Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improving Digital Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perspectives on Design Thinking Using Q-Methodology Cover

Improving Digital Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perspectives on Design Thinking Using Q-Methodology

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 135137. 10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86120.1033
  2. Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. V. (2021). Performance task assessment supported by the design thinking process: Results from a true experimental research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100116. 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100116
  3. Angheloiu, C., Sheldrick, L., Tennant, M., & Chaudhuri, G. (2020). Future Tense: Harnessing Design Futures Methods to Facilitate Young People’s Exploration of Transformative Change for Sustainability. World Futures Review, 12(1), 104122. 10.1177/1946756719844050
  4. Armatas, C. A., Venn, T. J., & Watson, A. E. (2014). Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States. Ecological Economics, 107, 447456. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.010
  5. Baker III, F. W., & Moukhliss, S. (2020). Concretising design thinking: A content analysis of systematic and extended literature reviews on design thinking and human-centred design. Review of Education, 8(1), 305333. 10.1002/rev3.3186
  6. Balch, G. (1982). Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research (Pre-1986), 19(000001), 162.
  7. Beckman, S., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1)(1), 2556. 10.2307/41166415
  8. Beligatamulla, G. (2021). Design thinking pedagogy: A phenomenographic study of design thinking teaching in the higher education context [PhD, Queensland University of Technology]. 10.5204/thesis.eprints.210530
  9. Bhandari, A. (2022). Design thinking: From bibliometric analysis to content analysis, current research trends, and future research directions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 10.1007/s13132-022-00920-3
  10. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
  11. Brown, S. R. (2019). Q Methodology in Research on Political Decision Making. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.980
  12. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 521. 10.2307/1511637
  13. Burdick, A., & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 546556. 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.005
  14. Callahan, K. C. (2019). Design thinking in curricula. In The International Encyclopedia of Art and Design Education (pp. 16). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118978061.ead069
  15. Chang, R., Cao, Y., Lu, Y., & Shabunko, V. (2019). Should BIPV technologies be empowered by innovation policy mix to facilitate energy transitions? - Revealing stakeholders’ different perspectives using Q methodology. Energy Policy, 129, 307318. 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.047
  16. Chikudza, L., Gauzente, C., Guillotreau, P., & Alexander, K. A. (2020). Producer perceptions of the incentives and challenges of adopting ecolabels in the European finfish aquaculture industry: A Q-methodology approach. Marine Policy, 121, 104176. 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104176
  17. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1542. 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
  18. Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Pragmatism and Design Thinking. 8(1).
  19. de Vries, M. (2021). Design-based concept learning in science and technology as integrate STEM, Chapter 2, pp. 14-24 in Ineke Henze and Marc J. de Vries (Eds), Design-Based Concept Learning in Science and Technology Education. Leiden, The Netherlands, Brill. 10.1163/9789004450004_002
  20. Devecchi, A., & Guerrini, L. (2017). Empathy and Design. A new perspective. The Design Journal, 20(sup 1), S4357S4364. 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352932
  21. Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521532. 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
  22. Dorst, K. (2019). Design beyond design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 117127. 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.05.001
  23. Ejsing-Duun, S., & Skovbjerg, H. M. (2019). Design as a mode of inquiry in design pedagogy and design thinking. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(2), 445460. 10.1111/jade.12214
  24. Ericson, J. D. (2022). Mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 406429. 10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w
