Applying Concepts from Political Science and Economics to Advance the Study of Engineering Education

Andrew Katz; Joyce Main

doi:10.21061/see.75

Applying Concepts from Political Science and Economics to Advance the Study of Engineering Education

Studies in Engineering Education

Volume 3 (2022): Issue 1

By: Andrew Katz and Joyce Main

Open Access

|Jun 2022

Abstract

Background: There are myriad social, political, and economic factors that influence decision-making processes in and around engineering education. Although the engineering education community may study those processes and their effects using a variety of quantitative and qualitative research methods, a more systematic use of concepts from political science and economics could help advance the study of engineering education.

Purpose: In this article, we outline concepts and tools from the study of political science and economics that can help clarify aspects of the engineering education system that many researchers may already intuit by providing precise language and analytical formalisms to describe and explain aspects of engineering education more directly.

Scope: By way of introduction to the field of engineering education, we begin by outlining definitions. We then illustrate six main phenomena within engineering education where researchers can potentially apply these ideas to further understand and improve elements of how we educate engineers.

Conclusions: By focusing on the political and economic factors influencing engineering education, researchers, faculty members, administrators, and/or stakeholders can have an alternative set of conceptual tools at their disposal for studying, analyzing, and changing engineering education systems.

References

Arndt, J. (1983). The political economy paradigm: Foundation for theory building in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 44–54. DOI: 10.1177/002224298304700406
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ASEE. (2014). Phase I: Synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives (Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education). American Society for Engineering Education.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Besterfield-Sacre, M., Cox, M. F., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Changing engineering education: Views of U.S. faculty, chairs, and deans. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 193–219. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20043
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bhagwati, J., Panagariya, A., & T. N., S. (2004). The muddles over outsourcing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 93–114. DOI: 10.1257/0895330042632753
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011). Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. Science, 334(6061), 1344–1345. DOI: 10.1126/science.334.6061.1344
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bjorklund, S. A., & Colbeck, C. L. (2001). The view from the top: Leaders’ perspectives on a decade of change in engineering education*. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 13–19. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00562.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Black, K. M. (1994). An industry view of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(1), 26–28. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb00112.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7). DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C. B. (2011). Motivation in academic life: A prestige economy. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(4), 399–411. DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2011.626971
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bó, E. D. (2006). Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203–225. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grj013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303–352. DOI: 10.2307/2185445
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1977). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brint, S. G., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195048155.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958–1978. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Campbell, C. M., & O’Meara, K. (2013). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 49–74. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-013-9303-x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carlson, W. B. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship and engineering education: Dugald C. Jackson and the MIT-GE Cooperative Engineering Course, 1907–1932. Technology and Culture, 29(3), 536–567. JSTOR. DOI: 10.2307/3105273
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carpentier, V. (2015). State education, crisis and austerity: An historical analysis through the lens of the Kondratiev cycles. In C. Aubry, M. Geiss, V. Magyar-Haas, & J. Oelkers (Eds.), Education and the State: International perspectives on a changing relationship (1st ed., pp. 78–102). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315772387
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cech, E. A. (2013). The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices. In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering Education for Social Justice (pp. 67–84). Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cech, E. A., & Sherick, H. M. (2015). Depoliticization and the structure of engineering education. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), International Perspectives on Engineering Education, 20, 203–216. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_10
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Charfauros, K. H., & Tierney, W. G. (1999). Part-time faculty in colleges and universities: Trends and challenges in a turbulent environment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(2), 141–151. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008112304445
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark, M. C., Froyd, J., Merton, P., & Richardson, J. (2004). The evolution of curricular change models within the Foundation Coalition. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 37–47. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00786.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century (U.S.), & Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.) (Eds.). (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.). (2006). Biological, social, and organizational components of success for women in academic science and engineering: Report of a workshop (Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, Eds.). National Academies Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Courtois, A. D. M., & O’Keefe, T. (2015). Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1538710/1/13-1-3.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. DOI: 10.1177/2372732214549471
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Denney, J. J. (2011). Priming the innovation pump: America needs more scientists, engineers, and basic research. DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIV FT BELVOIR VA. https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA535501
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Denton, D. D. (1998). Engineering education for the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1), 19–22. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00317.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Doten-Snitker, K., Margherio, C., Litzler, E., Ingram, E., & Williams, J. (2021). Developing a shared vision for change: Moving toward inclusive empowerment. Research in Higher Education, 62(2), 206–229. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-020-09594-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drazen, A. (2002). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frantz, A. C., Beebe, S. A., Horvath, V. S., Canales, J., & Swee, D. E. (2004). The roles of teaching and learning centers. To Improve the Academy, 23(1), 72–90. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2004.tb00427.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garritzmann, J. L. (2016). The political economy of higher education finance: The politics of tuition fees and subsidies in OECD countries, 1945–2015. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29913-6_1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Geiger, R. L. (2011). Markets and the End of the Current Era in U.S. Higher Education. In P. Teixeira & D. D. Dill (Eds.), Public Vices, Private Virtues? – Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education (pp. 3–17). Sense Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-466-9_1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/00343400903389979
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Graham, R. (2012a). Achieving excellence in engineering education: The ingredients of successful change. The Royal Academy of Engineering.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Graham, R. (2012b). The one less traveled by: The road to lasting systemic change in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 596–600. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01120.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helm, D. (2006). Regulatory reform, capture, and the regulatory burden. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 169–185. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grj011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20439
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jamieson, L., & Lohmann, J. (2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jesiek, B. K., Newswander, L. K., & Borrego, M. (2009). Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 39–52. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kabo, J., Tang, X., Nieusma, D., Currie, J., Wenlong, H., & Baillie, C. (2012). Visions of social competence: Comparing engineering education accreditation in Australia, China, Sweden, and the United States. 25.1463.1–25.1463.16. DOI: https://peer.asee.org/22220
