Table 1
Correlations between the variables. P-values below the correlation coefficients.
| VARIABLE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | – | |||||||||||||||
| Age | .001 .979 | – | ||||||||||||||
| Education | .046 .299 | –.070 .115 | – | |||||||||||||
| WIT1 | –.089 .045 | .076 .086 | .044 .324 | – | ||||||||||||
| IJPT1 | .025 .582 | .132 .003 | –.038 .397 | .542 .000 | – | |||||||||||
| ICPT1 | .067 .133 | .043 .339 | .089 .044 | .423 .000 | .650 .000 | – | ||||||||||
| ILDT1 | –.070 .116 | .288 .000 | .148 .001 | .380 .000 | .358 .000 | .426 .000 | – | |||||||||
| CCT2 | –.081 .100 | –.054 .277 | –.032 .520 | –.133 .007 | –.108 .027 | –.153 .002 | –.038 .437 | – | ||||||||
| WI × CC | –.059 .231 | .048 .327 | .031 .533 | .012 .815 | .034 .493 | –.010 .839 | –.075 .125 | .029 .562 | – | |||||||
| IJP × CC | –.086 .080 | .024 .631 | –.044 .369 | .035 .477 | .058 .241 | .052 .294 | –.023 .639 | .040 .417 | .366 .000 | – | ||||||
| ICP × CC | –.001 .981 | .050 .312 | –.034 .486 | –.015 .766 | .049 .316 | –.025 .606 | –.098 .047 | .218 .000 | .363 .000 | .517 .000 | – | |||||
| ILD × CC | .049 .320 | .037 .451 | .029 .558 | –.076 .120 | –.017 .730 | –.092 .062 | –.082 .094 | .082 .096 | .387 .000 | .380 .000 | .570 .000 | – | ||||
| TPT1 | .005 .919 | .028 .527 | .026 .565 | –.279 .000 | –.202 .000 | –.086 .052 | –.109 .014 | .276 .000 | –.027 .585 | .107 .029 | .138 .005 | .148 .002 | – | |||
| OCBT1 | –.017 .704 | .112 .012 | –.072 .104 | .100 .025 | .092 .039 | .111 .013 | .154 .000 | .201 .000 | –.073 .138 | –.032 .520 | .001 .977 | –.050 .307 | .172 .000 | – | ||
| TPT2 | –.012 .795 | .038 .410 | .072 .122 | –.190 .000 | –.121 .009 | –.054 .249 | –.061 .192 | .356 .000 | –.091 .064 | .109 .026 | .114 .020 | .088 .072 | .567 .000 | .188 .000 | – | |
| OCBT2 | –.054 .249 | .044 .342 | –.057 .223 | .122 .009 | .087 .061 | .089 .058 | .146 .002 | .303 .000 | –.153 .002 | .066 .176 | .067 .172 | .023 .642 | .167 .000 | .655 .000 | .269 .000 | – |
[i] Note for abbreviations: T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2, WI = work intensification, IJP = intensified job-related planning and decision-making demands, ICP = intensified career-related planning and decision-making demands, ILD = intensified learning demands, CC = career calling, TP = task performance, OCB = organizational citizenship behavior.
Table 2
Intensified job demands (IJDs) and career calling (CC) as predictors of task performance and organizational citizenship behavior.
| PREDICTORS AT T1 | TASK PERFORMANCE AT T2 | ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR AT T2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STANDARDIZED β-COEFFICIENTS, (p-VALUE) | CONFIDENCE INTERVALS 95% | STANDARDIZED β-COEFFICIENTS, (p-VALUE) | CONFIDENCE INTERVALS 95% | |
| Step 1 | ||||
| Dependent variable control | .484 (.000) | .401, .573 | .608 (.000) | .576, .729 |
| ΔR2, F-value (df), p-value | .316, 191.022(1) (.000) | .441, 325.591(1) (.000) | ||
| Step 2 Intensified job demands (IJDs) | ||||
| Work intensification (WI) | –.037 (.460) | –.091, .041 | .082 (.060) | –.002, .089 |
| Intensified job-related planning and decision-making demands (IJP) | .019 (.742) | –.062, .086 | .012 (.809) | –.046, .058 |
| Intensified career-related planning- and decision-making demands (ICP) | –.019 (.732) | –.090, .063 | –.027 (.590) | –.069, .039 |
| Intensified learning demands (ILD) | .041 (.368) | –.033, .088 | .047 (.246) | –.018, .068 |
| ΔR2, F-value (df), p-value | .004, .616(4) (.651) | .007, 1.381(4) (.240) | ||
| Step 3 Moderator at T2 | ||||
| Career calling (CC) | .219 (.000) | .095, .212 | .186 (.000) | .063, .145 |
| ΔR2, F-value (df), p-value | .042, 26.605(1), (.000) | .033, 25.789(4) (.000) | ||
| Step 4 Interaction terms | ||||
| WIT1 × CCT2 | –.117 (.009) | –.127, –.018 | –.182 (.000) | –.129, –.052 |
| IJPT1 × CCT2 | .095 (.048) | .001, .128 | .119 (.005) | .020, .110 |
| ICPT1 × CCT2 | –.013 (.806) | –.082, .064 | –.009 (.851) | –.056, .047 |
| ILDT1 × CCT2 | .015 (.769) | –.057, .064 | .076 (.084) | –.006, .089 |
| ΔR2, F-value (df), p-value | .014, 2.258(4) (.062) | .033, 6.815(4) (.000) | ||
[i] Note. Sex, education, and age were controlled for in the models only if they correlated significantly with the predicted variables.
N = 507 teachers; Time 1 (T1), Time 2 (T2). Coefficients derived from the last step after all variables have been entered into the model.
Figure 1
The interaction effect of intensified job-related planning and decision-making demands (IJP) and career calling (CC) on task performance (TP).
T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2 (low SD = –1, high SD = +1).
Figure 2
The interaction effect of intensified job-related planning and decision-making demands (IJP) and career calling (CC) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB).
T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2 (low SD = –1, high SD = +1).
Figure 3
The interaction effect of work intensification (WI) and career calling (CC) on task performance (TP).
T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2 (low SD = –1, high SD = +1).
Figure 4
The interaction effect of work intensification (WI) and career calling (CC) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB).
T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2 (low SD = –1, high SD = +1).