Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Applying Concepts from Political Science and Economics to Advance the Study of Engineering Education Cover

Applying Concepts from Political Science and Economics to Advance the Study of Engineering Education

By:  and    
Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Arndt, J. (1983). The political economy paradigm: Foundation for theory building in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 4454. DOI: 10.1177/002224298304700406
  2. ASEE. (2014). Phase I: Synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives (Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education). American Society for Engineering Education.
  3. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Cox, M. F., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Changing engineering education: Views of U.S. faculty, chairs, and deans. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 193219. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20043
  4. Bhagwati, J., Panagariya, A., & T. N., S. (2004). The muddles over outsourcing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 93114. DOI: 10.1257/0895330042632753
  5. Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011). Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. Science, 334(6061), 13441345. DOI: 10.1126/science.334.6061.1344
  6. Bjorklund, S. A., & Colbeck, C. L. (2001). The view from the top: Leaders’ perspectives on a decade of change in engineering education*. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 1319. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00562.x
  7. Black, K. M. (1994). An industry view of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(1), 2628. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb00112.x
  8. Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7). DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
  9. Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C. B. (2011). Motivation in academic life: A prestige economy. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(4), 399411. DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2011.626971
  10. , E. D. (2006). Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203225. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grj013
  11. Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303352. DOI: 10.2307/2185445
  12. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185207. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x
  13. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1977). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.
  14. Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley.
  15. Brint, S. G., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195048155.001.0001
  16. Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 19581978. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
  17. Campbell, C. M., & O’Meara, K. (2013). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 4974. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-013-9303-x
  18. Carlson, W. B. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship and engineering education: Dugald C. Jackson and the MIT-GE Cooperative Engineering Course, 1907–1932. Technology and Culture, 29(3), 536567. JSTOR. DOI: 10.2307/3105273
  19. Carpentier, V. (2015). State education, crisis and austerity: An historical analysis through the lens of the Kondratiev cycles. In C. Aubry, M. Geiss, V. Magyar-Haas, & J. Oelkers (Eds.), Education and the State: International perspectives on a changing relationship (1st ed., pp. 78102). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315772387
  20. Cech, E. A. (2013). The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices. In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering Education for Social Justice (pp. 6784). Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4
  21. Cech, E. A., & Sherick, H. M. (2015). Depoliticization and the structure of engineering education. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), International Perspectives on Engineering Education, 20, 203216. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_10
  22. Charfauros, K. H., & Tierney, W. G. (1999). Part-time faculty in colleges and universities: Trends and challenges in a turbulent environment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(2), 141151. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008112304445
  23. Clark, M. C., Froyd, J., Merton, P., & Richardson, J. (2004). The evolution of curricular change models within the Foundation Coalition. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 3747. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00786.x
  24. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century (U.S.), & Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.) (Eds.). (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press.
  25. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.). (2006). Biological, social, and organizational components of success for women in academic science and engineering: Report of a workshop (Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, Eds.). National Academies Press.
  26. Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99112. DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
  27. Courtois, A. D. M., & O’Keefe, T. (2015). Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1538710/1/13-1-3.pdf
  28. Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 2129. DOI: 10.1177/2372732214549471
  29. Denney, J. J. (2011). Priming the innovation pump: America needs more scientists, engineers, and basic research. DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIV FT BELVOIR VA. https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA535501
  30. Denton, D. D. (1998). Engineering education for the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1), 1922. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00317.x
  31. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
  32. Doten-Snitker, K., Margherio, C., Litzler, E., Ingram, E., & Williams, J. (2021). Developing a shared vision for change: Moving toward inclusive empowerment. Research in Higher Education, 62(2), 206229. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-020-09594-9
  33. Drazen, A. (2002). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton University Press.
  34. Frantz, A. C., Beebe, S. A., Horvath, V. S., Canales, J., & Swee, D. E. (2004). The roles of teaching and learning centers. To Improve the Academy, 23(1), 7290. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2004.tb00427.x
  35. Garritzmann, J. L. (2016). The political economy of higher education finance: The politics of tuition fees and subsidies in OECD countries, 1945–2015. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29913-6_1
  36. Geiger, R. L. (2011). Markets and the End of the Current Era in U.S. Higher Education. In P. Teixeira & D. D. Dill (Eds.), Public Vices, Private Virtues? – Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education (pp. 317). Sense Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-466-9_1
  37. Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 115. DOI: 10.1080/00343400903389979
  38. Graham, R. (2012a). Achieving excellence in engineering education: The ingredients of successful change. The Royal Academy of Engineering.
  39. Graham, R. (2012b). The one less traveled by: The road to lasting systemic change in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 596600. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01120.x
  40. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
  41. Helm, D. (2006). Regulatory reform, capture, and the regulatory burden. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 169185. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grj011
  42. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952984. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20439
  43. Jamieson, L., & Lohmann, J. (2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society.
  44. Jesiek, B. K., Newswander, L. K., & Borrego, M. (2009). Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 3952. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x
  45. Kabo, J., Tang, X., Nieusma, D., Currie, J., Wenlong, H., & Baillie, C. (2012). Visions of social competence: Comparing engineering education accreditation in Australia, China, Sweden, and the United States. 25.1463.125.1463.16. DOI: https://peer.asee.org/22220
  46. Katz, A., & Knight, D. B. (2017). Factors related to faculty views toward undergraduate engineering ethics education. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/factors-related-to-faculty-views-toward-undergraduate-engineering-ethics-education
  47. Klees, S. J. (2008). A quarter century of neoliberal thinking in education: Misleading analyses and failed policies. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(4), 311348. DOI: 10.1080/14767720802506672
  48. Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to Non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. The Science Press Printing Company. http://archive.org/details/sciencesanityint00korz
  49. Kosak, L., Manning, D., Dobson, E., Rogerson, L., Cotnam, S., Colaric, S., & McFadden, C. (2004). Prepared to teach online? Perspectives of faculty in the University of North Carolina System. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(3).
