Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Practitioners’ Pedagogic Stances in Relation to Integrated Guidance: A Q-Method Study Cover

Exploring Practitioners’ Pedagogic Stances in Relation to Integrated Guidance: A Q-Method Study

Open Access
|Mar 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Fisher’s balanced block design.

CATEGORYLEVELS
Approaches to guidancea) Physicalb) Integratedc) Digital
The digital environmentd) Hostilee) Friendly
Professional competencef) Able to adaptg) Concerned about adapting
Table 2

Demographics.

YEARS OF PRACTICECONFIDENCE IN USING DIGITAL TOOLSSECTOR
Less than a year11 (Not confident)1Regional career service19
2–4 years723High school8
5–10 years15318Higher education5
More than ten years164 (Very confident)17Public employment services3
Elementary school2
Criminal reform1
Other1
Table 3

Statistical information.

FACTOR 1FACTOR 2FACTOR 3FACTOR 4FACTOR 5FACTOR 6FACTOR 7
Eigenvalues20.161822.713351.377831.338841.089510.232141.04227
% Explained Variance49733313
Cumulative % Explained Var49565962656668
Humphrey’s Rule0.76530.373120.14060.122070.121650.023410.13555
Standard Error0.050.050.050.050.050.050.05
Table 4

Factor characteristics.

FACTOR CHARACTERISTICSFACTOR 1FACTOR 2FACTOR 3
Number of defining variables (Q sorts)2066
Average relational coefficient0.80.80.8
Composite reliability0.987650.960.96
Standard error of factor Z-scores0.111110.20.2
Table 5

Statement rankings by factor.

STATEMENT RANKINGS BY FACTORSF1F2F3
1I can teach the client how to use the internet in a safer way when we meet in person.03–1
2It is better to meet in person when using assessment tools to map personality, abilities and interests in career guidance.011
3I can’t stay updated, so it’s difficult to work closely with clients with little digital competence.–40–5
4I want to learn more about using the internet as an asset when I give career guidance face-to-face.221
5Digital career guidance is more effective, so I want to learn how to become an excellent digital career counsellor.0–20
6The quality of career guidance becomes better when we use digital platforms than when we meet in person for career guidance or education.–1–4–3
7I prefer giving career guidance face-to-face because many clients don’t have much digital competence and need help.–140
8Videocalls work well in career guidance, but you must be careful in case the client is not alone and cannot speak freely.1–11
9I personally follow up with my clients because I’m worried they might have negative experiences on social media.–3–3–1
10I’m comfortable having career guidance conversations face-to-face.355
11The internet is a good and helpful resource in career education, but I find it hard to adapt to digital career guidance formats.–30–4
12It’s not ethical to use social media for career guidance conversations or career education because people’s digital skills vary.–3–1–1
13I’m happy to adapt and give career guidance both through the Internet and face-to-face.533
14I’m not sure how to combine digital and face-to-face guidance.–4–2–2
15The pace of digital development is frightening.–11–1
16The internet is a great asset for people’s career development, so of course, I use it for career guidance.323
17Digital technologies can strengthen and improve career learning processes.422
18People’s careers are developing in a digital world, so I will continue combining physical and digital guidance the way I do.0–11
19The internet is amazing, and I think all career guidance will soon be digital and online.–2–5–3
20Communicating through digital channels is not as efficient as communicating face-to-face.132
21I agree that it’s valuable that integrated guidance can help people get better at using the internet, but I don’t think I can adapt how I give career guidance.–2–2–3
22The internet helps people build their careers, and combining physical and digital resources can have many positive effects.320
23New technology can make it easier to develop new forms of career guidance.404
24I prefer not to use digital resources in career guidance.–5–2–4
25Online synchronous guidance is fine if the technology works well, but technical problems can be distracting.112
26There are many strange things to be found on the internet, but I often try new platforms and technologies in career guidance without testing them very thoroughly.–1–4–1
27If the digital tools or platforms are not helpful to me in my job, then I don’t use them.003
28You can become more digitally competent and learn how to use digital tools in career guidance when “learning by doing”.214
29It may be that we’ll go back to giving career guidance mostly face-to-face after the pandemic, but that is negative for the development and/or access to the services for the future.1–3–2
30We see many clients who are not digitally literate, so we must adapt our strategies to keep career guidance relevant for them.240
31There is a lot of information and technical stuff out there, but it’s not necessary to learn or use everything.012
32The pace of digital/technological developments is quite high, but I still think I can keep up.2–11
33It feels like there is no limit to what we will have to learn; new digital resources appear constantly.–10–2
34I think employers understand that people’s appearance on social media mainly shows their private selves.–2–30
35It’s essential to be aware of how we appear on social media because mistakes here can seriously affect an individual’s career development.100
36I think many people will be unable to keep up with the developments in digital technology.–2–1–2
Figure 1

Composite Q-sort for factor 1 (Enthusiasts).

Figure 2

Composite Q-sort for Factor 2 (human connectors).

Figure 3

Composite Q-sort for Factor 3 (critical pragmatists).

Table 6

Pedagogical stances of the three groups.

ENTHUSIASTSHUMAN CONNECTORSCRITICAL PRAGMATISTS
Professional roleMavensCustodiansEvaluators
TheoryCo-careeringHumanisticIntegrated guidance
Student modelDigital careeristsDigitally challengedDigital learners
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/njtcg.76 | Journal eISSN: 2003-8046
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 72
Submitted on: Jul 31, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2024
Published on: Mar 20, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Julie Sikin Bhanji Jynge, Ingrid Bårdsdatter Bakke, Tristram Hooley, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.