Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learning by Evaluating in Engineering Design Classrooms: A 5E Instructional Model Perspective from Teachers Cover

Learning by Evaluating in Engineering Design Classrooms: A 5E Instructional Model Perspective from Teachers

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (1st ed., pp. 492505). Wiley. 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
  2. Anggraeni, R. E. (2021). The analysis of the development of the 5E-STEAM learning model to improve critical thinking skills in natural science lesson. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 012050. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012050/meta
  3. Bartholomew, S. R., & Jones, M. D. (2022). A systematized review of research with adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ) in higher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 11591190.
  4. Bartholomew, S. R., Mentzer, N., Jones, M., Sherman, D., & Baniya, S. (2020). Learning by evaluating (LbE) through adaptive comparative judgment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2), 115.
  5. Bartholomew, S. R., Nadelson, L. S., Goodridge, W. H., & Reeve, E. M. (2018). Adaptive comparative judgment as a tool for assessing open-ended design problems and model eliciting activities. Educational Assessment, 23(2), 85101.
  6. Bartholomew, S. R., Strimel, G. J., & Yoshikawa, E. (2019a). Using adaptive comparative judgment for student formative feedback and learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
  7. Bartholomew, S. R., Strimel, G. J., & Yoshikawa, E. (2019b). Using adaptive comparative judgment for student formative feedback and learning during a middle school design project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 363385. 10.1007/s10798-018-9442-7
  8. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). (n.d.). Our story: BSCS and the development of the 5E instructional model. https://bscs.org/about/our-story/
  9. Bramley, T., & Vitello, S. (2019). The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 235251.
  10. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
  11. Burke, B. N. (2014). The ITEEA 6E Learning ByDesignTM Model: Maximizing informed design and inquiry in the integrative STEM classroom. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(6), 1419.
  12. Bybee, R. W. (2004). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines.
  13. Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS, 24.
  14. Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 1013.
  15. Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 812. https://search.proquest.com/openview/392f0dc54e46d73a943efca09f664cf9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=41736
  16. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., & others. (1987). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. BSCS.
  17. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS.
  18. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. BSCS. https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs_5e_full_report.pdf
  19. Canty, D., Seery, N., Hartell, E., & Doyle, A. (2017a). Integrating peer assessment in technology education through adaptive comparative judgment. PATT34 Technology & Engineering Education–Fostering the Creativity of Youth Around The Globe, Millersville University, Pennsylvania, USA, 1014.
  20. Canty, D., Seery, N., Hartell, E., & Doyle, A. (2017b). Integrating peer assessment in technology education through adaptive comparative judgment. PATT34 Technology & Engineering Education.
  21. Chayati, N., Masykuri, M., & Utomo, S. B. (2020). Development learning cycle 5e module integrated with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) in thermochemistry. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 5(3), 282292. http://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jkpk/article/view/38938
  22. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738797. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
  23. DeKalb County School District. (2021). Annual Demographic Report. DeKalb County School District. https://www.dekalbschoolsga.org/
  24. Duran, E., & Duran, L. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. Science Education Review, 3(2), 4958.
  25. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107115. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  26. Elwood, K., Savenye, W., Jordan, M. E., Larson, J., & Zapata, C. (2016). Design thinking: A new construct for educators. Paper Session Presented at the Annual Convention of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology. http://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings16/2016/16_08.pdf
  27. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906911.
