Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interacting with Ruling Relations: Engineering Graduate Student Experiences of Discrimination Cover

Interacting with Ruling Relations: Engineering Graduate Student Experiences of Discrimination

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. Artiles, M. S., & Matusovich, H. M. (2020). Examining doctoral degree attrition rates: Using expectancy-value theory to compare student values and faculty supports. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 10711081. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol36-3/22_ijee3935.pdf
  2. Bahnson, M., Cass, C., & Wyer, M. (2019) Student Poster “Interview Protocol Development to Explore Experienced Bias in Engineering Graduate Students” Presentation at 31st Association for Psychological Science Annual Convention, May 23–26, 2019, Washington, DC, USA.
  3. Bahnson, M., Perkins, H., Tsugawa, M., Satterfield, D., Parker, M., Cass, C., & Kirn, A. (2021). Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures. Journal of Engineering Education, (October 2019), 949976. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20427
  4. Bancroft, S. F. (2018). Toward a critical theory of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics doctoral persistence: Critical capital theory. Science Education, 102(6), 13191335. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21474
  5. Banda, R. M. (2012). Perceptions of Social Support Networks and Climate in the Persistence of Latinas Pursuing an Undergraduate Engineering Degree. A Dissertation by ROSA MARIA BANDA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A & M University. https://ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/perceptions-social-support-networks-climate/docview/1319256064/se-2?accountid=13158
  6. Bégin, C., & Gérard, L. (2013). The role of supervisors in light of the experience of doctoral students. Policy Futures in Education, 11(3), 267276. DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.267
  7. Berdanier, C. G. P., Whitehair, C., Kirn, A., & Satterfield, D. (2020). Analysis of social media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 125147. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20299
  8. Bilen-Green, C., Carpenter, J., Doore, S., Green, R., Horton, K., Jellison, K., … O’Neal, D. P. (2015). Implementation of advocates and allies programs to support and promote gender equity in academia. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/p.24242
  9. Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391409. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020909529486
  10. Burt, B. A. (2017). Learning competencies through engineering research group experiences. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(1), 4864. DOI: 10.1108/SGPE-05-2017-019
  11. Burt, B. A., McKen, A., Burkhart, J., Hormell, J., & Knight, A. (2019b). Black men in engineering graduate education: Experiencing racial microaggressions within the advisor–advisee relationship. The Journal of Negro Education, 88(4), 493. DOI: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.4.0493
  12. Burt, B. A., Williams, K. L., & Palmer, G. J. M. (2019a). It takes a village: The role of emic and etic adaptive strengths in the persistence of Black men in engineering graduate programs. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 3974. DOI: 10.3102/0002831218789595
  13. Burt, B. A., Williams, K. L., & Smith, W. A. (2018). Into the storm: Ecological and sociological impediments to Black males’ persistence in engineering graduate programs. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 9651006. DOI: 10.3102/0002831218763587
  14. Cass, C., Kirn, A., Tsugawa-Nieves, M., Perkins, H., Chestnut, J., Briggs, D., & Miller, B. (2018). Improving performance and retention of engineering graduate students through motivation and identity formation. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--27798
  15. Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 7386. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x
  16. Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2012). Learning in graduate engineering research groups of various sizes. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 565589. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00062.x
  17. Cross, K. J., Mamaril, N., Johnson-Glauch, N., & Herman, G. (2021). Building cultures of collaboration that promote instructional change. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(2), 118. DOI: 10.21061/see.48
  18. Daumeyer, N. M., Onyeador, I. N., Brown, X., & Richeson, J. A. (2019). Consequences of attributing discrimination to implicit vs. explicit bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84(April), 103812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.04.010
  19. Dedoose. (2018). Version 8.0.35, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com
  20. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis. A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London & New York: Routledge.
  21. Dryburgh, H. (1999). Work hard, play hard: Women and professionalization in engineering – Adapting to the culture. Gender and Society, 13(5), 664682. http://www.jstor.org/stable/190328. DOI: 10.1177/089124399013005006
  22. Dutta, D. (2015). Sustaining the pipeline: Experiences of international female engineers in U.S. graduate programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(3), 326344. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20077
  23. Foster, E., Karlin, J., Riley, D. M., & Quiles-Ramos, S. (2019). Seeding a strategic campaign to address root causes of inequity in engineering education. CoNECD 2019 – Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity. https://strategy.asee.org/31789
  24. Framt, S. M. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), 125. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/fram1.pdf
  25. Frehill, L. M. (2004). The gendered construction of the engineering profession in the United States, 1893–1920. Men and Masculinities, 6(4), 383403. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X03260963
  26. Gearing, R. E. (2004). Bracketing in research: A typology. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 14291452. DOI: 10.1177/1049732304270394
  27. Gittings, G., Bergman, M., Shuck, B., & Rose, K. (2018). The impact of student attributes and program characteristics on doctoral degree completion. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 30(3), 322. DOI: 10.1002/nha3.20220
  28. Green, D. O., Creswell, J. W., Shope, R. J., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Grounded theory and racial/ethnic diversity. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 472492). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607941.n22
  29. Gumpertz, M., Brent, R., Campbell, C. D., Grasso, M., Huet, Y. M., & Schimmel, K. A. (2019). An institutional transformation model to increase minority STEM doctoral student success. CoNECD 2019 – Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity. Washington, DC.
