Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Calling for a Paradigm Shift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education Cover

Calling for a Paradigm Shift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education

Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. Allen, P. G. (1992). The sacred hoop: Recovering the feminine in American Indian traditions. Beacon Press.
  2. Ainsworth, C. (2015). Sex Redefined. Nature, 518, 288291. DOI: 10.1038/518288a
  3. Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 95109. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1
  4. Baxter, K. (2010). Women in science and engineering: Thriving or surviving? Available from University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll127/id/337683
  5. Beasley, M., & Fischer, M. (2012). Why they leave: the impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math, and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 427448. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3
  6. Beddoes, K. (2011). Engineering education discourses on underrepresentation: Why problematization matters. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27, 11171129.
  7. Beddoes, K., & Borrego, M. (2011). Feminist theory in three engineering education journals: 1995–2008. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 281303. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00014.x
  8. Beemyn, B. (2003). Serving the needs of transgender college students. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 3(1), 3350. DOI: 10.1300/J367v01n01_03
  9. Beemyn, B., Curtis, B., Davis, M., & Tubbs, N. J. (2005). Transgender issues on college campuses. New Directions for Student Services, 111, 4960. DOI: 10.1002/ss.173
  10. Blackwell, M. (2011). ¡Chicana power! Contested Histories of Feminism in the Chicano Movement. University of Texas Press.
  11. Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369386. DOI: 10.1080/09540250500145072
  12. Boone, C. (2020, March 15). Tech officer who shot, killed student won’t face charges. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved from https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/tech-officer-who-shot-killed-student-won-face-charges/Og73InPCgkjWKmxG5fye6O/
  13. Bottrell, D. (2009). Understanding ‘Marginal’ Perspectives: Towards a Social Theory of Resilience. Qualitative Social Work, 8(3): 321339. DOI: 10.1177/1473325009337840
  14. Boudreau, K., Bunyea, L. R., DiBiasio, D., Johnson, R., & Reidinger, Z. (2019, April). Integrating inclusive pedagogy and experiential learning to support student empowerment, activism, and institutional change: A case study with transgender STEM students. Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE CoNECD Conference, Crystal City, VA. https://peer.asee.org/31772
  15. Brigandt, I., & Love, A. (2017). Reductionism in Biology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 edition), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/reduction-biology/
  16. Case, J., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186210. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
  17. Case, K., Stewart, B., & Tittsworth, J. (2009). Transgender across the curriculum: A Psychology for Inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 117121. DOI: 10.1080/00986280902739446
  18. Cech, E. A. (2007). Dilbert in stilettos: Deterrents facing women in engineering. In I. Welpe, B. Reschka & J. Larkin (Eds.), Gender in engineering: Strategies and possibilities (pp. 3550). Peter Lang Press.
  19. Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 4272. DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504305
  20. Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. (2019). STEM Inclusion Study Organization Report: AIChE. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://www.aiche.org/community/sites/fellows/blog/stem-inclusion-study
  21. Chachra, D., Kilgore, D., Loshbaugh, H., McCain, J., & Chen, H. (2008). Being and becoming: Gender and identity formation of engineering students. Paper presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. https://peer.asee.org/3597
  22. Cieminski, M. (2019, June). Queer(y)-ing technical practice: Queer experiences in student theater productions at a technical university. Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Crystal City, VA. https://peer.asee.org/33222
  23. Conger, K. (2017). Of mice, men and women: Making research more inclusive. Stanford Medicine, Special report: Sex, gender, and medicine, Spring 2017, 611. Retrieved from https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2017spring/how-sex-and-gender-which-are-not-the-same-thing-influence-our-health.html
  24. Creese, G., & Frisby, W. (2011). Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies. University of British Columbia Press.
  25. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43, 12411299. DOI: 10.2307/1229039
  26. deSouza, A., & Purpura, A. (2012). Undisciplined knowledge. In J. Grabski & C. Magee (Eds.), African Art, Interviews, Narratives: Bodies of Knowledge at Work (pp. 163178). Indiana University Press.
  27. Dumlao, A. (2018, June 22). 100 ways to make the world better for non-binary people Vice. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/evkwm4/how-to-be-an-ally-to-non-binary-gender-non-conforming-people-support
  28. Faber, C., Bodnar, C., Strong, A., Lee, W., McCave, E., & Smith, C. (2016, June). Narrating the experiences of first-year faculty in the engineering education research community: Developing a qualitative, collaborative research methodology. Paper presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA. DOI: 10.18260/p.25771
  29. Faulkner, W. (2011). Gender (in)authenticity, belonging, and identity work in engineering. Brussels Economic Review, ULB - Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 54(2–3), 277293.
