
Weaving Academic Grace into the Fabric of Online Courses and Faculty Training: First-Year Engineering Student Advice for Online Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Faculty Responses
References
- Abdulla, D. (2012). Attitudes of college students enrolled in 2-year health care programs towards online learning. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1215–1223. Retrieved from
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/50285/ . DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.006 - Abel, K. D. (2021). Effective online teaching practices during a Covid environment. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual, Paper ID # 35330. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/effective-online-teaching-practices-during-a-covid-environment.pdf - Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(100011), 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
- Aleksejuniene, J., Hysi, D., Nikolovovska, J., Stangvaltaite-Mouhat, L., Chałas, R., Oancea, R., Richardas, K., Lipski, M., Sarna-Boś, K., & Puriene, A. (2022). European student wellness, stress, coping, support and perceptions about remote dental training during COVID-19. European Journal of Dental Education, 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12765
- Ally, F., Pillay, J. D., & Govender, N. (2022). Teaching and learning considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Supporting multimodal student learning preferences. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 14(1), 2–5. DOI: 10.7196/AJHPE.2022.v14i1.1468
- Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1234–1244. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.020
- Bakir, N., & Phirangee, K. (2021). ZOOMing into a community: Exploring various teaching practices to help foster sense of community and engagement in emergency remote teaching. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(special issue), 386–389. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.31226
- Barker, S. (2021). The use of virtual design modules in an introduction to engineering course: Impact on learning outcomes and engineering identity. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #32320. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/the-use-of-virtual-design-modules-in-an-introduction-to-engineering-course-impact-on-learning-outcomes-and-engineering-identity - Blankenship, D., & Jones, I. S. (2021). COVID-19 student mental health check. Research in Higher Education Journal, 39, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
- Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
- Buswell, N. T. (2021). The purpose of a PhD in engineering: Where does teaching fit in? Studies in Engineering Education, 1(1), 83–96. DOI: 10.21061/see.8
- Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182, 104463. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
- California State University, Chico. (2009). Rubric for Online Instruction, Copyright 2003/Revised 2009. Retrieved from
https://www.csuchico.edu/eoi/_assets/documents/rubric-for-online-instruction-accessible.pdf - Case, J., & Light, G. (2014).
Framing qualitative methods in engineering education research . In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 535–550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034 - Chen, N., Ko, H., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2004). Synchronous learning model over the Internet. Proceedings in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357466
- Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Anthony, J. (2018). Linkages between course status, perceived course value, and students’ preference for traditional versus non-traditional learning environments. Computers & Education, 125, 175–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.002
- Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2020). Title 34: Education, Subtitle B, Chapter VI, Part 600—institutional Eligibility Under The Higher Education Act Of 1965, As Amended, Subpart A—general, 2020. Available at:
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=45333f1baff1fb4eb6289b4caaf4ed50&mc=true&node=se34.3.600_12&rgn=div8 - Cohen, M., & Ellis, T. (2004). Developing criteria for an on-line learning environment: From the student and faculty perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), 161–167. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00800.x
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed., pp. 143). Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781452230153
- Crawley, J. (2013). Endless patience and a strong belief in what makes a good teacher: Teacher educators in post-compulsory education in England, and their professional situation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(4), 336–347. DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2013.847153
- Cudney, E., Murray, S., Groner, B., Kaczmarek, K., Wilt, B., Blaney, K., & Phelps, J. (2017). Using the voice of the student to evaluate learning management systems. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/engman_syseng_facwork/459 . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29091 - Davidson, P. L. (2019). Future online faculty competencies: Student perspectives. International Journal on E-learning, 18(3), 233–250. Retrieved from
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150552/ - De Souza, N., Ochotorena, M., Self, B. P., & Cooper, L. A. (2021). Sudden shift to online learning: COVID-19’s impact on engineering student experiences. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #32966. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/sudden-shift-to-online-learning-covid-19-s-impact-on-engineering-student-experiences - DiBenedetto, M. (2011). Barry J. Zimmerman: An Educator with Passion for Developing Self-Regulation of Learning through Social Learning. Presented at The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, Louisiana. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518491.pdf - Diehl, W. C. (2016). Online Instructor and Teaching Competencies: Literature Review for Quality Matters. © 2016 MarylandOnline. Retrieved from
https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Online-Instructor-Teaching-Competencies-2016.pdf - Dietz, B., Petonito, G., Mann, K., Oswald, B., McMahon, C., & Linthicum, M. (2021). Pivoting during a pandemic: Creating presence for all students. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 194–206. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.313
- Dofe, J., & Kurwadkar, S. T. (2021). Project-based learning: Contrasting experience between traditional face-to-face instruction and virtual instruction. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #33338. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/project-based-learning-contrasting-experience-between-traditional-face-to-face-instruction-and-virtual-instruction - Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1). DOI: 10.24059/olj.v6i1.1869
- Edwards, J. T., & Helvie-Mason, L. (2010). Technology and instructional communication: Student usage and perceptions of virtual office hours. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 174–186. DOI:
http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/edwards_0310.pdf - Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1). Retrieved from
https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2015_12_1/elliott_rhoades_jackson_mandernach . DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2015.1.2 - Fadda, D., Rios, O., & Vinay, R. (2021). Teaching modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID # 35097. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/teaching-modalities-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf - Fadda, D., & Thamban, P. L. S. (2021). Online delivery of engineering courses where hand calculations are vital. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID # 35098. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/online-delivery-of-engineering-courses-where-hand-calculations-are-vital . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36607 - Finley, D. L. (2012). Using quality matters. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(2) 48–50. Retrieved from
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/3093/3046 - Flick, U. (2018).
