Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Coslenchus paramaritus n. sp. and C. cancellatus (Cobb, 1925) Siddiqi, 1978 (Nematoda: Tylenchidae) from Iran Cover

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Coslenchus paramaritus n. sp. and C. cancellatus (Cobb, 1925) Siddiqi, 1978 (Nematoda: Tylenchidae) from Iran

Open Access
|Sep 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Morphometric characters of Coslenchus paramaritus n. sp. and C. cancellatus from Iran (measurements are in µm).

C. paramaritus n. sp. C. cancellatus
Character\SpeciesHolotypeFemalesMalesFemales
n–10CV8CV12CV
L519537 ± 22.3 (508–572)4.2529 ± 31.4 (474–571)5.9446 ± 29.9 (388–481)6.7
a26.627.3 ± 3 (22.5–33.6)11.136 ± 1.6 (33.7–38.2)4.625.6 ± 1.8 (23.2–28.1)7.3
b5.95.4 ± 0.3 (5.1–6.1)5.914.8 ± 0.4 (14–15.3)2.94.7 ± 0.4 (3.4–5.1)10.6
c4.54.7 ± 0.4 (4.3–5.7)9.64.6 ± 0.1 (4.3–4.9)4.05.8 ± 0.5 (4.9–6.5)9.1
c′11.910.7 ± 1.2 (7.8–11.8)11.511.3 ± 0.9 (10.1–13)8.67.5 ± 0.7 (6.5–8.4)9.6
V or T62.663.8 ± 2.3 (61.8–69.6)3.734 ± 4.1 (28.6–39.4)12.166.4 ± 1.5 (64.6–69.9)2.3
V'80.480.5 ± 1.9 (76.7–83.2)2.4––80.2 ± 1.8 (77–82.9)2.3
Stylet13.512.8 ± 0.6 (12–13.9)5.212.4 ± 0.2 (12–12.9)2.310.9 ± 0.3 (10.5–11.4)2.8
m (conus/stylet %)45.346.1 ± 1.8 (43.2–48.3)3.947.8 ± 1.3 (45.8–49.5)2.744.8 ± 2 (42.2–48.5)4.7
Pharynx9097.9 ± 5.8 (85–107)6.097.1 ± 4.4 (92–103)4.695.4 ± 9 (85–112)9.5
Median bulb44.544.6 ± 2.1 (41–47)4.944.6 ± 2.2 (42–49)5.141.9 ± 3.8 (38–50)9.3
MB4745.6 ± 2.5 (42.4–51.7)5.645.9 ± 1.1 (44.5–47.5)2.443.9 ± 1.4 (41.8–46.6)3.2
Excretory pore7981 ± 3.3 (76–86)4.279.9 ± 3 (74–83)3.875.6 ± 12 (59–103)15.9
Head-vulva325340 ± 17.6 (314–370)5.2––296 ± 18.2 (257–319)6.2
Head-anus404423 ± 22.7 (394–459)5.4414 ± 24.1 (373–442)5.8369 ± 28 (310–401)7.6
Vulva–anus8982.6 ± 10.5 (71–104)12.8––73 ± 11.5 (53–92)15.8
Body width1919.6 ± 1.6 (17–22)8.614.7 ± 1.1 (12.5–15.8)7.517.4 ± 2.1 (14.2–20.7)12.5
Vulval body width1617.1 ± 1 (15.5–19)6.3––15.2 ± 1.5 (13–17)10.3
Anal body width9.710.6 ± 0.6 (9.7–12)5.810.1 ± 0.2 (10–10.6)2.310.2 ± 0.6 (9–11)6.5
Tail/Vulva–Anus1.31.4 ± 0.2 (0.9–1.8)17.4––1 ± 0.1 (0.7–1.4)17.6
Annulus width2.82.8 ± 0.1 (2.6–3)5.12.8 ± 0.2 (2.4–3)7.22.9 ± 0.2 (2.4–3.3)7.6
Tail length115114 ± 9.9 (94–128)8.7115 ± 8.9 (101–130)7.776.8 ± 6.9 (65–87)9.0
R216222.4 ± 10 (210–240)4.5214.6 ± 10.7 (201–233)5.0188.5 ± 13.8 (170–210)7.3
Rv8586 ± 5.8 (76–96)6.7––65.6 ± 7.5 (58–83)11.5
Ran5453.2 ± 6.4 (41–59)12.253.8 ± 4 (48–60)7.531.7 ± 2.8 (28–36)9.0
Rvan3032.8 ± 4.5 (26–40)13.9––33.9 ± 6.3 (27–47)18.7
Gubernaculum–––5.1 ± 0.3 (4.5–5.5)6.7––
Spicules–––14.3 ± 0.8 (13–15.5)6.3––
Figure 1:

Figure 1: Coslenchus paramaritus n. sp. (line drawing). (A, B) Entire body in female and male. (C, D) Anterior portion. (E) Anterior end in dorso-ventral view. (I, K) Female tail. (J, L) Male tail. (F) Reproductive system. (G, H) Cross section at mid-body.

Figure 2:

Figure 2: Coslenchus paramaritus n. sp. (light photograph). (A) Female Anterior end (Lateral view). (B) Female Anterior end (Dorso-ventral view). (C) Male anterior end (Lateral view). (D) Male anterior end (Dorso-ventral view). (E) Entire body. (F) Cross section at mid-body. (G–I) Spicules and Bursa. (J) End portion of esophagus. (K, L) Female reproductive system. (M) Female tail. (N) Male tail. (A–D, F–L = 5 µm, E = 100 µm, M–N = 20 µm).

Figure 3:

Figure 3: Coslenchus cancellatus (Cobb, 1925) Siddiqi, 1978 (line drawing). (A) Entire body in female. (B) Anterior portion. (C, D) Anterior end in lateral view. (E) Anterior end in dorso-ventral view. (F) Cross section at mid-body. (G) Reproductive system. (H–M) Female tail.

Figure 4:

Figure 4: Coslenchus cancellatus (Cobb, 1925) Siddiqi, 1978, female (light photograph). (A) Entire body. (B, C) Anterior end in lateral view. (D) Anterior end in dorso-ventral view. (E) Posterior of esophagus. (F) Reproductive system. (G) Front view of vulva. (H) Front view of anus. (J) Lateral field. (K) tail. (L–O) Posterior of tail. (A = 20 µm, B–G, L–O = 5 µm, K = 50 µm.)

Figure 5:

Figure 5: The 50% majority rule consensus trees from Bayesian analysis generated from the D2–D3 expansion fragments of 28 S rRNA gene dataset under GTR+I+G model. Posterior probabilities for BI analysis more than 50% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-059 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 10
Submitted on: May 25, 2019
Published online: Sep 17, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2019
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Manouchehr Hosseinvand, Ali Eskandari, Reza Ghaderi, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.