Co-Designing and Implementing a 4th Grade Robotics and Coding Event: Preservice and Inservice Teacher Perspectives
References
- Adams, A., Lubega, J., Walmsley, S., & Williams, S. (2004). The effectiveness of assessment learning objects produced using pair programming. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 2(2), 247–256. Retrieved from
https://www.a-cubed.info/Publications/v2-i2-art1-adams.pdf - Asunda, P., Faezipour, M., Tolemy, J., & Do Engel, M. T. (2023). Embracing Computational Thinking as an Impetus for Artificial Intelligence in Integrated STEM Disciplines through Engineering and Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 34(2), 43–63. doi: 10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.3
- Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 121–144. doi: 10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9
- Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.
- Bjursten, E. L., Nilsson, T., & Gumaelius, L. (2023). Computer programming in primary schools: Swedish Technology Teachers’ pedagogical strategies. International journal of technology and design education, 33(4), 1345–1368. doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09786-7
- Blikstein, P., & Moghadam, S. H. (2019). Computing education. The Cambridge handbook of computing education research, 56–78.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Buckler, C., Koperski, K., & Loveland, T. R. (2018). is computer science compatible with technological literacy? Technology & Engineering Teacher, 77(4). Retrieved from
https://www.purdue.edu/in-mac/assets/pdf/TET77-4web-2.pdf#page=15 - Buffum, P. S., Frankosky, M. H., Boyer, K. E., Wiebe, E. N., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2016, February). Empowering all students: closing the CS confidence gap with an in-school initiative for middle school students. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education (pp. 382–387). doi: 10.1145/2839509.2844595
- Cheng, L., Wang, X., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2023). The effects of computational thinking integration in STEM on students’ learning performance in k-12 education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 416–443. doi: 10.1177/07356331221114183
- Code.org, CSTA, & ECEP Alliance. (2021). 2021 State of computer science education: Accelerating action through advocacy. Retrieved from
https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs - Code.org, CSTA, & ECEP Alliance. (2023). 2023 State of computer science education: Understanding our National IMperative. Retrieved from
https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs - Conklin, H. G. (2014). Toward more joyful learning: integrating play into frameworks of middle grades teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1227–1255. doi: 10.3102/0002831214549451
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
- DeLyser, L., Goode, J., Guzdial, M., Kafai, Y., & Yadav, A. (2018). Priming the computer science teacher pump: Integrating computer science education into schools of education. New York: CSforAll. Retrieved from
https://www.csfored.org/report2018 - Dong, W., Li, Y., Sun, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 191–227. doi: 10.1007/s10798-023-09811-3
- El-Hamamsy, L., Bruno, B., Audrin, C., Chevalier, M., Avry, S., Zufferey, J. D., & Mondada, F. (2023). How are primary school computer science curricular reforms contributing to equity? Impact on student learning, perception of the discipline, and gender gaps. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 60. doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00438-3.pdf
- Elkind, D. (2007). The power of play: Learning what comes naturally. Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo.
- Expanding Computing Education Pathways (ECEP) Alliance. (2023). Profiling Computer Science (CS) Preservice Teacher Education Programs: Policy Brief. Retrieved from
https://ecepalliance.org/media/filer_public/b9/a8/b9a8a0e0-c929-49ca-ad6b0193f12222e1/ecep_policies_brief_12022023.pdf - Freire, P. (2021). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Goldenberg, P., Mark, J., Harvey, B., Cuoco, A., & Fries, M. (2020, February). Design principles behind beauty and joy of computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 220–226). doi: 10.1145/3328778.3366794
- Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school, 19(1), 19–38.
- Hooks, b. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
- International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2020). Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education.
www.iteea.org/STEL.aspx - Jeet, G., & Pant, S. (2023). Creating joyful experiences for enhancing meaningful learning and integrating 21st century skills. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(2), 900–903. doi: 10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i2-05
- Joseph, N. M., Erving, C. L., & Ellis, K. A. (2023).
