Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Weaving Academic Grace into the Fabric of Online Courses and Faculty Training: First-Year Engineering Student Advice for Online Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Faculty Responses Cover

Weaving Academic Grace into the Fabric of Online Courses and Faculty Training: First-Year Engineering Student Advice for Online Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Faculty Responses

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Abdulla, D. (2012). Attitudes of college students enrolled in 2-year health care programs towards online learning. Computers & Education, 59(4), 12151223. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/50285/. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.006
  2. Abel, K. D. (2021). Effective online teaching practices during a Covid environment. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual, Paper ID # 35330. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/effective-online-teaching-practices-during-a-covid-environment.pdf
  3. Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(100011), 117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
  4. Aleksejuniene, J., Hysi, D., Nikolovovska, J., Stangvaltaite-Mouhat, L., Chałas, R., Oancea, R., Richardas, K., Lipski, M., Sarna-Boś, K., & Puriene, A. (2022). European student wellness, stress, coping, support and perceptions about remote dental training during COVID-19. European Journal of Dental Education, 110. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12765
  5. Ally, F., Pillay, J. D., & Govender, N. (2022). Teaching and learning considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Supporting multimodal student learning preferences. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 14(1), 25. DOI: 10.7196/AJHPE.2022.v14i1.1468
  6. Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses. Computers & Education, 55(3), 12341244. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.020
  7. Bakir, N., & Phirangee, K. (2021). ZOOMing into a community: Exploring various teaching practices to help foster sense of community and engagement in emergency remote teaching. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(special issue), 386389. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.31226
  8. Barker, S. (2021). The use of virtual design modules in an introduction to engineering course: Impact on learning outcomes and engineering identity. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #32320. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/the-use-of-virtual-design-modules-in-an-introduction-to-engineering-course-impact-on-learning-outcomes-and-engineering-identity
  9. Blankenship, D., & Jones, I. S. (2021). COVID-19 student mental health check. Research in Higher Education Journal, 39, 115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
  10. Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
  11. Buswell, N. T. (2021). The purpose of a PhD in engineering: Where does teaching fit in? Studies in Engineering Education, 1(1), 8396. DOI: 10.21061/see.8
  12. Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182, 104463. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
  13. California State University, Chico. (2009). Rubric for Online Instruction, Copyright 2003/Revised 2009. Retrieved from https://www.csuchico.edu/eoi/_assets/documents/rubric-for-online-instruction-accessible.pdf
  14. Case, J., & Light, G. (2014). Framing qualitative methods in engineering education research. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 535550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034
  15. Chen, N., Ko, H., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2004). Synchronous learning model over the Internet. Proceedings in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357466
  16. Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Anthony, J. (2018). Linkages between course status, perceived course value, and students’ preference for traditional versus non-traditional learning environments. Computers & Education, 125, 175181. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.002
  17. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2020). Title 34: Education, Subtitle B, Chapter VI, Part 600—institutional Eligibility Under The Higher Education Act Of 1965, As Amended, Subpart A—general, 2020. Available at: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=45333f1baff1fb4eb6289b4caaf4ed50&mc=true&node=se34.3.600_12&rgn=div8
  18. Cohen, M., & Ellis, T. (2004). Developing criteria for an on-line learning environment: From the student and faculty perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), 161167. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00800.x
  19. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed., pp. 143). Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781452230153
  20. Crawley, J. (2013). Endless patience and a strong belief in what makes a good teacher: Teacher educators in post-compulsory education in England, and their professional situation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(4), 336347. DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2013.847153
  21. Cudney, E., Murray, S., Groner, B., Kaczmarek, K., Wilt, B., Blaney, K., & Phelps, J. (2017). Using the voice of the student to evaluate learning management systems. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/engman_syseng_facwork/459. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29091
  22. Davidson, P. L. (2019). Future online faculty competencies: Student perspectives. International Journal on E-learning, 18(3), 233250. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150552/
  23. De Souza, N., Ochotorena, M., Self, B. P., & Cooper, L. A. (2021). Sudden shift to online learning: COVID-19’s impact on engineering student experiences. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #32966. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/sudden-shift-to-online-learning-covid-19-s-impact-on-engineering-student-experiences
  24. DiBenedetto, M. (2011). Barry J. Zimmerman: An Educator with Passion for Developing Self-Regulation of Learning through Social Learning. Presented at The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, Louisiana. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518491.pdf
  25. Diehl, W. C. (2016). Online Instructor and Teaching Competencies: Literature Review for Quality Matters. © 2016 MarylandOnline. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Online-Instructor-Teaching-Competencies-2016.pdf