Triangulation . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 444–461), Thousand Oaks, California, SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvddzffm.4 - Fox, H. L. (2017). What motivates community college students to enroll online and why it matters. Insights on Equity and Outcomes, Office of Community College Research and Leadership. Issue 19. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574532 - Freeman, T. M., & Jarvie-Eggart, M. E. (2019). Best practices in promoting faculty-student interaction in online STEM courses. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from
https://monolith.asee.org/public/conferences/140/papers/25830/view . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32148 - Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum, pp. 164
- Getzlaf, B., Perry, B., Toffner, G., & Lamarche, K. (2009). Effective instructor feedback: Perceptions of online graduate students. Journal of Educators Online, 6(2). Retrieved from
https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2009_6_2/getzlaf_perry_toffner_lamarche_edwards . DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2009.2.1 - Gillingham, M., & Molinari, C. (2012). Online courses: Student preferences survey. Internet Learning, 1(1), 36–45. Retrieved from
http://www.ipsonet.org/internet-learning/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Online-Courses-Student-Preferences-Survey-wcover-page-copy.pdf . DOI: 10.18278/il.1.1.4 - Hart, C. M. D., Alonso, E., Xu, D., & Hill, M. (2021). COVID-19 and community college instructional responses. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 41–69. Retrieved from
https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2568/1035 . DOI: 10.24059/olj.v25i1.2568 - Healy, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.
https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher - Heath, S., & Shine, B. (2021). Teaching techniques to facilitate time management in remote and online teaching. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 164–171. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31370
- Hegeman, J. (2015). Using instructor-generated video lectures in online mathematics courses improves student learning. Online Learning, 19(3), 70–87. DOI:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067530.pdf . DOI: 10.24059/olj.v19i3.484 - Herold, D. S., & Chen, T. (2021). Switching from face-to-face to online instruction midsemester: Implications for student learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 321–336. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.30521
- Higher Learning Commission. (2020). Substantive change: Distance and correspondence education. Retrieved from
https://www.hlcommission.org/Accreditation/distance-delivery.html - Hilliger, I., Melian, C., Meza, J. F., Cortes, G., & Baier, J. A. (2021). Work in progress paper: A cross-sectional survey study for understanding and addressing the needs of engineering students during COVID-19. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #43092. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-a-cross-sectional-survey-study-for-understanding-and-addressing-the-needs-of-engineering-students-during-covid-19 - Hughes, A., Pritchard, M., Hughes, A., & Pritchard, M. (2019). I don’t want to hear it: Student preferences in online learning lecture formats. 3rd Annual Celebration of Teaching & Learning Symposium.
February 6, 2019 ,University of Southern Indiana , University Center East. Retrieved fromhttps://soar.usi.edu/handle/20.500.12419/146 - Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
- Jaggars, S. S., Motz, B. A., Rivera, M. D., Heckler, A., Quick, J. D., Hance, E. A., & Karwischa, C. (2021). The digital divide among college students: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 emergency transition. Midwest Higher Education Compact. Retrieved from
https://www.mhec.org/news/new-report-digital-divide-among-college-students - Jarvie-Eggart, M., Freeman, T., & Kempainnen, A. (2019). Online programs increase the availability of education. Computers In Education Journal, 10(3), pp. 1–7. Retrieved from
https://coed.asee.org/2019/07/03/online-programs-increase-the-availability-of-education/ - Jarvie-Eggart, M., & Singer, A. (2020). First-year engineering students’ advice for online faculty, Educational Technology Organization of Michigan (ETOM), virtual conference.
