Teaching, Learning, and Employing Analytical Frameworks as Performance: Analysis of a Quantitative Literacy Event in Applied Mechanics
By: Zach Simpson and Robert Prince
References
- Addison, N. (2014). Doubting learning outcomes in higher education contexts: From performativity towards emergence and negotiation. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 33(3), 313–325. DOI: 10.1111/jade.12063
- Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., Nomikou, E., & Seakins, A. (2017). Killing curiosity? An analysis of celebrated identity performances among teachers and students in nine London secondary science classrooms. Science Education, 101(5), 741–764. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21291
- Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000).
Literacy practices . In: Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, 7–15. London: Routledge. - Baynham, M., & Baker, D. (2002). ‘Practice’ in literacy and numeracy research: Multiple perspectives. Ways of Knowing, 2(1), 1–9.
- Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
- Chapman, A., & Lee, A. (1990). Rethinking literacy and numeracy. Australian Journal of Education, 34(3), 277–289. DOI: 10.1177/000494419003400305
- Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Collins, H. M. (2001).
What is tacit knowledge? In: Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 107–119. Oxon: Routledge. - Department of Education (DoE). (2003). National Curriculum Statement Grades 10–12 (General): Mathematical Literacy. Pretoria: Department of Education.
- Falter, M. M. (2016). Threatening the patriarchy: Teaching as performance. Gender and Education, 28(1), 20–36. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1103838
- Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University press.
- Frith, V., & Prince, R. (2006).
Quantitative literacy . In: Griesel, H. (ed.), Access and Entry Level Benchmarks: The National Benchmark Tests Project. Pretoria: Higher Education South Africa. Retrieved from:http://www.hesa.org.za/sites/hesa.org.za/files/2006_HESA_Access%20and%20Entry%20Level%20Benchmarks.pdf . Accessed on February 24, 2015. - Frith, V., & Prince, R. (2009). A framework for understanding the quantitative literacy demands of higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 23(1), 83–97. DOI: 10.4314/sajhe.v23i1.44804
- Gal, I., van Groenestijn, M., Manly, M., Schmitt, M. J., & Tout, D. (2005).
Adult numeracy and its assessment in the ALL Survey: A conceptual framework and pilot results . In: Scott Murray, T., Clermont, Y., & Binkley, M. (eds.), International Adult Literacy Survey – Measuring adult literacy and life skills: New frameworks for assessment, 137–191. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. - Hughes-Halett, D. (2001).
Achieving numeracy: The challenge of implementation . In: Steen, L. A. (ed.), Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, 93–98. USA: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines. - Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers’ design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3): 303–317. DOI: 10.1080/17439880701511149
- Johnston, B. (1994). Critical numeracy. FinePrint, 16(4), 32–35.
- Johnston, B. (2002). Numeracy in the Making: Twenty Years of Australian Adult Numeracy – An Investigation by the New South Wales Centre, Adult Literacy and Numeracy Australian Research Consortium. Sydney: Sydney University of Technology.
- Johnston, B. (2007).
Critical numeracy? In: Kelly, S., Johnston, B., & Yasukawa, K. (eds.), The Adult Numeracy Handbook: Reframing Adult Numeracy in Australia, 50–56. Sydney: Adult Literacy and Numeracy Australian Research Consortium. - Kress, G. (2000).
Design and transformation: New theories of meaning . In: Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, 153–161. London: Routledge. - Lewis, T. (2013). Validating teacher performativity through life-long school-university collaboration. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(10), 1028–1039. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2012.00859.x
- Macfarlane, B. (2015). Student performativity in higher education: Converting learning as a private space into a public performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(2), 338–350. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2014.956697
- Morgan-Fleming, B. (1999). Teaching as performance: Connections between folklore and education. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 273–291. DOI: 10.1111/0362-6784.00128
- Orrill, R. (2001).
Mathematics, numeracy and democracy . In: Steen, L. A. (ed.), Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, xiii–xx. USA: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines. - Prince, R., & Archer, A. (2014). Exploring academic voice in multimodal quantitative texts. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 22(1), 41–78.
- Prince, R., & Simpson, Z. (2016). Quantitative Literacy Practices in Civil Engineering Study: Designs for Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the Designs for Learning conference. Copenhagen, Denmark.
18–20 May . - Riveros, A., & Viczko, M. (2015). The enactment of professional learning policies: Performativity and multiple ontologies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 533–547. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2015.980492
- Selander, S. (2008). Designs for learning: A theoretical perspective. Designs for Learning, 1(1), 10–22. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.5
- Steen, L. A. (2004). Achieving Quantitative Literacy: An Urgent Challenge for Higher Education. Washington D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America.
- Street, B. (2000).
Literacy events and literacy practices: Theory and practice in the New Literacy Studies . In: Martin-Jones, M., & Jones, K. (eds.), Multilingual Literacies: Reading and Writing Different Worlds, 17–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. - Street, B. (2005).
Applying New Literacy Studies to numeracy as social practice . In: Rogers, A. (ed.), Urban Literacy: Communication, Identity and Learning in Development Contexts, 87–96. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education. - Street, B., & Baker, D. (2006).
So, what about multimodal numeracies? In: Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (eds.), Travel Notes from the New Literacy Studies, 219–233. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI: 10.21832/9781853598630-012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.95 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 87
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 14, 2018
Published on: Nov 28, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2018 Zach Simpson, Robert Prince, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.