  28. Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of Instructional Design (5th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  29. Govaerts, S., van den Bossche, P., de Maeyer, S., Segers, M., & Dochy, F. (2011). The impact of self- and peer assessment on students’ self-regulated learning and learning skills. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 379389. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.003
  30. Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. (2009). Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/tr/ADA512853
  31. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2025). Engineering byDesignTM\ (EbDTM): A comprehensive, Preschool–12th grade solution for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. https://www.iteea.org/engineering-bydesign
  32. Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., Bartholomew, S. R., Lee, W., Yauney, J. M., Thorne, S., & Bayah, D. (2023, June 25). Board 332: Learning by Evaluating (LbE): Engaging Students in Evaluation as a Pedagogical Strategy to Improve Design Thinking. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/board-332-learning-by-evaluating-lbe-engaging-students-in-evaluation-as-a-pedagogical-strategy-to-improve-design-thinking
  33. Joswick, C., & Hulings, M. (2024). A Systematic Review of BSCS 5E Instructional Model Evidence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 167188. 10.1007/s10763-023-10357-y
  34. Kimbell, R. (2022). Examining the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) as an assessment tool in educational settings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 15151529. 10.1007/s10798-021-09654-w
  35. Kimbell, R., & Stables, K. (2007). Researching Design Learning: Issues and Findings from Two Decades of Research and Development. Springer Science & Business Media.
  36. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by DesignTM into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495547.
  37. Lin, Y.-H. (2023). Integrating the STEAM-6E model with virtual reality instruction: Effects on motivation, creativity, and learning outcomes among learners of diverse cognitive styles. Sustainability, 15(7), 6269. 10.3390/su15076269
  38. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
  39. McCurdy, R. P., Nickels, M. L., & Bush, S. B. (2020). Problem-based design thinking tasks: Engaging student empathy in STEM. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 2255. https://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/19925
  40. Mentzer, N., Lee, W., Jackson, A., & Bartholomew, S. (2023). Learning by Evaluating (LbE): Promoting meaningful reasoning in the context of engineering design thinking using Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ). International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 10.1007/s10798-023-09853-7
  41. Mentzer, N., Lee, W., Jackson, A., & Bartholomew, S. (2024). Learning by Evaluating (LbE): Promoting meaningful reasoning in the context of engineering design thinking using Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ). International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(3), 11451169. 10.1007/s10798-023-09853-7
  42. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  43. Pollitt, A. (2012a). Comparative judgement for assessment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 157170. 10.1007/s10798-011-9189-x
  44. Pollitt, A. (2012b). The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 281300.
  45. Potter, T., Englund, L., Charbonneau, J., MacLean, M. T., Newell, J., & Roll, I. (2017). ComPAIR: A New Online Tool Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement to Support Learning with Peer Feedback. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 89113.
  46. Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., & Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E Learning Cycle. The Science Teacher, 86(5), 4855. 10.2505/4/tst18_086_05_48
  47. Saimon, M., Mtenzi, F., Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., Arnold, M., & Diego-Mantecón, J. (2024). Applying the 6E learning by design model to support student teachers to integrate artificial intelligence applications in their classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 2393723954. 10.1007/s10639-024-12795-9
  48. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  49. Seery, N., & Canty, D. (2017). Assessment and learning: The proximal and distal effects of comparative judgment. In Handbook of Technology Education. Springer.
  50. Seery, N., Canty, D., & Phelan, P. (2012). The validity and value of peer assessment using adaptive comparative judgement in design driven practical education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 205226. 10.1007/s10798-011-9194-0
  51. Susilowati, S. M. E., & Anam, K. (2017). Improving students’ scientific reasoning and problem-solving skills by the 5E learning model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3), 506512. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/biosaintifika/article/view/12022
  52. Thorne, S., Mentzer, N., Strimel, G., Bartholomew, S., & Ware, J. (2024). Learning by Evaluating: An Exploration of Optimizing Design-Based Instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 35(2), 5380. 10.21061/jte.v35i2.a.4
  53. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273286. 10.1037/h0070288
  54. Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 314.
  55. Yaşar, Y., Yazıcı, Y., Hacıoğlu, Y., & Sarı, U. (2023). Entrepreneurship, STEM attitude, and career interest development through 6E learning by DeSIGNTM model based STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 10.1007/s10798-022-09780-z
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 129
Submitted on: May 8, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 14, 2025
Published on: Nov 7, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Wonki Lee, Nathan Mentzer, Andrew Jackson, Scott R. Bartholomew, Amiah Bailey Clevenger, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.