  30. Ferguson, R. (2004). Aberrations in black: Toward a queer of color critique. University of Minnesota Press.
  31. Ferguson, R. (2012). The reorder of things: The university and its pedagogies of minority difference. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816672783.001.0001
  32. Fernandez, T., Godwin, A., Doyle, J., Verdín, D., Boone, H., Kirn, A., Benson, L., & Potvin, G. (2016, June). More comprehensive and inclusive approaches to demographic data collection. Paper presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA. DOI: 10.18260/p.25751
  33. Fine, D. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. W. W. Norton & Company.
  34. Foley, D., & Valenzuela, A. (2008). Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (3rd edition, pp. 287310). Sage Publications, Inc.
  35. Foor, C., Walden, S., Trytten, D. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103115. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x
  36. Freehill, L., Di Fabio, N., Hill, S., Traeger, K., & Buono, J. (2007). Women in engineering: A Review of the 2007 literature. SWE Magazine, 54(3), 3470. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000272202.60548.dd
  37. Garbacik, J. (2013). Gender and sexuality for beginners. For Beginners Books.
  38. Gates, G. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? University of California Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09h684X2
  39. Gilbert, J. (2001). Science and its ‘other’: Looking underneath ‘woman’ and ‘science’ for new directions in research on gender and science education. Gender and Education, 13(3), 291305. DOI: 10.1080/09540250120063571
  40. Godfrey, E. (2007). Cultures within cultures: Welcoming or unwelcoming for women? Paper presented at the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--2302
  41. Godwin, A., Verdín, D., Kirn, A., & Satterfielf, D. (2018). The intersection of gender and race: Exploring chemical engineering students’ attitudes. Chemical Engineering Education, 52(2), 8997.
  42. Gossett, C. (2017). Blackness and the trouble of trans visibility. In R. Gossett, E. Stanley & J. Burton (Eds.), Trap door: Trans cultural politics and the politics of visibility (pp. 183190). The MIT Press.
  43. Gregory, S. L. (2015). African American female engineering students’ persistence in stereotype-threatening environments: A critical race theory perspective. Available from Utah State University Libraries, Digital Commons @ USU. Retrieved from https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/105853/101499. DOI: 10.5339/qproc.2015.wcee2014.3
  44. Guishard, M. (2009). The false paths, the endless labors, the turns now this way and now that: Participatory action research, mutual vulnerability, and the politics of inquiry. Urban Review, 41(1), 85105. DOI: 10.1007/s11256-008-0096-8
  45. Haverkamp, A. (2018, June). The complexity of nonbinary gender inclusion in engineering culture. Paper presented at the 2018 ASEE Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/31084
  46. Haverkamp, A. (2019a, March), Climate Perceptions of Transgender & Nonbinary Engineering Undergraduate. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE PNW Section Conference, Corvallis, OR. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/31870
  47. Haverkamp, A., Butler, A., Pelzl, N. S., Bothwell, M. K., Montfort, D., Driskill, Q. (2019b, April). Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering Undergraduate Experiences through Autoethnography. Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE CoNECD Conference, Crystal City, VA. https://peer.asee.org/31764
  48. Harbin, B. (2016). Teaching Beyond the Gender Binary in the University Classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-beyond-the-gender-binary-in-the-university-classroom/
  49. Harding, S. (1986). The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs, 11(4), 645664. DOI: 10.1086/494270
  50. Harrison, J., Grant, J., & Herman, J. (2012). A gender not listed here: Genderqueers, gender rebels, and otherwise in the national transgender discrimination survey. LGBTQ Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School, 2, 1324.
  51. Hatmaker, D. (2013). Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers. Gender, Work, and Organization, 20(4), 382396. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x
  52. Hesse-Biber, S. (2014). Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Sage.
  53. Hull, A., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (2015). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women’s studies (2nd Edition). The Feminist Press.
  54. Human Rights Campaign. (2016, October 26). Collecting transgender-inclusive gender data in workplace and other surveys. Retrieved from https://www.hrc.org/resources/collecting-transgender-inclusive-gender-data-in-workplace-and-other-surveys
  55. Human Rights Campaign. (2018). Dismantling a culture of violence: understanding anti-transgender violence and ending the crisis. Report. Retrieved from https://assets2.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/2018AntiTransViolenceReportSHORTENED.pdf
  56. Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., Dobrean, A., & Clinciu, A. I. (2016). Sex differences in intelligence: A multi-measure approach using nationally representative samples from Romania. Intelligence, 58, 5461. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2016.06.007
  57. James, S., Herman, J., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. National Center for Transgender Equality.
