Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Description of Ektaphelenchus koreanus n. sp. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchidae) with morphometrical notes on the Ektaphelenchus species Cover

Description of Ektaphelenchus koreanus n. sp. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchidae) with morphometrical notes on the Ektaphelenchus species

Open Access
|Jul 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Line drawings of Ektaphelenchus koreanus n. sp. (A) female; (B) male; (C) head region; (D) posterior part of female; (E–H) female tail region; (I) lateral view of male tail; (J–L) spicules. (Scale bars = A–L = 10; B = 20 μm).

Figure 2:

Light photomicrographs of Ektaphelenchus koreanus n. sp. (A) female; (B) male; (C) head region; (D) lateral region; (E) feeding on Aphelenchoides sp.; (F, G) vulval region (lateral view); (H) vulval region (ventral view); (I, J) female tail; (K, L) Male tail. (Scale bars = 10 μm).

Table 1.

Morphometrics data for Ektaphelenchus koreanus n. sp. All measurements are in µm and in the form of mean ± s.d. (range).

FemaleMale
CharactersHolotypeParatypesParatypes
n208
L631585 ± 68.2 (474–705)475 ± 20.0 (448–517)
a32.333.1 ± 1.7 (30.2–36.4)32.5 ± 2.5 (27.2–35.4)
b10.59.9 ± 0.8 (8.2–10.9)8.1 ± 0.6 (7.2–8.7)
b′4.24.0 ± 0.4 (3.2–4.6)3.5 ± 0.2 (3.3–4.0)
c16.5 ± 0.9 (15.2–18.2)
c′2.6 ± 0.2 (2.3–3.0)
V or T77.977.3 ± 0.7 (75.7–78.1)31.3 ± 3.4 (27.3–38.1)
Max body diam19.517.8 ± 2.4 (14.0–21.8)14.7 ± 1.2 (13.4–16.7)
Lip diam8.26.8 ± 0.9 (5.5–8.2)6.6 ± 0.2 (6.3–7.0)
Lip height3.93.2 ± 0.6 (2.3–4.3)2.6 ± 0.2 (2.2–2.9)
Stylet length15.814.0 ± 0.8 (12.4–16.4)13.5 ± 0.9 (12.4–14.9)
Median bulb length16.215.9 ± 0.8 (13.6–17.1)14.8 ± 0.7 (14.0–15.9)
Median bulb diam10.810.3 ± 0.9 (8.2–11.7)9.6 ± 0.7 (8.5–11.0)
Median bulb length/diam1.51.6 ± 0.1 (1.4–1.8)1.5 ± 0.0 (1.5–1.6)
Excretory pore position89.686.7 ± 4.7 (77.1–93.5)86.1 ± 5.5 (76.3–92.7)
Spicule(chord)13.2 ± 0.3 (12.7–13.7)
Ovary or testis length372298 ± 66.7 (201–411)148 ± 14.1 (130–171)
Post-uterine sac length14.511.3 ± 2.1 (7.1–14.7)
Post vulval intestinal/blind sac10281.9 ± 16.4 (55.0–106.0)
Table 2.

Morphometrical values of Ektaphelenchus species.