  30. Hall, W. M., Schmader, T., & Croft, E. (2015). Engineering exchanges: Daily social identity threat predicts burnout among female engineers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 528534. DOI: 10.1177/1948550615572637
  31. Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  32. Harden, B. Y. K., & Harden-moore, T. A. I. (2018). Moving from ally to accomplice: how far are you willing to go to disrupt racism in the workplace. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 36(2), 32. https://www.diverseeducation.com/opinion/article/15104148/moving-from-ally-to-accomplice-how-far-are-you-willing-to-go-to-disrupt-racism-in-the-workplace
  33. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2017). The practice of qualitative research, 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  34. Kajfez, R. L., & McNair, L. D. (2014). Graduate Student Identity: A Balancing Act between Roles. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--20543
  35. London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 3042011. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
  36. Long, L. L. (2020). Toward an antiracist engineering classroom for 2020 and beyond: A starter kit. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 636639. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20363
  37. Long, L. L., & Mejia, J. A. (2016). Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers for underrepresented engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 211218. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20114
  38. Martin, J. P., Simmons, D. R., & Yu, S. L. (2013). The role of social capital in the experiences of Hispanic women engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(2), 227243. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20010
  39. McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture? American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 16261662. DOI: 10.3102/0002831216676572
  40. McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 13471389. DOI: 10.3102/0002831211423972
  41. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass
  42. Miles, M. L., Brockman, A. J., & Naphan-Kingery, D. E. (2020). Invalidated identities: The disconfirming effects of racial microaggressions on Black doctoral students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 16081631. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21646
  43. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2018). Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. DOI: 10.17226/25038
  44. National Science Foundation, & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019 | NSF – National Science Foundation. https://doi.org/NSF19-304
  45. Nieto, N. (2018). Technology and gendered spaces: Examining equity and access. 2018 CoNECD The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference. Crystal City, VA. https://peer.asee.org/29584
  46. NSB (National Science Board). (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
  47. O’Meara, K. A., Griffin, K. A., Nyunt, G., & Lounder, A. (2018). Disrupting ruling relations: The role of the PROMISE Program as a third space. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(3), 205218. DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000095
  48. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172209. DOI: 10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
  49. Pawley, A. L. (2017). Shifting the “default”: The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 531533. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20181
  50. Pawley, A. L. (2019). Learning from small numbers: Studying ruling relations that gender and race the structure of U.S. engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(1), 1331. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20247
  51. Perez, R. J., Robbins, C. K., Harris, L. W., & Montgomery, C. (2019). Exploring graduate students’ socialization to equity, diversity, and inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 133145. DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000115
  52. Perkins, H., Bahnson, M., Tsugawa-Nieves, M., Kirn, A., & Cass, C. (2018b). WIP: Influence of laboratory group makeup on recognition and identity development in the engineering graduate student population. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8658669
  53. Perkins, H., Bahnson, M., Tsugawa-Nieves, M., Kirn, A., & Cass, C. (2020). An intersectional approach to explore engineering graduate students’ identities and academic relationships. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 11(3), 440465. http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/679
  54. Perkins, H. L., Bahnson, M., Tsugawa-Nieves, M. A., Kirn, A., & Cass, C. (2018a). Development and testing of an instrument to understand engineering doctoral students’ identities and motivations. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2-30319
  55. Pietri, E. S., Hennes, E. P., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Bailey, A. H., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Handelsman, J. (2019). Addressing unintended consequences of gender diversity interventions on women’s sense of belonging in STEM. Sex Roles, 80(9–10), 527547. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-018-0952-2
  56. Ramirez, E. (2014). “¿Qué estoy haciendo aquí? (What am I doing here?)”: Chicanos/Latinos(as) navigating challenges and inequalities during their first year of graduate school. Equity and Excellence in Education, 47(2), 167186. DOI: 10.1080/10665684.2014.900394
  57. Ro, H. K., & Loya, K. I. (2015). The effect of gender and race intersectionality on student learning outcomes in engineering. Review of Higher Education, 38(3). DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2015.0014
  58. Robnett, R. D. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 6579. DOI: 10.1177/0361684315596162
  59. Siegel, D. P. (2019). Transgender experiences and transphobia in higher education. Sociology Compass, 13(10), 113. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12734
  60. Sivesind, K. H. (1999). Structured, qualitative comparison. Quality and Quantity, 33: 361380. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004691318311
  61. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  62. Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.3138/9781442683747
  63. Sowell, R., Allum, J., & Okahana, H. (2015). Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion. Washington, DC.
  64. Sue, D. W., Bucceri, J., Lin, A. I., Nadal, K. L., & Torino, G. C. (2007). Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 7281. DOI: 10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.72
  65. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
  66. Truong, K. A., Museus, S. D., & McGuire, K. M. (2016). Vicarious racism: A qualitative analysis of experiences with secondhand racism in graduate education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(2), 224247. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2015.1023234
  67. Trytten, D. A., Lowe, A. W., & Walden, S. E. (2012). “Asians are good at math. What an awful stereotype”: The Model Minority Stereotype’s impact on Asian American engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 439468. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00057.x
  68. Vargas-Ordaez, C. E., & Hynes, M. M. (2020). Engineering design and social justice: A systematized literature review. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June. DOI: 10.18260/1-2-34551
  69. Verdín, D., Godwin, A. F., & Morazes, J. L. (2015). Qualitative study of first-generation Latinas: understanding motivation for choosing and persisting in engineering. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/p.24628
  70. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4). DOI: 10.1002/jee.20029
  71. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119140. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  72. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 6991. DOI: 10.1080/1361332052000341006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.76 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 78
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 26, 2022
Published on: Jul 14, 2022
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Matthew Bahnson, Derrick Satterfield, Mary Wyer, Adam Kirn, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.