  58. Joel, D. (2011). Male or female? Brains are intersex. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 5(57), 15. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00057
  59. Joel, D., Tarrasch, R., Berman, Z., Mukamel, M., & Ziv, E. (2014). Queering gender: Studying gender identity in ‘normative’ individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(4), 291321. DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2013.830640
  60. Jolivette, A. (2015). Research Justice: Methodologies for Social Change. Policy Press, University of Bristol. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t89jrt
  61. Khuntia, D., & Barik, P. (2019). Paradigm shift in curriculum: A visionary mission. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(1), 3842. DOI: 10.34293/education.v8i1.658
  62. Kim, E., & Hargrove, D. T. (2013). Deficient or resilient: A critical review of black male academic success and persistence in higher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 82(3), 300311. DOI: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.3.0300
  63. Krum, T., Davis, K., & Galupo, P. (2013). Gender-inclusive housing preferences: A survey of college-aged transgender students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 10, 6482. DOI: 10.1080/19361653.2012.718523
  64. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1st edition). The University of Chicago Press.
  65. Lichtenstein, G., Chen, H., Smith, K., & Maldonado, T. (2014). Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 311334). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.021
  66. Long, L. L., III, & Mejia, J. A. (2016). Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers for underrepresented engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105, 211218. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20114
  67. Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Sustainability Institute. Retrieved from http://donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Leverage_Points.pdf
  68. Meadows, D. H., (2008). Leverage points – Places to intervene in a system. In D. Wright (Ed.), Thinking in systems: A primer (pp. 145165). Chelsea Green Publishing.
  69. Male, S. A., Gardner, A., Figueroa, E., & Bennett, D. (2018). Investigation of students’ experiences of gendered cultures in engineering workplaces, European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 360377. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1397604
  70. Marine, S. B. (2011). Our college is changing: Women’s college student affairs administrators and transgender students. Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 11651186. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2011.605730
  71. Marine, S., & Nicolazzo, Z. (2014). Names that matter: Exploring the tensions of campus LGBTQ centers and trans* inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(4), 265281. DOI: 10.1037/a0037990
  72. Martin, J. P., & Garza, C. (2020). Centering the marginalized student’s voice through autoethnography: Implications for engineering education research. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(1), 1. DOI: 10.21061/see.1
  73. McQueen, P. (2015). Subjectivity, gender and the struggle for recognition. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137425997
  74. Mejia, J., Chen, D., Dalrymple, O., Lord, S. (2018). Revealing the invisible: Conversations about -isms and power relations in engineering courses. Paper presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30937
  75. Mejia, J. A., Revelo, R. A., Villanueva, I., & Mejia, J. (2018). Critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit and liberative approach. Education Science, 8(4), 158170. DOI: 10.3390/educsci8040158
  76. Meyers, K., Ohland, M., Pawley, A., Silliman, S., & Smith, K. (2012). Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(1), 120131.
  77. Miranda, D. (2010). Extermination of the joyas: Gendercide in Spanish California. GLQ, 16(1–2), 253284. DOI: 10.1215/10642684-2009-022
  78. Morgensen, S. (2011). Unsettling queer politics: What can non-Natives learn from Two-Spirit organizing? In Q. Driskill, C. Finley, B. Gilley & S. Morgensen (Eds.), Queer indigenous studies: Critical interventions in theory, politics, and literature (pp. 132152). University of Arizona Press.
  79. Namaste, V. (2000) Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. University of Chicago Press.
  80. Nicolazzo, Z. (2016). Just go in looking good: The resilience, resistance, and kinship-building of trans* college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(5), 538556. DOI: 10.1353/csd.2016.0057
  81. Nicolazzo, Z. (2017). Trans* in college: Transgender students’ strategies for navigating campus life and the institutional politics of inclusion. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  82. Nicolazzo, Z. (2020). Trans* Studies in Higher Education Syllabus. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uUFd5pMlLTOigvVtt9uJYmimhH2w4rZL9azrrUiqZJc/edit?usp=sharing
  83. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172208. DOI: 10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
  84. Pawley, A. (2012). Engineering faculty drawing the line: A taxonomy of boundary work in academic engineering. Engineering Studies, 4(2), 145169. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2012.687000
  85. Pawley, A. (2013). Learning from small numbers of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative. Paper presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conferennnce, Atlanta, GA. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--19030
  86. Pawley, A., Schimpf, C., & Nelson, L. (2016). Gender in engineering education research: A content analysis of research in JEE, 1998–2012, Journal of Engineering Education, 105, 508528. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20128
  87. Pawley, A. (2017). Shifting the “default”: The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 531533. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20181
  88. Pawley, A. (2019). Learning from small numbers: Studying ruling relations that gender and race the structure of U.S. engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 108, 1331. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20247
  89. Pérez, E. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing chianas into history. Indiana University Press.
  90. Phipps, A. (2007). Re-inscribing gender binaries: Deconstructing the dominant discourse around women’s equality in science, engineering, and technology, The Sociological Review, 55(4), 768787. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00744.x
  91. Prosser, J. (2006). Judith Butler: Queer feminism, transgender, and the transubstantiation of sex. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The Transgender Studies reader (pp. 257280). Taylor & Francis Group.
