Performing the Pre-Formed: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Teaching as Curricular Transformation
By: Øystein Kvinge, Magne Espeland and Kari Smith
References
- Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389–411. DOI: 10.1080/00220270600579141
- Angus, I. (1998). The materiality of expression: Harold innis’ communication theory and the discursive turn in the human sciences. Canadian Journal of Communication, 23(1). DOI: 10.22230/cjc.1998v23n1a1020
- Barthes, R. (2003).
Rhetoric of the image . 114–125. London: Routledge. - Biesta, G., & Osberg, D. (2007). Beyond Re/Presentation: A case for updating the epistemology of schooling. Interchange, 38(1), 151–29. DOI: 10.1007/s10780-007-9015-2
- Bjørndal, B. (1978). In: Lieberg, S. (ed.), Nye veier i didaktikken?: En innføring i didaktiske emner og begreper. Oslo: Aschehoug.
- Camiciottoli, B. C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2015). Multimodal analysis in academic settings: From research to teaching. Routledge.
- Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). Power point and the dynamics of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 31(3), 147–160. DOI: 10.1007/s10755-006-9017-5
- Drange, E.-D., Rambø, G.-R. M., & Birkeland, N. R. (2017). Students’ redesign of mandatory assignments in teacher education. Designs for Learning, 9(1), 1–9. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.69
- Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B. M. (2006). Curriculum leadership: Development and implementation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
- Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice.
- Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
- Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
- Jones, A. M. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in the life sciences: A personal overview. Bioscience Education. DOI: 10.3108/beej.2003.02000004
- Jurado, J. V. (2015). 5 A multimodal approach to persuasion in conference presentations. Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching, 108.
- Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
- Kjeldsen, J. E., & Guribye, F. (2015). Digitale presentasjonsteknologier i høyere utdanning - foreleseres holdninger og bruk. Uniped, 38(03).
- Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020–1041. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
- Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Taylor & Francis.
- Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
- Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
- Lancaster, L., Hauck, M., Hampel, R., & Flewitt, R. (2013).
What are multimodal data and transcription? In: Jewitt, C. (ed.), The routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd edtn). London: Routledge. - Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2005). Modelling by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 193–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.005
- Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001
- Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage publ. DOI: 10.4135/9781412957397
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Querol Julián, M. M., & Fortanet Gómez, I. (2014). Evaluation in discussion sessions of conference presentations: Theorical foundations for a multimodal analysis.
- Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: Context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00080.x
- Selander, S. (2008). Designs for learning – a theoretical perspective. Designs for Learning, 1(1).
- Selander, S. (2017). Didaktiken efter Vygotskij – design för lärande. Stockholm: Liber.
- Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande: Ett multimodalt perspektiv. Stockholm: Norstedts.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
- Thijs, A., & Van den Akker, J. (2009). Curriculum in development.
- Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press.
- Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
- Van Leeuwen, T. (2016). Masterclass. Semiotic technology: Software, social medial and digital artefacts. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
- Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. DOI: 10.1515/text-2014-0005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.83 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 39
Submitted on: Jun 26, 2017
Accepted on: Mar 27, 2018
Published on: Jun 7, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2018 Øystein Kvinge, Magne Espeland, Kari Smith, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.