  26. Dietz, B., Petonito, G., Mann, K., Oswald, B., McMahon, C., & Linthicum, M. (2021). Pivoting during a pandemic: Creating presence for all students. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 194206. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.313
  27. Dofe, J., & Kurwadkar, S. T. (2021). Project-based learning: Contrasting experience between traditional face-to-face instruction and virtual instruction. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #33338. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/project-based-learning-contrasting-experience-between-traditional-face-to-face-instruction-and-virtual-instruction
  28. Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1). DOI: 10.24059/olj.v6i1.1869
  29. Edwards, J. T., & Helvie-Mason, L. (2010). Technology and instructional communication: Student usage and perceptions of virtual office hours. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 174186. DOI: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/edwards_0310.pdf
  30. Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1). Retrieved from https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2015_12_1/elliott_rhoades_jackson_mandernach. DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2015.1.2
  31. Fadda, D., Rios, O., & Vinay, R. (2021). Teaching modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID # 35097. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/teaching-modalities-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf
  32. Fadda, D., & Thamban, P. L. S. (2021). Online delivery of engineering courses where hand calculations are vital. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID # 35098. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/online-delivery-of-engineering-courses-where-hand-calculations-are-vital. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36607
  33. Finley, D. L. (2012). Using quality matters. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(2) 4850. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/3093/3046
  34. Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 444461), Thousand Oaks, California, SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvddzffm.4
  35. Fox, H. L. (2017). What motivates community college students to enroll online and why it matters. Insights on Equity and Outcomes, Office of Community College Research and Leadership. Issue 19. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574532
  36. Freeman, T. M., & Jarvie-Eggart, M. E. (2019). Best practices in promoting faculty-student interaction in online STEM courses. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from https://monolith.asee.org/public/conferences/140/papers/25830/view. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32148
  37. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum, pp. 164
  38. Getzlaf, B., Perry, B., Toffner, G., & Lamarche, K. (2009). Effective instructor feedback: Perceptions of online graduate students. Journal of Educators Online, 6(2). Retrieved from https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2009_6_2/getzlaf_perry_toffner_lamarche_edwards. DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2009.2.1
  39. Gillingham, M., & Molinari, C. (2012). Online courses: Student preferences survey. Internet Learning, 1(1), 3645. Retrieved from http://www.ipsonet.org/internet-learning/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Online-Courses-Student-Preferences-Survey-wcover-page-copy.pdf. DOI: 10.18278/il.1.1.4
  40. Hart, C. M. D., Alonso, E., Xu, D., & Hill, M. (2021). COVID-19 and community college instructional responses. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 4169. Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2568/1035. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v25i1.2568
  41. Healy, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
  42. Heath, S., & Shine, B. (2021). Teaching techniques to facilitate time management in remote and online teaching. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 164171. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31370
  43. Hegeman, J. (2015). Using instructor-generated video lectures in online mathematics courses improves student learning. Online Learning, 19(3), 7087. DOI: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067530.pdf. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v19i3.484
  44. Herold, D. S., & Chen, T. (2021). Switching from face-to-face to online instruction midsemester: Implications for student learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 321336. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.30521
  45. Higher Learning Commission. (2020). Substantive change: Distance and correspondence education. Retrieved from https://www.hlcommission.org/Accreditation/distance-delivery.html
  46. Hilliger, I., Melian, C., Meza, J. F., Cortes, G., & Baier, J. A. (2021). Work in progress paper: A cross-sectional survey study for understanding and addressing the needs of engineering students during COVID-19. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID #43092. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-a-cross-sectional-survey-study-for-understanding-and-addressing-the-needs-of-engineering-students-during-covid-19
  47. Hughes, A., Pritchard, M., Hughes, A., & Pritchard, M. (2019). I don’t want to hear it: Student preferences in online learning lecture formats. 3rd Annual Celebration of Teaching & Learning Symposium. February 6, 2019, University of Southern Indiana, University Center East. Retrieved from https://soar.usi.edu/handle/20.500.12419/146
  48. Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 2738. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
  49. Jaggars, S. S., Motz, B. A., Rivera, M. D., Heckler, A., Quick, J. D., Hance, E. A., & Karwischa, C. (2021). The digital divide among college students: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 emergency transition. Midwest Higher Education Compact. Retrieved from https://www.mhec.org/news/new-report-digital-divide-among-college-students
  50. Jarvie-Eggart, M., Freeman, T., & Kempainnen, A. (2019). Online programs increase the availability of education. Computers In Education Journal, 10(3), pp. 17. Retrieved from https://coed.asee.org/2019/07/03/online-programs-increase-the-availability-of-education/
  51. Jarvie-Eggart, M., & Singer, A. (2020). First-year engineering students’ advice for online faculty, Educational Technology Organization of Michigan (ETOM), virtual conference. Nov 6, 2020, virtual due to COVID-19. (Presentation).