Nov 6, 2020 , virtual due to COVID-19. (Presentation). - Jarvie-Eggart, M., Singer, A., & Mathews, J. (2019). Advice from a first-year student, 2019 First Year Engineering Experience Annual Conference, Penn State College of Engineering.
State College, PA ,July 28–30, 2019 . Retrieved fromhttps://peer.asee.org/advice-from-a-first-year - Jones, S., & Chacko, S. (2021). Quantitative analysis of the evolving student experience during the transition to online learning: Second-language STEM students. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 373–385. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.31401
- Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
- Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), article 13. DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113
- Lagi, R. K. (2020). Covid 19- resilient education in the islands. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1367–1371. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1825347
- Landa, N., Zhou, S., & Marongwe, N. (2021). Education in emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 in South Africa. International Review of Education, 67, 167–183. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-021-09903-z
- Lei, S. I., & So, A. S. I. (2021). Online teaching and learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – A comparison of teacher and student perceptions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(3), 148–162. DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2021.1907196
- Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2). Retrieved from
https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol20/iss2/7/ - Liu, Q., Sweeney, J., & Evans, G. (2021). Exploring self-directed learning among engineering undergraduates in the extensive online instruction environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID# 33727. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/?collection_id=109&division=Educational+Research+and+Methods&q=Exploring+self-directed+learning+among+engineering+undergraduates+in+the+extensive+online+instruction+environment+during+the+COVID-19+pandemic&year=2021 - Magana, A. J., Karabiyik, T., Thomas, P., Jaiswal, A., Perera, V., & Dworkin, J. (2022). Teamwork facilitation and conflict resolution training in a HyFlex course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(2), 446–473. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20450
- Malladi, H., Trauth, A., Enszer, J. A., Headley, M. G., & Buckley, J. (2021). Transforming a large-lecture FYE course structure into virtual collaborative learning. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID# 32889. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/transforming-a-large-lecture-fye-course-structure-into-virtual-collaborative-learning - Marquez, E., & Garcia, S. (2021). Teaching engineering virtually: A rapid response to address the academic challenges generated by COVID-19. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID# 35065. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/teaching-engineering-virtually-a-rapid-response-to-address-the-academic-challenges-generated-by-covid-19 - Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Bichronous online learning: Blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. EDUCAUSE. Sept. 8, 2020. Retrieved from
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning - Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 8–27. Retrieved from
https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2496 - Michigan Community College Virtual Collaborative. (2020). Online course development guidelines and rubric. Retrieved from
https://www.micollegesonline.net/uploads/ckeditor/files/MCO%20Rubric%20-%20Final.pdf - Mishraa, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
- Mohandas, L., & Mentzer, N. (2021). The effectiveness of synchronous vs. asynchronous modes of instruction in an online flipped design thinking course. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual. Paper ID# 33732. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/the-effectiveness-of-synchronous-vs-asynchronous-modes-of-instruction-in-an-online-flipped-design-thinking-course - Monterey Institute for Technology and Education. (2005). Online course evaluation project overview. Retrieved from
http://www.toddhitchcock.com/resources/OCEP.pdf - Moser, F. Z. (2007). Faculty Adoption of Educational Technology. Educause Quarterly. Nov. 1, 2007. 66–69. Retrieved from
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2007/2/faculty-adoption-of-educational-technology - Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2020). College student transition to synchronous virtual classes during the COVID-19 pandemic in northeastern United States. Pedagogical Research, 5(4),
em0078 . DOI: 10.29333/pr/8485 - Naik, G. L., Deshpande, M., Shivananda, D. C., Ajey, C. P., & Patel, G. C. (2021). Online teaching and learning of higher education in India during COVID-19 emergency lockdown. Pedagogical Research, 6(1),
em0090 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 - Noel-Levitz. (2014).
2014–15 National Online Learners Priorities Report . Coralville, IA: Noel-Levitz. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ruffalonl.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/2014-15_OnlineLearners.pdf - Noor, S., Isa, F. Md., & Mazhar, F. F. (2020). Online teaching practices during the CODIV-19 pandemic. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(3), 169–184. DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2020.93.4
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th Ed.). Sage, London.
- Pechenkina, E., & Aeschliman, C. (2017). What do students want? Making sense of student preferences in technology-enhanced learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 26–39. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/6185
- Peterson, A., Beymer, P., & Putnam, R. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 7–25. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517
- Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. DOI: 10.1177/2347631120983481
- Pomales-Garcia, C., & Liu, Y. (2007). Excellence in engineering education: Views of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 253–262. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00934.x
- Price Banks, D., & Vergez, S. M. (2022). Online and in-person learning preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic among students attending the City University of New York. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, e00012–22. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00012-22
- Quality Matters. (2016). Online instructor Skill Set. Retrieved from
https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/teaching-skills-set - Quality Matters. (2018). The Quality Matters higher education rubric, sixth edition. Retrieved from
https://www.qualitymatters.org/ - Quality Matters. (2021). Quality Matters at Top-Ranked Institutions. Retrieved from
https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/members-ranked-us-news-2020 - Quality Matters. (2022). QM Online Instructor Skills Set Mapped to Teaching Online Certificate. Available by request from Quality Matters.
- Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 383–407. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z
- Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2330
- Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
- Santelli, B., Robertson, S., Larson, E., & Humphrey, S. (2020). Procrastination and delayed assignment submissions: Student and faculty perceptions of late point policy and grace within an online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 24(3), 35–49. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v24i3.2302
- Scott, C. J., James, P., Astatke, Y., & Ladeji-Osias, J. (2012).
Useful strategies for implementing an online undergraduate electrical engineering program . 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22170 - Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sánchez-Peña, M. L., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 19–43. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20377
- Sener, J. (2019). Quality matters: Inter-institutional quality improvement for online courses. OLJ, 10(1). DOI: 10.24059/olj.v10i1.1772
- Sezer, S., Karabacak, N., Kucuk, M., & Korkmaz, I. (2020). School administrators’ opinions related to the values that should be gained to classroom teachers through in-service training. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 86, 175–196. Retrieved from
https://ejer.com.tr/school-administrators-opinions-related-to-the-values-that-should-be-gained-to-classroom-teachers-through-in-service-training/ . DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2020.86.9 - Shin, J. C., Arimoto, A., Cummings, W. K., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2014).
Teaching and Research in Contemporary Higher Education: Systems, Activities and Rewards . Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6830-7 - Simms, S. K., & Baker, D. M. (2021). Faculty perceptions of teaching online during the COVID-19 university transition of courses to an online format. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 337–353. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31621
- Singer, A. M., & Jarvie-Eggart, M. E. (2021). First-year engineering student advice for succeeding in online courses. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual. Retrieved from
https://strategy.asee.org/37193 - Slate, J. R., LaPrairieb, K. N., Schultec, D. P., & Onwuegbuziea, A. J. (2011). Views of effective college faculty: A mixed analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), 331–346. DOI: 10.1080/02602930903428684
- Thompson, L. L., & Rodriguez-Nikl, T. (2021). A first look at resilience in both an his and a PWI during the COVID-19 pandemic. ASEE CoNECD Virtual Conference,
Jan 24–28 , Paper ID# 32191. Retrieved fromhttps://peer.asee.org/a-first-look-at-resilience-in-both-an-hsi-and-a-pwi-during-the-covid-19-pandemic - Vedel, I., Ramaprasad, J., & Lapointe, L. (2020). Social media strategies for health promotion by nonprofit organizations: Multiple case study design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4),
e15586 , 1–11 DOI: 10.2196/15586 - Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Schacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20159
- Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626–659. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20029
- Wang, D. C. (2021). Virtual vs. In-Person Learning: A Study on Student Motivation, Experience, and Perception in a First-Year Introduction to Engineering Course. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual, Paper ID #32526. Retrieved from
https://peer.asee.org/virtual-vs-in-person-learning-a-study-on-student-motivation-experience-and-perception-in-a-first-year-introduction-to-engineering-course.pdf - Wang, H. (2019). Improving Online STEM courses through Quality Matters Certification. Journal of Online Engineering Education, 10(2), article 1. Retrieved from
https://onlineengineeringeducation.com/index.php/joee/article/view/32 - Wang, Q., & Woo, H. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 272-286. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x
- Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003
- Weiling, M. B., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2010). The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers & Education, 54, 992–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.002
- Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15-35. Retrieved from
https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/761 . DOI: 10.24059/olj.v21i1.761 - Xie, H., Liu, W., Bhairma, J., & Shim, E. (2018). Analysis of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning environments. Atlantis Highlights in Engineering Volume 3. 3rd Joint International Information Technology, Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2018). DOI: 10.2991/jimec-18.2018.58
- Young. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77. DOI: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
- Zimmerman, W., Altman, B., Simunich, B., Shattuck, K., & Burch, B. (2020). Evaluating online course quality: A study on implementation of course quality standards. Online Learning, 24(4), 147–163. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v24i4.2325
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.88 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 126
Submitted on: Nov 20, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2022
Published on: Dec 19, 2022
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Michelle Jarvie-Eggart, Amanda Singer, Marika Seigel, Mary Raber, Thomas Freeman, Brett Hamlin, Amy Hamlin, Michael Meyers, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.