  25. Exel, J., & Graaf, G. (2005). Q Methodology: A Sneak Preview. [Available from Www.Jobvanexel.Nl].
  26. Gobble, M. M. (2014). Design thinking. Research-Technology Management, 57(3), 5962. 10.5437/08956308X5703005
  27. Gunn, V. (2019). Design education in higher education. In A Companion to Contemporary Design since 1945 (pp. 412435). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781119112297.ch20
  28. Gute, G. G. (2003). The California Adult Q-Sort as a method for idiographic personality assessment in semi-structured interviews (p. 6075529) [Doctor of Philosophy, Iowa State University, Digital Repository]. 10.31274/rtd-180813-9837
  29. Jamal, T., Kircher, J., & Donaldson, J. P. (2021). Re-visiting design thinking for learning and practice: Critical pedagogy, conative empathy. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 2. 10.3390/su13020964
  30. Joachim, G., Schulenkorf, N., Schlenker, K., Frawley, S., & Cohen, A. (2022). “This is how I want us to think”: Introducing a design thinking activity into the practice of a sport organisation. Sport Management Review, 25(3), 428453. 10.1080/14413523.2021.1948260
  31. Kamran, Q. (2018). Da-sein thinking: A phenomenological epistemology for design thinking (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3273883). 10.2139/ssrn.3273883
  32. Kim, K. Y., & Lee, B. G. (2015). Marketing insights for mobile advertising and consumer segmentation in the cloud era: A Q–R hybrid methodology and practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 7892. 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.011
  33. Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part i. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285306. 10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
  34. Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 437448. 10.1080/09544820902875033
  35. Ladachart, L., Cholsin, J., Kwanpet, S., Teerapanpong, R., Dessi, A., Phuangsuwan, L., & Phothong, W. (2022). Ninth-grade students’ perceptions on the design-thinking mindset in the context of reverse engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(5), 24452465. 10.1007/s10798-021-09701-6
  36. Leinonen, T., & Gazulla, E. D. (2014). Design thinking and collaborative learning. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 22(1). 10.3916/C42-2014-10
  37. Lutfallah, S., & Buchanan, L. (2019). Quantifying subjective data using online Q-methodology software. The Mental Lexicon, 14(3), 415423. 10.1075/ml.20002.lut
  38. Magistretti, S., Bianchi, M., Calabretta, G., Candi, M., Dell’Era, C., Stigliani, I., & Verganti, R. (2022). Framing the multifaceted nature of design thinking in addressing different innovation purposes. Long Range Planning, 55(5), 102163. 10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102163
  39. McKeown, B. F. (1984). Q Methodology in Political Psychology: Theory and Technique in Psychoanalytic Applications. Political Psychology, 5(3), 415436. 10.2307/3790885
  40. Mentzer, N., & Mohandas, L. (2022). Student experiences in an interactive synchronous HyFlex design thinking course during COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 116. 10.1080/10494820.2022.2124423
  41. Noel, L.-A. (2021). “Here’s what we really want your class to be about!”: A design thinking class responds to the pandemic. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(4), Article 4.
  42. Online Q-Methodology Software | Q-Sort | Analysis for Q Methodology. (n.d.). QMethod Software. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from https://qmethodsoftware.com/
  43. Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281306. 10.1515/edu-2019-0022
  44. Pusca, D., & Northwood, D. (2018). Design thinking and its application to problem solving. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 4853.
  45. Rahma, A., Mardiatno, D., & Rahmawati Hizbaron, D. (2020). Q methodology to determine distinguishing and consensus factors (a case study of university students’ ecoliteracy on disaster risk reduction). E3S Web of Conferences, 200, 01003. 10.1051/e3sconf/202020001003
  46. Reed, S. K. (2016). The structure of ill-structured (and well-structured) problems revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 691716. 10.1007/s10648-015-9343-1
  47. Revano, T. F., & Garcia, M. B. (2020). Manufacturing design thinkers in higher education institutions: The use of design thinking curriculum in the education landscape. 2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), 15. 10.1109/HNICEM51456.2020.9400034
  48. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155169. 10.1007/BF01405730
  49. Severino, L., Petrovich, M., Mercanti-Anthony, S., & Fischer, S. (2021). Using a Design Thinking Approach for an Asynchronous Learning Platform during COVID-19. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 145162.
  50. Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3), 181201. 10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
  51. Schmolck, P., & Atkinson, J. (2013). PQMethod (2.33). Computer Program. http://www.Qmethod.org
  52. Shanta, S. & Wells, J. G. (2022). T/E design based learning: Assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 267285. 10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8
  53. Stephenson, W. (1980). Newton’s Fifth Rule and Q methodology: Application to educational psychology. American Psychologist, 35(10), 882889. 10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.882
  54. Stergiou, D., & Airey, D. (2011). Q-methodology and tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), 311322. 10.1080/13683500.2010.537316
  55. Sung, E., & Kelley, T. R. (2019). Identifying design process patterns: A sequential analysis study of design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 283302. 10.1007/s10798-018-9448-1
  56. Thakker, S. (2020). An integral adventure with process philosophy and design thinking. https://www.academia.edu/76879583/An_Integral_Adventure_with_Process_Philosophy_and_Design Thinking
  57. Valenta, A. L., & Wigger, U. (1997). Q-methodology: Definition and Application in Health Care Informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(6), 501510. 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040501
  58. Vial, S. (2015). Philosophy applied to design: A design research teaching method. Design Studies, 37, 5966. 10.1016/j.destud.2014.12.006
  59. Wang, J. (2013). The Importance of Aristotle to Design Thinking. Design Issues, 29(2), 415.
  60. Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 6791. 10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
  61. Wells, J. G. (2021). Design based biotechnological learning: Distinct knowledge forms supporting technology and science conceptual understanding, Chapter 11, pp. 223-247 in Ineke Henze and Marc J. de Vries (Eds), Design-Based Concept Learning in Science and Technology Education. Leiden, The Netherlands, Brill. 10.1163/9789004450004_011
  62. Wells, J. G. (2016). Efficacy of the technological/engineering design approach: Imposed cognitive demands within design based biotechnology instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 420.
  63. Willig, C., & Rogers, W. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. SAGE.
  64. Zabala, A. (2014). qmethod: A Package to Explore Human Perspectives Using Q Methodology. 10/248225
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 52
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 11, 2024
Published on: Jun 25, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Basilia E. Blay, Alma S. Espartinez, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.