  50. Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, how, and when. Whittlesey House.
  51. Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. ABET, INC. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/EngineeringChange-executive-summary.pdf
  52. Layton, E. T. (1971). The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession (Johns Hopkins pbk. ed). Johns Hopkins University Press.
  53. Leslie, L. L., & Johnson, G. P. (1974). The market model and higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 45(1), 120. DOI: 10.2307/1980645
  54. Li, A. Y. (2017). Dramatic declines in higher education appropriations: State conditions for budget punctuations. Research in Higher Education, 58(4), 395429. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-016-9432-0
  55. Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469489. DOI: 10.1023/A:1027381906977
  56. Lucena, J. C. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. policymaking to create scientists and engineers from Sputnik to the “war against terrorism.” Univ. Press of America.
  57. Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433447. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00991.x
  58. Maloney, W. F., & Caicedo, V. (2017). Engineering growth: Innovative capacity and development in the Americas (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2932756). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2932756
  59. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273283. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
  60. Matusovich, H. M., Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., & Hixson, C. (2014). Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 302330. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20044
  61. McMasters, J. (2004). Influencing engineering education: One (aerospace) industry perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 353371.
  62. Merry, S. E. (1990). The discourses of mediation and the power of naming. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2, 136. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7410
  63. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 5663. DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
  64. Milstein, T. (2011). Nature identification: The power of pointing and naming. Environmental Communication, 5(1), 324. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2010.535836
  65. Morgan, M. G. (1990). Accreditation and diversity in engineering education. Science, 249(4972), 969969. DOI: 10.1126/science.249.4972.969
  66. Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed). SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279946
  67. Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203768761
  68. National Research Council. (1985). Engineering education and practice in the United States: Foundations of our techno-economic future. National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/582
  69. Newman, S., & Jahdi, K. (2009). Marketisation of education: Marketing, rhetoric and reality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 111. DOI: 10.1080/03098770802638226
  70. Noble, D. F. (1979). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. Oxford Univ. Press.
  71. Noe, T. (2012). A survey of the economic theory of reputation: Its logic and its limits. In T. G. Pollock & M. L. Barnett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199596706.001.0001
  72. North, D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
  73. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313345. DOI: 10.1080/02680930500108718
  74. Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 9741010. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309360280
  75. Park, T. (2011). Academic capitalism and its impact on the American professoriate. Journal of the Professoriate, 6, 8499.
  76. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20140378. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
  77. Reisel, J. R. (2018, June 23). Attacks on tenure: An engineering professor’s experiences with public policy actions impacting higher education. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/attacks-on-tenure-an-engineering-professor-s-experiences-with-public-policy-actions-impacting-higher-education
  78. Rosinger, K. O., Taylor, B. J., Coco, L., & Slaughter, S. (2015). Organizational segmentation and the prestige economy: Deprofessionalization in high- and low-resource departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 2754. DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2016.0000
  79. Ryle, G. (1937). Categories. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 38, 189206. DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/38.1.189
  80. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
  81. Seely, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900–1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00449.x
  82. Shelton, W. (1982). Government and engineering education: Economic imperative versus academic freedom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 7(1), 219225. DOI: 10.1080/03043798208903656
  83. Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology, 18(1), 1529. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00094.x
  84. Skinner, Q. (2003). A third concept of liberty. In B. Academy (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Academy, 117: 2001 Lectures (pp. 237268). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197262795.003.0007
  85. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  86. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 154161. DOI: 10.1177/1350508401082003
  87. Splitt, F. G. (2003). The challenge to change: On realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(2), 181187. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00756.x
  88. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (2016). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 6171. DOI: 10.1518/001872099779577273
  89. Taylor, J. (2001). The impact of performance indicators on the work of university academics: Evidence from Australian universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(1), 4261. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2273.00173
  90. Teixeira, P., & Dill, D. D. (2011). Introduction—The many faces of marketization in higher education. In P. Teixeira & D. D. Dill (Eds.), Public Vices, Private Virtues? – Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education (pp. 317). SensePublishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-466-9_1
  91. Veblen, T. (1965). The engineers and the price system. A.M. Kelley.
  92. Vest, C. M. (1995). U.S. engineering education in transition. The Bridge, 25(4), 49.
  93. Washburn, J. (2005). University, Inc: The corporate corruption of American higher education. Basic Books.
  94. Watson, K. (2009). Change in engineering education: Where does research fit? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 34. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01000.x
  95. Wegener, B. (1992). Concepts and measurement of prestige. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 253280. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001345
  96. Weingast, B. R., & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of political economy. Oxford University Press.
  97. Wickenden, W. E. (1930). A comparative study of engineering education in the United States and in Europe. In Report of the investigation of engineering education 1923–1929 (Vol. 1). Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, Lancaster Press.
  98. Williams, G. (2016). Higher education: Public good or private commodity? London Review of Education, 14(1), 131142. DOI: 10.18546/LRE.14.1.12
  99. Zussman, R. (1985). Mechanics of the middle class: Work and politics among American engineers. University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520314825
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.75 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 28 - 52
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2021
Accepted on: Apr 29, 2022
Published on: Jun 9, 2022
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Andrew Katz, Joyce Main, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.