  52. Jarvie-Eggart, M., Singer, A., & Mathews, J. (2019). Advice from a first-year student, 2019 First Year Engineering Experience Annual Conference, Penn State College of Engineering. State College, PA, July 28–30, 2019. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/advice-from-a-first-year
  53. Jones, S., & Chacko, S. (2021). Quantitative analysis of the evolving student experience during the transition to online learning: Second-language STEM students. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 373385. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.31401
  54. Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
  55. Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), article 13. DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113
  56. Lagi, R. K. (2020). Covid 19- resilient education in the islands. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 13671371. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1825347
  57. Landa, N., Zhou, S., & Marongwe, N. (2021). Education in emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 in South Africa. International Review of Education, 67, 167183. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-021-09903-z
  58. Lei, S. I., & So, A. S. I. (2021). Online teaching and learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – A comparison of teacher and student perceptions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(3), 148162. DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2021.1907196
  59. Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2). Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol20/iss2/7/
  60. Liu, Q., Sweeney, J., & Evans, G. (2021). Exploring self-directed learning among engineering undergraduates in the extensive online instruction environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID# 33727. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/?collection_id=109&division=Educational+Research+and+Methods&q=Exploring+self-directed+learning+among+engineering+undergraduates+in+the+extensive+online+instruction+environment+during+the+COVID-19+pandemic&year=2021
  61. Magana, A. J., Karabiyik, T., Thomas, P., Jaiswal, A., Perera, V., & Dworkin, J. (2022). Teamwork facilitation and conflict resolution training in a HyFlex course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(2), 446473. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20450
  62. Malladi, H., Trauth, A., Enszer, J. A., Headley, M. G., & Buckley, J. (2021). Transforming a large-lecture FYE course structure into virtual collaborative learning. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID# 32889. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/transforming-a-large-lecture-fye-course-structure-into-virtual-collaborative-learning
  63. Marquez, E., & Garcia, S. (2021). Teaching engineering virtually: A rapid response to address the academic challenges generated by COVID-19. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual, Paper ID# 35065. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/teaching-engineering-virtually-a-rapid-response-to-address-the-academic-challenges-generated-by-covid-19
  64. Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Bichronous online learning: Blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. EDUCAUSE. Sept. 8, 2020. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning
  65. Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 827. Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2496
  66. Michigan Community College Virtual Collaborative. (2020). Online course development guidelines and rubric. Retrieved from https://www.micollegesonline.net/uploads/ckeditor/files/MCO%20Rubric%20-%20Final.pdf
  67. Mishraa, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
  68. Mohandas, L., & Mentzer, N. (2021). The effectiveness of synchronous vs. asynchronous modes of instruction in an online flipped design thinking course. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual. Paper ID# 33732. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/the-effectiveness-of-synchronous-vs-asynchronous-modes-of-instruction-in-an-online-flipped-design-thinking-course
  69. Monterey Institute for Technology and Education. (2005). Online course evaluation project overview. Retrieved from http://www.toddhitchcock.com/resources/OCEP.pdf
  70. Moser, F. Z. (2007). Faculty Adoption of Educational Technology. Educause Quarterly. Nov. 1, 2007. 6669. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2007/2/faculty-adoption-of-educational-technology
  71. Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2020). College student transition to synchronous virtual classes during the COVID-19 pandemic in northeastern United States. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0078. DOI: 10.29333/pr/8485
  72. Naik, G. L., Deshpande, M., Shivananda, D. C., Ajey, C. P., & Patel, G. C. (2021). Online teaching and learning of higher education in India during COVID-19 emergency lockdown. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), em0090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
  73. Noel-Levitz. (2014). 2014–15 National Online Learners Priorities Report. Coralville, IA: Noel-Levitz. Retrieved from https://www.ruffalonl.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/2014-15_OnlineLearners.pdf
  74. Noor, S., Isa, F. Md., & Mazhar, F. F. (2020). Online teaching practices during the CODIV-19 pandemic. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(3), 169184. DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2020.93.4
  75. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th Ed.). Sage, London.
