Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multi-response optimization of red mud and sand proportions in paving block production via response surface methodology (RSM) Cover

Multi-response optimization of red mud and sand proportions in paving block production via response surface methodology (RSM)

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Arya, A., & L. K. Sahu. (2024). Sustainability in technological advancements. IJFMR – International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.36948/IJFMR.2024.V06I01.12528
  2. Abouhelal, D., Kamel, W., & Bassioni, H. (2023). Informatic analysis and review of literature on the optimum selection of sustainable materials used in construction projects: Critical review. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.01.011
  3. Aryanto, Sutandar, E., & Prasetijo, J. (2025). The influence of quartz powder addition on the production of paving blocks. Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 34(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.22630/SREES.10423
  4. Aslami, M. (2023). Key role of construction industry in achieving the goal of sustainable energy worldwide. E3S Web of Conferences, 457, 02061. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202345702061
  5. Badan Standardisasi Nasional [BSN]. (1990). Metode pengujian analisis saringan Agregat halus dan kasar (SNI 03-1968). https://pdfcoffee.com/sni-03-1968-1990-analisa-saringan-agg-pdf-free.html?utm_source
  6. Badan Standardisasi Nasional [BSN]. (1996). Bata beton (Paving block) (SNI 03-0691). https://dwikusumadpu.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/sni-03-0691-1996-paving-block.pdf
  7. Badan Standardisasi Nasional [BSN]. (2004). Semen portland pozzolan (SNI 15-0302). https://wancik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/sni-15-0302-2004_semen-portland-pozolan.pdf
  8. Gencel, O., Ozel, C., Koksal, F., Erdogmus, E., Martínez-Barrera, G., & Brostow, W. (2012). Properties of concrete paving blocks made with waste marble. Journal of Cleaner Production, 21(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.08.023
  9. Huang, X., Li, J. S., Jiang, W., Chen, Z., Wan, Y., Xue, Q., Liu, L., & Poon, C. S. (2022). Recycling of phosphogypsum and red mud in low carbon and green cementitious materials for vertical barrier. Science of The Total Environment, 838(Part 2), 155925. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.155925
  10. Io, H., Sutandar, E., & Budi, G. S. (2024). Study of the effect of mineral admixture addition on paving blocks' physical and mechanical properties. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 24(2), 941–956. https://doi.org/10.26418/JTS.V24I2.76545
  11. Jaya, R. P., Munirwan, R. P., & Bunyamin, B. (2025). Challenges and solutions for using waste materials in various construction applications. Smart and Green Materials, 1(2), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.70028/SGM.V1I2.22
  12. Khan, K., Khan, S., Ahmed, M., Ahmed, W., Khan, S., & Zaman, G. (2025). Multi-response optimization of carbon-nanotubes concrete: Study on mechanical properties and durability behaviors. Structural Concrete, 26(6), 7795–7815. https://doi.org/10.1002/SUCO.70185
  13. Khayat, K. H., Meng, W., Vallurupalli, K., & Teng, L. (2019). Rheological properties of ultra-high-performance concrete – An overview. Cement and Concrete Research, 124, 105828. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2019.105828
  14. Liu, Y., Naidu, R., & Ming, H. (2011). Red mud as an amendment for pollutants in solid and liquid phases. Geoderma, 163(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2011.04.002
  15. Liu, Z., & Li, H. (2015). Metallurgical process for valuable elements recovery from red mud – A review. Hydrometallurgy, 155, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HYDROMET.2015.03.018
  16. Meng, W., Samaranayake, V. A., & Khayat, K. H. (2018). Factorial design and optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete with lightweight sand. Materials Journal, 115(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.14359/51700995
  17. Mohibullah, & Acharya, P. K. (2025). Red mud-ground granulated blast furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete: a comprehensive study on mechanical performance, durability and environmental impact. Innovative Infrastructure Solution, 10, 503. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41062-025-02322-1
  18. Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley.