Identity-Centered STEM Curricula for Black Girls: An Intersectional Intervention for Black Girl Joy . In Developing and Sustaining STEM Programs Across the K-12 Education Landscape (pp. 149–171). IGI Global. - Jones, S. T., & Melo, N. (2020). ‘Anti-blackness is no glitch’ the need for critical conversations within computer science education. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 27(2), 42–46. doi: 10.1145/3433134
- Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Salonen, V., Salmela-Aro, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). A teacher–researcher partnership for professional learning: Co-designing project-based learning units to increase student engagement in science classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 625–641. doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2021.1872207
- Karlin, M., Stephany, C., & Reed, M. (2023). Coding to Connect: Centering Joy and Community in Elementary Computer Science Education. In Dialogue/En Diálogo, 1(1), 71–84. doi: 10.46787/dialogue.v1i1.3327
- Lee, S. J., Francom, G. M., & Nuatomue, J. (2022). Computer science education and K-12 students’ computational thinking: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 114,
102008 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102008 - Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational technology research and development, 64, 707–734. doi: 10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5
- Madkins, T. C., Howard, N. R., & Freed, N. (2020). Engaging equity pedagogies in computer science learning environments. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 3(2). doi: 10.26716/jcsi.2020.03.2.1
- Margulieux, L. E., Enderle, P., Junor Clarke, P., King, N., Sullivan, C., Zoss, M., & Many, J. (2022). Integrating Computing into Preservice Teacher Preparation Programs across the Core: Language, Mathematics, and Science. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 5(1). doi: 10.26716/jcsi.2022.11.15.35
- Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013
- McGill, M. M., & Reinking, A. (2022). Early findings on the impacts of developing evidence-based practice briefs on middle school computer science teachers. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 22(4), 1–29. doi: 10.1145/3543512
- Miguel-Alonso, I., Rodriguez-Garcia, B., Checa, D., & Bustillo, A. (2023). Countering the novelty effect: a tutorial for immersive virtual reality learning environments. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 593. doi: 10.3390/app13010593
- Montessori, M. (1967). The discovery of the child (M. J. Costelloe, Trans.). Ballantine Books. (Original work published 1948).
- NASEM (2021). Cultivating Interest and Competencies in Computing: Authentic Experiences and Design Factors. Washington DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25912
- Ni, L., Bausch, G., & Benjamin, R. (2021). Computer science teacher professional development and professional learning communities: a review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 1–32. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2021.1993666
- Pappa, C. I., Georgiou, D., & Pittich, D. (2024). Assessing the state of technology education in primary schools: a systematic review of the last 2 decades. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(3), 1003–1044. doi: 10.1007/s10798-023-09851-9
- Salac, J., White, M., Wang, A., & Franklin, D. (2019, February). An analysis through an equity lens of the implementation of computer science in k-8 classrooms in a large, urban school district. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1150–1156). doi: 10.1145/3287324.3287353
- Scharber, C., Peterson, L., Chang, Y. H., Barksdale, S., & Sivaraj, R. (2021). Critical computing literacy: Possibilities in K-12 computer science education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 16(2), 136–151. doi: 10.1080/1554480X.2021.1914055
- Shanta, S., & Wells, J. G. (2022). T/E design based learning: assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 267–285. doi: 10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8
- The White House. (2016). Computer Science for All. Retrieved from
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all - Tsan, J., Boyer, K. E., & Lynch, C. F. (2016, February). How early does the CS gender gap emerge? A study of collaborative problem solving in 5th grade computer science. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education (pp. 388–393). doi: 10.1145/2839509.2844605
- van der Meulen, A., Hermans, F., Aivaloglou, E., Aldewereld, M., Heemskerk, B., Smit, M., & de Wit, S. (2021). Who participates in computer science education studies? A literature review on K-12 subjects. PeerJ Computer Science, 7,
e807 . doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.807 - Vakil, S. (2018). Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review, 88(1), 26–52. doi: 10.17763/1943-5045-88.1.26
- Vogel, S., Santo, R., & Ching, D. (2017). Visions of computer science education: Unpacking arguments for and projected impacts of CS4All initiatives. In the Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. doi: 10.1145/3017680.3017755
- Ward, G., & Dahlmeier, C. (2011). Rediscovering Joyfulness. YC: Young Children, 66(6). Retrieved from
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/64fe18e67e2f0f4997486839/t/654b64860010db239aa3c0d6/1699439755857/Rediscovering+Joyfulness.pdf - Warner, J. R., Fletcher, C. L., Torbey, R., & Garbrecht, L. S. (2019, February). Increasing capacity for computer science education in rural areas through a large-scale collective impact model. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 1157–1163). doi: 10.1145/3287324.3287418
- Wurman, Z. E., & Donovan, W. (2020). Breaking the Code: The State of Computer Science Education in America’s Public Schools. White Paper No. 206. Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605364.pdf - Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1145/2576872
- Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. doi: 10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
- Yadav, A., DeLyser, L. A., Kafai, Y., Guzdial, M., & Goode, J. (2021).
Building and expanding the capacity of schools of education to prepare and support teachers to teach computer science . In C. Mouza, A. Yadav, & A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich (Eds.), Preparing pre-service teachers to teach computer Science: Models, practices, and policies (pp. 191–203). Information Age Publishing. - Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ying, K. M., Rodríguez, F. J., Dibble, A. L., Martin, A. C., Boyer, K. E., Thomas, S. V., & Gilbert, J. E. (2021, March). Confidence, connection, and comfort: Reports from an all-women’s cs1 class. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 699–705). doi: 10.1145/3408877.3432548
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v36i1.a.2 | Journal eISSN: 1045-1064
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 37
Submitted on: May 15, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 22, 2024
Published on: Nov 6, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Mike Karlin, Cristina Stephany, Mahya Minaiy, Swati Mehta, Marcia Reed, Desiderio Acosta, Claudia Garcia-Valles, Christine Kim, Adan Gonzalez, Sarah Wong, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.