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katz, A., & Knight, D. B. (2017). Factors related to faculty views toward undergraduate engineering ethics education. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/factors-related-to-faculty-views-toward-undergraduate-engineering-ethics-education
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klees, S. J. (2008). A quarter century of neoliberal thinking in education: Misleading analyses and failed policies. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(4), 311–348. DOI: 10.1080/14767720802506672
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to Non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. The Science Press Printing Company. http://archive.org/details/sciencesanityint00korz
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kosak, L., Manning, D., Dobson, E., Rogerson, L., Cotnam, S., Colaric, S., & McFadden, C. (2004). Prepared to teach online? Perspectives of faculty in the University of North Carolina System. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(3).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, how, and when. Whittlesey House.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. ABET, INC. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/EngineeringChange-executive-summary.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Layton, E. T. (1971). The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession (Johns Hopkins pbk. ed). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leslie, L. L., & Johnson, G. P. (1974). The market model and higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 45(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.2307/1980645
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, A. Y. (2017). Dramatic declines in higher education appropriations: State conditions for budget punctuations. Research in Higher Education, 58(4), 395–429. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-016-9432-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489. DOI: 10.1023/A:1027381906977
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lucena, J. C. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. policymaking to create scientists and engineers from Sputnik to the “war against terrorism.” Univ. Press of America.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433–447. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00991.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maloney, W. F., & Caicedo, V. (2017). Engineering growth: Innovative capacity and development in the Americas (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2932756). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2932756
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matusovich, H. M., Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., & Hixson, C. (2014). Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 302–330. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20044
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McMasters, J. (2004). Influencing engineering education: One (aerospace) industry perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 353–371.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merry, S. E. (1990). The discourses of mediation and the power of naming. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2, 1–36. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7410
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milstein, T. (2011). Nature identification: The power of pointing and naming. Environmental Communication, 5(1), 3–24. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2010.535836
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morgan, M. G. (1990). Accreditation and diversity in engineering education. Science, 249(4972), 969–969. DOI: 10.1126/science.249.4972.969
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed). SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279946
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203768761
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
National Research Council. (1985). Engineering education and practice in the United States: Foundations of our techno-economic future. National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/582
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Newman, S., & Jahdi, K. (2009). Marketisation of education: Marketing, rhetoric and reality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/03098770802638226
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noble, D. F. (1979). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. Oxford Univ. Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noe, T. (2012). A survey of the economic theory of reputation: Its logic and its limits. In T. G. Pollock & M. L. Barnett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199596706.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
North, D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. DOI: 10.1080/02680930500108718
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974–1010. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309360280
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Park, T. (2011). Academic capitalism and its impact on the American professoriate. Journal of the Professoriate, 6, 84–99.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20140378. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reisel, J. R. (2018, June 23). Attacks on tenure: An engineering professor’s experiences with public policy actions impacting higher education. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/attacks-on-tenure-an-engineering-professor-s-experiences-with-public-policy-actions-impacting-higher-education
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosinger, K. O., Taylor, B. J., Coco, L., & Slaughter, S. (2015). Organizational segmentation and the prestige economy: Deprofessionalization in high- and low-resource departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 27–54. DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2016.0000
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryle, G. (1937). Categories. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 38, 189–206. DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/38.1.189
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seely, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900–1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00449.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shelton, W. (1982). Government and engineering education: Economic imperative versus academic freedom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 7(1), 219–225. DOI: 10.1080/03043798208903656
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology, 18(1), 15–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00094.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Skinner, Q. (2003). A third concept of liberty. In B. Academy (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Academy, 117: 2001 Lectures (pp. 237–268). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197262795.003.0007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 154–161. DOI: 10.1177/1350508401082003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Splitt, F. G. (2003). The challenge to change: On realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(2), 181–187. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00756.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (2016). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61–71. DOI: 10.1518/001872099779577273
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Taylor, J. (2001). The impact of performance indicators on the work of university academics: Evidence from Australian universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(1), 42–61. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2273.00173
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira, P., & Dill, D. D. (2011). Introduction—The many faces of marketization in higher education. In P. Teixeira & D. D. Dill (Eds.), Public Vices, Private Virtues? – Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education (pp. 3–17). SensePublishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-466-9_1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veblen, T. (1965). The engineers and the price system. A.M. Kelley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vest, C. M. (1995). U.S. engineering education in transition. The Bridge, 25(4), 4–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Washburn, J. (2005). University, Inc: The corporate corruption of American higher education. Basic Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Watson, K. (2009). Change in engineering education: Where does research fit? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 3–4. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01000.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wegener, B. (1992). Concepts and measurement of prestige. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 253–280. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001345
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weingast, B. R., & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of political economy. Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wickenden, W. E. (1930). A comparative study of engineering education in the United States and in Europe. In Report of the investigation of engineering education 1923–1929 (Vol. 1). Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, Lancaster Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williams, G. (2016). Higher education: Public good or private commodity? London Review of Education, 14(1), 131–142. DOI: 10.18546/LRE.14.1.12
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zussman, R. (1985). Mechanics of the middle class: Work and politics among American engineers. University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520314825
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article