  19. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Building empirical models. In Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (pp. 13–62). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
  20. Nandurkar, B. P., Raut, J. M., Hinge, P. K., Bahoria, B. V., Patil, T. R., Upadhye, S., Vairagade, V. S., & Shelare, S. D. (2025). Optimization and predictive performance of fly ash-based sustainable concrete using integrated multitask deep learning framework with interpretable machine learning techniques. Scientific Reports, 15, 30820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16678-y
  21. Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete. Pearson.
  22. Nofrianto, H., & Hutrio, H. (2023). Analisis mutu paving block dengan variasi agregat halus [Quality analysis of paving block with variations of fine aggregate]. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Vokasi, 1(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.21063/JTV.2023.1.1.54-62
  23. Oleh, D., Ridwan, M., & Harimukti, N. (2022). Komparasi mutu paving block penambahan abu batu antara metode mekanis dan konvensional [Comparison of the quality of paving block with additional stone dust between the mechanical and conventional method]. Universitas Islam Indonesia. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/41552
  24. Power, G., Gräfe, M., & Klauber, C. (2011). Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices. Hydrometallurgy, 108(1–2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HYDROMET.2011.02.006
  25. Regulacion, R. E., & Oreta, A. W. C. (2013). Application of response surface methodology: Optimum mix design of concrete with slag as coarse aggregate. In B.H.V. Topping & P. Iványi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing (Paper 169). Civil-Comp Press. https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.102.169
  26. Sunkpho, J., Thangavel, P., Kumar, D. R., Wipulanusat, W., & Doh, J. H. (2026). Sustainable use of red mud in concrete: Assessing mechanical strength, durability, and performance through machine learning models. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 4(2), 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GRETS.2025.100283
  27. Sutar, H., Mishra, S. C., Sahoo, S. K., Chakraverty, A. P., & Maharana, H. S. (2014). Progress of red mud utilization: An overview. Chemical Science International Journal, 4(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.9734/ACSJ/2014/7258
  28. Topçu, I. B., & Uygunoǧlu, T. (2010). Effect of aggregate type on properties of hardened self-consolidating lightweight concrete (SCLC). Construction and Building Materials, 24(7), 1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.12.007
  29. Tw, A. R. P., Irianti, L., Sebayang, S., & Isneini, M. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), semen modifikasi jenis III dan IV, dan Portland Composite Cement (PCC) terhadap kuat tekan beton. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Desain, 11(4), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v11i4.3759
  30. Venkatesh, C., Nerella, R., & Chand, M. S. R. (2021). Role of red mud as a cementing material in concrete: a comprehensive study on durability behavior. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00371-2
  31. Viyasun, K., Anuradha, R., Thangapandi, K., Kumar, D. S., Sivakrishna, A., & Gobinath, R. (2021). Investigation on performance of red mud based concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 39, 796–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.09.637
  32. Wang, X. (2025). Application of environmentally friendly building materials in urban construction. Applied and Computational Engineering, 126(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.20030
  33. Yang, C., Zeng, Q., Hu, J., & Zhu, W. (2025). Study on performance optimization of red mud–mineral powder composite cementitious material based on response surface methodology. Buildings, 15(13), 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132339
  34. You, Z., Dai, Q., & Xiao, F. (2018). Advanced paving materials and technologies. Applied Sciences, 8(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040588
  35. Zhang, J., Yao, Z., Wang, K., Wang, F., Jiang, H., Liang, M., Wei, J., & Airey, G. (2021). Sustainable utilization of bauxite residue (Red Mud) as a road material in pavements: A critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 270, 121419. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.121419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.11102 | Journal eISSN: 2543-7496 | Journal ISSN: 1732-9353
Language: English
Page range: 241 - 250
Submitted on: Jan 28, 2026
Accepted on: May 13, 2026
Published on: Sep 30, 2026
Published by: Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Erwin Sutandar, Tavio, Daniel Christianto, published by Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.