Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding Access to Learning Opportunities in Collaborative Projects: Gendered Social Hierarchies in Student Teams Cover

Understanding Access to Learning Opportunities in Collaborative Projects: Gendered Social Hierarchies in Student Teams

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Alexander, B. K. (2003). (Re)Visioning the ethnographic site: Interpretive ethnography as a method of pedagogical reflexivity and scholarly production. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 416441. DOI: 10.1177/1077800403009003006
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1987.4306538
  3. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015). The structure of racism in color-blind, “post-racial” America. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(11), 13581376. DOI: 10.1177/0002764215586826
  4. Campbell, C., Roth, W., & Jornet, A. (2019). Collaborative design decision-making as social process. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(3), 294311. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1465028
  5. Casakin, H., & Badke-Schaub, P. G. (2015). Team mental models in design problem solving: An interdisciplinary perspective. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.) Advances in psychology research (pp. 169182). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers. https://novapublishers.com/shop/advances-in-psychology-research-volume-106/
  6. Casakin, H., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2017). Sharedness of team mental models in the course of design-related interaction between architects and clients. Design Science, 3(14), 121. DOI: 10.1017/dsj.2017.15
  7. Concannon, J. P., & Barrow, L. H. (2009). A cross-sectional study of engineering students’ self-efficacy by gender, ethnicity, year, and transfer status. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 163172. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-008-9141-3
  8. Dahlgren, M. A., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Portraits of PBL: students’ experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology. Instructional Science, 30(2), 111127. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014819418051
  9. den Otter, A., & Emmitt, S. (2007). Exploring the effectiveness of team communication: Balancing synchronous and asynchronous communication in design teams. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 408419. DOI: 10.1108/09699980710780728
  10. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Chapter 7: Ethnographic poetics and narrative of the self. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices in the 21st century (pp. 199228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/interpretive-ethnography. DOI: 10.4135/9781452243672.n7
  11. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103120. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
  12. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd edition). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo12182616.html. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001
  13. Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245268. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
  14. Fowler, R. R. (2020). There are many “I’s” in team: Considering individual experiences in team-based pedagogy. [Seminar presentation]. University of Michigan Engineering Education Research Seminar Series, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9S41aQ43nQ. Accessed on 15 June 2022.
  15. Fowler, R. R., & Su, M. P. (2018). Gendered risks of team-based learning: A model of inequitable task allocation in project-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(4), 312318. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2018.2816010
  16. Henderson, T. S., Shoemaker, K. A., & Lattuca, L. R. (2022). Career calculus: Assessing the psychological cost of pursuing an engineering career. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(4), 770791. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20474
  17. Hirshfield, L., & Koretsky, M. D. (2017). Gender and participation in an engineering problem-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1). DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1651
  18. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Techonology Research and Development, 48(4), 6385. DOI: 10.1007/BF02300500
  19. Jonassen, D. H. (2015). Chapter 6 – Engineers as problem solvers. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 103118). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.009
  20. Joshi, A. (2014). By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2), 202239. DOI: 10.1177/0001839214528331
  21. Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). Introduction. In C. F. Karpowitz & Mendelgberg (Eds.), The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions, (pp. 17). Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zvffd. DOI: 10.1515/9781400852697
  22. Keough, M., Hirshfield, L., & Fowler, R. (2021). How male students talk about the female student experience on teams. Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37256
  23. Kolmos, A. & de Graaff, E. (2015). Chapter 8 – Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 141160). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.012
  24. Kolmos, A., Mejilgaard, N., Hasse, S., & Holgaard, J. E. (2013). Motivational factors, gender, and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 340358. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2013.794198
  25. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from: http://provost.tufts.edu/celt/files/High-Impact-Ed-Practices1.pdf
  26. Layne, P. (2010). Perspectives on leadership from female engineering deans. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 10(4), 185190. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000083
  27. Li, H., Öchsner, A., & Hall, W. (2019). Application of experiential learning to improve student engagement and experience in a mechanical engineering course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(3), 283293. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1402864
  28. Madison, D. S. (2012). Chapter 1: Introduction to critical ethnography: Theory and Method. In D. S. Madison (Ed.), Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (pp. 116). Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781452233826.n1
  29. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 2738. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x
  30. McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 16261662. DOI: 10.3102/0002831216676572
  31. McGee, E. O., Botchway, P. K., Naphan-Kingery, D. E., Broackman, A. J., Houston, S., II, & White, D. T. (2022). Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on Black STEM doctoral students. Race Ethnicity and Education, 24(4), 487507. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137
  32. McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 13471389. DOI: 10.3102/0002831211423972
  33. Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education – is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 216.
  34. Norström, P. (2013). Engineers’ non-scientific models in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 377390. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-011-9184-2
  35. Nguyen, H., Wu, L., Fischer, C., Washington, G., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Increasing success in college: Examining the impact of a project-based introductory engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 384401. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20319
  36. Paik, J. E., & van Swol, L. M. (2021). The effects of expertise, status power, and language use on perception of task partner. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(4). DOI: 10.1177/0261927X211067249
  37. Rohde, J., Musselman, L., Benedict, B., Verdín, D., Godwin, A., Kirn, A., Benson, L., & Potvin, G. (2019). Design experiences, engineering identity, and belongingness in early career electrical and computer engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 165172. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2019.2913356
  38. Schar, M., Gilmartin, S. K., Rieken, B., Brunhaver, S. R., Chen, H. L., & Sheppard, S. (2017). The making of an innovative engineer: Academic and life experiences that shape engineering task and innovation self-efficacy. Paper presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Columbus, OH. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28986
  39. Sheu, H., Lent, R. W., Miller, M. J., Penn, L. T., Cusick, M. E., & Truong, N. N. (2018). Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics domains: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 118136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.003
  40. Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2012). Status hierarchies and the organization of collective action. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 149166. DOI: 10.1177/0735275112457912
  41. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams – an analysis of communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473496. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2
  42. Wolfe, J., & Powell, E. (2009). Biases in interpersonal communication: How engineering students perceive gender typical speech acts in teamwork. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 516. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01001.x
  43. Wu, L. L., Fischer, C., Rodriguez, F., Washington, G. N., & Warschauer, M. (2021). Project-based engineering learning in college: Associations with self-efficacy, effort regulation, interest, skills, and performance. SN Social Sciences, 1(12), 120. DOI: 10.1007/s43545-021-00286-4
  44. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253280. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.101 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 90 - 114
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 6, 2023
Published on: Jul 14, 2023
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Trevion Shamir Henderson, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.