-0041-1.10.1186/s40738-017-0041-1563724929046817
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. 44. Blackburn EH, Collins K. Telomerase: an RNP enzyme synthesizes DNA. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(5):1–9; DOI:10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A003558.10.1101/cshperspect.a003558310184820660025
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
45. Jiang J, Wang Y, Sušac L, Chan H, Basu R, Zhou ZH, Feigon J. Structure of telomerase with telomeric DNA. cell. 2018;173(5):1179-1190; DOI:10.1016/J.CELL.2018.04.038.10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.038599558329775593
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
46. Celtikci B, Erkmen GK, Dikmen ZG. Regulation and Effect of Telomerase and Telomeric Length in Stem Cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;16(7):809–23; DOI:10.2174/1574888x15666200422104423.10.2174/1574888X1566620042210442332321410
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
47. Hiyama E, Hiyama K. Telomere and telomerase in stem cells. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(7):1020–4; DOI:10.1038/SJ.BJC.6603671.10.1038/sj.bjc.6603671236012717353922
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
48. Mondello C, Zongaro S. Telomerase expression in somatic Cells: fountain of youth or Damocles’ sword? Cell Cycle. 2006;5(5):465–6; DOI:10.4161/cc.5.5.2499.10.4161/cc.5.5.249916481747
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
49. Shay JW, Wright WE. Telomeres and telomerase: three decades of progress. Nat Rev Genet 2019 205. 2019;20(5):299–309; DOI:10.1038/s41576-019-0099-1.10.1038/s41576-019-0099-130760854
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
50. Kosebent EG, Uysal F, Ozturk S. Telomere length and telomerase activity during folliculogenesis in mammals. J Reprod Dev. 2018;64(6):477–84; DOI:10.1262/jrd.2018-076.10.1262/jrd.2018-076630584730270279
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
51. Lavranos TC, Mathis JM, Latham SE, Kalionis B, Shay JW, Rodgers RJ. Evidence for ovarian granulosa stem cells: telomerase activity and localization of the telomerase ribonucleic acid component in bovine ovarian follicles. Biol Reprod. 1999;61(2):358–66; DOI:10.1095/BIOLREPROD61.2.358.10.1095/biolreprod61.2.35810411512
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
52. Russo V, Berardinelli P, Martelli A, Di Giacinto O, Nardinocchi D, Fantasia D, Barboni B. Expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit (TERT) and telomere sizing in pig ovarian follicles. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54(4):443–55; DOI:10.1369/JHC.4A6603.2006.10.1369/jhc.4A6603.200616400001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
53. Tománek M, Chronowska E, Kott T, Czerneková V. Telomerase activity in pig granulosa cells proliferating and differentiating in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;104(2–4):284–98; DOI:10.1016/J.ANIREPROSCI.2007.02.003.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.02.00317363198
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
54. Liu JP, Li H. Telomerase in the ovary. Reproduction. 2010;140(2):215–22; DOI:10.1530/REP-10-0008.10.1530/REP-10-000820562297
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
55. Yamagata Y, Nakamura Y, Umayahara K, Harada A, Takayama H, Sugino N, Kato H. Changes in telomerase activity in experimentally induced atretic follicles of immature rats. Endocr J. 2002;49(6):589–95; DOI:10.1507/ENDOCRJ.49.589.10.1507/endocrj.49.58912625407
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
56. Cheng EH, Chen SU, Lee TH, Pai YP, Huang LS, Huang CC, Lee MS. Evaluation of telomere length in cumulus cells as a potential biomarker of oocyte and embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(4):929–36; DOI:10.1093/HUMREP/DET004.10.1093/humrep/det00423377770
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
57. Butts S, Riethman H, Ratcliffe S, Shaunik A, Coutifaris C, Barnhart K. Correlation of telomere length and telomerase activity with occult ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(12):4835–43; DOI:10.1210/JC.2008-2269.10.1210/jc.2008-2269279565019864453
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
58. Chen H, Wang W, Mo Y, Ma Y, Ouyang N, Li R, Mai M, He Y, Bodombossou-Djobo MMA, Yang D. Women with high telomerase activity in luteinised granulosa cells have a higher pregnancy rate during in vitro fertilisation treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(9):797–807; DOI:10.1007/S10815-011-9600-2.10.1007/s10815-011-9600-2316968321717175
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
59. Misiti S, Nanni S, Fontemaggi G, Cong Y-S, Wen J, Hirte HW, Piaggio G, Sacchi A, Pontecorvi A, Bacchetti S, Farsetti A. Induction of hTERT expression and telomerase activity by estrogens in human ovary epithelium cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(11):3764–71; DOI:10.1128/MCB.20.11.3764-3771.2000.10.1128/MCB.20.11.3764-3771.20008569210805720
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
60. Bayne S, Li H, Jones MEE, Pinto AR, van Sinderen M, Drummond A, Simpson ER, Liu JP. Estrogen deficiency reversibly induces telomere shortening in mouse granulosa cells and ovarian aging in vivo. Protein Cell. 2011;2(4):333–46; DOI:10.1007/S13238-011-1033-2.10.1007/s13238-011-1033-2487520421574023
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Follicular renewal and stemness potency of follicular cells depended of telomerase activity and TERT expression – short review

Abstract

Paradigm

My account