  76. Pechenkina, E., & Aeschliman, C. (2017). What do students want? Making sense of student preferences in technology-enhanced learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 2639. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/6185
  77. Peterson, A., Beymer, P., & Putnam, R. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 725. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517
  78. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133141. DOI: 10.1177/2347631120983481
  79. Pomales-Garcia, C., & Liu, Y. (2007). Excellence in engineering education: Views of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 253262. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00934.x
  80. Price Banks, D., & Vergez, S. M. (2022). Online and in-person learning preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic among students attending the City University of New York. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, e0001222. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00012-22
  81. Quality Matters. (2016). Online instructor Skill Set. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/teaching-skills-set
  82. Quality Matters. (2018). The Quality Matters higher education rubric, sixth edition. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/
  83. Quality Matters. (2021). Quality Matters at Top-Ranked Institutions. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/members-ranked-us-news-2020
  84. Quality Matters. (2022). QM Online Instructor Skills Set Mapped to Teaching Online Certificate. Available by request from Quality Matters.
  85. Reid, P. (2014). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 383407. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z
  86. Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2330
  87. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  88. Santelli, B., Robertson, S., Larson, E., & Humphrey, S. (2020). Procrastination and delayed assignment submissions: Student and faculty perceptions of late point policy and grace within an online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 24(3), 3549. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v24i3.2302
  89. Scott, C. J., James, P., Astatke, Y., & Ladeji-Osias, J. (2012). Useful strategies for implementing an online undergraduate electrical engineering program. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22170
  90. Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sánchez-Peña, M. L., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 1943. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20377
  91. Sener, J. (2019). Quality matters: Inter-institutional quality improvement for online courses. OLJ, 10(1). DOI: 10.24059/olj.v10i1.1772
  92. Sezer, S., Karabacak, N., Kucuk, M., & Korkmaz, I. (2020). School administrators’ opinions related to the values that should be gained to classroom teachers through in-service training. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 86, 175196. Retrieved from https://ejer.com.tr/school-administrators-opinions-related-to-the-values-that-should-be-gained-to-classroom-teachers-through-in-service-training/. DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2020.86.9
  93. Shin, J. C., Arimoto, A., Cummings, W. K., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching and Research in Contemporary Higher Education: Systems, Activities and Rewards. Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6830-7
  94. Simms, S. K., & Baker, D. M. (2021). Faculty perceptions of teaching online during the COVID-19 university transition of courses to an online format. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(Special Issue), 337353. DOI: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31621
  95. Singer, A. M., & Jarvie-Eggart, M. E. (2021). First-year engineering student advice for succeeding in online courses. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual. Retrieved from https://strategy.asee.org/37193
  96. Slate, J. R., LaPrairieb, K. N., Schultec, D. P., & Onwuegbuziea, A. J. (2011). Views of effective college faculty: A mixed analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), 331346. DOI: 10.1080/02602930903428684
  97. Thompson, L. L., & Rodriguez-Nikl, T. (2021). A first look at resilience in both an his and a PWI during the COVID-19 pandemic. ASEE CoNECD Virtual Conference, Jan 24–28, Paper ID# 32191. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/a-first-look-at-resilience-in-both-an-hsi-and-a-pwi-during-the-covid-19-pandemic
  98. Vedel, I., Ramaprasad, J., & Lapointe, L. (2020). Social media strategies for health promotion by nonprofit organizations: Multiple case study design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4), e15586, 111 DOI: 10.2196/15586
  99. Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Schacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123148. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20159
  100. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626659. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20029
  101. Wang, D. C. (2021). Virtual vs. In-Person Learning: A Study on Student Motivation, Experience, and Perception in a First-Year Introduction to Engineering Course. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual, Paper ID #32526. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/virtual-vs-in-person-learning-a-study-on-student-motivation-experience-and-perception-in-a-first-year-introduction-to-engineering-course.pdf
  102. Wang, H. (2019). Improving Online STEM courses through Quality Matters Certification. Journal of Online Engineering Education, 10(2), article 1. Retrieved from https://onlineengineeringeducation.com/index.php/joee/article/view/32
  103. Wang, Q., & Woo, H. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 272-286. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x
  104. Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003
  105. Weiling, M. B., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2010). The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers & Education, 54, 992998. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.002
  106. Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15-35. Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/761. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
  107. Xie, H., Liu, W., Bhairma, J., & Shim, E. (2018). Analysis of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning environments. Atlantis Highlights in Engineering Volume 3. 3rd Joint International Information Technology, Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2018). DOI: 10.2991/jimec-18.2018.58
  108. Young. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 6577. DOI: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
  109. Zimmerman, W., Altman, B., Simunich, B., Shattuck, K., & Burch, B. (2020). Evaluating online course quality: A study on implementation of course quality standards. Online Learning, 24(4), 147163. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v24i4.2325
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.88 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 126
Submitted on: Nov 20, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2022
Published on: Dec 19, 2022
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Michelle Jarvie-Eggart, Amanda Singer, Marika Seigel, Mary Raber, Thomas Freeman, Brett Hamlin, Amy Hamlin, Michael Meyers, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.