  92. Richardson, G. (2002). The metatheory of resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307321. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10020
  93. Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 218235. DOI: 10.2307/2657301
  94. Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and Social Justice. Morgan & Claypool. DOI: 10.2200/S00117ED1V01Y200805ETS007
  95. Riley, D., Pawley, A., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education: Transformative possibilities. NWSA Journal, 21(2), 2140. DOI: 10.1353/nwsa.0.0076
  96. Riley, D., Slaton, A. E., & Pawley, A. L. (2014). Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 335356). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.022
  97. Robinson, J. (2008). Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond, Futures, 40(1), 7086. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2007.06.007
  98. Robinson, G., & McIlwee, J. (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 403421. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00166.x
  99. Ross, M. (2017). Repositioning race, gender, and role identity formation in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(1), 3752. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017016424
  100. Roy, J. (2019, July 15). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics-UPDATED-15-July-2019.pdf
  101. Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23(4), 440464. DOI: 10.1177/0891243209340034
  102. Secules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A. and Tanu, E. (2018). Supporting the Narrative Agency of a Marginalized Engineering Student. Journal of Engineering Education, 107, 186218. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20201
  103. Secules, S. (2019) Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of Integration Contextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as Masculine and Competitive. Engineering Studies, 11(3), 196216. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200
  104. Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Seal Press.
  105. Silbey, Susan. (2016, August 23). Why do so many women who study engineering leave the field? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/08/why-do-so-many-women-who-study-engineering-leave-the-field
  106. Smith, A. (2016). Heteropatriarchy and the three pillars of white supremacy: Rethinking women of color organizing. In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Ed.), Color of violence: The INCITE! anthology (pp. 6673). Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1220mvs.9
  107. Smith, Z. (2017, April 12). ‘Survivor’ contestant opens up about being outed as transgender. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/survivor-zeke-smith-outed-as-transgender-guest-column-991514
  108. Snorton, C. R. (2017). Black on both sides: A racial history of trans identity. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9781517901721.001.0001
  109. Somerville, S. B. (2000). Queering the color line: Race and the invention of homosexuality in American culture. Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11smx6p
  110. Spade, D. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822374794
  111. Stanley, E. A., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2015). Captive genders: Trans embodiment and the prison industrial complex (2nd Edition). AK Press.
  112. Stolzenberg, E., & Hughes, B. (2017). The experiences of incoming transgender college students: New data on gender identity. Liberal Education, 103(2), 3843.
  113. Stryker, S. (2014). Trans Studies: Queer Studies Evil Twin. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 10(2), 212215. DOI: 10.1215/10642684-10-2-212
  114. Stryker, S. (2017). Transgender history (2nd Edition). Seal Press.
  115. Torregosa, M., Ynalvez, M., & Morin, K. (2016). Perceptions matter: Faculty caring, campus racial climate, and academic performance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(4), 864877. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12877
  116. Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 115. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020114
  117. Vanasupa, L. (2020). From 2020 vision: Engineering education that honors the whole. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 353357. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20327
  118. Verdín, D., & Godwin, A. (2018). Exploring Latina first-generation college students’ multiple identities, self-efficacy, and institutional integration to inform achievement in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 24(3), 261290. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2018018667
  119. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade, Review of Education Research, 71(4), 613634. DOI: 10.3102/00346543071004613
  120. Volman, M., van Eck, E., & Ten Dam, G. (1995). Girls in science and technology: The development of a discourse, Gender and Education, 7(3), 283292. DOI: 10.1080/09540259550039004
  121. Walsh, R. (2015). ‘Objectivity’ and intersectionality: How intersectional feminism could utilize identity and experience as a dialectical weapon of liberation within academia. Feminism & Psychology, 25(1), 6166. DOI: 10.1177/0959353514562807
  122. Walther, J., Sochacka, N., Benson, L., Bumbaco, A., Kellam, N., Pawley, A., & Phillips, C. (2017). Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398430. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20170
  123. Walton, G., & Cohen, G. (2007). A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 8296. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
  124. Watson, K. (2005). Queer theory. Group Analysis, 38(1), 6781. DOI: 10.1177/0533316405049369
  125. Weiss, J. (2011). Reflective paper: GL verses BT: The archaeology of biphobia and transphobia within the U.S. gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(4), 498502. DOI: 10.1080/15299716.2011.620848
  126. Whitebear, L. (2020). Secrets of survival: Restoring cultural memories through counter-colonial intergenerational storytelling in indigenous activist circles. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Oregon State University. Oregon State University Libraries & Press.
  127. Wilkes, G. (2002). Introduction: a second generation of resilience research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), p. 229232. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10025
  128. Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257337. DOI: 10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.34 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 70
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 10, 2020
Published on: Feb 11, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Andrea Haverkamp, Michelle Bothwell, Devlin Montfort, Qwo-Li Driskill, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.