SpeciesLStylet LSpicule LVulva to tail terminusabcV/TReference
Species having 2 incisures in the lateral field
E. josephi Male71032712 Massey (1974)
Female830–9202229.5–338–975–77
E. riograndensis Male670–81024–346.3–81.6–1.8 Massey (1964a, 1964b)
Female750–91025–346.4–8.580
Male620–65021–2220–22.526–317.1–8.12.5–2.6 Kaisa (2000)
Female630–78022–2325.2–31.56.8–9.579–81
Species having 3 incisures in the lateral field
E. joyceae Male400–47014–1613–1426–355–715–18 Kaisa, et al. (1995)
Female550–74014–1829–447–1377–86
E. macrobulbosus Male432–46314–161325.7–30.89.1–9.320.5–22.0 Rühm (1956)
Female518–5761693–11224–28.79.9–10.85.1–5.680.5–82.1
E. obtusus Male70018.5237 Massey (1956)
Female8002430841–78
Male96822.520.6 Kanzaki et al. (2008) b
Female648–88124–3025.9–33.36.4–9.871.8–79 Kanzaki et al. (2008) c
E. sandiaensis Male620–64016328.0–8.516 Massey (1964a)
Female630–64028–318.0–8.5
E. taiwanensis Male474–54011.9–15.711.3–13.126.6–31.96.3–8.615.2–18.6 Gu et al. (2013a)
Female482–66112–16.926.8–31.17.2–9.676.7–79
Species having 4 incisures in the lateral field
E. ibericus Male45313.112.832.87.515.4 Gu et al. (2013b)
Female475–62411.2–14.630.1–34.78–9.676–78
E. koreanus n. sp.Male448–51712.4–14.912.7–1330.2–36.47.2–8.715.2–18.227.3–38.1This study
Female474–70512.4–16.427.2–35.48.2–10.975.7–78.1
E. olea Male452–60215–1716–1826.5–336.7–814–16.5 Miraeiz et al. (2017)
Female441–65215–1928–416.9–8.714.8–1970–81.5
Species with unknown incisures in lateral field
E. betulae Male600–6751715–1734.3–386.6–7.421.5–22.5 Rühm (1956)
Female750–94521180–22527–307.4–9.34.1–4.276–77
E. dendroctoni Male720–810221829.4–307.3–7.418.9–20.2 Rühm (1956)
Female780–87023191–19631.1–31.86.9–8.03.9–4.674–78
E. goffarti Male442–48516–1813–1617.3–2010.7–11.116.7–17 Rühm (1956)
Female547–70119–20125–16325–2710.3–11.712.5–15.677–78
E. piniperdae Male483–75014–1531–449.3–12.519.4–25 Kakulia and Lazarevskaja (1965)
Female615–78014–1628–3810–1267–75
E. prolobos Male610–66035714 Massey (1964a, 1964b)
Female700–81012358.579
E. propora Male630–9009.8–2415–2232.6–45.123.3–40.4Yang (1985)
Female900–1,26015–30.534.5–5464.4–82.6
E. scolyti Male690–76515–1714–1532.8–36.46.7–8.425.5–27.1 Rühm (1956)
Female900–1,18521291–31532.1–48.48.0–17.82.8–4.165–75
E. skrjabini Male370–42013–1428–3513.2–15 Lazarevskaya (1961)
Female466–50813–1528.5–35.58.1–13.778–81
E. stammeri Male796–86715–1718–2134.6–41.38.9–9.216.9–20.2 Körner (1954)
Female645–93117–1831.9–35.87.6–1012.4–17.268–77
E. tuerkorum Male645–69015–1811–1432.8–36.87.1–8.423–25.5 Rühm (1956)
Female705–73516–19147–15835–40.29.5–9.64.5–5.077–80
E. tenuidens Male750Thorne (1935)
Female800
E. zwoelferi Male682–1,05621–3716–2433–35.88.6–9.717–17.3 Rühm (1957)
Female1,056–1,32034–40270–34433–358.7–10.713.1–14.966–68
Species described without males and unknown incisures in lateral field
E. amitini 52310–1427.511.581 Fuchs (1937) and Rühm (1956)
E.hylastophilus 8931737.221.716.872.4 Fuchs (1930)
E. larici 480–80017–2324.7–42.78.1–9.7 Lazarevskaya (1963)
E. olitorius 480–55021–2228–3315–1660–80 Chaturvedi and Khera (1977)
E. typographi 705–7352324.5–25.26.9–7.25.1–5.380–81 Rühm (1956)
a E.berbericus 512–69119–2228.7–36.37.2–9.616.7–19.279.1–81.4 Alvani et al. (2016)

1 Note: aFemales were described, having three lateral lines; bonly 1 male was presented by (Kanzaki et al., 2008); ccumulative results of all populations mentioned by Kanzaki et al. (2008).

Figure 3:

Spicule morphology of accessible Ektaphelenchus species. (A) = E. betulae; (B) = E. dendroctoni; (C) = E. goffarti; (D) = E. ibericus; (E) = E. josephi; (F) = E. joyceae; (G) = E. koreanus n. sp.; (H) = E. macrobulbosus; (I) = E. obtusus; (J) = E. oleae; (K) = E. piniperdae; (L) = E. prolobos; (M) = E. propora; (N) = E. riograndensis; (O) = E. sandiaensis; (P) = E. scolyti; (Q) = E. skrjabini; (R) = E. stammeri; (S) = E. taiwanensis; (T) = E. tuerkorum; (U) = E. zwoelferi. Scale bars (A–C, H, L, R, U, S = 20 µm; D, E, G, J, P, S, T = 10 µm; F = 7 µm; I = 30 µm; K = 25 µm; M = 50 µm; N = 100 µm; Q = 100 µm, O = 300 µm).

Figure 4:

Phylogenetic relationships of Ektaphelenchus koreanus n. sp. and aphelenchid nematodes based on full length of ITS. The 100001st Bayesian tree inferred from ITS under TVM+I+G model (ln L = −14,363.6136; freqA = 0.2773; freqC = 0.1724; freqG = 0.2291; freqT = 0.3213; R(a) = 1.0903; R(b) = 3.5149; R(c) = 1.7693; R(d) = 0.9479; R(e) = 3.5149; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.0940; Shape = 1.3200). Aphelenchoides besseyi served as the outgroup species. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-049 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 13
Submitted on: Mar 29, 2019
Published on: Jul 29, 2019
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Jianfeng Gu, Munawar Maria, Yiwu Fang, Lele Liu, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.